Well, as expected, there it is. Supreme Court forces all 50 states to perform gay "marriages". Someone can feel free to start a new thread on it, I'm tied up at the moment.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions...4-556_3204.pdf
I agree with you in a way Mal in that it seems like most, if not all, states would have gone this way but, 2 things.
1) The government shouldn't be getting deeper and deeper into the marriage world and it should be up to the states as to how they would wish to proceed with it if at all. Government should be slowly extricating itself and this SCOTUS ruling has done the exact opposite since marriage is religious in nature. They're now dug in like a tick.
Without reading the ruling or dissent, the anti-discrimination language I'm hearing mentioned (calling marriage a fundamental liberty akin to speech and voting) sounds like it could be used as a bludgeon to do exactly what you said about cakes and other functions in forcing them to accommodate.
2) If the government must be involved, it shouldn't be called marriage. It may seems petty but simply put, words have meaning and two people of the same sex in a codified relationship is not marriage.
Scalia sure is not happy, again. Sounds like he's really letting it rip in his dissent. I think I want him in the new Supreme Court after CW2. Here's part of his dissent:
Him, Alito, and Thomas. Here's part of Alito's dissent:"I write separately to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy. The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me. The law can recognize as marriage whatever sexual attachments and living arrangements it wishes, and can accord them favorable civil consequences, from tax treatment to rights of inheritance. Those civil consequences—and the public approval that conferring the name of marriage evidences—can perhaps have adverse social effects, but no more adverse than the effects of many other controversial laws. So it is not of
special importance to me what the law says about marriage. It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me.
Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. The opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact—and the furthest extension one can even imagine—of the Court’s claimed power to create “liberties” that the Constitution and its Amendments neglect to mention. This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves."
Sure is a lot of bullshit for less than 3% of the population."... Most Americans—understandably—will cheer or lament
today’s decision because of their views on the issue of
same-sex marriage. But all Americans, whatever their
thinking on that issue, should worry about what the majority’s
claim of power portends. ..."
The silver lining... Enjoy divorce homos!
Bookmarks