Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary


    Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary

    November 12, 2012

    President Obama is considering asking Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) to serve as his next defense secretary, part of an extensive rearrangement of his national security team that will include a permanent replacement for former CIA director David H. Petraeus.

    Although Kerry is thought to covet the job of secretary of state, senior administration officials familiar with the transition planning said that nomination will almost certainly go to Susan E. Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

    John O. Brennan, Obama’s chief counterterrorism adviser, is a leading contender for the CIA job if he wants it, officials said. If Brennan goes ahead with his plan to leave government, Michael J. Morell, the agency’s acting director, is the prohibitive favorite to take over permanently. Officials cautioned that the White House discussions are still in the early stages and that no decisions have been made.

    Petraeus’s resignation last week after revelations of an extramarital affair has complicated what was already an intricate puzzle to reassemble the administration’s national security and diplomatic pieces for Obama’s second term.

    The process has become further complicated by congressional ire at not being told that Petraeus was under FBI investigation, on top of what are likely to be contentious closed-door hearings this week on the administration’s actions surrounding the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.

    Rice, one of an inner circle of aides who have been with Obama since his first presidential campaign in 2007, is under particular fire over the Benghazi incident, in which U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed.

    Some Republican lawmakers have suggested that she was part of what they suspect was an initial election-related attempt to portray the attack as a peaceful demonstration that turned violent, rather than what the administration now acknowledges was an organized terrorist assault.

    Rice’s description, days after the attack, of a protest gone wrong indicated that she either intentionally misled the country or was *incompetent, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) said Sunday. Rice, he said, “would have an in*cred*ibly difficult time” winning Senate confirmation as secretary of state.

    But several White House officials said Obama is prepared to dig in his heels over her nomination to replace Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has long said she will serve only one term.

    Rice’s post-Benghazi remarks on several television news shows were merely a recitation of administration talking points drawn directly from intelligence available at the time, said the senior administration officials, who agreed to discuss the closely held transition planning on the condition of anonymity.

    Tommy Vietor, spokesman for the National Security Council, said the White House would not comment on personnel matters.

    The upcoming hearings and an independent State Department review of the Benghazi attack — being led by retired diplomat Thomas Pickering and retired Adm. Mike Mullen, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — may reveal some intelligence lapses and security missteps, one official said. But they will also demonstrate that there was no attempt at subterfuge, the official added.

    Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter also has been mentioned as a possible replacement for Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, as has been Michele Flour*noy, former undersecretary for policy at the Pentagon.

    The timing of a nomination for Panetta’s successor is unclear. On Monday, he said he had no imminent plans to step down but indicated that he was unlikely to stay in the job for the duration of Obama’s second term.

    “Who the hell knows,” Panetta said when asked by reporters traveling with him to Australia whether he would remain in office for four more years. “It’s no secret that at some point I’d like to get back to California.”

    Kerry did not respond to requests for comment on his possible nomination at the Pentagon. A spokeswoman, Jodi Seth, said: “Senator Kerry’s only focus right now is his job as senior senator from Massachusetts and chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.”

    But administration officials, one of whom described Kerry as a “war hero,” said his qualifications for the defense job included not only his naval service in Vietnam but also his knowledge of the budget and experience in the diplomacy that has increasingly become a part of the defense portfolio. They said the Democrats’ retention of the Senate majority, with a net gain of two seats, in the election provided a cushion that allowed them to consider Kerry’s departure from the chamber.

    White House national security adviser Thomas E. Donilon, principal deputy Denis R. McDonough and Benjamin Rhodes, deputy for strategic communications, are more likely than not to remain in place, at least initially, officials said.

    Antony J. Blinken, Vice President Biden’s national security adviser, is said to be under consideration for Rice’s job at the United Nations, as is Samantha Power, the National Security Council’s senior director for multilateral affairs and human rights.

    It was unclear who would take Brennan’s job if he leaves government or moves to the CIA. He was the top contender to lead the agency when Obama was elected in 2008, but he withdrew under criticism, which he deemed unfair, of his role in intelligence excesses in the administration of George W. Bush. Although that challenge is now seen as behind him, officials said he has not indicated whether he would like to be considered again to head the agency where he spent 25 years.

    Beyond complicating the overhaul of the national security team, Petraeus’s departure will send ripples through management layers at the CIA.

    Many had expected Petraeus to stay in place for Obama’s second term, and he had spent recent months planning transitions at other key posts at CIA headquarters. Now, four of the agency’s most critical positions — director, deputy director, head of the National Clandestine Service and chief of the Counterterrorism Center — have become question marks.

    Within hours of Petraeus’s resignation Friday, his biography was excised from the CIA Web site and replaced with that of Morell.

    If Morell ends up permanently in the job, he will need to designate a new deputy and would be in charge of other pending personnel decisions that Petraeus had been poised to make.

    Michael G. Vickers, undersecretary of defense for intelligence, also has been mentioned as a candidate for CIA director.

    The head of the clandestine service, John Bennett, was talked out of retirement to take that job and has signaled his intent to step down in the coming months, current and former officials said.

    The top position in the Counterterrorism Center, which carries out the CIA’s drone campaign, is also expected to come open. The current director, known by his cover name, “Roger,” has been in the job for more than six years. Former CIA officials said Roger has wanted to be named director of the clandestine service but has a reputation for harshness toward subordinates and had been expected to be passed over by Petraeus.

    Morell was considered a standout analyst at the CIA before entering the agency’s upper ranks and is highly respected among his colleagues and at the White House. Obama, a White House official said, “has enormous trust in [Morell’s] ability to lead the CIA for as long as is necessary.” He is also considered a possible candidate to replace Brennan at the White House.

    Craig Whitlock, traveling with Panetta, and Scott Wilson in Washington contributed to this report.

  2. #2
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary

    Ok.... it's really and truly time to get out of this racket.... holy crap, what a STUPID choice. STUPID STUPID STUPID!

    I would make a better Sec Def.... Good God.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  3. #3
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary

    This is being covered on Fox.

    God.... sickening
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  4. #4
    Super Moderator Malsua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8,020
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary

    Is he going to "report for duty" and call for free fire zones and running across the land raping and pillaging in a manner similar to Jingiss Kawn?

    Only an ass clown would give this ass clown any power to do anything.

    I mean, really, Obama simply looks for the worst possible choice...there's his man!
    "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat."
    -- Theodore Roosevelt


  5. #5
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary

    Jingiss Kawn LOL!
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  6. #6
    Super Moderator Malsua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8,020
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary

    Listen to the tape of the hearings when he testified. That's how this dill hole pronounces Genghis Kahn
    "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat."
    -- Theodore Roosevelt


  7. #7
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary

    yeah, I knew that. That's why you had me laughing about it. I'd forgotten it until you posted that
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  8. #8
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary

    Obama’s picks for State Department and Pentagon could be announced Friday


    View Photo Gallery — Obama’s second term: Who’s in, who’s out?: 





    By Karen DeYoung and Anne Gearan, Published: December 17

    President Obama hopes to announce his new national security nominees Friday, but the date depends on the status of the “fiscal cliff” negotiations, administration officials said.
    Other White House business has taken a back seat to talks with Republicans to avert the cliff — a set of mandatory spending cuts and tax increases — before the Dec. 31 deadline, the officials said. Obama may also postpone his scheduled Friday departure for his holiday vacation in Hawaii.

    16
    Comments









    Personal Post

    Gallery

    Best of the Obama campaign: A look back at moments from Democratic President Obama’s campaign.


    More from PostPolitics
    Tim Scott and the GOP's changing face

    Chris Cillizza DEC 17
    THE FIX | Republicans have elected a panoply on non-white politicians to prominent statewide offices in the past four years. But can they change their losing ways with minority voters?


    Majority sees Sandy Hook shooting as reflection of deep societal problems

    Jon Cohen and Peyton M. Craighill DEC 17
    POLL | Most say the shooting is not merely an isolated act, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll.


    Concealed-weapon laws: Less crime?

    Glenn Kessler DEC 17
    FACT CHECKER | Some lawmakers argue more guns always bring the crime rate down. We investigate.






    The announcement may also be delayed because of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s illness, although her presence at a public presentation of the nominees is not a prerequisite, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity about administration planning. Clinton is recovering from a stomach virus and a concussion.
    While the likely choices for top Cabinet posts — Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) as secretary of state and former senator Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) as defense secretary — are seen as confirmable by the Senate, neither is without opponents.
    Republican criticism of U.N. Ambassador Susan E. Rice was allowed to build for months, from the time she became widely rumored as Obama’s first choice for secretary of state to her withdrawal from consideration last week.
    Kerry and Hagel have already drawn questions in Israel. An article Monday on Ynet, that country’s most popular online news site, noted that while Kerry is considered a “friend of Israel,” he has been sharply critical of the government’s settlement policy.
    The headline on an analysis in Monday’s Jerusalem Post read: “Kerry and Hagel: Hardly Israel’s preferred choices.”
    In this country, Hagel’s perceived views on Israel and relations with Iran have prompted critical commentary from some political quarters. A few prominent Jewish Democratic activists have complained to the White House about Hagel, including at a White House Hanukkah party last week, according to participants.
    Most of the discomfort on both sides of the party line centers on Hagel’s voting record, during his two terms in the Senate, against tougher sanctions on Iran as a way to curb that nation’s nuclear program, which Israel sees as an existential threat. During the George W. Bush administration, Hagel, who did not seek a third term in 2008, repeatedly spoke against a military strike on Iran’s nuclear program and called for diplomatic engagement.
    “The White House is underestimating how much fury will be released on Hagel for his Iran views,” a senior Republican Senate aide said. The aide added that “groups are already cutting TV spots to run against Hagel.”
    The administration has tried to both negotiate with Iran and impose tougher sanctions, saying that sanctions can pave the way for more meaningful talks. But the sanctions approved after Hagel left the Senate have not forced Tehran to bargain, resulted in substantive negotiations or curbed Iran’s enrichment of uranium.
    In a Washington Post op-ed in September, Hagel echoed Obama’s policy on the importance of keeping “all options on the table, including the use of military force” in dealings with Iran.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 5th, 2014, 14:27
  2. John Bryson, U.S. Commerce Secretary, cited in Calif. hit-and-run
    By American Patriot in forum World Politics and Politicians
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: June 12th, 2012, 14:53
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 8th, 2012, 17:20
  4. Secretary of Defense Clinton?
    By vector7 in forum The U.S. Military
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: November 11th, 2010, 02:04
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 17th, 2008, 05:27

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •