http://wchildblog.com/2014/07/25/val...stevens-video/
Valerie Jarrett Was Behind the Botched Plan to KIDNAP Chris Stevens (video)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCa2...Gh-Pdtugdg_qcQ
Printable View
http://wchildblog.com/2014/07/25/val...stevens-video/
Valerie Jarrett Was Behind the Botched Plan to KIDNAP Chris Stevens (video)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCa2...Gh-Pdtugdg_qcQ
CIA expert: Obama, Osama share Mideast goal
Clare Lopez: 'It is clear what he is doing'
Garth Kant
http://static.squarespace.com/static...arrett_640.jpg
WASHINGTON – Clare Lopez looks more like the prototypical all-American mother she is than the highly trained government CIA operative she was for 20 years.
Sitting across the table at a Washington eatery, the somewhat petite, charming blonde with a friendly and engaging smile was generally soft-spoken but often emphatic in delivery, especially while unloading a bombshell analysis that turned the common understanding of U.S. foreign policy on its head.
According to the former CIA operative, President Obama’s plan for the Middle East is just what Osama bin Laden wanted: removing U.S. troops and putting the jihadis in power.
Lopez spent two decades in the field as a CIA operations officer; was an instructor for military intelligence and special forces students; has been a consultant, intelligence analyst and researcher within the defense sector; and has published two books on Iran. She currently manages the counterjihad and Shariah programs at the Center for Security Policy, run by Frank Gaffney, former assistant secretary of defense for international security policy during the Reagan administration.
Lopez told WND she sees a pattern in Obama’s actions, or inaction, that reveals his blueprint for the Middle East and Northern Africa is to let the warring jihadi factions, the Sunnis and the Shiites, divide the region into two spheres of influence, and for the U.S. to withdraw.
“The administration’s plan, I believe, is to remove American power and influence, including military forces, from Islamic lands,” Lopez asserted.
When WND remarked that was just what Osama bin Laden had demanded, Lopez pointed out that is the aim of all jihadis, “Because that is what Islam demands, that foreign forces be kicked out of Islamic lands.”
Does Obama think if we leave the Mideast the jihadis will then leave us alone?
“I don’t know,” she said. “I can just see the pattern that is enabling the rise of Islam, empowering the Muslim Brotherhood domestically and abroad, alienating and distancing ourselves from our friends and allies and debilitating the American military.”
http://www.wnd.com/files/2013/07/120...ry-300x168.jpg
Osama bin Laden
Even if she doesn’t have insideinformation, the former operative said, “I can see what he is doing; it seems to be a clear agenda. It is clear that is what he is doing.”
WND spoke with Lopez about the current crisis in Iraq, in which the Islamic terrorist army ISIS has blitzed across the country, capturing large chunks of territory while slaughtering Christians and other Muslims and threatening genocide. In a wide-ranging interview, the foreign policy expert also assessed the current state of the Mideast.
She believes Obama’s hesitance in the face of the horrific violence in the current crisis comes from a basic mistake, not recognizing the true motivation of the jihadis is an ideology of relentless conquest.
But she isn’t advocating a return to the Iraq War. Lopez believes the U.S. should protect its interests and those minorities facing genocide, but otherwise, let the warring parties sort it out, for the time being.
Lopez believes regimes such as Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey play all sides of the jihadi game and have “enabled a monster in ISIS” they can no longer control, and “they should be allowed to reap what they’ve sown.” Furthermore, she maintained, U.S. leadership has proven incapable of sorting out who’s who or who’s backing whom.
Besides, she observed, there isn’t much else left for the U.S. to protect in Iraq.
When WND asked her if Iraq is lost, she had a startling but succinct reaction: “Iraq doesn’t exist anymore. I liken it to Humpy-Dumpty. It’s fallen off the wall, and all the king’s horses and all the king’s men cannot put it back together again.”
Given that bleak assessment, the former CIA operative described what she believes the U.S. must now do to preserve its core interests in Iraq, Syria and the Persian Gulf region:
- Protect American personnel and facilities at the Embassy in Baghdad and the Irbil and Basra consulates with either airstrikes or evacuation.
- Provide as much humanitarian aid as possible to beleaguered minorities facing genocide, as well as to friendly countries like Jordan that are burdened with overwhelming economic demands to care for millions of refugees.
- Stand by allies and partners in the region, especially Israel and Jordan.
- Help the Kurds survive by providing diplomatic support, intelligence, logistics and modern weapons.
- Deploy a Special Forces capability to the region to gather intelligence and provide early warning of threats to U.S. interests, and provide the ability to project power and influence as required.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently criticized Obama for not arming what she called moderate rebels in Syria when the civil war there began, which, she claimed, could have prevented the rise of ISIS.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/06/o-H...ok-300x182.jpg
Hillary Rodham Clinton
WND asked Lopez if it really would have been possible to form a credible, non-Islamist, fighting force.
“No, I don’t think it was possible to find a truly credible, capable, pro-Western force in Syria,” she said. “Yes, there were those who were not jihadi.
Early in the conflict in Syria, in 2011, there were (acceptable) groups. There were military defectors from Assad’s regime who could have been classified as genuinely secular. Pro-Western? Not so sure. Genuinely pro-democracy? Not so sure.”
(Lopez also explained she doesn’t use the term Islamists, “because I can’t figure out a difference between Islam and Islamism. It’s either Islam or it’s not Islam. They are either Muslim or have declared themselves not to be Muslims, in which case, they’re apostates.”)
When WND asked whether the U.S. should have armed those groups, the former CIA operative said she was not sure that would have been effective, simply because their numbers were never going to be credible and significant enough in size and capability to overthrow Assad.
Did Obama really have bad intelligence on ISIS, as he had claimed?
Lopez said it was hard to know, but he was “certainly getting bad intel” in general.
“The CIA has proved it is completely incapable of operating in this environment,” she said. “But I’m not on the inside, and can’t be sure what they are telling him. What we do know is what we see.”
As an example, she described how U.S. special forces were sent to Jordan to train people who turned out to be jihadis, even though it was reported they “vetted everybody.”
“They vetted them and asked, ‘Did you ever belong to al-Qaida?’ and they said ‘Oh, no – not me!’ But did they ever ask them what their ideology was?
They’re not allowed to. We’re not allowed to define our enemy so how can we even identify our enemy? So, we fall into things like this where we actually train future ISIS jihadis, according to the Jordanian security officials.”
Lopez lauded the reporting of WND’s Aaron Klein in exposing the U.S training of what would become ISIS troops, saying, “Aaron is super. I did a radio interview with him in Tel Aviv. He is a very good reporter, very careful.”
Regardless of the quality of our intelligence, somehow, she said, we still ended up training the bad guys.
“We gave them tactics, intelligence and arms,” she noted.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/08/isi...re-300x170.jpg
Purported ISIS massacre in Iraq
Although it is often said the devil is in the details, in this instance, Lopez said the problem is really the administration’s myopic view of the big picture.
The analyst described a U.S. leadership that simply no longer recognizes the threat posed by the jihadist agenda, whether from ISIS or Iran, to U.S. regional interests, to friends and allies and, eventually, to the homeland itself.
“This sort of understanding demands a sharp reversal of existing policy that refuses even to acknowledge the Islamic ideology that animates this enemy’s threat doctrine. Only once that basic professional responsibility is met can an overall strategic policy that makes any sense be formulated and implemented.”
Lopez spoke of three keys to understanding the big picture and what is wrong with U.S. foreign policy.
- One was the aforementioned failure by the administration to appreciate that the jihadis are motivated by ideology, not political grievances.
- Another was the fact Obama appears bent upon empowering rather than confronting Iran.
- And, last but not least, she asserts the jihadist organization the Muslim Brotherhood has deeply infiltrated the Obama administration and other branches of the federal government.
‘Obama wants to empower Iran’
Lopez doesn’t just think Obama wants to withdraw entirely from the Mideast.
She believes he wants to turn most of it over to Iran.
“I am convinced that this administration intends Iran to become the nuclear power hegemon of the entire Persian Gulf region – and that includes especially the oil-rich areas. This includes the east coast of Saudi Arabia as well as southern Iraq and Iran itself.”
Lopez said the key to understand the president’s behavior is in a book written by a fellow former-CIA operative, “The Devil We Know,” by Robert Baer.
“I now believe this book is the blueprint for the Obama administration’s Middle East plan,” she explained.
She strongly disagrees with the book’s premise that the U.S. should empower and partner with Iran, and says it is mistaken on a number of points, but it is still important because the recommendations it made to the then-incoming administration in 2009 seem to have been adopted by Obama.
Lopez said the author knows Saudi Arabia very well and absolutely hates the Saudis. His premise was the Obama administration ought to assist Iran to become the dominant power of the Persian Gulf, and, essentially, the entire Middle East.
“I am not making this up. You can’t make this up to save your life,” she marveled.
Lopez said the book advises America to seek a truce with Iran, deal with it as an equal and reach settlements on one issue at a time, “until Iran is ready for détente and maybe more.”
And, she believes the Obama administration is, in fact, following a plan to let Iran become the dominant power in the Middle East, with the intention of turning the state that sponsors more terrorism than any other, into a security partner of the U.S.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/09/Per...lf-300x141.jpg
The Persian Gulf
“We pull all our forces out, which has been done, and we let them take over,” Lopez explained. “I think that’s already underway. This book’s argument says Iran should be enabled to do exactly what it is doing, which is take over the entire Persian Gulf region.”
She then quoted from the book: “We cannot and should not stand in the way of Iran’s quest to dominate Islam.” That includes throwing Israel under the bus, she added.
WND asked why the Obama administration would do something, were it known, that would be widely perceived as opposed to the best interest of the U.S.
“Its not in the United States’ best interests, but it is one way of getting us out of Muslim lands, which is what this administration wants done. They are trying to be even-handed between the Shiites and the Sunni, especially with the Muslim Brotherhood clamoring in their ear,” she said. “So, what happens? Arab Spring. North Africa goes to the Sunnis: al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood. They should be happy with that: They get Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. The Persian Gulf region goes to Iran.”
And Iran is permitted to be a nuclear power.
“I think it already is a nuclear power,” Lopez said. “I think they have functioning warheads. They obviously have functioning missiles, including ICBMs (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles). The Pentagon has published openly its estimate by next year, 2015, Iranian ICBMs will be capable of reaching the continental U.S. from Iran. This is open, unclassified, open-source publication.”
WND noted that made sense out of remarks Obama recently made that we were witnessing “a transition from an old order to a new order” in the Mideast, along with “the terrible violence that occurs as a result,” which seemed to indicate he believed the bloodshed was akin to birth pains.
Lopez said Americans have no clue what he is talking about, which is dividing the Middle East between two sets of jihadis, Sunni and Shiite.
Just in case it wasn’t already clear enough, she spelled out exactly what Obama’s plan would mean: A return to the barbaric past of the Dark Ages.
“So, the plan of this administration is to pull out of the Middle East, allow it to revert to Islamic control, as in the caliphates of old, or imamates, in the case of the Shiites. And to allow Islam to resurge, which is exactly what’s happening.”
WND asked, Obama’s plan is to take us back 1,300 years?
“Well, not us, but to let the Middle East do that,” she clarified.
“There have been monkey wrenches,” she said. “Syria was supposed to be (reserved) for Iran and under the control of (Syrian President Bashar al-) Assad. He winds up with a rump state. Syria is another Humpty-Dumpty. Also, the Kurds are a fly in the ointment. They are Muslims, but not jihadis.
They should be our natural allies in the Middle East. Recent events have forced the hand of the administration to assist the Kurds, especially as they are assisting such minorities as Yezidis and Christians to escape this savage slaughter.”
http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/05/bas...ad-300x142.jpg
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad
Lopez described how the administration had no other option but to support the Kurds now because ISIS has captured so much top-of-the-line American weaponry from the fleeing Iraqis, and they now have access to income from the oil wells they’ve captured as well as their income from kidnap ransoms.
She added, none of the shocking ISIS behavior, including beheadings and attempted genocide, should be considered strange or unknown, because “it is totally in keeping with Islamic doctrine. There is nothing ISIS is doing that is not what Muhammad did. It is completely according to Islamic doctrine, law and scripture, as well as Muhammad’s biography. But people now look at it and they’re horrified, as we all should be.”
But why, WND asked, would Obama have threatened to bomb Assad last summer for his alleged use of chemical weapons, if he wanted to see Iran’s influence spread?
That brought her to what she described as the biggest problem in the big picture, the influence of the jihadist group the Muslim Brotherhood over the U.S. government.
‘The Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the U.S. government’
Lopez said Obama only threatened Assad, “because of the infiltration of his government by the Muslim Brotherhood, who are clamoring in his ear at the National Security Council, ‘Do something, do something.’”
“They wanted help for their Muslim Brotherhood brothers. But the Middle East and Syria is designated for Iran, so what’s Obama gonna do? He decided on half and half. Give the Muslim Brotherhood Sunnis a little bit of aid, but not enough to overturn Assad. Make the Brotherhood happy. But don’t overturn Assad. And, at the same time, back and support Iran to be the hegemon.”
Lopez said, in addition to infiltrating the administration, the Brotherhood has established influence over many branches of the federal government over the last few decades.
She asserted the infiltration accelerated in the 1990s during the Clinton administration, picked up even more steam during the George W. Bush administration and is now in “hyper-drive” during the Obama administration.
The analyst maintains that infiltration has caused our elected political leadership, political appointees, the intelligence community and the military to all become “gradually blindfolded to what actual Islam really is.”
“They became incapable of seeing the history of Islam, the doctrine, the law, the scripture that motivates and animates Islamic terrorism,” she explained. “Those things became divorced. You were not allowed to talk about them anymore. Between 2011 and 2012 there was an actual purge in our government that removed hundreds of pages of presentations, PowerPoint presentations, curriculum and the instructors. They were taken out of all government curriculum, including the military.”
How could this have happened?
“It was done under the request, pressure and urging of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood, as a matter of fact, were the advisers who oversaw the purge. They were the ones who actually supervised the purge.”
Through intermediaries?
“No, directly,” she replied. “They were tapped to become advisers about what should be removed from the curriculum.”
Was this when former Egyptian Muhammad President Morsi was still in office in Egypt and the Muslim Brotherhood was our supposed ally?
Lopez said the purge of references to Islamic terrorism in U.S. government materials occurred from late 2011 into 2012. Morsi became president in the summer of 2012, so the purge was well under way before that.
“But it was the purge and the domination of the Muslim Brotherhood within our leadership that predisposed the Obama administration to be supportive of the Brotherhood in Egypt and elsewhere through what they call the Arab Spring.”
Lopez said the closest adviser for the National Security Council has been an imam named Muhammad Magid.
“He heads up something called the ADAMS Center, the ‘All Dulles Area Muslim Society Center,’ near Dulles airport. He is the son of the Muslim Brotherhood’s grand mufti of Sudan. He is also the president of something called ISNA, Islamic Society of North America, the largest Muslim Brotherhood front group in the country. And, ISNA is an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation Hamas terror funding trial.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/08/art...x0-254x300.jpg
Imam Muhammad Magid
Indeed, in February 2013, WND’s Diana West warned that Magid was working with the National Security Council with the support of John Brennan, who for four years was the president’s top counterterrorism adviser and is now CIA director. West reported then-deputy national security adviser Denis McDonough also heaped praise on Magid. McDonough is now Obama’s chief of staff.
WND also reported that one of the FBI’s former top experts on Islam even claimsthat Brennan became a Muslim while serving overseas. Brennan did, indeed, serve as CIA station chief in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in the 1990s.
Whether the claim about Brennan is true or not, from the above accounts, it appears Muslim Brotherhood penetration of the Obama administration could not have reached much higher.
Lopez explained that ISNA’s close connection to the Muslim Brotherhood is indisputable.
“ISNA is actually listed by the Muslim Brotherhood on its own documents called the ‘Explanatory Memorandum,’ which was submitted in evidence at that Holy Land Foundation trial; that’s how we know about it. The last page is a list of organizations, and it says it’s a list of our friends and the organizations of our friends. And ISNA is one of them.”
Lopez’s Center for Security Policy describes the Explanatory Memorandum as the guide to the Muslim Brotherhood’s goals, modus operandi and infrastructure in America, as written in 1991 by a member of the Board of Directors for the Muslim Brotherhood in North America and senior Hamas leader named Mohammed Akram. It had been approved by the Brotherhood’s Shura Council and Organizational Conference and was “certainly not intended for public consumption.”
“Magid, the head of ISNA, is probably the closest adviser to our national security council. Inside the White House,” she said. “See how this works?”
So, WND asked, the enemy is our consultant on how to deal with our enemy?
Lopez said, not only that, but “all of this infiltration completely suborns our national security apparatus.”
“They’re very smart,” she added. “These guys are not camel-jockeys with towels on their heads. These are sophisticated operators. This has been going on for more than 1,300 years. It just happens that we live in the 21st century. That doesn’t make us unique or immune or in some kind of historical bubble.”
Is cultural jihad a bigger threat than the military jihad?
The former CIA operative said that is true inside the United States, but in the Middle East, the bigger threat is military conquest.
“The Muslim Brotherhood is the vanguard of Islam and Islamic jihad. The forces of Islam, historically, have conquered every, single major civilization they’ve ever taken on, except for two. Western Civilization, or whatever’s left of it, and the Han Chinese. The Muslims have defeated the Buddhists, the Byzantines, Christianity in the Middle East, Jews in the Middle East, Hindus and the Persians. This includes huge, sophisticated civilizations.”
Did Muslims conquer those civilizations by using the same methods as they are applying against us?
“In part, yes. Infiltration first. Co-option and subordination of leadership. These are intelligence terms, okay? I recognize this because of my background. Infiltration and subordination from within are intelligence operations. These are information operations. We are completely ignoring the information battle space and yet that is the one where they are defeating us first.”
Lopez described terrorist acts such as Sept. 11 as “punctuation marks” for the overall campaign. She described the attacks as warnings that say, “Look, we can do this to you, you can’t stop us from doing this to you, and if you don’t shape up and accept what we’re telling you to accept, you’re going to get more of it.” It’s also punishment because the West has not accepted the call to Islam.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/04/Twi...21-300x300.jpg
Attack on World Trade Center in New York on Sept. 11, 2001
She said to remember that Osama bin Laden gave us two warnings because Islamic doctrine obligates them to do that, and we should take them seriously when they warn us.
In her criticism of Obama’s Mideast policy, Clinton advised practicing containment against radical Islam. WND asked if instead of seeking an elusive peaceful coexistence, should the U.S. pursue a more Reaganesque policy of confronting and defeating the enemy?
“Certainly peace through strength should be our policy. But, when you’re talking about containment, it sort of brings up this image of ‘They’re over there, and we can just draw this barrier around them and hold them in.’”
She said there is a bigger problem.
“They’re already inside the wire,” she said. “They’re already deeply embedded inside our own national security infrastructure. It’s no longer a question of manning the barricades and pointing outward. They are inside.”
The former operative advised going back to an intelligence-led strategy that understands information operations, stealth operations, and how to conduct counter-intelligence within our own ranks.
“Very much as back in the ’30s, ’40s and the ’50s, when the communists infiltrated our government, and the same phenomenon took place, our top leadership refused to acknowledge that, refused to accept it, refused to confront it, even to the point that Joe McCarthy was vilified. And he was 100 percent correct about communist infiltration, as documents released after the collapse of the Soviet Union verified.”
WND noted she was identifying our top priority as cleaning out our own stables, but that even a change to a hawkish administration would not, by itself, improve security.
“No,” she said. “Unless they understand the things I’ve just been telling you, that won’t help. This infiltration took place over multiple administrations. It’s not a partisan thing. It’s institutional now.”
Benghazi: When America Switched Sides In The War On Terror And Armed Al-Qaida
Posted By Ginni Thomas On 10:30 AM 08/17/2014 In | No Comments
The Center for Security Policy’s Vice President for Research and Analysis, Clare Lopez, says in this exclusive video interview with The Daily Caller that very few have seemed to care that America switched sides in the global war on terror when President Obama deposed an erstwhile ally in the Middle East and provided weapons to al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Focusing on this under-reported, critical shift in American foreign policy, Clare Lopez discusses how an American ambassador and others were killed in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11 because the Obama administration decided to promote and defend their narrative that “al-Qaida was on the run,” even as we were outright arming militants affiliated with the terrorist group.
Lopez spent 20 years as an undercover operations officer for the CIA. Believing she can now best serve her country in the policy arena, she has found a natural fit at a non-partisan non-profit that promotes American national security and foreign policy based on the principle of “peace through strength.”
This week, we feature part 1 of 2 of our video interview with Lopez on the topic of the Benghazi attacks.
Lopez, who’s also a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi, says, “Benghazi is symbolic of more than just a disastrous foreign policy or a disastrous attack on our mission that took the lives of four Americans serving there and injured many more. Benghazi is not just what happened on September 11, 2012 either.
Americans really need to care about Benghazi and what happened there because that is the place, and 2011 and 2012 was the time, when America switched sides in the war on terrorism.”
To her, the American decision to overthrow the head of a sovereign government, Muammar al-Gaddafi, and to instead support al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood laid the important framework for a resurgence of global jihad.
Lopez says when we supported the local Islamic forces, America flipped in the global war on terror and we, the U.S. government, turned on our erstwhile ally and provided funding, backing, intelligence, our participation in a NATO effort and weapons for rebel forces.
“We facilitated the flow of weapons to the Gaddafi opposition, and we knew the opposition was dominated by al-Qaida. It was led by the Muslim Brotherhood and the fighting militia was dominated by al-Qaida. That’s who we helped,” she explained.
Later in the interview, Lopez discusses the important, unanswered questions on Benghazi before, during and after the 2012 attack. She discusses the weapons transfers happening in Benghazi that were at the heart of the controversial change in American policy, and the significance of the capture and prosecution of Ahmed Abu Khattala.
In addition, Lopez discusses the significance of the Muslim Brotherhood giving a “kill order” to al-Qaida, showing significant “command and control” as the global jihadist forces began a resurgence.
Lopez ends by bringing viewers back to the fall of 2012. When the reality of the Benghazi attack came to light due to Judicial Watch’s “smoking gun email,” we now know the Obama administration scurried to promote a narrative that did not challenge the President’s reelection mantra “Osama bin Laden is dead and al-Qaida is on the run.” Lopez says, “It would not have suited, at all, to be defending against a nonexistent al-Qaida!”
She continues, “To admit that would be to admit a complete failure of American foreign policy, a complete failure and dereliction of duty by the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, and the President, Obama and the White House, to defend our mission and our people. And that, they could not allow.”
I'll believe this when I see it happen... lol
Obama To Resign January 1st Amid New Benghazi Revelations
Posted on September 9, 2014 | 1 Comment
Devvy Kidd
“According to several senior-ranking White House officials, President Barack Obama will resign from office on January 1st 2015, after learning that a so-called “Smoking Gun” story regarding the Benghazi scandal will soon be revealed. Those sources claim Obama will announce his resignation shortly after the midterm elections in November.
“The decision to resign came after reporters from Fox News were allegedly contacted in August by a survivor of the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack, who came forward with shocking video evidence that Obama, then- White House Chief of Staff Jacob Lew, and then- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knew that an attack on the US diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya was “imminent,” and intentionally ordered key security personnel to leave the facility and travel eight blocks away.
“Sources at Fox News say that the unidentified survivor allegedly recorded a video teleconference on his cell phone in which Lew gave the orders, while Obama and Clinton watched on. “You don’t want a guy like Mitt Romney deciding your budget,” Lew supposedly states in the video, which Fox News has not yet released. “We need to win this thing, and that means we need to make some sacrifices. Let me be clear, no one will be harmed in this. We’re sacrificing a few buckets of paint, that’s all. We just need a little nudge in the polls.”
“The sources at Fox say the network was prepared to air the video on August 23rd, but House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) convinced them to hold off on releasing the footage. White House sources say two unidentified reporters from Fox News joined Issa in a private meeting with Obama this past weekend, on August 30th, and agreed to not reveal the video if Obama agreed to resign. White House senior staff negotiated with Issa and the reporters so Obama could stay in office until the end of the year, and that he would announce the resignation in November, shortly after the midterms. Why they agreed to those terms is unclear.”
Last week the criminal impostor in the WH said he will delay giving millions of liars, cheats and thieves, illegal aliens, amnesty until after the mid-term elections. I’m sure Democrats in danger of losing a senate seat got in his face. After all Barry will be gone, but they do not want to give up the power of being a house member or senator. Naturally, the America hating pro-illegals groups and organizations are calling their favorite son all kinds of names, but nothing is done in Washington District of Criminals unless it’s well planned.
Barry’s announcement was a shocker although he’s still putting on the bravado he “will act”, just not now. If the senate loses control to the Republicans, I guess we’ll see what the game plan really is.
Over the weekend FOX ran an hour long special – the ‘smoking gun’ on Benghazi with survivors who have decided now they will talk. I watched part of it and their statements about who gave the order to stand down. That individual answers to Hillary and she could not have made it without approval from the piece of garbage in the White House.
Hillary the Hun has stated she’s going to wait ‘100 days’ to determine whether or not, tragically for this country, to run for president. That would be around the time if Barry jumps ship. IF being the key word. I think Daryl Issa owes the American people an explanation of the allegations in the cited column above. I do believe the one thing that will keep one world government priestess, Hillary the man Clinton, from running is Benghazi. She owns it for all the future to come.
Nothing will be gained if that dirty traitor leaves the White House because America will inherit Joe Biden who is just as rabid about giving amnesty as is Soetoro. Biden is very dangerous. Lots of people laugh at his ‘gaffes’, but I think he’s in the early stages of dementia. Should the powers that be decide old Joe can’t stay in the WH, who then becomes president? Why that would be our wino buddy, John Boehner, if he were to be elected Speaker of the House again. Beohner is for giving amnesty. He just dresses up his treachery in different packaging.
I've only seen clips of this. I reblogged it from the site that has the link so I can watch later.
Here's the gist of it.
13 Hours in BENGHAZI – Bret Baier, Fox News Special Report (Full video) – A Must See. Tags
09 Tuesday Sep 2014
Posted by bydesign001 in Uncategorized
≈ 1 Comment
Benghazi, governent coverups, libya, Scandal, September 11 2012 Islamic terrorist attacks
[COLOR=#]Rate This[/COLOR]
http://viewpointsofasagittarian.com/...ok-560x420.jpgImage from Bret Baier’s Facebook page.
The Right Planet
Bret Baier of Fox News sat down with three of the security contractors—Mark Geist, Kris Paronto and JohnTiegen—who were on the ground and fighting the terrorist mob that attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11–12, 2012; 22:00–02:00 EET (UTC+02:00). …
Read full article
Rarely do I watch a program more than once but I watched it at least three times out of the many times the above program played this weekend.
I did so because I wanted to be sure that I was hearing correctly the events as they unfolded as told by witnesses who were on the ground in Libya when the U.S. Consulate and CIA safe house came under assault in Benghazi almost two years to the date, September 12, 2012, by Islamic terrorists that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, US. Ambassador, Christopher Stevens, Ambassador, Sean Smith, Information Officer, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, Navy SEALs and the injuries dozens of others.
The fact that help was just five minutes away and had they not been ordered to stand down for 30 minutes, Stevens, Ambassador, Smith, Doherty and Woods would not have died that night leaves one’s blood boiling.
There must be accountability.
http://viewpointsofasagittarian.com/...ur-560x206.png
LINKS:
FOX NEWS HOST GRETA RECALLS WHITE HOUSE ‘DIRTY’ CALL ORDERING JENNIFER GRIFFIN TO STOP REPORTING ON BENGHAZI’S STAND DOWN ORDER…OBAMA HAS TO CALL FOX BECAUSE THE REST OF THE OBAMACRAT MEDIA UNDERSTOOD BENGHAZI IS A STORY HAS TO BE IGNORED.
MEDIA, Politics
September 9, 2014
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...eta10-Edit.jpg
Fox News Host Reveals the ‘Dirty’ Phone Call She Received From the White House
Zach Noble TheBlaze.com
Fox News has been aggressive in pursuing the story behind the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, and that persistence has earned the network more than a few snubs from the government, as Greta Van Susteren noted Friday.
“The Obama administration’s behavior post-Benghazi has been weird, like they’re hiding something,” Van Susteren said, outlining multiple government-sponsored news conferences from which Fox News was excluded as the network investigated Benghazi.
At one point, Van Susteren claimed, the White House tried to hush up information from the network.
“When reporter Jennifer Griffin said she was told that there was a stand-down order at Benghazi, I got a weird call from the Obama administration trying to pressure me to get Jennifer to back down from her report. I thought the call from the Obama administration was dirty.”
Read Griffin’s report here.
www.theblaze.com
BREAKING: First Public Benghazi Hearing Officially Announced For September 17
Katie Pavlich | Sep 10, 2014
http://media.townhall.com/Townhall//...iepavlich1.gif
http://media.townhall.com/townhall/r...EXICO-GUNS.JPG
The first public hearing in the Benghazi select committee investigation will be held a week from today on September 17. More from Fox News producer Chad Pergrum:
#BREAKING House Select Cmte on #Benghazi schedules 1st open hearing for 10 am et on September 17.According to the Committee website, Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security Greg Starr, Independent Panel on Best Practices Chairman Mark J. Sullivan and former Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection for the Department of Homeland Security Todd Keil will be the witnesses.
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) September 10, 2014
1st #Benghazi hrng will focus on recommendations of State Dept's Accountability Review Brd.The select committee was formed back in May of this year and is made up of seven Republicans and five Democrats. The Committee is chaired by Republican South Carolina Congressman and former prosecutor Trey Gowdy.
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) September 10, 2014
This post has been updated.
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/22...t-full-of-crap
Graham: House GOP Benghazi report 'full of crap'
By Rebecca Shabad - 11/23/14 09:29 AM EST
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Sunday blasted a House GOP-led investigation that recently debunked myths about the 2012 Benghazi attack.
“I think the report is full of crap,” Graham said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
The House Intelligence Committee released a report on Friday evening, which took two years to compile, that found there was no outright intelligence failure during the attack, there was no delay in the rescue of U.S. personnel and there was no political cover-up by Obama administration officials.
ADVERTISEMENT
After Graham was asked whether the report exonerates the administration, he initially ignored the question, and then eventually said “no.”
The House Intelligence panel, Graham said, is “doing a lousy job policing their own.”
Graham didn’t clearly pinpoint why he dismissed the report’s findings, but suggested its information was provided by people in the intelligence community who had previously lied to Congress about the attack.
“I don’t believe the report is accurate given the role [former CIA deputy director] Mike Morell played in misleading the Congress on two occasions,” Graham said.
Host Gloria Borger said the report found no one lied.
“That’s a bunch of garbage,” Graham replied.
“This report puts all the blame on the State Department and absolves the intelligence community.”
The pieces fall into place suddenly.
CIA Director John Brennan Appears On Fox News Sunday – And Missing Historical Puzzle Pieces Simultaneously Fall Into Place….
Posted on March 22, 2015 by sundance
Sorry to go so deep on a weekend, but seeing Brennan broadcast in a 22 minute interview is enough to blow the blood pressure cuff:
I have never been more certain of something, yet simultaneously never able to prove it, as I am about two events. The first is that Jack Lew and the White House in 2010/2011 coordinated the DOJ attack, with Eric Holder, against political opposition using the IRS.
The second event is that journalist Michael Hastings was killed by the dispatch of CIA Director John Brennan.
https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...5869.jpg?w=640
Director John Brennan spent almost his entire formative career inside the CIA and intelligence community. 25 Years inside the CIA prior to 2008.
Mr. Brennan spent most of his C.I.A. career as an analyst, but during the 1990s served a tour as the chief of the CIA station in Saudi Arabia, the rumored financier of a now famous Harvard Law Review editor.
Prior to the 9/11 attack (from 1999 to early 2001) Brennan was chief of staff to George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, as the position was then called. At the end of that period of his C.I.A. service, in the world created by the patriot act and homeland security (2004 and 2005), Mr. Brennan set up what is now the U.S. Counterterrorism Center.
John O. Brennan, later became candidate Senator Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser while also being owner of a company called The Analysis Corp. Brennan’s firm, Analysis Corp. was identified and cited in March 2008 for penetrating the files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain in the State Department’s passport office.
At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign. After the breach was revealed by the Washington Times Brennan stated:
“This individual’s actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at The Analysis Corp. and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards,” Brennan’s company said in a statement sent to reporters after the passport breach was made public. (link)The Washington Times Reported - Passport application data includes such details as date and place of birth, e-mail address, mailing address, Social Security number, former names and travel plans. Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu in 1961 to a Kenyan father and American mother. He lived in Jakarta, Indonesia, from age six to 10.
Computer-monitoring equipment detected the activities by the three employees on Jan. 9, Feb. 21 and March 14, triggering alarms in each case, Mr. McCormack said. Mr. McCormack said the officials accessed Mr. Obama’s records “without a need to do so.”
“In each case, we immediately contacted our contractors, their employer, and two were fired and one was disciplined,” [Brennan] said. (link)
http://counterjihadnews.files.wordpr...pg?w=297&h=170Yet people would have you believe after 25 years within the CIA,… and after being the Chief of Staff to the Director,…. and after being the person who set up the counter terrorism center,…. and after being the CIA approved contractor for the State dept.,… well, he just didn’t know that someone from his firm was penetrating the passport files within the State Dept. on three occasions in Jan and Feb 2008 to look at information of the candidate who he was specifically working for! You getting this?
Well, that was their story, and they stuck to it in 2008. After the initial inquiry, federal investigators maintained the target of the illegal activity was Obama’s passport file.
It does not take a stretch to come to the conclusion this was for the sole purpose of cleansing the records of information that would jeopardize Obama’s candidacy.
As many people speculated at the time, the breach of the passport records of the other candidates was merely to create confusion. Brennan was, at the time, an unpaid advisor working with Obama’s campaign. Passport files include an applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number.
Additional information may include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S. born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors.
It is important to remember the oversight agency who would be investigating the breach – Thehttp://seattletimes.com/ABPub/2008/08/22/2008133376.jpg Senate Foreign Relations Committee oversees the State Department.
At the time Senator Joe Biden, now Vice President Biden, was the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the time the breach would be investigated.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice phoned Obama and personally apologized for the breach. “I told him that I myself would be very disturbed if I learned that somebody had looked into my passport file,” Rice told reporters. She phoned Clinton and McCain and offered similar apologies.
Following the breach, State Department managers met with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, whose committee has oversight over the Foreign Service and the passport office. (link)
…..And, well, what do you know?…. Biden became the VP pick of Obama.
Also, after election -in mid February 2010- White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs alerted WH reporters who regularly cover daily events that certain questions about Obama’s job with Business International Corporation (BIC) would not be subject to discussion.
BIC was well-known in Washington DC to be a front company for the CIA, hence many speculated the State Department passport records were scrubbed to erase any mention of Obama’s CIA activities and his personal information; it would not be too long a dotted line to the false story claim of Columbia University attendance.
But it became over-the-top suspicious when the State Department employee, Lt. Quarles Harris, Jr. who had the access, and apparently was the one who penetrated the database and scrubbed the records, was killed – April 18th 2008.
Lt. Harris decided to cooperate with the FBI who was investigating the break-in. Soon after his cooperation became a matter of record his body was discovered in his parked car; He had been shot in the head, described as execution style.
…..FAST FORWARD TO 2013
https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...pg?w=640&h=355 Journalist Michael Hasting’s wife, Elise Jordan, confirmed to media in California that John Brennan was the subject of Hastings investigative reporting.
In 2013 a source provided San Diego 6 News with an alarming email hacked from super secret CIA contractor Stratfor’s President Fred Burton. The email (link here) was posted on WikiLeaks and alleged that Obama counter-terrorism Czar John Brennan, was in charge of the government’s continued crackdown or witch-hunt on investigative journalists.
After providing the Stratfor email to the CIA for comment, Brennan’s spokesperson responded in lightning speed. Two emails were received; one acknowledging Hastings was working on a CIA story and the other said:
“Without commenting on information disseminated by WikiLeaks, any suggestion that Director Brennan has ever attempted to infringe on constitutionally-protected press freedoms is offensive and baseless.”The emails also prompted a phone from CIA media spokesman Todd Ebitz. He said they were saddened by Michael’s death and reiterated their position that they had a cordial working relationship with the investigative reporter. (link)
https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...pg?w=300&h=200 Then last year -2014- Brennan admitted to directing the intentional spying on congress and openly apologized to Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein.
Obviously Brennan benefited from a left-wing U.S. media unwilling to call the Obama administration to task.
.
Let’s just say ALL OF THAT presents a baseline for understanding the truthfulness of John Brennan, ok?
But the essential conversation for this Fox News Sunday appearance surrounds questions about Iran. So it is worthwhile to focus on Brennan’s actual view of Iran, not the bullshit the administration and he would sell today.
John Brennan wrote about Iran in an obscure foreign policy magazine over the summer of 2008 – during the Obama campaign.
The article, entitled “The Conundrum of Iran: Strengthening Moderates without Acquiescing to Belligerence,” appeared in the July issue of “The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.”
Among other recommendations, it argued that the next U.S. administration should grant political legitimacy to the terrorist organizations Hezbollah and Hamas, and should exercise “strategic patience” with Iran rather than engaging in “bellicose” rhetoric and coercive diplomacy. (link)
https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...pg?w=300&h=200Remember that complete failure of an outstretched hand toward Iran in 2009? Remember the complete failure of the Obama administration to support the Green Party uprising in Iran, following Obama’s famous Cairo speech?
Remember all of that 2009/2010 insufferable stupidity that eventually led to the “Islamist Spring”?
From Brennan’s Abstract specifically about Iran:
After nearly three decades of antagonistic rhetoric and diplomatic estrangement between the United States and Iran, the next president has the opportunity to set a new course for relations between the two countries.
When the next president takes up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Iranian officials will be listening. The president must implement a policy of engagement that encourages moderates in Iran without implying tolerance for Tehran’s historic support of terrorist activities.
This strategy will require patience and sensitivity to the complex political realities inside Iran. To successfully chart a new course for U.S.-Iranian relations, the next president must (1) tone down rhetoric; (2) establish a direct dialogue with Tehran, including comprehensive, private discussions and deployment of a special envoy; (3) encourage greater assimilation of Hezbollah into Lebanon’s political system; and (4) offer carrots in addition to sticks, including consideration of legitimate Iranian concerns on regional security issues.
– John Brennan July, 2008
It was during the specific timeframe of this pre-election 2008 phase, that we recently became aware of another massive puzzle piece.
https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...pg?w=311&h=175https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...pg?w=311&h=175
From a radio interview in October of 2014 Mark Levin discusses with Michael Leeden the details of a secret message sent by candidate Senator Barack Obama to Iran in 2008 via a former Ambassador, William G Miller.
In essence the content of the communique was Senator Obama telling the Iranian government not to negotiate with the outgoing George Bush administration because Obama was more friendly toward the position of Iran and he would work to structure a more favorable outcome to the Iranian people. (link)
To provide some even greater understanding to how Brennan’s ideology took hold while actually inside the White House – you only need to look at Brennan’s comments in 2011.
This commentary is from June of 2011 three months after the U.S. began arming al-Qaeda in Libya (Brennan is -at the time- Obama’s main national security guy):
“Our strategy is…shaped by a deeper understanding of al Qaeda’s goals, strategy, and tactics. I’m not talking about al Qaeda’s grandiose vision of global domination through a violent Islamic caliphate.So that’s the backdrop for this interview broadcast today on Fox News Sunday:
That vision is absurd, and we are not going to organize our counterterrorism policies against a feckless delusion that is never going to happen.
We are not going to elevate these thugs and their murderous aspirations into something larger than they are.”
~John Brennan, White House Senior Advisor to The President (for counterterrorism and national security) June 29th 2011
Trey Gowdy: Benghazi Committee Lacks Authority To Subpoena Hillary’s Private Server
By: Rachel Blevins
Following Hillary Clinton's decision to delete all of the emails on her private server, after they had been subpoenaed by the House Benghazi Committee, the Committee's chairman said he does not have the authority to issue a subpoena for Clinton's server.
http://benswann.com/wp-content/uploa...dy-700x357.png
On Wednesday, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, said that while the House has the authority to subpoena Hillary Clinton’s private server, his committee has a “more limited jurisdiction.”
In an interview with conservative radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt, Gowdy explained that although the Benghazi Committee lacks the authority under House rules, “most experts believe” that the House as an entity could issue a subpoena for the server.
“I would think if you’re interested in national security breaches, and also the completeness of the public record, that you would want a neutral, detached arbiter as opposed to her own lawyer,” Gowdy said. “The lawyer’s obligation is to the client. I want someone with an obligation to my fellow citizens to say the public record is complete. I can’t just take her lawyer’s word for it.”
Clinton’s personal email on a private server, which she used to conduct government business during her tenure as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013, was revealed in a report from the New York Times on March 2.
The Committee issued subpoenas on March 4, for all emails related to the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya, from both Clinton and her staff members’ personal accounts.
On March 27, Gowdy released a statement revealing that Clinton deleted all of her emails, and wiped her server clean. Gowdy explained that while it is not clear exactly when Clinton chose to delete the emails, he believes it was after the State Department first requested that she make her emails public in October 2014.
On March 31, the Benghazi Committee formally requested a transcribed interview with Clinton. The interview would include questions over Clinton’s use of private email for government business, along with questions on why Clinton chose to delete all of the emails on her server, after she was aware that they had been subpoenaed by the Committee.
While Gowdy’s request said that the Committee was willing to schedule the interview at a time that was convenient for Clinton, it gave a deadline of May 1.
Politico reported that a spokesperson for the Committee said that Clinton has yet to answer the request for either the interview about the emails, or a public hearing on the 2012 attack in Benghazi.
Gowdy told Hewitt that including Clinton, he plans to interview several others, regarding the Benghazi attack, such as former CIA deputy director Michael Morell, Clinton’s chief-of-staff Cheryl Mills and Clinton’s aide Huma Abedin. The interview list will also include Sidney Blumenthal, who according to Politico, is a “longtime confidant of the Clintons whose hacked emails to Hillary Clinton first revealed the existence of her private account.”
On Tuesday, the New York Times reported that it obtained letters, which revealed that congressional investigators wrote to Clinton in Dec. 2012, asking about her use of private email for government business.
The Times noted that it was not until March 2013, two months after Clinton left office, that Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), the Republican chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the author of the letter, received an answer from the State Department, which “ignored the question and provided no response.”
??? How can a select committee NOT have power to .... WTF?
Benghazi and Hillary's private emails
March 5, 2015 My analysis based on following this for years.
Hellary Clinton private UNTRACEABLE emails.
THIS is how Hellary and Huma communicated secretly and privately with Egypt and planned the Bengazi attack! THIS IS HUGE! I hope n pray this whole thing comes out!
Barak Hussein Obama PLANNED the Bengazi attack with Morsi
Hillary Clinton Tied To Muslim Sisterhood
Hillary Clinton’s #1 aide is a Muslim - Huma Abedin, Mrs. Anthony Weiner, Mrs. Huma Weiner, wife of a congressman.
Huma’s mother is best friends with the First Lady of Egypt,
the wife of Mohamed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist President of Egypt in 2012.
Morsi won the election promising to bring the blind shiek back from an American jail
for the 1993 WTC bombing. Unlike USA, Egyptians want campaign promises kept.
The Morsi-Obama plan was to have Morsi's men kidnap Ambassador Stevens and trade him for the blind shiek.
Navy SEALs ruined that plan. THAT is why the stand down orders. THAT is why Hellary ordered U.S. Marine guard away from Bengazi. THAT is why the silly video lies. It all makes sense when you know.
There was a rumor that Obama paid all the debts of Hillary Clinton if she would LIE, take the fall on Bengazi. This would have brought Obama down had ALL the facts come out long ago.
Hellary said - what difference does (5 dead Americans) make?
There is so much more but this is enuf for those wanting to know, and no amount of proof would convince those who dont.
Sources
Muslim Sisterhood is an offshoot of the Brotherhood.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/20...lim-sisterhood
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-...ouse-committee
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/sour...heikh-to-egypt
Huma Abedin Connected to Egypt President Morse (2012)
Walid Shoebat KNOWS Egypt has PROOF Obama planned Bengazi.
He doesnt really come out and make that bold declaration.
http://shoebat.com/2012/06/24/how-is...-new-president
Clinton Aide Huma Abedin’s Extensive Ties to Islamic Radicals and Terrorists
http://www.westernjournalism.com/cli...zDsJTFmtV3E.97
1993 WTC bombing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Wo...Center_bombing
CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack
The CIA operators twice to "stand down" rather than help the ambassador's team when shots were heard.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...ck-sources-say
AC-130 Gunship was On-Scene in Benghazi,
Obama Admin Refused to Let It Fire
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/10/26...to-let-it-fire
Obama mafia didnt cooperate
http://www.newsmax.com/newswidget/US...5/08/id/503336
Clinton Aides Spy Network
March 29, 2015 - Starting weeks before Muslim Brotherhood terrorists attacked Benghazi, Libya, Clinton pal Sidney Blumenthal supplied intelligence to Hillary Clinton gathered by a secret network that included a former CIA clandestine service officer. Blumenthal’s emails to Clinton include detailed reports on events on the deteriorating security climate in Libya.
Blumenthal’s account was hacked in 2013 by Romanian hacker Marcel-Lehel Lazar, who went by the name Guccifer.
August 23, 2012
One memo was sent on August 23, 2012, less than 3 weeks before Morsi's terrorists stormed Benghazi. It portrays a deteriorating security climate. After the Benghazi attack Clinton claimed that U.S. intelligence officials didn’t have advance knowledge of the threat.
On September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, Blumenthal sent a memo that the assault was inspired by an anti-Muslim video.
Long detailed article
http://www.propublica.org/article...-clinton-aides-secret-spy-network
Blumenthal comes across as if hellary is his puppet
Valerie Jarrett behind Hellary Clinton Email leak
March 15, 2015 - The puppet master is revealed, a vast left-wing conspiracy.
Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett leaked Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail address to the press.
Jarrett had the State Department launch a series of investigations into Hillary’s conduct, including her expense account, funds, her contact with foreign leaders and her possible collusion with the Clinton Foundation.
6 separate probes into Hillary’s performance have been *going on at the State Department. The e-mail scandal was timed to come out just as Hillary was about to announce that she was running for president — and there’s more to come.
Bill Clinton suspects the White House is the source of the leak and is furious.
http://nypost.com/2015/03/14/obam...f-hillary-clintons-e-mail-scandal
Truthfully, I have reported the globalists DO NOT want Hellary in the whitehouse.
Normally the NYpost cant be trusted, but in this case. I believe Bill C is angry and I believe NWO exposed Hellarymails. They know both Clintons are too 'dirty.'
Valerie Jarrett, who is she?
http://cj.myfreeforum.org/ftopic3662-9.php
llary destroyed server evidence
March 28, 2015 - Hillary Clinton wiped clean the private server housing emails from her tenure as secretary of state. Clinton permanently deleted all emails from her server after October 28, 2014 when the Department of State asked the Secretary to return her public record to the Department, said Trey Gowdy, chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi. HELLary Clinton was under a subpoena order from the panel for all documents related to the 2012 attacks on the American compound there.
http://www.politico.com/story/201...iped-her-server-clean-116472.html
Bengazi select committee
http://cj.myfreeforum.org/about3721.html
Bill, Hillary Clinton
http://cj.myfreeforum.org/ftopic536-54.php
We KNOW those Emails are highly indicting because the House committee investigating the 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi is seeking them. The witch destroyed evidence.
http://i674.photobucket.com/albums/v...ps721225f2.gif
Benghazi probe to last into 2016
April 23, 2015 - The chairman of the House select committee probing Hellary Clinton signaled that the release of a final report could slip months before the 2016 presidential election if the Obama administration delays producing documents and witnesses. Clinton-Obama refuse to hand over demanded reports. THEY are causing the delays.
Benghazi panel Chairman Trey Gowdy denied the delay of the report was politically motivated.
Gowdy said "If the report is not critical of (Hellary), then she would probably want it to come out closer to the election." Gowdy hopes to be done before the end of this year.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2...slip-into-2016/?intcmp=latestnews
Judicial Watch has received FOI documents on hellary clinton
April 23, 2015
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases
http://www.judicialwatch.org/pres...ns-activities-with-saudi-entities
State Department Documents Reveal Concern about Bill Clinton’s Activities with ‘Saudi Entities.’
Routine Government Employee Information on Hillary Clinton Shielded from the Public.
Washington, DC
Judicial Watch has received 126 pages of documents from the State Dept related to Hillary Clinton’s possible conflicts of interest regarding her position as Secretary of State. The initial Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request was placed on May 2, 2011. These documents are being released as a result of a federal court order in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the State Department on May 28, 2013
The State Department turned over 1,000 records to the Clinton Foundation, beginning in January 2014, for review prior to public release.
- 200 conflict-of-interest rulings that led to $48 million for the Clinton Foundation from entities linked to Saudi Arabia, China and Iran, among others.
- Bill Clinton worked with a Saudi group that paid Clinton $300,000.
- fully redacted June 2011 exchange between Cheryl Mills and Doug Band.
The State Department turned over 128 records to the Clinton Foundation for review under Exemption 4 of FOIA which allows the withholding of information about third parties that could cause them competitive harm. Judicial Watch understands that over 1,000 records have been turned over to the Clinton Foundation under this unusual review process, resulting in more delay.
Dozens of State Department attorneys’ emails are heavily redacted and neglect to include the records Judicial Watch specifically sought in its FOIA request, such as Mrs. Clinton “SF 50s,” the standard form the government uses any time an employee changes jobs, or has an increase in step, grade or pay. Also noticeably scarce are the requested ethics waivers issued to Mrs. Clinton, and the communications relating to Mr. Clinton’s speech schedule and his personal or charitable financial relationships with foreign leaders and governments.
Hillary summoned to May 18 public hearing
April 23, 2015 - A House investigatory panel has summoned Hillary Clinton to testify at a May 18 public hearing about her use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.
The panel is probing the September 2012 terrorist attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. They scheduled a second public hearing one month later, on June 18, to grill Clinton about Benghazi.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com...18-public-hearing/article/2563528
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/T...lary-Clinton/2015/04/23/id/640406
BENGHAZI Libya Coverup, Select Committee
http://cj.myfreeforum.org/ftopic3721-54.php
Obama and Hillary PLANNED Bengazi attack with Morsi. The terrorists who attacked were Morsi's men. That is GOING to come out! Egypt has the PROOF Gowdy needs - which he may already have.
FOX Report Today: Documents Reveal Benghazi Libya Weapons (Provided by U.S. and NATO) Shipped To Syria…
Posted on May 18, 2015 by sundance
Today Fox News is reporting confirmation that weapons from Benghazi were shipped to Syria. This affirms one of the essential elements outlined in our Benghazi Brief.
https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...pg?w=900&h=279
The “Benghazi Brief” remains the most controversial research report we have ever produced. The brief contains over two years of research and hundreds of very specific citations supporting it.
The Brief has also been challenged and with extensive vetting factually withstood all scrutiny. The report, while exhaustive in detail, remains the strongest summary of events surrounding the two years leading up to the Benghazi Libya attack on 9/11/12.
We have repeatedly stated The Benghazi Brief, and ALL of the cited information contained therein, is available for use by anyone who has a goal of communicating the truth surrounding the controversial events. Continue reading →
Judicial Watch: Defense, State Department Documents Reveal Obama Administration Knew that al Qaeda Terrorists Had Planned Benghazi Attack 10 Days in Advance
MAY 18, 2015
Administration knew three months before the November 2012 presidential election of ISIS plans to establish a caliphate in IraqAdministration knew of arms being shipped from Benghazi to Syria(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified “Secret” documents from the Department of Defense (DOD)and the Department of State revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked “Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman” (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance. Rahman is known as the Blind Sheikh, and is serving life in prison for his involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist acts. The new documents also provide the first official confirmation that shows the U.S. government was aware of arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria. The documents also include an August 2012 analysis warning of the rise of ISIS and the predicted failure of the Obama policy of regime change in Syria.
The documents were released in response to a court order in accordance with a May 15, 2014, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against both the DOD and State Department seeking communications between the two agencies and congressional leaders “on matters related to the activities of any agency or department of the U.S. government at the Special Mission Compound and/or classified annex in Benghazi.”
Spelling and punctuation is duplicated in this release without corrections.
A Defense Department document from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group “to kill as many Americans as possible.” The document was sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council. The heavily redacted Defense Department “information report” says that the attack on the Benghazi facility “was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR).” The group subscribes to “AQ ideologies:”
The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012. The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for U.S. killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 atacks on the World Trade Center buildings.
“A violent radical,” the DIA report says, is “the leader of BCOAR is Abdul Baset ((AZUZ)), AZUZ was sent by ((ZAWARI)) to set up Al Qaeda (AQ) bases in Libya.” The group’s headquarters was set up with the approval of a “member of the Muslim brother hood movement…where they have large caches of weapons. Some of these caches are disguised by feeding troughs for livestock. They have SA-7 and SA-23/4 MANPADS…they train almost every day focusing on religious lessons and scriptures including three lessons a day of jihadist ideology.”
The Defense Department reported the group maintained written documents, in “a small rectangular room, approximately 12 meters by 6 meters…that contain information on all of the AQ activity in Libya.”
(Azuz is again blamed for the Benghazi attack in an October 2012 DIA document.)
The DOD documents also contain the first official documentation that the Obama administration knew that weapons were being shipped from the Port of Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. An October 2012 report confirms:
Weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the Port of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The weapons shipped during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s, and 125 mm and 155mm howitzers missiles.The DIA document further details:
During the immediate aftermath of, and following the uncertainty caused by, the downfall of the ((Qaddafi)) regime in October 2011 and up until early September of 2012, weapons from the former Libya military stockpiles located in Benghazi, Libya were shipped from the port of Benghazi, Libya to the ports of Banias and the Port of Borj Islam, Syria. The Syrian ports were chosen due to the small amount of cargo traffic transiting these two ports. The ships used to transport the weapons were medium-sized and able to hold 10 or less shipping containers of cargo.
The weapons shipped from Syria during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s and 125mm and 155mm howitzers missiles. The numbers for each weapon were estimated to be: 500 Sniper rifles, 100 RPG launchers with 300 total rounds, and approximately 400 howitzers missiles [200 ea – 125mm and 200ea – 155 mm.]The heavily redacted document does not disclose who was shipping the weapons.
Another DIA report, written in August 2012 (the same time period the U.S. was monitoring weapons flows from Libya to Syria), said that the opposition in Syria was driven by al Qaeda and other extremist Muslim groups: “the Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria.” The growing sectarian direction of the war was predicted to have dire consequences for Iraq, which included the “grave danger” of the rise of ISIS:
The deterioration of the situation has dire consequences on the Iraqi situation and are as follows:
This creates the ideal atmosphere for AQI [al Qaeda Iraq] to return to its old pockets in Mosul and Ramadi, and will provide a renewed momentum under the presumption of unifying the jihad among Sunni Iraq and Syria, and the rest of the Sunnis in the Arab world against what it considers one enemy, the dissenters. ISI could also declare an Islamic state through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create grave danger in regards to unifying Iraq and the protection of its territory.
Some of the “dire consequences” are blacked out but the DIA presciently warned one such consequence would be the “renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.”
From a separate lawsuit, the State Department produced a document created the morning after the Benghazi attack by Hillary Clinton’s offices, and the Operations Center in the Office of the Executive Secretariat that was sent widely through the agency, including to Joseph McManus (then-Hillary Clinton’s executive assistant). At 6:00 am, a few hours after the attack, the top office of the State Department sent a “spot report” on the “Attack on U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi” that makes no mention of videos or demonstrations:The State Department has yet to turn over any documents from the secret email accounts of Hillary Clinton and other top State Department officials.
Four COM personnel were killed and three were wounded in an attack by dozens of fighters on the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi beginning approximately 1550 Eastern Time….
“These documents are jaw-dropping. No wonder we had to file more FOIA lawsuits and wait over two years for them. If the American people had known the truth – that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other top administration officials knew that the Benghazi attack was an al-Qaeda terrorist attack from the get-go – and yet lied and covered this fact up – Mitt Romney might very well be president. And why would the Obama administration continue to support the Muslim Brotherhood even after it knew it was tied to the Benghazi terrorist attack and to al Qaeda?
These documents also point to connection between the collapse in Libya and the ISIS war – and confirm that the U.S. knew remarkable details about the transfer of arms from Benghazi to Syrian jihadists,” stated Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president. “These documents show that the Benghazi cover-up has continued for years and is only unraveling through our independent lawsuits. The Benghazi scandal just got a whole lot worse for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.”
“13 Hours” the Movie: Obama White House and CIA Ought to Be F*cking Ashamed “13 Hours” the Movie: Obama White House and CIA Ought to Be F*cking Ashamed
Author: Jim Hoft – The Gateway Pundit
** Note: readers of this site know that we frown on using profanity. But we would be doing a disservice to the heroes and victims of Benghazi if we were to blanket over our emotional response to this incredible movie.
“13 Hours” the Movie: Obama White House and CIA Ought to Be F*cking Ashamed
“13 Hours” the movie opened in theaters nationwide this weekend.
http://megynkelly.org/wp-content/upl...ie-575x323.png
“13 Hours” the Movie: Obama White House and CIA Ought to Be F*cking Ashamed
“13 hours” is shocking and heartbreaking. “13 Hours” is infuriating and captivating. “13 Hours” is a true story – we finally get to see the truth.“13 Hours” the Movie: Obama White House and CIA Ought to Be F*cking Ashamed
The clear takeaway from the movie that cannot be refuted is that no one came.
The Obama administration abandoned Ambassador Stevens and all of the Americans on the ground in Benghazi.
http://megynkelly.org/wp-content/upl...is-stevens.png
Islamic fighters showing off the ambassador’s dead body in the Benghazi morgue after his death on 9-11-2012.
You also learn from “13 Hours” that the CIA officer in charge, “Bob,” gave the Benghazi security forces a stand down order.
“Bob”, who is now retired, would not be interviewed for the book “13 Hours” or the film, but this weekend he anonymously spoke to the far left Washington Post to defend himself and his actions in Benghazi. And, he lied. He said (anonymously) he never gave the stand down order. Yet, it is clear by the authors and several men who were on the ground that the stand down order was given while Americans were dying in a massive terrorist attack less than one mile away.
What is also very disturbing from the movie is the way the CIA treated the security personnel on the ground in Benghazi. In this day and age, it is hard to imagine such pompous, elitist, abrasive and abusive men and women in such high level positions of power at the Central Intelligence Agency. The male and female agents in Benghazi, as depicted in the movie, could not have been more offensive and ignorant to the men who reported to them. They were mean, condescending and arrogant assholes. If this behavior is even remotely accurate the CIA ought to be ashamed and apologetic. And classes and training on basic communication skills should be made a priority at Langley.
We also discover from “13 Hours” that the Obama administration created a huge lie to cover up their failures. There was no YouTube video and there was no protest.
That was all just a big lie to put Obama back in the White House. Benghazi attack was a carefully planned and organized terrorist attack on the US.
Today we know that Al-Qaeda is on the run – all over the Middle East. We know that Hillary Clinton is still lying about Benghazi. And, we know that no one was ever held accountable for the failures. We still have no idea what Obama was doing as the men sat on a rooftop in Benghazi for 13 Hours.
13 Hours is much more than a statement on failed leadership. It is a statement on dysfunctional government. It is a statement on abusive assholes in the CIA.
But 13 Hours is also statement of heroics and skill and professionalism. Thank God for the heroes of Benghazi. It would have been much worse without their courage, talent and prowess.
http://megynkelly.org/wp-content/upl...3548998372.jpg
Pray for the heroes of Benghazi and for the brave men and women who protect this great nation. Pray that American leaders learn to value our heroes again.
And, pray that truth and justice will be served.
Never forget the heroes of Benghazi.
The post “13 Hours” the Movie: Obama White House and CIA Ought to Be F*cking Ashamed appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
“13 Hours” the Movie: Obama White House and CIA Ought to Be F*cking Ashamed
Related Stories
- Juan Williams: ‘Civility’s breakdown’ isn’t Obama’s fault — it’s that darn GOP!
- Watch the Donald Praising Hillary Clinton, Affirming His New York Values on Partial Birth Abortion
- BLACKS SHOULD SEGREGATE THEMSELVES FROM WHITE AMERICA because…
1
2
Just watched it earlier myself and posted up a quick review in the Entertainment forum.
This really was another Black Hawk Down with the way those people were abandoned. 20 fucking years and we haven't learned a damn thing.
On top of it, it was in a way worse with the weapons trafficking and lack of planning.
Interesting how a Clinton was behind the scenes in both of them.
http://strackattack.com/random_files...down%20m14.jpg
'Black Hawk Down' doesn't tell whole story
Movie about Somalia military disaster leaves out Clinton episodes
A new film about the ambush of U.S. special operations soldiers during a mission in Somalia nearly a decade ago leaves out important “behind-the-scenes” details that few Americans have ever heard, according to an author and military researcher familiar with the battle.
Tom McKenny, co-author of “The Clinton Chronicles” – a book and video exposing alleged Clinton-era scandals – said the film, “Black Hawk Down: Leave No Man Behind,” doesn’t quite do justice to the 100 U.S. Army Rangers and Delta Force troops ambushed in Mogadishu, Somalia, on Oct. 3, 1993, by forces loyal to wanted warlord Mohammed Farrah Aidid.
“The American public has never been told some of these things,” except as relayed by McKenny several years ago in “Chronicles,” he said.
Relying on first-hand accounts and interviews with the family members of soldiers involved in the so-called “Battle of Mogadishu,” McKenny said the movie – which is No.
1 at the box office this week – does a good job of depicting the bravery and mettle of American troops under fire. Eighteen troopers were killed during the 18-hour battle, and 73 were wounded. An estimated 500 enemy were killed, according to reports.
But it just doesn’t tell the complete story, he says.
Little-known details
On Oct. 3, a force of about 100 Rangers and Delta Force troopers rappelled from more than a dozen Black Hawk helicopters into a building complex in Mogadishu, after several Cobra helicopter gunships sent missiles into many buildings thought to contain Aidid and his Habr Gidr clan leaders.
The Army’s mission was to capture two of Aidid’s top lieutenants; they and others, including Aidid, were being held responsible by Washington and the U.N. for a June 5 ambush that had left 24 Pakistani peacekeepers dead.
Early into the mission, however, the American force was ambushed by hundreds of Aidid’s men. Two of the helicopters were shot down, and the entire company of U.S. troops was immediately surrounded and pinned down.
According to Philadelphia Inquirer reporter Mark Bowden – who penned a book with the same title as the movie and on which the film is based – the American force immediately began taking hostile fire when they landed.
“Fire was getting heavier. To officers [at] the command center, it was as if their men had poked a stick into a hornet’s nest,” Bowden wrote.
McKenny said one incident that wasn’t in the movie had to do with the rescue mission commanders put together to extract U.S. troops.
“After the troops began to take terrible casualties and [a pre-staged] reaction force could not get to them, it was necessary to force, at gunpoint in some cases, the Malaysian and Pakistani commanders to move their tanks in and rescue the American troops,” he told WorldNetDaily.
McKenny said History Channel depictions of Bowden’s book “shows tanks finally – after some of the soldiers had died unnecessarily – shows the armor moving in to take care of the situation, but it was many, many hours too late.”
Shortly after the battle, the Clinton administration and, specifically, the late Les Aspin, Clinton’s first defense secretary, were criticized heavily by military experts because the American force had been sent in to a known Aidid stronghold without proper air and armor support.
Indeed, commanders for the mission had requested Bradley armored personnel carriers for their men, but Aspin and the Pentagon refused the request.
“Every Ranger who was there (at the battle) knew that it was absurd not to have tanks or armored personnel carriers and other air support denied them for political reasons,” McKenny said.
The author also noted that James Smith, a former Ranger captain and father of Cpl. Jamie Smith – who bled to death after he was shot in the leg during the battle, because he could not be evacuated – returned a letter of condolence from President Clinton. In rejecting it, he sent a letter of his own, blaming Clinton for the Mogadishu debacle.
Also not in the movie was an after-action incident between Clinton and the parents of two Delta Force soldiers – MSgt. Gary Gordon, 33, and SFC Randy Shughart, 35 – who were killed in action but posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for their actions.
McKenny said that family members were invited to the White House to receive the medals. Clinton reportedly invited the parents of Gordon and Shughart into the Oval Office for a private meeting.
When he did, “he stuck his hand out to shake the hands of the parents, but Randy Shughart’s father refused to take Clinton’s hand.”
Then, McKenny said, “he looked Clinton in the face, told him he was responsible for his son’s death, that it was for no purpose and that he wasn’t fit to be president or commander in chief.”
Smith, who had his left leg amputated after being wounded in Vietnam in the mid-60s, later said Clinton also didn’t take responsibility for the decisions that left the Rangers without heavy armored support.
In a another incident, the author said that weeks later family members of many of the dead were called to Washington, D.C., to testify at congressional hearings into the debacle.
“When Clinton heard they were in town, he called them into his office for a meeting and told them that part of the reason they were dead was their own fault,” McKenny said. “He said they may have been responsible for their own deaths because they were ‘too aggressive’ in Mogadishu.”
One other incident that didn’t make the movie – or the American press, McKenny said – happened after the wounded soldiers were brought back to Walter Reed Army Hospital outside Washington.
“Clinton was advised to go see them, but he didn’t want to,” McKenny said. “Somewhat reluctantly, he finally did go. When he got there, he offered to have his picture taken with each one of them. At least four turned him down, saying they wouldn’t dishonor their dead friends or their uniform by having their pictures taken with him.”
Hellfire Missiles Bound For Portland Oregon Intercepted in Europe…
Posted on March 13, 2016 by sundance
ADVERTISEMENT
♦ Corrupt progressive union officials control the ports and transit hubs of Oregon. ♦ This is the same type of missile recently admitted as being “accidentally” shipped to Cuba. ♦ In a little discussed 2014 article, the Obama administration announced they were sending 5,000 of these missiles to Iraq. ♦ Is it possible these sketchy transfers are lining up to be a similar problem evidenced in Operation Zero Footprint?
https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...iles.jpg?w=640BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) – Serbia’s authorities are investigating reports that a cargo package bound for the U.S. containing two missiles with explosive warheads was found on a passenger flight from Lebanon to Serbia.
N1 television said the package with two guided armor-piercing missiles was discovered Saturday by a sniffer dog after an Air Serbia flight from Beirut landed at Belgrade airport.
Serbian media say documents listed the final destination for the AGM-114 Hellfire missiles as Portland, Oregon. The American-made projectiles can be fired from air, sea or ground platforms.
Local media said the missiles, which are about 1.5 meters in length, were packed and labeled as model rockets.
N1 reported Sunday that Air Serbia is helping in the investigation. The Serbian flag carrier says “security and safety are the main priorities for Air Serbia.” (link)
https://theconservativetreehouse.fil...pg?w=580&h=435FLASHBACK 2014 – Washington (AFP) – The United States plans to sell 5,000 Hellfire missiles to Iraq in a $700 million deal, officials said Tuesday, as Washington tries to help Baghdad retake ground captured by Sunni militants.
The US government, which has been reluctant so far to take military action in support of Baghdad, has rushed hundreds of the missiles to Iraq to help the Shiite-led government counter jihadists, who have seized areas north and west of the capital.
The proposed sale is the largest yet of the lethal missiles, which the Iraqis fire from AC-208 Cessna Caravan planes and other aircraft.
The deal calls for 5,000 AGM-114K/N/R Hellfire missiles and related equipment, parts, training and logistical support worth a total of $700 million, the Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a statement Tuesday.
“Iraq will use the Hellfire missiles to help improve the Iraq Security Forces’ capability to support current on-going ground operations,” the agency said.
The State Department has approved the deal and US law requires the government to inform members of Congress of a possible weapons sale. Lawmakers are not expected to try to block the sale. (link)http://www.weaselzippers.us/wp-conte...ey-550x458.jpg
Golly by Gosh, must have been a white, right wing, religious nut case with guns afraid of the government, clinging too hard to his bible that got those things lifted out of Lebanon....
DOJ Drops Bombshell against Hillary Clinton’s Email Investigation: “It’s a Law Enforcement Matter”
Tim Brown — May 3, 2016
Hillary Clinton has laughed off the probe into her illegal email server which has compromised hundreds of classified documents. She has mocked the FBI at every turn and said there would be no way she would be put in handcuffs. To top it off, she's even claimed that the FBI's investigation is nothing more than a "security review." However, the Department of Justice has shot that down and claimed that the investigation into Clinton's crimes are "a law enforcement matter."
Appearing on Fox and Friends, Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the DOJ has turned down Freedom of Information Act requests. Instead of them acknowledging that the investigation was a "security review," as Clinton has told Americans, they reasoned that they could not comply with the FOIA requests because the investigation was "a law enforcement matter."
Napolitano added, "We now know that it's not a 'security review.'"
The judge explained that the DOJ would have no problem in complying with FOIA requests if this was simply a security review. He then dropped a bombshell.
"This is the first time the Justice Department has acknowledged this is a federal law enforcement matter," he said. "But I doubt Mrs. Clinton will start saying that."
Of course, Bill Clinton took up for his wife in a similar manner to what she did concerning his adultery with Monica Lewinsky when she said there was "a vast right wing conspiracy" after her husband. Bill said that this investigation is nothing more than a "game" that has been played on his wife by her political opponents.
Still, Napolitano believes this is a very serious matter and said that "dozens and dozens" of FBI agents are investigating not only Clinton's illegal email server, but also the Clinton Foundation, which has become nothing more than a slush fund for the Clintons to do whatever they want and even engage in criminal activity.
In May 2015, Rep. Michele Bachmann said that the Clinton Foundation was nothing more than "an international money laundering ring," and later it was reported that the Clinton Foundation may be at the center of Russians obtaining the uranium from the land in western united States.
Napolitano commented back in November that he did not believe that Clinton's name would appear on any ballot in the general election in 2016 because of the legal matters that are building.
"It is difficult to believe that the federal prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Clinton will not recommend that she be indicted," said Napolitano. "Inexplicably, she seems to have forgotten that they were monitoring what she said under oath to the Benghazi committee. By lying under oath, and by misleading Congress, she gave that team additional areas to investigate and on which to recommend indictments."
The question is, when is someone going to bring some charges against Hillary Clinton?
http://freedomoutpost.com/doj-drops-...cement-matter/
The Benghazi Lie in Black and White
The administration's public and private timelines of what happened are very different.
5:00 AM, Jun 28, 2016 | By Stephen F. Hayes
https://thespeechatimeforchoosing.fi...thenandnow.jpg
The final majority report of the Benghazi Select Committee is set to be released later Tuesday morning. Representatives Jim Jordan and Mike Pompeo have signed onto the official majority document and authored a supplemental, 51-page "additional views" report of their own.
Among the most interesting aspects of their "additional views" is a timeline that contrasts the story top Obama administration officials were telling in public with the very different story some of those same officials were sharing with one another in private emails, conversations and documents. The timeline reinforces in a compelling way what will be one of the most significant takeaways from the committee investigation: The Obama administration knowingly provided the American people a false story about the Benghazi attack, its causes and its consequences.
Read the excerpt below:
Public vs. Private Timeline
9/11—Public Statements
Secretary Clinton's 10:08 p.m. Statement on the Attack in Benghazi:
"I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. * * * Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet."
9/11—Private Statements
Secretary Clinton's Call Sheet for call with President of Libya Mohammed al Magariaf at 6:49 p.m.:
Under heading "Purpose of Call" notes that "Secretary should urge Mr. Magariaf to respond urgently to the attack against the U.S. Mission Benghazi, and security threats against U.S. Embassy Tripoli." No mention of a protest or video.
Summary of Call between Secretary Clinton and President Magariaf:
"[O]ur diplomatic mission was attacked[.] . . . [T]here is a gun battle ongoing, which I understand Ansar as-Sharia [sic] is claiming responsibility for." No mention of protest or video.
Secretary Clinton's E-mail to daughter at 11:23 p.m.:
"Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an Al Quedalike [sic] group[.]"
9/12—Public Statements
Secretary Clinton's Remarks on the Deaths of American Personnel in Benghazi, Libya morning of September 12, 2012:
"We are working to determine the precise motivations and methods of those who carried out this assault. Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior, along with the protest that took place at our Embassy in Cairo yesterday, as a response to inflammatory material posted on the internet."
9/12—Private Statements
Summary of Discussion between Acting Assistant Secretary Beth Jones and Libyan Ambassador Aujali at 9:45 a.m.:
"I told him that the group that conducted the attacks—Ansar Al Sharia—is affiliated with Islamic extremists."
Jacob Sullivan in e-mail to embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan:
"There was not really violence in Egypt [and] "we are not saying that the violence in Libya erupted 'over inflammatory videos.'"
Secretary Clinton's Statements to Egyptian Prime Minister Kandil at 3:04 p.m.:
"We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack – not a protest. . . . Based on the information we saw today we believe the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al Qaeda."
Under Secretary Patrick Kennedy to congressional staff briefing:
When asked whether "this [was] an attack under the cover of a protest" Kennedy said, "No the attack was a direct breaching attack." More to the point, he was then asked whether "we believe [this was] coordinated with [the] Cairo [protests] to which Kennedy responded, "Attack in Cairo was a demonstration. There were no weapons shown or used. A few cans of spray paint."
9/13—Public Statements
Secretary Clinton's Morocco Remarks:
"I also want to take a moment to address the video circulating on the Internet that has led to these protests in a number of countries. * * *
To us, to me personally, this video is disgusting and reprehensible. It appears to have a deeply cynical purpose: to denigrate a great religion and to provoke rage. But as I said yesterday, there is no justification, none at all, for responding to this video with violence. * * *
Violence, we believe, has no place in religion and is no way to honor religion. Islam, like other religions, respects the fundamental dignity of human beings, and it is a violation of that fundamental dignity to wage attacks on innocents. As long as there are those who are willing to shed blood and take innocent life in the name of God, the world will never know a true and lasting peace.
It is especially wrong for violence to be directed against diplomatic missions. . . .
***
I wanted to begin with this statement, because, as our Moroccan friends and all of you know, this has been a difficult week at the State Department. I very much appreciate, Minister, the condolences your government expressed to our Embassy in Rabat. And even though that tragedy happened far away in Benghazi, we found a reminder of the deep bounds that connect Morocco to the United States."
9/13—Private Statements
Summary of call between State Department Deputy Secretary Thomas Nides and Egyptian ambassador to U.S.:
"Nides said he understood the difference between the targeted attack in Libya and the way the protest escalated in Egypt."
9/14—Public Statements
White House Spokesman Jay Carney during press conference answering question about Benghazi:
"We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack. The unrest we've seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive. And while the violence is reprehensible and unjustified, it is not a reaction to the 9/11 anniversary that we know of, or to U.S. policy."
E-mail from White House Advisor Benjamin Rhodes:
Under heading "Goals" he wrote "To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy[.]"
Return of remains ceremony statement to father of Tyrone Woods recorded in diary:
"I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand, and she said we are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son."
Return of remains ceremony statement to mother of Sean Smith:
"We were nose-to-nose at the coffin ceremony. She told me it was the fault of the video. I said 'are you sure?' She says 'yes, that's what it was . . . it was the video.'" 9/14—Private Statements
E-mail from State Department press officer in embassy in Tripoli, Libya: "Colleagues, I mentioned to Andy this morning, and want to share with all of you, our view at Embassy Tripoli that we must be cautious in our local messaging with regard to the inflammatory film trailer, adapting it to Libyan conditions. . . . Relatively few [Facebook comments and tweets] have even mentioned the inflammatory video. So if we post messaging about the video specifically, we may draw unwanted attention to it. And it is becoming increasingly clear that the series of events in Benghazi was much more terrorist attack than a protest which escalated into violence. It is our opinion that in our messaging, we want to distinguish, not conflate, the events in other countries with this well-planned attack by militant extremists. I have discussed this with Charge Hicks and he shares PAS's view."
9/15—Public Statements
President's Weekly Address titled "Carrying on the Work of Our Fallen Heroes" muddles Benghazi and protests in other countries:
"This tragic attack takes place at a time of turmoil and protest in many different countries. I have made it clear that the United States has a profound respect for people of all faiths. We stand for religious freedom. And we reject the denigration of any religion – including Islam."
9/15—Private Statements
Secretary Clinton's call with Prime Minister-Elect of Libya:
Makes no mention of either a protest or the video.
9/16—Public Statements
Ambassador Rice on Fox News With Chris Wallace:
"But we don't see at this point signs this was a coordinated plan, premeditated attack."
9/16—Private Statements
Excerpt from Embassy Tripoli Media Report September 16, 2012: "[T]here is evidence that suggests that the second confrontation at the UM mission's safe house could not have happened without insider knowledge or some degree of organization. This goes against statements that the attacks were not carried out by a single group but by an angry multitude protesting[.]"
9/17—Public Statements
Excerpt from State Department Daily Press Briefing:
"Ambassador Rice, in her comments on every network over the weekend, was very clear, very precise, about what our initial assessment of what happened is. . . . I don't have anything to give you beyond that."
9/17—Private Statements
Excerpt from e-mail discussion between members of NEA press office about what to say about attack:
NEA Press Officer Suggested the following language:
"The currently available information suggests the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests of the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault[.]"
Senior Libya Desk Officer, Near Eastern Affairs Bureau responding to suggested language:
"I really hope this was revised. I don't think we should go on the record on this."
9/18—Public Statements
Excerpt from White House Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney:
. . . I would point you to what Ambassador Rice said and others have said about what we know thus far about the video and its influence on the protests that occurred in Cairo, in Benghazi and elsewhere."
9/18—Private Statements
Deputy Director of CIA Michael Morell in written statement to House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence:
"The critically important point is that the analysts considered this a terrorist attack from the very beginning."
E-mail exchange between State Department security officers commenting on news article titled "White House sees no sign Libya attack premeditated":
DS Agent #30: "Can you believe this?"
DS Agent: "Was there any rioting in Benghazi reported prior to the attack?"
DS Agent #30: "Zip, nothing nada"
9/19—Public Statements
From "ALDAC"—a worldwide cable—from Secretary Clinton to all U.S. Embassies drafted by Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivan:
"Since September 11, 2012, there have been widespread protests and violence against U.S. and some other diplomatic posts across the Muslim world. The proximate cause of the violence was the release by individuals in the United States of the video trailer for a film that many Muslims find offensive. Diplomatic compounds have been breached in several countries including Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, and Yemen. In Benghazi, Libya four U.S. personnel were killed in the violence[.]"
The administration, including Secretary Clinton, knew that Benghazi was a terrorist attack—from witness accounts, from their understanding of the history of violence in Benghazi, and from the nature of the well-planned, complex attack. Yet, they led the public to believe the video and a protest were to blame in Benghazi.
9/20—Public Statements
Excerpt from interview of the President on Univision Town Hall:
In response to the question, "We have reports that the White House said today that the attacks in Libya were a terrorist attack. Do you have information indicating that it was Iran, or al Qaeda was behind organizing the protests?" the President answered, "[W]e're still doing an investigation[.] . . .
What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests[.]"
Secretary Clinton has since blamed her statements on changing information received from U.S. intelligence reports. She and others have claimed that the 10:08 p.m. statement was not meant to ascribe a motive to the attack. Yet, Sullivan knew the morning of September 12th—based on the press release from the embassy in Kabul—that people had heard it exactly that way.
Moreover, whether or not the intelligence information changed, Secretary Clinton's public and private statements remained unchanged—publicly tying Benghazi and Cairo together and privately recognizing the violence in Benghazi was a terrorist attack with nothing to do with a protest or video.
Moreover, to the extent any intelligence analysis incorrectly reported on a protest or a video in connection with Benghazi, Secretary Clinton and other State officials, who knew better, simply ignored them. As just one example, in her conversation September 15, 2012 with the president of Libya, Secretary Clinton made no mention of anything in the CIA talking points that administration officials later claimed were the best assessment available at the time, and those talking points made no mention of a video in connection with Benghazi. In short, Secretary Clinton and the administration knew better than to rely on flawed intelligence reports. Intelligence assessments may have changed.
News reports may have changed. But the eye witness accounts remained same—and not one said a protest had occurred. Yet, once Secretary Clinton and Ben Rhodes set the message, the truth became an afterthought.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/the-be...rticle/2003058
Hillary Clinton & GOOGLE Created Covert Server to Cloak Benghazi-era Emails from Lawmakers, FBI: Part 1
Posted on by admin
http://truepundit.com/wp-content/upl...s-1500x575.jpg
This story is Part 1. Part 2 will be published Thursday.
Following the Benghazi consulate attack in 2012, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton secretly worked with Google to reroute email traffic away from her private computer server and use public Google mail servers instead. That clandestine move, by Clinton and Google, served to cloak her inner circle’s communications from lawmakers, public scrutiny and criminal investigators, according to intelligence sources.
These bombshell revelations shatter Clinton’s repeated claims and testimony that she solely used her private server in her Chappaqua NY home to conduct government business at State. But it also, for the first time, reveals that previously undisclosed computer servers were employed by Clinton and her aides for conducting official government business. Lawmakers have been on a dogged and often frustrated quest to secure all of Clinton’s emails during her tenure as Secretary of State. She has maintained in interviews and testimony that all emails were warehoused on a single home home brew server during her four years in office.
According to sources, Clinton’s former and privately-paid information technology guru Bryan Pagliano worked with Google programmers to convert Clintonemail.com’s server. Pagliano, now a federal witness for the FBI in Clinton’s criminal investigation, has been granted immunity in exchange for his cooperating with federal agents. Sources confirm Clinton and her aides used Google’s servers for their private email backbone during November and December 2012, a very turbulent period in Clinton’s State Department tenure.
Last week, revelations surfaced proving Google’s internet search algorithms are weighted to favor Clinton, by scrubbing negative results and stories about the Democratic presidential front runner. However, her colluding with Google to shroud government and personal emails is far more troubling and dangerous. Google brass has been accused of intentionally boosting Clinton’s presidential campaign. Helping the Secretary of State divert email, however, likely propels Google into the realm of the FBI’s criminal investigation as a possible accomplice for potentially damaging national security infrastructure.
Clinton has stressed that the use of her private email set up was to foster the convenience of using one mobile device, not squelch transparency and skirt federal record laws. These recent bombshells, however, detail a very different story and for the first time highlight a definitive pattern of possible criminal intent for the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate, sources said. The Federal Records Act mandates that all copies of all old work-related emails be preserved. Rerouting and thereby cloaking email content, few would argue, appears to violate the tenets of that law and likely many others, including the Espionage Act.
Likewise, the use of public servers shared by Google’s 425 million subscribers in 2012 raises additional concerns over the security of the sensitive, classified, TK (Talent Keyhole), and other top secret data sent and exchanged over these networks, especially when dealing with sensitive compartmented information. While a home brew server is not nearly as secure as a government-maintained computer server, both options are more reliable and safer from hackers than a public Google server, especially given the sensitive nature of correspondences sent to and from the country’s top diplomat. For several reasons, Google Mail is a problematic choice to maintain secure email because all email content is scanned, or “indexed” by robots or Google personnel. That data is ultimately stored separately by Google and thereby presents an additional security risk if the servers are ever breached. Google mail is often hacked, especially the private accounts of U.S. government brass. But this plays to the central theme of the entire email saga, as Clinton has been accused of many things except protecting her emails.
So, instead of the normal email traffic flowing through Clinton’s home server — which she maintains was guarded by Secret Service 24 hours a day — incoming and outgoing emails were instead being routed through public servers in Mountain View, California; Lenoir, North Carolina; and Council Bluffs, Iowa, according to records and intelligence sources. These servers were also shared by hundreds of millions of Google subscribers throughout the world.
In Part II tomorrow, we will examine what compelled Clinton’s stealth deal with Google and where all those “re-routed” emails might be today.
Read Part II here: GOOGLE Built Hillary A Secret Server; Clinton Used Gmail for Benghazi-era Emails Before they Vanished
GOOGLE Built Hillary A Secret Server; Clinton Used Gmail for Benghazi-era Emails Before they Vanished: Part 2
Posted on by admin
http://truepundit.com/wp-content/upl...9-1100x575.jpg
This is Part II of the True Pundit’s Exclusive Clinton/Google Email story.
If you missed Part 1 you can read it here
Summary/Background of Part 1
Following the Benghazi consulate attack in 2012, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton secretly worked with Google to reroute email traffic away from her private computer server and use public Google mail servers instead. That clandestine move, by Clinton and Google, served to cloak her inner circle’s communications from lawmakers, public scrutiny and criminal investigators, according to intelligence sources.
According to sources, Clinton’s former and privately-paid information technology guru Bryan Pagliano worked with Google programmers to convert Clintonemail.com’s server. Pagliano, now a federal witness for the FBI in Clinton’s criminal investigation, has been granted immunity in exchange for his cooperating with federal agents. Sources confirm Clinton and her aides used Google’s servers for their private email backbone during November and December 2012, a very turbulent period in Clinton’s State Department tenure.
Last week, revelations surfaced proving Google’s internet search algorithms are weighted to favor Clinton, by scrubbing negative results and stories about the Democratic presidential front runner. However, her colluding with Google to shroud government and personal emails is far more troubling and dangerous. Google brass has been accused of intentionally boosting Clinton’s presidential campaign. Helping the Secretary of State divert email, however, likely propels Google into the realm of the FBI’s criminal investigation as a possible accomplice for potentially damaging national security infrastructure.
Now Part II of the Exclusive Story
It’s like a bad spy movie involving a third-world government. Or perhaps a slap stick comedy. The Secretary of State reading, sending, receiving sensitive emails with national security secrets, threats and classified or top secret intelligence over Google’s public Gmail. We expect this from chatting soccer moms but not from the top diplomat of the United States.
But it gets even worse.
Intelligence sources confirm Clinton and her aides also accessed emails through a customized Gmail-like interface publicly hosted by the tech giant and set up specifically for the Secretary of State and her aides by Google programmers. True Pundit has learned Clinton also accessed her emails via the Gmail app on her mobile devices.
Equally alarming to Clinton and Google colluding to divert emails, True Pundit has found that there are an untold number of emails Clinton has yet to turn over to regulators, despite swearing under oath in federal court that she is not withholding any additional emails. But intelligence sources cooperating with True Pundit say this is simply not true.
The bulk of Clinton’s emails which were diverted using Google have never been provided to anyone: not the State Department; not Congress; not the U.S. House Select Committee on Benghazi. Therefore, their content likewise remains secret.
Switch Followed Turmoil
Amid questions and pressure from lawmakers following the attack on Benghazi, Clinton faced a barrage of harsh questions and criticisms. In early November 2012, U.S senators urged the immediate creation of a temporary Select Committee to investigate the Benghazi attack. This followed a letter sent by over 50 members of the House of Representatives to President Obama and Clinton requesting responses to oversight questions, how the State Department protected the Benghazi compound, contradictions in the administration’s public statements of the attack as a deliberate terrorist attack or a spontaneous protest (prompted by a YouTube video), and numerous other wild discrepancies.
During the same time frame, members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs notified Clinton she would likely be called to testify at a public hearing on Benghazi within weeks. Following Clinton’s return from Albania in early November, according to sources, Clinton’s home server and her Clintonemail.com website were reconfigured to route all email using Google’s mail servers as its networking backbone.
So, instead of the normal email traffic flowing through Clinton’s home server — which she maintains was guarded by Secret Service 24 hours a day — incoming and outgoing emails were instead being routed through public servers in Mountain View, California; Lenoir, North Carolina; and Council Bluffs, Iowa, according to records and intelligence sources. These servers were also shared by hundreds of millions of Google subscribers throughout the world.
Critical Gap in Emails
U.S. Rep.Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the special House committee investigating the Benghazi attacks, has complained about mysterious gaps in Clinton’s emails. For instance, Gowdy notes there are scant emails found relating to Benghazi and Libya. “There are gaps of months, and months, and months,” Gowdy has lamented.
Forced by a federal judge’s order, the State Department has been slowly releasing Clinton’s emails to the media and the public. These add to the emails Clinton has turned over herself. Only a handful, however, were included from the time frame in question, while the other emails that were released span the entire tenure at State without similar alarming gaps. The November following Benghazi was perhaps the most intense, turmoil-filled period of Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State. Consider the surrounding events:
* David H. Petraeus resigned his position as CIA Director and admitted to having an extramarital affair.
* The Department of Defense released a detailed timeline of the Pentagon’s response to the attack.
* U.S. intelligence and counter-terrorism officials testified in congressional public and closed hearings about Benghazi.
* Former CIA Director David Petraeus was grilled in closed hearings to both congressional intelligence committees where he testified that he knew that the attack was a terrorist attack linked to al-Qaeda affiliates and not sparked by a protest over an anti-Islam video, as White House officials and President Obama had said for weeks afterwards.
* News outlets hammered Clinton for holding back key reinforcements who were ready to deploy and help Americans under siege at the Benghazi consulate among hundreds of other breaking new developments from the media.
*Clinton and aides during these events left the United States on Nov 12 to travel to Australia, Singapore, Thailand, Burma, Cambodia, Israel, Palestine, and Egypt. President Obama joined Clinton in Thailand and Burma.
Yet the State Department has only a handful of outgoing emails from Clinton during this time frame? Impossible to believe. This beckons two simple questions: Where are these emails? And is the American public supposed to actually believe that no emails exist from the most tumultuous period of Clinton’s public office?
Alleged Injury Prompts Email Switch Back
On Dec. 7, the House Committee on Foreign Affairs announced that Clinton would testify, as early as the following week, at an open hearing on the Benghazi attack.
On Dec. 15, Clinton allegedly faints and suffers a concussion. As a result, her aides announce that they no longer expect her to testify at the hearing on the Benghazi attack until she is medically cleared to do so.
Within days of being excused from testifying, Clintonemail.com’s mail servers were switched from Google Mail back to Clinton’s private server in Chappaqua, NY, according to intelligence sources.
Clinton never used Google for her domain’s email again, intelligence sources said.