No Pay for Congress!

[American Patriot]

House GOP to vote next week on three-month increase to debt limit

By Russell Berman - 01/18/13 12:47 PM ET
Tweet
WILLIAMSBURG, Va. — House Republican leaders on Friday announced a plan to condition a three-month increase in the debt limit on the Senate committing to pass a budget by the April 15 statutory deadline.
“Before there is any long-term debt limit increase, a budget should be passed that cuts spending,” Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) told the Republican conference in remarks to close the party’s three-day retreat in Williamsburg. “The Democratic-controlled Senate has failed to pass a budget for four years. That is a shameful run that needs to end, this year.”
The House will also seek to prevent members of Congress from being paid if the two chambers do not pass a budget resolution.
“We are going to pursue strategies that will obligate the Senate to finally join the House in confronting the government’s spending problem,” Boehner said. “The principle is simple: no budget, no pay.”






Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said the House would vote next week on a three-month extension of borrowing authority. “If the Senate or House fails to pass a budget in that time, members of Congress will not be paid by the American people for failing to do their job. No budget, no pay,” Cantor said.
Party leaders spent much of their three-day retreat sounding out rank-and-file members on the idea of approving a temporary debt-ceiling hike to buy time for fiscal negotiations over automatic spending cuts in sequestration and an extension of government funding, which runs out in late March.
“The Senate has never even passed a budget. It is the rule and the law that by April 15 you have to, so what we’re saying is, we will extend the debt limit until the timeline when you have a budget, a roadmap,” Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), the No. 3 House Republican, told reporters during a series of brief television interviews. “We think it’s only right that both [chambers] lay out their roadmap to put on a path to a balanced budget.”
The idea to use the annual budget process as a string to attach to a debt-limit hike speaks to a central frustration of the House Republican majority — that the Democratic-led Senate has not approved a budget resolution in nearly four years.
“If individuals cannot pass a budget, why should taxpayers pay their salary?” McCarthy said. “I mean, that’s the most fundamental thing you do, and how do you ever stop digging yourself in the hole if you don’t pass a budget?”
A Republican leadership aide said the legislation, which has yet to be written, would stipulate that member pay would be “withheld,” not changed, because of concerns over the 27th Amendment. The constitutional amendment ratified in 1992 states, “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.”
Boehner had said since 2011 that any increase in the debt ceiling must be accompanied by spending cuts or reforms equal to or greater than the amount in new borrowing authority. The Republican aide said the new proposal would qualify as a “reform” because it would add an enforcement mechanism to the statutory requirement that each chamber of Congress approve an annual budget resolution.
No additional spending cuts would be included, the aide said.Though the details have not been finalized, the aide said that the legislation would authorize the Treasury to borrow money as needed up to a certain date, as opposed to setting a new monetary limit above the current cap of $16.4 trillion.

Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray (D-Wash.) denounced the bill as another threat from the GOP.
"Republicans should stop using these threats of default to hold our economy hostage, and as always, we are ready to work with them to determine the most productive path toward ending these constant crises and moving toward a balanced, bipartisan, and comprehensive budget deal,” Murray spokesman Eli Zupnick said.
Zupnick pointed to an interview in which Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) said that the U.S. will not default on its debt despite GOP rhetoric.
“As Senator Cornyn said today, Republican threats to play politics with the debt limit are nothing more than a negotiating ploy, so we expect them to allow us to raise the debt limit so the government can pay the bills it has already accrued," he said.
Republicans in the House are trying to formulate a plan that Senate leaders and the White House would have a hard time credibly rejecting. That could include finding spending cuts that Obama has proposed or endorsed, rather than ones favored by conservatives that he has repeatedly rejected.
A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Democrats would be "happy" to consider a debt-ceiling bill that isn't paired with spending cuts.
"It is reassuring to see Republicans beginning to back off their threat to hold our economy hostage. If the House can pass a clean debt ceiling increase to avoid default and allow the United States to meet its existing obligations, we will be happy to consider it," Reid spokesman Adam Jentleson said.
“As President Obama has said, this issue is too important to middle class families' economic security to use as a ploy for collecting a ransom. We have an obligation to pay the bills we have already incurred — bills for which many House Republicans voted."
Approving a three-month debt-limit extension would essentially push the issue from the front to the back of a series of looming fiscal deadlines. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has told Boehner that the department will run out of ways to avoid defaulting on the nation’s debt sometime between mid-February and the beginning of March. The $85 billion in sequestration cuts will begin taking effect March 1, and the government will run out of funding on March 27.
Acting on the debt ceiling would allow House Republicans to make a stronger fight on the other two fronts, members and aides say.
“A long-term increase in the debt limit that is not preceded by meaningful and responsible reductions in government spending might avert a default, but it would also invite a downgrade of our nation’s credit that damages our economy, hurts families and small businesses, and destroys jobs,” Boehner said.


Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/27...#ixzz2IMCZNPqA
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

[American Patriot]

OMG... how stupid. Illegal. Nasty and downright wrong.


Shut this group down.

Bring it on: Obama to counter Rove

President Obama’s campaign has transformed itself into a tax-exempt group aimed at supporting his second-term agenda and countering a similar group that top Republican strategist Karl Rove has run during the last two election cycles.


Mr. Obama’s campaign manager, Jim Messina, has turned the Obama for America campaign operation into a 501(c)4 tax-exempt organization, an Obama campaign operative confirmed.


The new organization is similar to Crossroads GPS, a spin-off of the super PAC fundraising machine Mr. Rove, President George W. Bush’s top political adviser, created three years ago.


In a fundraising pitch last week, Mr. Messina told supporters he would discuss how the use of millions in leftover campaign cash at an “Obama Legacy Conference” this weekend during inauguration events. There are restrictions on the inauguration committee using money raised during the campaign.


Mr. Obama is the first president in history to continue fundraising for his campaign after the election was over — at least since the late 1970s when the Federal Election Commission was established and started keeping records of such things.


Since Election Day, Obama for America has produced at least two web videos showcasing the president’s record and including “donate” buttons users can click.


Although most of the staffers have gone on to other jobs, the campaign still holds onto one of its most valuable resources – lists of millions of emails of supporters and volunteers, which the new organization can use to help mobilize grassroots support for the president’s agenda.


Mr. Obama has not said a word about the future of his campaign apparatus, but Vice President Joe Biden this week hinted at the creation of the new organization by saying he and the president could rely on campaign resources to help generate public support for the administration’s new package of gun control proposals.


As a 501(c)4 organization, the transformed Obama campaign will operate completely separate from Priorities USA, the pro-Obama super PAC that tried to compete with Republican-aligned groups that collected millions of dollars in unlimited contributions to support Mitt Romney’s campaign for president.


Even though it was run by former Obama aides and had the backing of former President Bill Clinton, Priorities struggled to attract multimillion dollar donations. Bill Burton, one of two co-founders, just joined the Democratic-leaning public affairs firm Global Strategy Group.


All told, Priorities USA spent at least $66 million on attack ads, much of it paid for by a small group of investors, trial lawyers and labor unions. But the super PAC supporting Mitt Romney, Restore Our Future, spent $143 million with American Crossroads, which supported Mr. Romney and Republican candidates generally, spending another $176 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.


Government watchdogs groups were already lamenting the president’s decision to accept unlimited corporate donations to fund his inauguration celebration. The creation of Mr. Messina’s new tax-exempt group, combined with Mr. Obama’s previous flip-flops on trying to crack down on special interests’ grip on Washington, have left many watchdogs disillusioned.



“The creation of a nonprofit group with close ties to the president after he has made a pitch to corporations for funds could raise some eyebrows on how donations from corporations might influence federal policy,” said Public Citizen’s Lisa Gilbert. “It’s a red flag when it comes to influence.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz2IMDJAInw
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter