Given the remarks you made in another thread confirming your following of "Communism" - which is completely and diametrically opposed to what America even stands for - who is the "We" to which you're referring "getting Congress"?
Printable View
Given the remarks you made in another thread confirming your following of "Communism" - which is completely and diametrically opposed to what America even stands for - who is the "We" to which you're referring "getting Congress"?
America isn't ready for Communism, which is peaceful and voluntary and non-marxist, until she is truly on the path to liberty also. America, for one thing, isn't ready for the real Communism precisely because of the Statist Marxist Abomination misnamed 'Communism'. When man is more free he will naturally and organically tend towards co-operation. And, all this happens gradually without violence and without the State; good people don't need the State and bad people are not changed or reformed by It except for the worse.
You don't need the State, it needs you and should leave you be. Force people to share and co-operate involuntarily like the State does, the more people retreat from each other and view each other as enemies. All the necessary movement against this Statism takes time, so until then we need a framework for freedom which is provided by our Minarchist/Libertarian US Constitution. Evolution, not Revolution. As time goes on, some people will tend to a more Anarcho-Capitalist position, others towards a Anarcho-Communist position, and time will show which experiment in Liberty is better for Mankind's future.
So In answer to your immediate question, I advocate voting for the less Statist Party of the two main ones; the Republican Party. My position absolutely requires Freedom and Law as a prerequisite for any future development of Mankind; the Nanny Statist 'Soft Totalitarianism' of the Democratic Party absolutely rules them out of any political post whatsoever if that future is to have any reality.
The better future for Mankind also means resistance to Islam of the strongest and most uncompromising sort.
I resent that people are trying to "prepare" America for communism.
America HAS Freedom. America HAS been free up until the last decade of RINOS and Liberals in office who have sought to place more and more controls over the human population, energy resources, oceans, streams, fish and the latests-and-greatest "endangered bug".
I reject this argument completely. Marxism and Communism do NOT believe this and under NO circumstances has communism flourished. You DO need the "State" - as far as it was intended to be. Not as it IS. The basic concepts under which this country was formed worked FINE for over 200 years. It has only been recently with the "remaking of America" under Obama that we have lost our freedoms. Bush helped it along as well.Quote:
You don't need the State, it needs you and should leave you be. Force people to share and co-operate involuntarily like the State does, the more people retreat from each other and view each other as enemies. All the necessary movement against this Statism takes time, so until then we need a framework for freedom which is provided by our Minarchist/Libertarian US Constitution. Evolution, not Revolution. As time goes on, some people will tend to a more Anarcho-Capitalist position, others towards a Anarcho-Communist position, and time will show which experiment in Liberty is better for Mankind's future.
But Communism IS NOT and never will be the answer.
There is no "less statist" party unless it is the Tea Party. You get on that train and you'll be welcomed. Keep pushing Communism, when the bullets start flying, you won't stand a change of a snowball in hell.Quote:
So In answer to your immediate question, I advocate voting for the less Statist Party of the two main ones; the Republican Party. My position absolutely requires Freedom and Law as a prerequisite for any future development of Mankind; the Nanny Statist 'Soft Totalitarianism' of the Democratic Party absolutely rules them out of any political post whatsoever if that future is to have any reality.
Resistance to any other form of government is in the cards. Islam is the worst and Communism is right up there with it.Quote:
The better future for Mankind also means resistance to Islam of the strongest and most uncompromising sort.
Obama’s Brother Funds Hamas (Proof Below)
By Shoebat Foundation on January 30, 2014
By Walid Shoebat
A Shoebat Exclusive
So if you think that Malik Obama, president Obama’s brother dons a Hamas scarf for sentimental reasons only, think again. The evidence he materially supports Hamas financially is another reason to begin to consider this man’s terror links.
http://shoebat.com/wp-content/upload...1079475338.jpg
How Malik implicates Barack.
As Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization, Malik helps to lead an organization that collects funds and sends them directly to Hamas; this can be found on several Islamic websites.
The types of funding for Hamas are real and chilling, here is but one example:
“The price of Kalashnikov bullet is $3 and the price of the Kalashnikov gun itself now is $2,000; it was $3,500 a couple of months ago. Did you know that the price of R-P-G is $12,000 and the price of T.N.T. that’s used by your mujahideen brothers is $100 a kilo? Martyr Izz el-Deen el-Qassam Phalanxes now manufactures Al-Qassam land-to-land missiles in different sizes and also the anti-shields Al-Banna bomber, Martyr Izz el-Deen el-Qassam Phalanxes also supervises the development of fighting, defensive and attacking weapons and other much projects mustn’t be elaborated for confidentiality purposes…The call to fund the Hamas Izz el-Deen el-Qassam terrorist group is done on several Islamic forums and even on major Islamist websites.
Your brothers,
Martyr Izz el-Deen el-Qassam Phalanxes
The military wing of Hamas movement- Palestine”
So how does all this link to Malik Obama?
Here’s how:
Malik Obama is the official Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO) of Sudan’s Omar Al-Bashir, an international criminal who is wanted on seven counts for genocide and crimes against humanity. Malik officially is a fundraiser for IDO (Islamic Da’wa Organization).
While IDO is supposed to be for “Da’wa” which strictly means, “to proselytize”, or “spreading the good news of Islam,” it does much more. IDO also has raised funds for Gaza relief. These are unmonitored funds that use a bank known for its links to Al-Qaeda. The funds are then distributed through Hamas to whichever way they like to spend them. For example, one fund to aid Hamas comes from an Account #1782 under IDO and is advertised by the Muslim Brotherhood as “Aiding Our Brothers in Gaza,” which is set up in the Shamal Bank, an Al-Qaeda bank that was founded by Osama bin Laden. Shamal Bank, as explained in a 1996 State Department report on bin Laden’s finances:
“Bin Laden co-founded the Al Shamal bank with a group of wealthy Sudanese and capitalized it with $50 million of his inherited fortune…”The Al Shamal bank was also identified as one of bin Laden’s principal financial entities during the trial earlier this year of four Al Qaeda operatives convicted in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa.
In fact, the banking of Malik’s IDO through Al-Shamal is ironclad and is advertised on their own websites [Here] and [Here].
The funding to Hamas circulates under different monikers and is promoted by several major Islamist websites known for their material and spiritual support for terrorism. For example, the Muslim Brotherhood (Al-Ikhwan) has a Sisterhood branch (Al-Akhawat). We have done extensive research on the Akhawat [here]. In 2010, an APB was sent out for funds to aid Gaza and depending on which Muslim country you are in, several bank accounts are provided via Islamic banks. Malik’s IDO (Islamic Da’wa Organization) is clearly listed:
http://shoebat.com/wp-content/upload...hamal_Bank.jpg
Translation: “Shamal Islamic Bank – presidency
Account 1782 Foreign donations account:
of the Islamic Dawa Organization P.O Box. 199
Khartoum – Sudan”
The sisterhood posts their ads on akhawat.islamway.net which is on islamway.net. The website Islamway.net is no small cookie, it was founded by the leader of the Kuwaiti Muslim Brotherhood Dr. Tareq Mohammed Al-Suwaidan. Al-Suwaidan was listed by U.S. federal prosecutors, along with a group of U.S. Muslim Brotherhood members, as an unindicted co-conspirator in the terrorism financing case against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development in which all defendants were found guilty and convicted on charges that included financing Hamas. Al-Suwaidan was also identified as a member of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood in the HLF case. See evidence [here] [here] and [here]
http://shoebat.com/wp-content/upload...l-Suwaidan.jpg
Tareq Al-Suwaidan
Malik’s IDO is part of a Coalition of Islamic Organizations (CIO) which also includes the Islamic Society in Gaza, a Hamas front organization founded by Hamas terror leader Sheikh Yassin and headed by Hamas Prime Minister / terror leader Ismail Haniyeh who was its president for almost ten years.
Besides Malik’s Islamic Da’wa Organization, other members of the Coalition the Islamic Organizations (CIO) are involved in the funding as well, like the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY), Commission for Humanitarian Relief – Syndicate doctors Egypt.
Other websites throughout the years have advertised the call to aid [here] and [here]. On a side note, Malik attended events for the World Assembly for Muslim Youth (WAMY) [1] [2] [3]. This involves his other IRS illegally approved (back-dated 38 months by Lois Lerner) Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) future cooperation with WAMY. BHOF’s tax-exempt status was approved after Lerner was asked to investigate the foundation.
http://shoebat.com/wp-content/upload...Malik_WAMY.jpg
Malik Obama visiting with WAMY in 2011.
This type of funding is also used to funnel donations to send weapons and explosives to Hamas as was promoted by several terror forums [here] and [here] asking to fund purchasing “Kalashnikovs” “RPGs” “TNT” “missiles” “Al-Banna bombers …”
The story even gets more interesting as all this funding went unnoticed by Americans and only one American found these links and warned about it. Jeremy Reynalds had told the FBI to no avail. He decided to deal with Hamas himself by disguising himself as an Arab and started communicating with them. Hamas even asked if he would like his promised funds to be diverted to whichever type of terror he likes:
“…please tell us the field in which you prefer your money to be spent on such as â€~on martyrdom attacks, on buying weapons to the Mujahideen, training the youth, on inventing and developing missiles, on mortars, on explosives. or if you want us to decide it is also okay?’”When Reynolds finally had the western host remove the website, he stated:
“U.S. Customs Service which asked that the sites be put back on line again…”Finally, the good Samaritan who had informed the best way he could, gave up and on Free Republic the concerned Americans unanimously concluded,
“OK, so everyone says that it’s all part of a government ‘sting’ operation (which has been going on for years).”They are wrong; it wasn’t “a sting operation”. Americans watch too much TV. It is very serious. The same call to fund Hamas with weapons is in Arabic using the official email of the Qassam Martyrs Brigade email address support@qassam.org (code name Al-Suhba Brigade) which circulates on a litany of forums [here] [here] [here] [here] [here] [here] [here] [here] and on serious news outlets like Islamtoday.net which is all too keen to spot a sting, they know and communicate with the Hamas, the banks and all.
The fundraising by Al-Suhba Al-Saleha Brigade is predominately done by women from the Sisterhood (Akhawat), the branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. In fact, detailed dialogues were captured on the official Akhawat (Sisterhood) website Akhawat.com. The operate just as regular terrorists and even have women’s female Battalions with code names and everything. Al-Suhba Al-Saleha is “Battalion number two”.
Every news item regarding Malik’s non-profit work we found, involves his attendance at events in his capacity as Executive Secretary for IDO. Such events with Malik are very well advertised in the Arabic media. They are all in the following areas:
A—Attended an event combating the spread of Christian evangelism [1] B—Attended an event regarding orphans in Yemen [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Meeting with Ali Abdullah Saleh, the Prime Minister of Yemen requesting Malik to influence his brother Barack Obama to support the Palestinian cause [1] C—Attending an event for the Islamic Da’wa Organization in Sudan [1] [2] D—Attended the General Conference of the Islamic Council of South Sudan [1] E—Attending an event for the World Assembly for Muslim Youth (WAMY) [1] [2] [3] [4] This involves BHOF future cooperation with WAMY.
We have done detailed research on thee issues.
Malik’s Boss
Let’s take a look at Malik Obama’s superior within the leadership of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO). Suar al-Dahab sits on the group’s board. In 2010, both men were present at the IDO Conference in Khartoum; Sudan’s president Omar al-Bashir presided over the conference.
http://shoebat.com/wp-content/upload...hab_1_2010.jpg
Malik Obama and Suar al-Dahab.
Last May, al-Dahab paid a visit to Gaza and spent a large portion of his time with Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi.
http://shoebat.com/wp-content/upload...adawi_2013.jpg
Suar al-Dahab (Malik’s boss) with Prime Minister of Hamas and Qaradawi.
While at an event with Haniyeh and Qaradawi in Gaza during that visit, Suar al-Dahab made the following comments beginning at approximately the 5:30 mark of the video below (tanslated):
This (Gaza) is the land of jihad… Greetings from our people in Sudan. Despite the conspiracies our people have had to endure, like last week, as we were attacked from outside by killers… Sudan will be a very strong power to confront the enemies of the Islamic nation until we liberate all holy places and on the top of the list is al-Aqsa [Jerusalem], Allah willing and Palestine as a whole that is from river to sea… Our people wish for and long to join you in order to liberate this holyland [Palestine]. For that, we assure you that we in Sudan are with you heart and soul, despite the oil problem because we consider the case of Jerusalem and the repatriation of Palestine is the highest priority for Sudan. Trust and be assured that your brothers in Sudan are with you, soul and heart. May Allah give blessings upon you and may we all be victorious by the will of Allah.At another speech, while in Gaza, al-Dahab said the following (translated):
This great opportunity for us to gather together with the jihadis (terrorists) and we’re proud to be with our great spiritual leader during our visit to Gaza – Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Gaza is the fortress for jihadists. Despite our distance, Gaza has never left our minds, nor has the al-Aqsa [Temple Mount] for one moment, despite our problems in the Sudan…Some critics have also conceded that our findings on Malik Obama are true by avoiding the charges altogether and proclaiming that just because Malik has done these things doesn’t mean Barack is guilty. There are at least two problems with this assertion. The 501(c)(3) status granted to Malik’s BHOF by Lois Lerner very much appears to be illegal simply by being backdated so long. Lerner implicates herself as being an accessory to terror funding while committing that crime. This is why she should be granted immunity to testify as to who directed her to do this.
…we are not too busy to stand here with you, with our hearts and prayers, including everything we own [financially] to give you victory by the will of Allah. Truly, we assure you that the people of Sudan who participated alongside our brothers here in Palestine, in jihad operations from 1948 until now, we stand with you in heart and soul, elated by this meeting.
To come to Gaza, the fortress that assures we are victorious by Allah’s will and Jerusalem will be returned to us, Allah willing, and that Gaza has been liberated, that we will have a state called Palestine, with a capital in Jerusalem, Allah willing…
…be assured that your brothers of Sudan are with you and they will never depart from participating in jihad with you. May Allah protect you and give you health and happiness so we stand with you and peace be upon you.
The other involves Form 86, which became an issue in the Huma Abedin story that broke in the summer of 2012, one year after we broke it. Forme 86 specifically requires all government employees to divulge any familial relationships which might compromise the loyalty of said government employee. As we now know, Barack Obama has at least four family members whose allegiances he should have disclosed both publicly and privately before running for office.
One of those family member is his brother. The other three are his Step-grandmother, Mama Sarah, his cousin Musa Ismail Obama, and his uncle Sayyid Obama.
Predictably, after we identified the scarf worn by Malik Obama during a trip to Yemen in 2010 as a ‘Hamas scarf’, the critics protested. While objecting to the moniker we gave Malik’s attire, these critics completely avoided addressing the fact that the statements and symbols on that scarf match exactly, the fundamental beliefs of Hamas. For example, on Malik’s scarf, a map of Palestine that includes the absence of Israel is accompanied with the following saying:
‘From the River to the Sea!’ and ‘Jerusalem is ours – We are coming (or) we march forth’!http://shoebat.com/wp-content/upload...1046598541.jpg
Malik’s scarf: ‘From the River to the Sea – Palestine’
Consider what Hamas leader Khaled Mesha’al said at a Hamas ‘victory’ rally upon his return to Gaza, via the U.K. Guardian:
Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal vowed Gaza’s rulers would never give up “an inch of the land” to Israel in an uncompromising speech before tens of thousands of cheering supporters at a triumphalist “victory” rally in Gaza City.http://shoebat.com/wp-content/upload...1088998375.jpg
“Palestine is ours, from the river to the sea and from the south to the north. There will be no concession on an inch of the land,” he told the crowd on his first visit to Gaza. “We will never recognise the legitimacy of the Israeli occupation and therefore there is no legitimacy for Israel, no matter how long it will take.”
Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal and Malik Obama express same sentiment.
Is this not exactly what Malik Obama’s scarf said? Case closed. It’s a Hamas scarf. Therefore, on this issue, Malik and a top Hamas leader are in full agreement with what should happen to Israel. Drawing a line of distinction between Malik’s scarf and a Hamas scarf is like trying to separate Al-Qaeda from Ansar Al-Sharia; there is no difference. Besides, who is in charge of Gaza today? That’s right, Hamas.
Still not convinced?
http://shoebat.com/2014/01/30/malik-...egiance-hamas/
Obama Praises Muslims in Easter Message
Obama and The Muslim Brotherhood Obama's 2nd Term
http://pamelageller.com/wp-content/u...8.49.16-PM.png
Does Obama ever mention Christians or Jews or Hindus when he makes his long-winded Ramadan messages? No. But he’s used his holiday message to Jews to equate the liberation of Jews from 400 years of slavery to the Islamic supremacist revolutions in Egypt, Libya etc. He’s even strongarmed Rabbis to politicize the bema on high holy days.
It’s Easter, Obama. Address the mass persecution, oppression and slaughter of Christians across the Muslim world.
No, instead he proselytize for Islam. On Easter. It’s sick.“Obama Praises Muslims in Easter Message,” Frontpage, April 20, 2014Lest we forget the interview Obama conducted with the NY Times. Nicholas wrote:
http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-conte...e8-273x350.jpg
It just wouldn’t be Easter… without Muslims.Obama said this time of year is a good time to remember the “common thread of humanity that connects us all – not just Christians and Jews, but Muslims and Hindus and Sikhs – is our shared commitment to love our neighbors as we love ourselves.”Nope. Sorry.
Here’s what the Koran has to say about loving your neighbor.Qur’an (5:51) – “O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.”So yes, Muslims believe in loving their neighbors, as long as the neighbors are Muslims. And the right kind of Muslims.
Don’t go expecting Sunni Muslims to love Shiite Muslims or vice versa. Also don’t expect Salafis to love Sunnis who are insufficiently lacking in dedication to terrorism.
So much for that “common thread of humanity.”Let’s review. Michael Snyder ran these Obama quotes on Islam and Christianity:NY Times “I was a little Jakarta street kid,” he said in a wide-ranging interview in his office [...]. He once got in trouble for making faces during Koran study classes in his elementary school...
Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”
20 Quotes By Barack Obama About Islam
#1 “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam”
#2 “The prettiest sound on Earth” is the Muslim call to prayer at sunset.
#3 “We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world — including in my own country.”
#4 “As a student of history, I also know civilization’s debt to Islam.”
#5 “Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.”
#6 “Islam has always been part of America”
#7 “we will encourage more Americans to study in Muslim communities”
#8 “These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.”
#9 “America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles of justice and progress, tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.”
#10 “I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam.”
#11 “Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism – it is an important part of promoting peace.”
#12 “So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed”
#13 “In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education.”
#14 “throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.”
#15 “Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity and racial equality”
#16 “The Holy Koran tells us, ‘O mankind! We have created you male and a female; and we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another.’”
#17 “I look forward to hosting an Iftar dinner celebrating Ramadan here at the White House later this week, and wish you a blessed month.”
#18 “We’ve seen those results in generations of Muslim immigrants – farmers and factory workers, helping to lay the railroads and build our cities, the Muslim innovators who helped build some of our highest skyscrapers and who helped unlock the secrets of our universe.”
#19 “That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”
#20 “I also know that Islam has always been a part of America’s story.”
20 Quotes By Barack Obama About Christianity
#1 “Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation”
#2 “We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation.”
#3 “Which passages of scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is OK and that eating shellfish is an abomination? Or we could go with Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith?”
#4 “Even those who claim the Bible’s inerrancy make distinctions between Scriptural edicts, sensing that some passages – the Ten Commandments, say, or a belief in Christ’s divinity – are central to Christian faith, while others are more culturally specific and may be modified to accommodate modern life.”
#5 “The American people intuitively understand this, which is why the majority of Catholics practice birth control and some of those opposed to gay marriage nevertheless are opposed to a Constitutional amendment to ban it. Religious leadership need not accept such wisdom in counseling their flocks, but they should recognize this wisdom in their politics.”
#6 From Obama’s book, The Audacity of Hope: “I am not willing to have the state deny American citizens a civil union that confers equivalent rights on such basic matters as hospital visitation or health insurance coverage simply because the people they love are of the same sex—nor am I willing to accept a reading of the Bible that considers an obscure line in Romans to be more defining of Christianity than the Sermon on the Mount.”
#7 Obama’s response when asked what his definition of sin is: “Being out of alignment with my values.”
#8 “If all it took was someone proclaiming I believe Jesus Christ and that he died for my sins, and that was all there was to it, people wouldn’t have to keep coming to church, would they.”
#9 “This is something that I’m sure I’d have serious debates with my fellow Christians about. I think that the difficult thing about any religion, including Christianity, is that at some level there is a call to evangelize and prostelytize. There’s the belief, certainly in some quarters, that people haven’t embraced Jesus Christ as their personal savior that they’re going to hell.”
#10 “I find it hard to believe that my God would consign four-fifths of the world to hell. I can’t imagine that my God would allow some little Hindu kid in India who never interacts with the Christian faith to somehow burn for all eternity. That’s just not part of my religious makeup.”
#11 “I don’t presume to have knowledge of what happens after I die. But I feel very strongly that whether the reward is in the here and now or in the hereafter, the aligning myself to my faith and my values is a good thing.”
#12 “I’ve said this before, and I know this raises questions in the minds of some evangelicals. I do not believe that my mother, who never formally embraced Christianity as far as I know … I do not believe she went to hell.”
#13 “Those opposed to abortion cannot simply invoke God’s will–they have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths.”
#14 On his support for civil unions for gay couples: “If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount.”
#15 “You got into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
#16 “In our household, the Bible, the Koran and the Bhagavad Gita sat on the shelf alongside books of Greek and Norse and African mythology”
#17 “On Easter or Christmas Day, my mother might drag me to church, just as she dragged me to the Buddhist temple, the Chinese New Year celebration, the Shinto shrine, and ancient Hawaiian burial sites.”
#18 “we have Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, agnostics, Buddhists, and their own path to grace is one that we have to revere and respect as much as our own”
#19 “All of us have a responsibility to work for the day when the mothers of Israelis and Palestinians can see their children grow up without fear; when the Holy Land of the three great faiths is the place of peace that God intended it to be; when Jerusalem is a secure and lasting home for Jews and Christians and Muslims, and a place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra — (applause) — as in the story of Isra, when Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed, peace be upon them, joined in prayer. (Applause.)”
#20 “I believe that there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people.”
http://pamelageller.com/2014/04/obam...-message.html/
He's not a Mohammadan, he's a Neo-Bolshevik, with enough of a post-christian multicultural background to be inoffensive to none and charismatic to all. I thought he might be 'Moslem Brotherhood', but I recall my history regarding the Communists and their attitude regarding the millitant Moslems today is equivalent to their attitude towards Fascists and National Socialists in the 20's and 30's; it is all a late-period phenomena of Capitalist decline, and these movements can be manipulated to become bombs going off in the Capitalist hands, or to use Stalin's metaphor about Hitler; 'Hitler is the Icebreaker of the Revolution'.
I look at Obama, and I see an Atheist, albeit a clever one, who uses religion like he uses everybody and everyone else; in order to throw down the global and domestic order he sees and terminally weaken it. He's not a Lenin either; he's a Kerensky.
Companion Thread:
Obama’s Secret Directive Supporting Global Islamism
By Raymond Ibrahim on July 4, 2014 in Islam, Other Matters
A recent Gulf News report sheds some light on how and why the United States helped bring the Muslim Brotherhood and its Islamist allies to power, followed by all the subsequent chaos and atrocities in the Mideast region.
http://www.raymondibrahim.com/_admin...terrorist-.jpg
Large portions of the report follow with my commentary interspersed for added context:Dubai: For the past decade, two successive US administrations have maintained close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Tunisia, Syria and Libya, to name just the most prominent cases.And we have certainly witnessed this shift. Chaos and the Islamic ascendancy in the Middle East and North Africa never flourished as under the Obama administration—and precisely because the administration shifted from supporting stability under secular-minded autocrats.
The Obama administration conducted an assessment of the Muslim Brotherhood in 2010 and 2011, beginning even before the events known as the “Arab Spring” erupted in Tunisia and in Egypt. The President personally issued Presidential Study Directive 11 (PSD-11) in 2010, ordering an assessment of the Muslim Brotherhood and other “political Islamist” movements, including the ruling AKP in Turkey, ultimately concluding that the United States should shift from its longstanding policy of supporting “stability” in the Middle East and North Africa (that is, support for “stable regimes” even if they were authoritarian), to a policy of backing “moderate” Islamic political movements (emphasis in bold added throughout).
The most significant example of this is how the Obama administration threw Hosni Mubarak—a U.S. ally for three decades—under the bus in order to support the Islamists, most specifically the Muslim Brotherhood. And we saw how that ended—with another revolution, hailed as the largest revolution in human history, with the average Egyptian accusing Obama of being a terrorist supporter.To this day, PSD-11 remains classified, in part because it reveals an embarrassingly naïve and uninformed view of trends in the Middle East and North Africa (Mena) region.“Embarrassingly naïve and uninformed view” is synonymous with the “orthodox and mainstream view pushed forth by Mideast studies professors and academics,” especially those with political influence, such as the Center for Contemporary Arab Studies of Georgetown University, in Washington D.C. Such programs, which I’m only too well acquainted with, begin with false—that is, “embarrassingly naïve and uninformed”—premises, namely: that the source of all the region’s woes are (formerly) U.S.-propped autocrats (reality is that dictators don’t create such societies but rather are the natural outcome of Islamic societies and are the ones most prone to keeping law and order—compare Iraq under Saddam and Iraq now, as a “democracy,” with “ISIS” proclaiming a caliphate).
Mideast academics have also long spearheaded the idea that there are “moderate” Islamists and “radical” Islamists, and that the U.S. should work with the former (in reality they are all radical—to be an Islamist is to be radical—the only difference is that the “moderate” Islamists don’t wear their radicalism on their sleeves, even as they work toward the same goals that the more open “radicals” work for, namely, a Sharia-enforcing caliphate).The revelations were made by Al Hewar centre in Washington, DC, which obtained the documents in question.This too is significant. As Daniel Greenfield writes: “Al-Hewar, which actually got hold of the documents, is linked to the International Institute of Islamic Thought… which is a Muslim Brotherhood front group. Figures in the Muslim Brotherhood had threatened to leak understandings with Obama Inc. This is the next best thing. It warns Obama that if he tries to forget about them, they can prove that the relationship was official policy.”
To be sure, after the ousting of the Brotherhood in Egypt, several Brotherhood members made, sometimes not so veiled, threats to expose the Obama administration if it turned its back on them, including top ranking Brotherhood member, Khairat al-Shatter’s son.Through an ongoing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, thousands of pages of documentation of the US State Department’s dealings with the Muslim Brotherhood are in the process of being declassified and released to the public.If and when these thousands of pages are released, they should be combed through, as no doubt answers to many of the Obama administration’s hitherto inexplicable policies in the Middle East will be found—to wit:
US State Department documents obtained under the FOIA confirm that the Obama administration maintained frequent contact and ties with the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood. At one point, in April 2012, US officials arranged for the public relations director of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, Mohammad Gaair, to come to Washington to speak at a conference on “Islamists in Power” hosted by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Indeed, despite the administration’s later insistence that it did not favor the Islamists over other parties, anecdotes implying otherwise were constantly on display. In Egypt alone, U.S. ambassador Anne Patterson, due to her close ties not just to President Morsi, but the Muslim Brotherhood in general, became such a hated figure in the months before last year’s anti-Brotherhood revolution.A State Department Cable classified “Confidential” report says the following: “Benghazi Meeting With Libyan Muslim Brotherhood: On April 2 [2012] Mission Benghazi met with a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood steering committee, who will speak at the April 5 Carnegie Endowment ‘Islamist in Power’ conference in Washington, D.C. He described the Muslim Brotherhood’s decision to form a political party as both an opportunity and an obligation in post-revolution Libya after years of operating underground.These documents on the Obama administration’s connections with the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya are especially disturbing in the context of earlier revelations made in Arabic media, including that the Brotherhood’s Libyan wing was very much involved in the 9/11 Benghazi U.S. consulate attack.Another State Department paper marked “Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU)” contained talking points for Deputy Secretary of State William Burns’ scheduled July 14, 2012 meeting with Mohammad Sawan, the Muslim Brotherhood leader who was also head of the Brotherhood’s Justice and Construction Party. The document is heavily redacted, but nevertheless provides clear indication of Washington’s sympathies for the emergence of the Muslim Brotherhood as a major political force in the post-Gaddafi Libya.The talking points recommended that Secretary Burns tell Sawan thatthe US government entities “share your party’s concerns in ensuring that a comprehensive transitional justice process is undertaken to address past violations so that they do not spark new discontent.”“To address past violations so that they do not spark new discontent” is another way of stating another popular position among Mideast professors, namely that whenever Islamists engage in violence or terrorism, that is proof positive that they have a legitimate grievance, hence the US must “appease” lest it “spark new discontent” (perhaps the true backdrop of Benghazi).The Burns paper described the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood: “Prior to last year’s revolution, the Muslim Brotherhood was banned for over three decades and its members were fiercely pursued by the Gaddafi regime.In light of all the chaos the Islamists have been responsible for in Libya, Iraq, Egypt, Syria, et al—is it now obvious why Arab autocrats like Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, Hosni Mubarak, and currently Bashar Assad have always “banned” and “fiercely pursued” the Brotherhood and its affiliates?
Obama Thanks Muslims For “Building The Very Fabric Of Our Nation”…
http://static.squarespace.com/static...0/?format=750w
Via White House website:As Muslims throughout the United States and around the world celebrate Eid-al-Fitr, Michelle and I extend our warmest wishes to them and their families. This last month has been a time of fasting, reflection, spiritual renewal, and service to the less fortunate. While Eid marks the completion of Ramadan, it also celebrates the common values that unite us in our humanity and reinforces the obligations that people of all faiths have to each other, especially those impacted by poverty, conflict, and disease.
In the United States, Eid also reminds us of the many achievements and contributions of Muslim Americans to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy. That is why we stand with people of all faiths, here at home and around the world, to protect and advance their rights to prosper, and we welcome their commitment to giving back to their communities.
On behalf of the Administration, we wish Muslims in the United States and around the world a blessed and joyous celebration. Eid Mubarak.
Obama Celebrates Muslim Contributions to the USA
http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver...Muslims-AP.jpg
by Robert Wilde 28 Jul 2014, 11:09 AM PDT 21 post a comment
On Sunday, President Obama and First Lady Michelle released a statement thanking Muslim Americans for their many “achievements and contributions… to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.”
The comments were made to mark the celebration of Eid-al-Fitr, a time of spiritual renewal for Muslims which comes at the end of the month-long fast of Ramadan. The Obamas said in their statement that Eid “celebrates the common values that unite us in our humanity” and “welcomed their commitment to giving back to their communities.” The International Business Times reports that during Eid, Muslims join in Islamic prayer, while saying "Allahu Akbar," or "God is Great," and feasting.
The statement further reads that the administration “wishes Muslims in the United States and around the world a blessed and joyous celebration.” The letter ended with salutation of “Eid Mubarak,” which roughly means “blessed celebration.”
So the main stream media simply doesn't cover this shit, right?
Obama’s Muslim Founding Fathers
July 30, 2014 by Robert Spencer
http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-conte...a2-450x228.jpg
In his message to Muslims on their holiday Eid al-Fitr, issued Sunday, Barack Obama asserted that “Eid also reminds us of the many achievements and contributions of Muslim Americans to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.” He did not, unfortunately, provide even a single example of these “many achievements and contributions” that Muslims have made to “building the very fabric of our nation,” but he said that there were many, so they shouldn’t be hard to list a few, right?
You remember a few of them, don’t you? Remember the Muslim signers of the Declaration of Independence? With Yahya al-Hanqoq’s large signature front and center, so that the infidel King George III could read it without his spectacles? And then there was Ibrahim Clark of New Jersey and El-Bridge Gerry of Massachusetts. Remember also the Muslims who gave James Madison information about Muhammad’s Constitution of Medina – which, as we all know, granted equal rights to women and religious minorities, predating such documents in the West by 1,000 years. Madison, of course, used the Medina Constitution as a model when framing the U.S. Constitution.
Then there were the Muslims who fought so valiantly during the War of 1812 and the Mexican War. And in the titanic struggles over slavery, Muslims were front and center: remember the Muslim abolitionist Senators who faced down the South in the antebellum Senate, the Senate chamber ringing with their oratory about how the Qur’an says to free slaves and so the U.S. government should, too? Remember the Muslim regiments in the Civil War (all on the Union side, of course!)? Then in the aftermath of the Civil War came the Muslim industrialists who brought us railroads, the telegraph, the telephone.
Not to be forgotten are the Muslims who also fought courageously in the Spanish-American War, World War I and World War II, and the Muslim entertainers who kept us laughing on the Vaudeville circuit and on the home front during those terrible world wars with their jokes from the Hadith.
None of this rings a bell? Not to worry. Before too long it will be taught in all the textbooks. Absurd? Maybe – but no more than Obama’s statement itself. And even if they don’t go so far as to Islamize John Hancock and imagine Muslim Americans fighting against slavery and defending America in world wars, public school textbooks already present a ridiculously rosy picture of Islam. A study by the American Textbook Council, an independent national research organization that evaluates the quality of textbooks, found that ten of the most widely used middle school and high school social studies textbooks “present an incomplete and confected view of Islam that misrepresents its foundations and challenges to international security.”
The books present highly tendentious constructions as undisputed truth, making common cause with West-hating multiculturalists to bowdlerize the presentation of Islam, denigrate or downplay Christianity and Western civilization, and transform numerous public school textbooks into proselytizing tracts.
Meanwhile, even though the Constitution of Medina is of highly doubtful authenticity and is contradicted both by Islamic law and by Islamic traditions about Muhammad’s actions, it is already becoming common for Islamic apologists to invoke it as evidence that Islam and democracy are not only compatible, but that Islam originated the idea of republican rule. Ahmadi Muslim apologist Qasim Rashid recently wrote in the Huffington Post that “when Prophet Muhammad was popularly appointed Medina’s ruler, he entered into a pact with the Jewish communities of Medina. Through this pact, he granted equal political rights to non-Muslims. They were ensured complete freedom of religion and practice.” Undercutting Rashid’s case are the facts that Muhammad ended up exiling two of the Jewish tribes of Medina and massacring the third, and that the Qur’an mandates that Jews (and Christians) in the Islamic state, rather than enjoying “equal political rights,” must “pay the jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued” (9:29).
But facts just get in the way of the narrative, and so the facts must go. It feels so good and multicultural to imagine Muslims at the founding of this nation, contributing to its very fabric, doesn’t it? Heck, speaking of fabric, probably Betsy Ross was a Muslim. And doesn’t the flag of South Carolina have a crescent moon on it?
Likewise regarding slavery – I imagine Muslim abolitionists above in pre-Civil War America above, in trying to give some substance to Barack Obama’s absurd statement. In reality, of course, there were no Muslim abolitionists, or Muslims, in the antebellum United States. What’s more, there were no Muslim abolitionists anywhere. Islamic apologists in the West routinely claim that Islam forbids slavery, but in fact the Qur’an takes slavery for granted, and according to Islamic tradition, Muhammad hallowed the practice by owning slaves himself. In some Muslim nations, it is still practiced, even though it is against the law (laws that initially began to be adopted in Muslim countries under Western pressure). Mauritania, for example, abolished slavery in 1981 and made it a crime in 2012, but it is still widespread — because it has Islamic sanction. Yet I myself remember being taught in high school, way back in the 1970s, that the last country to abolish slavery was Brazil, in 1889. There was no mention of Saudi Arabia’s abolishing slavery in 1962, or of the persistence of the practice in some Muslim countries. And that was forty years ago, showing that whitewashing of Islam in the textbooks, now rampant, had begun even then.
So when it comes to Barack Obama’s claim that Muslim Americans have made contributions to “building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy,” if there were no Muslim Founding Fathers scrutinizing the Constitution of Medina for material they could use in the charter document of their new nation, then they have to be invented. The textbooks have already departed from reality regarding Islam – what could possibly be the problem with a few more steps into fantasy? What difference, at this point, does it make? Yahya al-Hanqoq, grab your quill!
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/rob...nding-fathers/
Allen West Declares Obama An Islamist
http://www.westernjournalism.com/wp-...Allen-West.jpg
Former Florida Rep. Allen West declared President Obama an Islamist who is intentionally working against the security of the United States. “The only plausible explanation for many actions taken by President Obama and his administration is that they are working counter to the security of the United States of America,” the former Florida congressman and retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel wrote in the post published Wednesday.
Among six examples he gives to back up his point is Obama’s decision to release of five Taliban in exchange for Sgt. Bergdahl in May, providing weapons of support to the Egyptian government led by the Muslim Brotherhood, and negotiating with Hamas.
He also writes at length about Obama’s recent decision to lift a ban on Libyan’s attending U.S. flight schools and studying nuclear science, which had been in place since 1983.
“Can anyone explain what the strategy and objective is here in lifting this ban with a nation that is or should be on the terrorist watch list?” he asks. ”Sorry, but I can only explain this one way: Barack Hussein Obama is an Islamist in his foreign policy perspectives and supports their cause.”
“The pivot away from the Middle East seems to be nothing more than an opportunity to enable Islamists and their goals,” he continues.
“Anyone supporting this Libyan ban being lifted is indeed an enemy of this state.”
Saw this article re; West. Good man.
Obama is certainly in my mind an Islamist, and he's not the only one in his Administration, either.
Obama: Get Off Your High Horse Christians Committed Terrible Deeds In The Name of Christ
/ 209 Comments
http://minutemennews.wpengine.netdna...11-300x178.jpg
President Obama today said he and other Christians should not “get on our high horse” with respect to the ISIS rampages in the name of religion, suggesting that Christians had done similar things in the name of their religion during the crusades and with slavery in the United States.
Obama listed the many outrages throughout the world being carried out unjustly in the name of Islam. But then he added:Lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ . . .
Obama at Prayer Breakfast: "People Committed Terrible Deeds In The Name Of Christ"
President Obama spoke at the annual congressional prayer breakfast, where legislators, officials and clergy gathered to offer thanks to God for the blessings bestowed on the United States.
Obama touched on the claims made by his political opponents that he is blind to a fascist ideology within Islam. Instead, he says that those who commit acts of violence in the name of Islam are hijacking an otherwise peaceful religion, which has happened throughout human history to many different faiths, including our own. After all, "during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ,” Obama said. And "in our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ."
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: We see faith driving us to do right, but we also see faith being twisted and distorted, used as a wedge, or worse, sometimes as a weapon.
From a school in Pakistan to the streets of Paris we have seen acts of terror and violence perpetrated by those who profess to stand up for faith; their faith. Professing to stand up for Islam but, in fact, are betraying it.
We see ISIS, a brutal, vicious death cult that in the name of religion carries out unspeakable acts of barbarism. Terrorizing religious minorities, like the Yazidis, subjecting women to rape as a weapon of war, and claiming the mantle of religious authority for such actions.
We see sectarian war in Syria. The murder of Muslims and Christians in Nigeria. Religious war in the Central African Republic. A rising tide of anti-Semitism and hate crimes in Europe. So often perpetrated in the name of religion.
So how do we as people of faith reconcile these realities?
The profound good, the strength, the tenacity, the compassion and love that can flow from all of our faiths, operating alongside those who seek to hijack religions for their own murderous ends.
Humanity has been grappling with these questions throughout human history, and unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the crusades and the inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow, all too often was justified in the name of Christ.
Michelle and I returned from India, an incredible, beautiful country, full of this magnificent diversity, but a place where in past years religious faiths of all types have on occasion been targeted by other peoples of faith, simply due to their heritage and believes. Acts of intolerance that would have shocked Gandhi, the person who helped to liberate that nation.
So this is not unique to one group or one religion. There is a tendency in us, a sinful tendency that can pervert and distort our faith.
In today's world when hate groups have their own Twitter accounts and bigotry can fester in hidden places in cyber space, it can be even harder to counteract such intolerance, but God compels us to try. And in this mission I believe there are a few principles that can guide us, particularly those of us who profess to believe. And first we should start with some basic humility.
I believe that the starting point of faith is some doubt. Not being so full of yourself and so confident that you are right and -- and that God speaks only to us, and doesn't speak to others, that God only cares about us and doesn't care about others. That somehow we alone are in possession of the truth.
Our job is not to ask that God respond to our notion of truth. Our job it to be true to him, his word and his commandments, and we should assume humbly that---
...we're confused and don't always know what we're doing, and we're staggering and stumbling towards him. And have some humility in that process.
And that means we have to speak up against those who would misuse his name to justify oppression or violence or hatred with that fierce certainty. No God condones terror. No grievance justifies the taking of innocent lives, or the oppression of those who are weaker or fewer in number. And so as people of faith we are summoned to push back against those who try to distort our religion-- Any religion for their own nihilistic ends, and here at home and around the world we'll constantly reaffirm that fundamental freedom. Freedom of religion. The right to practice our faith how we choose, to change our faith if we choose to practice no faith at all, if we choose, and to do so free of persecution and fear and discrimination.
There's wisdom in our founders, writing in those documents that helped found this nation, the notion of freedom of religion, because they understood the need for humility. They also understood the need to uphold freedom of speech, that there was a connection between freedom of speech and freedom of religion, for to infringe on one right under the pretext of protecting another is a betrayal of both.
Defending Islam a particular crusade of Obama
Doug MacEachern, columnist | azcentral.com 1:44 p.m. MST February 5, 2015
This is a story of simple coincidence, nothing more. Arrive at your own conclusions. It's just... a weird thing.
I just started binge-watching on Netflix a History Channel production from 2012, "Mankind: The Story of All of Us."
It's interesting.
Not exactly plowing un-tilled earth, for the most part. But interesting. The 12-part series relies on some rather odd historical "experts," like an excitable and bald former Navy Seal, as well as (I am not kidding) NBC news anchor Brian Williams, whose grasp of even very recent history seems a little tenuous right now.
Well, just last night, I watched a segment titled "Warriors," that in part delves into the era of the Crusades, which, by any stretch, was not Christianity's finest hour on earth. According to "Mankind's" tally, a million people died over the course of the various crusades. I've got no reason to doubt that. Very nasty time. They call them the "Dark Ages" for a reason (although some disagree on even that).
By weird coincidence, President Obama invoked exactly that sentiment this morning during his speech at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C.
The president observed that "humanity has been grappling with" its habit of murdering others in the name of religion for a long time. And he characterizes modern-day horrors being perpetrated in the name of Islam by the likes of the Islamic State in Iraq and Boko Haram in Nigeria as latter-day manifestations of an ages-old blood-lust of which all religions have been guilty, from time to time.
Like Christians during the Crusades.
"And lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ," said Obama.
President Obama, as most of us know, is very defensive of the Muslim faith. He goes to great lengths to avoid tying the word "Islamic" to the word "terrorism." (see: here, here and here). And, on Thursday, he modestly upped that game by calling out Christianity for acting just as poorly... albeit, 800 or 900 years ago.
Now, I'm not sure which "high horse" Obama is referring to. I don't know if the current spate of terrorist murders in the name of Allah has caused the terror debate to descend entirely into "my religion is better than yours" territory. I don't really think that is where most critics of groups like al-Qaeda and the Islamic State are going when they use phrases like "Islamist terrorists." But, apparently, that is what the president thinks. Get off your precious high horse. Christians have been just as bad. Well, OK.
As I said, this is just a story of weird coincidence. Which is this: One of the more authoritative talking heads in the "Mankind" series is Henry Louis Gates, Jr., professor of African and African American research at Harvard.
"When you think about the brutality of the crusades, when you think about what was done to the people who were there, it just flies in the face of what the Christian message was all about," said Gates in the "Mankind" segment on the crusades.
When I heard President Obama's speech this morning, I couldn't help thinking that I'd heard this point of view expressed before. And not long ago before.
Then, it dawned on me that I had heard it the evening before, from President Obama's close friend and beer-drinking buddy, Professor Gates.
http://pearlsofprofundity.files.word...muslims-2a.jpg
http://allenbwest.com/wp-content/upl...ama-muslim.jpg
http://hodja.files.wordpress.com/201...a6vl.jpg?w=727
Obama At National Prayer Breakfast: ’People Committed Terrible Deeds In The Name of Christ’
http://media.breitbart.com/media/201...AP-640x480.jpg
At the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama reminded attendees that violence rooted in religion isn’t exclusive to Islam, but has been carried out by Christians as well.
Obama said that even though religion is a source for good around the world, there will always be people willing to “hijack religion for their own murderous ends.”
“Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ,” Obama said. “In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”
Obama also denounced Islamic State terrorists for professing to stand up for Islam when they were actually “betraying it.”
“We see ISIL, a brutal vicious death cult that in the name of religion carries out unspeakable acts of barbarism,” he said criticizing them for “claiming the mantle of religious authority for such actions.”
http://assets.newsinc.com/10449_75X27.png?t=1423132080 Obama at Prayer Breakfast: "Faith Distorted"
Reuters
http://content-img.newsinc.com/jpg/3...g?t=1423132080
By this logic, BLACKS are responsible for slavery in America.
America was responsible for the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
Europe was responsible for Hitler's invasion of Poland.
White, middle class Americans were the cause of AIDS in Monkeys and monkey fuckers in Africa.
And some dumb ass in Iowa is responsible for the Ebola virus.
Christians are not responsible for the violence against themselves perpetrated by Islamists. Wait, MUSLIMS. They ARE MUSLIMS.
NO Innocent person deserves to die by being beheaded, burned to death because some religion has tenants that says it's ok.
Children, little boys watching a SOCCER GAME do NOT deserve to die because they watched a soccer game (I'd like to get my hands on the fucker that ordered that.... beheading would be the least of his worries).
Terrorism is not up for debate. This is not a religious debate of who is worse, and is irrelevant.
Terrorist, Al Qaeda, ISIS, Boka Bullshit Haroom or whatever they call themselves need to be shut down, KILLED and DESTROYED.
These people will continue until they are DEAD. Get it Obama, DEAD.
Kill them. Close your mouth, order the destruction of these organizations and send in the US military to do the job.
More than ever, we need the Neutron Bomb.
I think they are more expensive than regular nukes.
There's nothing in the ME that I want.
glass it.
Obama Equivocates Christians With Jihad Terrorists At National Prayer Breakfast
https://swordattheready.files.wordpr...pg?w=500&h=375
In the continuing push to equivocate Christians with Jihadists, Obama cites the Crusades and Inquisition as evidence Christianity employs violence in the Name of Christ, states we must ‘push back those who would distort OUR religion for their nihilistic ends’.
History shows and teaches, that whenever the leaders or ruling class of a society demonize and equivocate a specific group as a threat to society – WITHOUT EXCEPTION, such groups soon find themselves criminalized, imprisoned tortured and exterminated.
Why do I mention this? Because there is a meme growing from the halls of power and the Ruling Class in the USA that the problem in the world is not Islamic Jihadists, but Christians – specifically Conservative Biblically-based Christians.
One insidious technique they employ is the comparison of Islamic atrocities taking place right now, with Christianity.
Obama rails against ‘atrocities committed in the name of religion’ while demanding that any and all references to Jihad and Islam in the same sentence be expunged from definition, he not only ignores atrocities committed in the Name of the State, he justifies those atrocities committed in the name of Islam, as not being Islamic.
This is becoming more self-evident every single day:
https://swordattheready.files.wordpr...pg?w=500&h=345
Yesterday Obama had a ‘secret White House Meeting’ with Muslim leaders, that his regime has refused to discuss or reveal who was in attendance.
President Obama met with American Muslim leaders this afternoon, according to the White House schedule, but so far the administration is unwilling to reveal who attended the meeting, which was closed to the press.This morning, at the “National Prayer Breakfast”, where Muslim leaders perpetrating Jihadist genocide were invited and in attendance, His Heinous made the outrageous and deliberate comparison of ISIS with Christianity:
The president said that while religion is a source for good around the world, people of all faiths have been willing to “hijack religion for their own murderous ends.”Really?? I do not find Christians today advancing their faith by doing things like this:
“Unless we get on our high horse and think that this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ,” Obama said. “In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”So it is not unique to one group or one religion,” Obama said. “There is a tendency in us, a simple tendency that can pervert and distort our faith.”
“So it is not unique to one group or one religion,” Obama said. “There is a tendency in us, a simple tendency that can pervert and distort our faith.”
https://swordattheready.files.wordpr...pg?w=500&h=265
The outrageous attempt to equate Jihadists with Christianity by citing the Crusades, Jim Crow and the Inquisition is not only intellectually dishonest, it is intended to inflame Jihadists even further as Bizpac Review rightly notes:
…the Crusades, slavery and Jim Crow aren’t currently a problem for the civilized world. So his attempt to draw a moral equivalency — aside from being intellectually dishonest — is likely to do more harm by emboldening Islamic terrorists.Of course Obama was not done, it was not enough to suggest that Christians are just like ISIS Jihadists – who kill and commit atrocity in the name of religion for the purpose of forcing their faith at the end of the sword upon the world, Obama then had to preach against ‘exclusivity':
Also, perhaps Obama needs a history lesson. The Crusades took place between 1095 and 1291; the Spanish Inquisition started in 1478.
Not to mention the Crusades were a response to Muslim aggression in the Holy Land.
Perhaps the president hasn’t watched the news, but Islamic terrorism is a problem today.
Obama called for all people of faiths to show humility about their beliefs and reject the idea that “God speaks only to us and doesn’t speak to others.”So we must show ‘humility’ and change our faith to believe that all religion is equal before God? Did the God of the Bible not say that He is a Jealous God – and that we should have no others before Him? Did Jesus not tell us that there is no path to the Father except through Him?
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. No one can come to the Father except through me. – John 14:6
Obama continues to demonstrate the fact that he is no Christian of any kind, acts as a Jihad sympathizer and traitor from the highest office in the land.
http://domania.us/Oaccess/OBAMA/ObamaSpeaksOfChrist.gif
Krauthammer 'Stunned' By Obama's 'Banal & Offensive' Prayer Breakfast Remarks
by Fox News Insider Posted in:
Charles Krauthammer tonight slammed President Barack Obama’s remarks today at the National Prayer Breakfast, where Obama compared ISIS attacks to the violence committed by Christians in the Crusades.
“Humanity has been grappling with these questions throughout human history. Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ," Obama said.
Krauthammer told Sean Hannity, “I was stunned that the president could say something so at once banal and offensive.”
Krauthammer noted that the speech came two days after a shocking act of barbarism, yet Obama’s message is to remember the Crusades. Krauthammer remarked that the story of the Crusades is over, and today’s story is of the overwhelming barbarism due to radical Islam.
“The present issue is Muslim radicalism and how to attack it,” he said.
Krauthammer also weighed in on Brian Williams’ untrue story of being in a helicopter that was hit by an RPG, calling it “a big mistake on his part.”
“If you’re gonna make up a story, you do it when there aren’t other people around […] you tell a story about wrestling a lion to the ground because, generally speaking, lions don’t have access to the Internet. But you don’t do it about an event that everybody saw and that you know in the end you’re gonna be unmasked about,” Krauthammer said.
Plus, Hannity asked Krauthammer to sound off on "American Sniper." Hear what he had to say in the video above.