This morning, about 38 minutes into his GBTV HD Broadcast of the Glenn Beck Radio Program, Glenn Beck made a startling announcement:
Valerie Jarrett, a Senior Advisor to Barack Hussein Obama, whose father-in-law was a famous Communist (who worked with Obama's Communist mentor Frank Marshall Davis), has herself proven to be a committed Communist. So it shouldn't be surprising that Glenn Beck named her Obama's KGB handler.
And yes, Glenn was kidding, but Jarrett's hard line Communist background is a very serious matter that is part of the reason that Obama has been so destructive since he moved into the White House. Here's some more information about Valerie Jarrett's Communist father-in-law:
After graduating from Knoxville College, Vernon Jarrett started at The Chicago Defender in 1946, where he wrote columns extolling Communist poet Langston Hughes and lifelong Stalinists W.E.B. DuBois and Paul Robeson. (Obama would write in Dreams of My Father that “I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm [X], DuBois and Mandela.”) A contemporary writer at Kansas City Star asserts by 1948 Jarrett “had been forced out [of journalism] by the Cold War, the Red scare and racism.” He freelanced at Kansas City’s The Call from 1954-58, then returned to Chicago to become the first nationally syndicated black columnist for the Chicago Tribune, and still later wrote for the Chicago Sun-Times.
Here's some more interesting information about Vernon Jarrett, Valerie Jarrett, and BHO, from the same article:
Vernon Jarrett later wrote of another up-and-coming political figure in the Chicago Sun-Times:
Good news! Good news! Project Vote, a collectivity of 10 church-based community organizations dedicated to black voter registration, is off and running. Project Vote is increasing its rolls at a 7,000-per-week clip. Just last Saturday it registered 2,000 during the Chicago Defender’s annual Bud Billiken Parade. But now, the not-so-good news: If Project Vote is to reach its goal of registering 150,000 out of an estimated 400,000 unregistered blacks statewide, “it must average 10,000 rather than 7,000 every week,” says Barack Obama, the program’s executive director…”There’s a lot of talk about `black power’ among the young but so little action.”
When Vernon died in 2004, he was saluted in the pages of People’s Weekly Worker, the house organ of the Communist Party USA. A final point of confluence, perhaps more fortuitous than anything: Vernon Jarrett once sat on a union publicity committee with Frank Marshall Davis, the Communist poet who occasionally counseled…the young Barack Obama.
Valerie Jarrett had more immediate radical ties. Her mother, Barbara Taylor Bowman, co-founded Her mother, Barbara Taylor Bowman, co-founded the Erickson Institute in Chicago and still serves on its Board of Trustees. Tom Ayers, the father of Bill Ayers, was a one-time fellow trustee. According to WorldNet Daily’s Brad O’Leary, the Erickson board also included Bill Ayers’ wife, Bernadine Dohrn. For his part, Bill Ayers called Bowman “a neighbor and friend” in his book A Kind and Just Parent, noting his neighbors include Louis Farrakhan (whose guard, The Fruit of Islam, patrols the neighborhood and “has an eye on things twenty-four hours a day”), and “writer Barack Obama.”
And remember, Valerie Jarrett was sent by Barack Hussein Obama to be the keynote speaker at the Islamic Society of North America’s national convention in 2009, and the ISNA has admitted its ties to the Brotherhood.
And do you remember this headline?
New Warning About Muslim Brotherhood’s Influence on White House From…Liberal Marxist Muslim
Not only was Valerie Jarrett a slum lord at one point, let's not forget her key role in recruiting self-avowed Communist Van Jones into the White House.
And remember that Glenn Beck showed Valerie Jarrett's ridiculous spin prior to the 2011 Obama State of the Union Address, including her reference to Obama's 'five pillars' of his SOTU speech. If you don't remember it, the episode featured Glenn Beck, a bunny rabbit, and a chainsaw (and Lang Lang playing an Anti-American Communist Chinese tune at the White House):
I could go on for days on the subject of Valerie Jarrett, so I'll just end this now. If it weren't for the fact that Glenn Beck was joking (although it's quite possible he's actually correct), the media would be right to raise an eyebrow, since the KGB has been called the FSB since April of 1995. But since he was obviously kidding, I expect to see them attack Glenn Beck about this by this time tomorrow.
December 11th, 2011, 05:11
Phil Fiord
Re: Is Barack Obama a real Manchurian candidate?
Jarrett is the key. I have seen this for some time. She is definately the liason for what O is to do. While she acts as the conscience to O, it is her take on things that probably also stopped any action regarding the UAV downing in Iran.
Her involvement in Osama was noted as she pushed O to decline the attack. He only took credit because it was a popular thing to do and he simply had to since the .mil accomplished it.
That brings to mind something Rick has touched on. Many Generals have been fired. Suppose these Generals knew what O was about and refused to follow his directives?
Last week, Americans learned that they are, or soon may be, at war with Vladimir Putin's Russia. That is, of course, unless they do just exactly what the Kremlin asks, which is pretty simple, really, and consists largely of re-electing Barack H. Obama, the best friend the Kremlin ever had, as president of the United States.
The word came down from two of Russia's highest-ranking politicians, Nikolai Patrushev (head of Russia's National Security Council) and Dmitri Rogozin (formerly Russia's ambassador to the United Nations, recently elevated to deputy prime minister). Both chose to use Iran as the focal point of their remarks.
Iran is our neighbor. And if Iran is involved in any military action, it's a direct threat to our security. We are definitely interested in the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. But at the same time, we believe that any country has the right to have what it needs to feel comfortable, including Iran.
The words sounded uncomfortably like the words used by President John Kennedy in his October 1962 address to the nation regarding the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Then Patrushev chimed in:
There is a likelihood of military escalation of the conflict, towards which Israel is pushing the Americans. It cannot be ruled out that the Iranians will be able to carry out their threat to shut exports of Saudi oil through the Strait of Hormuz if faced with military actions against them. Talk about Iran creating an atomic bomb by next week we have heard for many years.
Patrushev accused the United States of attempting to topple Iran's government and subjugate its population "by all available means" and implied that Russia would help Iran to shut down oil supplies to the United States through the Persian Gulf if the U.S. dared to try to block Iran's nuclear weapons program, which, he assured, is nothing urgent that Americans need to worry about.
But Patrushev (who is one of Russia's most strident haters of America and her values) said it all still might work out: "In the case of Vladimir Putin and then Barack Obama coming to power, the Russian-U.S. relationship, as well as the situation in the world as a whole, may see a strengthening trend." It seems that the prospect of Americans returning Republicans to the White House makes Russians at least as nervous as the prospect of the West unseating Russia's bosom buddies in Tehran.
Russia did not limit itself to aggressively supporting Iran against the U.S. It also sailed a major part of its naval fleet into Syria, including a weapons delivery, in order to push back against Western efforts to support pro-democracy protesters there. Such action is hardly surprising, since the Kremlin has consistently supported dictators throughout the Arab spring, from Mubarak to Gaddafi.
By supporting tyrants across the Middle East, Russia accomplishes multiple objectives. It takes a stand against the spread of democracy protests, thus immunizing its own domestic scene against such outbursts. It destabilizes the Middle East, roiling oil markets and helping to fill Russian coffers with cash as the price of crude soars. And it undermines American influence, sending a clear message that if the United States does not play ball, it will face increased terrorism and uncertainty abroad.
Russia's Foreign Ministry simultaneously launched a scathing attack on the recently enacted U.S. defense budget, echoing the Soviet era in accusing the U.S. of violating multiple provisions of international law, including the Geneva Conventions, just by enacting it. Russia also accused the U.S. of violating the Conventions in conducting activity at its prison in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. And Vladimir Popovkin, head of the Russian version of NASA, implied that the United States was secretly behind the recent string of spectacular Russian failures in space, using ominous and unspecified "powerful means" to knock out Russian space exploration vehicles time and again.
Even as these bellicose declarations were issuing from Russia, America's new ambassador, Michael McFaul, was arriving in Russia. McFaul released an utterly ridiculous propaganda video on YouTube and was deluged with hostile comments from Russians. Then McFaul opened a Twitter feed and proudly retweeted multiple press articles proclaiming that he had arrived in Russia like a white knight upon a fiery steed to prove that Obama's "reset" with Russia was not dead. Instead of confronting the Kremlin, in other words, Obama was sending a clear signal that he was on board with Russian plans -- not a hard position to take, since they conveniently include the reelection of the Russian dictatorship's best friend abroad, Obama himself.
So the Kremlin will be actively engaged in two different election campaigns this year. First in March, it will be struggling to reinsert Vladimir Putin into office as president for life, and then in November it will be struggling even harder to make sure that Putin's patsy, Barack Obama, gets to remain in the White House. Its principle strategy will be to threaten Americans with World War III unless they choose Obama.
Meanwhile, Putin is launching an all-out attack on his opponents inside Russia, for instance releasing a video comparing demonstration leader Aleksei Navalny to Adolf Hitler. Another opposition leader, Sergei Mitrokhin, was arrested during a protest action. It's a sign of things to come. Once he's president for life and has Obama safely re-ensconced in Washington, Putin will be free to launch a final crackdown on Russian civil society and wipe out any chance that the Arab spring could spread to Russia. Having done so, Putin can continue his foreign policy, which amounts to raking in a bounty of unilateral concessions from Obama, including WTO admission and the abandonment of missile defense in Eastern Europe, meanwhile forging ahead with aggressive policies in the Middle East.
In Russia's behavior, we see proven the fact that one can deal with a bully only through strength. Russia has understood Obama's "reset" proposal and his unilateral concessions only as weakness, and Putin has responded with more and more aggression both at home and abroad. Only if Obama is ousted from office by a Republican who understands the lessons taught by Ronald Reagan will there be any hope for Russia or for American interests where Russia is concerned.
January 23rd, 2012, 14:59
American Patriot
Re: Is Barack Obama a real Manchurian candidate?
Quote:
last week, americans learned that they are, or soon may be, at war with vladimir putin's russia. That is, of course, unless they do just exactly what the kremlin asks, which is pretty simple, really, and consists largely of re-electing barack h. Obama, the best friend the kremlin ever had, as president of the united states.
Full speech of Dinesh D'Souza from the CPAC livestream
March 28th, 2012, 03:30
samizdat
Re: Is Barack Obama a real Manchurian candidate?
There is only one thing scarier for the future of America than all of the debt and bad policies President Obama has built up since his 2008 election: It’s what the prospect of an Obama second term would bring. And the president isn’t being honest about what his secret plans are.
That Mr. Obama has dangerous ideas up his sleeve and won’t be forthcoming about his true agenda during this year’s presidential campaign were exposed in candid comments he made to Russian President Dmitri Medvedev on Monday. On the subject of sensitive arms-control negotiations, the U.S. president advised, “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” This admission begs the question: Flexibility to do what? What agreement with Russia does Mr. Obama want to sign that he thinks would be so damaging to his re-election chances that he would need to wait until afterward to perpetrate it? If such a hidden intention would be dangerous to his re-election, it surely wouldn’t be a safe policy for our national defense.
Mr. Medvedev responded to Mr. Obama’s plea by saying, “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” referring to former and incoming Russian President Vladimir Putin, the strongman who has held the reins of power in Moscow one way or another since 1999. There is no gray area about whether Mr. Obama’s request to delay major diplomatic relations until after the election was motivated entirely by his own political considerations, an uncomfortable reality reflected in the beginning of the repartee between the two presidents. Mr. Obama explained, “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him [Mr. Putin] to give me space.” Mr. Medvedev replied, “I understand your message about space. Space for you … .”
The insidious nature of this back and forth is due to the fact that Mr. Obama didn’t know a microphone was on and thought his conversation with the foreign leader was confidential. That he would be so forthcoming about making U.S. national security second fiddle to his personal quest for re-election is startling. That his candor benefits Russia - a strategic competitor to the United States and former longtime enemy - is scary. Mr. Obama already signed the ill-advised “New Start” Treaty, which allows Moscow to expand and modernize its nuclear stockpile while America unilaterally cuts down our own arsenal. It is the president’s self-centeredness, combined with a cavalier lack of respect for the global perception of U.S. power, that has many security analysts speculating about a rash October surprise to help his electoral bid.
This isn’t the first time Mr. Obama has tried to cut a backroom deal to push off serious action until after the election. Three weeks ago, he reportedly offered Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu bunker-buster bombs and other sophisticated military assistance if Israel would agree to wait until after November to bomb Iran. Such wheeling and dealing shows that Mr. Obama is willing to do anything to win re-election. But when national security is subjugated to politics, America loses.
Brett M. Decker is editorial page editor of The Washington Times. He is coauthor of the new book “Bowing to Beijing” (Regnery, 2011).
Why wouldn't the Russians want their advocate in the White House? They know Obama is out of his league, not negotiating in America's self interest, and giving away the store. They have outplayed Obama (at the expense of our allies) more than once. Of course they want that quisling in the White House.
Russian President Medvedev Says He Wants Obama To Be Re-elected To Avoid America’s “Conservative Wing” (thanks to Weasel Zippers)
(AFP) — Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Monday he wanted his US counterpart Barack Obama to win re-election next year, fearing that the two men’s efforts to improve ties may lose steam under a new administration.
“I can tell you directly — I would like Barack Obama to be re-elected president of the United States maybe more than someone else,” Medvedev said in an interview with the Financial Times whose full transcript was released by the Kremlin early Monday.
“If another person becomes US president then he may have another course,” he said.
“We understand that there are representatives of a rather conservative wing there who are trying to achieve their political goals at the expense of inflaming passions in relation to Russia, among other things.
“But what use is criticising them? This is simply a way of achieving political goals.”
On Thursday, Russian Newspaper Pravda (former official propaganda arm of the Soviet Communist Party) delivered an endorsement of President Obama in an op-ed that also attacked GOP frontrunner Mitt Romney.
In what was an exhaustive string of piercing insults, the column’s author, Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, juxtaposed his detest for Romney – and the U.S.-Russia relations he believes would result from his potential election — with what he hailed a golden era currently enjoyed under Obama.
Responding to an instance in which Romney reportedly called Russia America’s “geopolitical foe,” Hinchey writes: “Exactly at a time when Russia and the USA are finding that they have far more in common than differences, exactly when they see that they are much more friends than foes, when they see that there is so much to be gained through collaboration, a foul-mouthed, big-headed oaf like Romney with more money than sense makes a comment that reveals who he really is to the world: a pea-brained, pith-headed simpleton with too much testosterone and too little common sense, with zero tact, no diplomacy and a paramount grasp on the intricacies of world politics.”
He goes on to exuberantly heap praise on a myriad U.S.-Russian collaborations, including its shared space works programs and the two countries’ ongoing cooperation sharing “information more freely on terrorists, on crime, combating drugs trafficking.“ Hinchey also painted a picture of excellent ”trade and commerce” partnerships forged under the current administration.
All of this progress, according to Hinchey, would collapse with a resounding thud were Mitt Romney to take office — a man he dubs an “ignoramus” and a “stick-in-the-mud wannabe“ who spouts ”outdated Cold War drivel like some redneck nearing an alcoholic coma.”
Much of Hinchey’s assertions induce incredulity, however, as most would argue U.S.-Russia relations are in a poor state currently.
On his Thursday radio broadcast, Beck honed in on this stunning endorsement of the current president and told listeners that “if we’re smart, we’d do the opposite” of what Pravda tells us to do.
He added that the New York Times would do well to endorse incoming Russian President Vladmir Putin as then “both propaganda arms” could be working in tandem.
If Obama is voted into office again, his policies then should come as no surprise, Beck argued. “We know what we are getting.”
Ironically, in Russian, “Pravda” translated means: “The Truth.” There is also a Russian newspaper titled “Novosti” which means “The News.”
A long-running joke among Russians goes: So, the news is not the truth, and the truth is not the news.
March 29th, 2012, 20:39
American Patriot
Re: Is Barack Obama a real Manchurian candidate?
Hey! Any Presidential Candidate that's got Commie Fans MUST be ok!
By Coach Collins, on April 7th, 2012
by Doug Book, staff writer
While the American media provide cover for the Constitutionally ineligible Barack Hussein Obama, Vladimir Putin and the nation of Russia are reaping a treasure trove of defense secrets and missile technology by threatening to reveal the true history of the Manchurian Candidate.
Obama has spent millions to prevent his personal story being revealed to the American public. Records have been destroyed, information hidden, false claims advanced, potential whistleblowers threatened and official documents forged. Enabled by a complicit media and the craven cowardice of political opponents, the most egregious felonies in the nation’s history have served to make the American people easy prey for the schemes of a dedicated Communist and committed enemy of our Constitutional Republic.
And those schemes have included the betrayal both of the United States and her allies.
In 2009 Obama scrapped the long awaited missile defense system for Poland and the Czech Republic because Russia objected
He has refused to keep secret the technical data on the U.S Standard Missile-3, as called for in the 2012 defense authorization bill
Obama will not pledge to keep American missile technology from China, North Korea and Iran as it would “…interfere with [his] constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs…” (1)
Obama will provide Russia information on every Trident missile supplied to Great Britain as part of an arms control deal signed with Russian President Medvedev
Leaked cables show the US will now provide Russia with ALL serial numbers of Trident missiles transferred to Britain. (1)
Obama proposes the United States CUT its nuclear arsenal by 80% yet demands no reciprocity on the part of Russia or any of America’s enemies. (4)
Joe Miller, 2010 US Senate candidate from Alaska reports that, under the guise of drawing a boundary, 7 Alaska-area islands and oil rich sea beds containing perhaps billions of barrels were given to Russia in an unannounced, secret deal by Obama’s State Department. (6)
Under Obama’s programs, by 2016 defense will account for 20% of the national budget, yet bear over HALF of the deficit-reduction cuts. (2) (3)
In mid-March, Obama declared he would “…provide the Russians with detailed technical information about the anti- missile systems he plans to base in Eastern Europe…” (4)
And Congressman Darrell Issa said, “the American people should be very afraid,” continuing with “I judge that in fact he is going to sell out our national defense after the election.” (5)
On March 26th, Obama’s conversation with outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was accidentally picked up on an open microphone. “This is my last election…After my election I have more flexibility,” Obama told Medvedev, who said he would relay that message to the new Russian “president” Vladimir Putin. “On all of these issues, but particularly missile defense this, this can be solved but it’s important for him (Putin) to give me space.” (7)
Why would an American President need to secretly petition a notorious KGB thug for “space?” Because Vladimir Putin is aware of Obama’s criminal abuses of the United States and the American people. He has Obama by the throat, possessed of information which can put the Manchurian Candidate in prison for a lifetime. And he is using that information to literally blackmail the American president into betraying the U.S. and her allies around the world.
And though Barack Obama has certainly needed no persuasion to betray the American people and inflict massive damage on the United States since his election, that treachery is now proceeding according to a schedule and terms dictated by Putin, making the guilt of the American President even more obvious and his chances for re-election more tenuous. Thus the plea for space.
How much MORE damage could the treasonous Barack Obama cause with another 4 years in power? And who might blackmail him next?
According to internal Emails circulated among the staff at Stratfor, an Austin Texas based private intelligence gathering firm, John McCain was presented with proof that Democrats in Pennsylvania and Ohio used voter fraud to win those states and committed other disturbing crimes. The communiqués were stolen and made public by WikiLeaks.
An Email dated November 7, 2008 under the subject line “ Insight – The Dems & Dirty Tricks ** Internal Use Only – Pls Do Not Forward **,” was sent by Fred Burton, Stratfor’s V.P. of Intelligence. It said in part, The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election and Sen. McCain chose not to fight. The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to “out”.
Burton also mentioned a “six-figure” Democrat donation/bribe to Jesse Jackson to buy his silence about Israel. On October 14, 2008 Jackson told fellow attendees in at the World Policy Forum in Evian France a ‘President Obama’ would “remove the clout of Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades.”
Burton continued with an explosive charge he apparently considered quite believable, The hunt is on for the sleezy Russian money into O-mans coffers. A smoking gun has already been found. Will get more on this when the time is right. My source was too giddy to continue. Can you say Clinton and ChiCom funny money? This also becomes a matter of how and when to out.
This allegation makes some sense of Obama’s reassurances to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev caught by an open mic. Obama said “….but it’s important for him [Putin] to give me space.”
Medvedev responded: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you …”
Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”
Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir [Putin]…” Fred Burton is a known quantity in the highest Intelligence circles. He has been Deputy Chief of the Department of State’s counterterrorism division for the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS).
Stratfor has acknowledged that last December its internal communications system was hacked and the group “Anonymous” has taken credit for the sabotage . WikiLeaks started to publish Stratfor’s stolen Emails last month. Startfor will neither confirm nor deny whether the communiqués attributed to its staff are real or fabrications.
A trade agreement currently under negotiation contains language that could potentially ban "Buy American" provisions, crimping American manufacturing.
WASHINGTON -- A group of 68 House Democrats and one Republican sent a letter to President Barack Obama on Thursday urging him to reconsider an element of the controversial free trade agreement currently being negotiated by the administration. If approved in its current form, the pact would effectively ban "Buy American" policies in government contracting.
Although the deal, known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, has received relatively little media attention in the United States, it has sparked international friction among consumer groups and environmental activists who worry that terms demanded by the Obama administration will eliminate important public protections. Domestically, however, the deal's primary source of political tension is from a portion that could ban "Buy American" provisions -- a restriction that opponents emphasize would crimp U.S. jobs.
Since the 1930s, the American government has offered preferential treatment to American producers in the awarding of federal contracts. If a domestic producer offers the government a more expensive bid than a foreign producer, it can still be awarded the contract under certain circumstances, but more recent free trade agreements have granted other nations the same negotiating status as domestic firms. The Obama administration is currently pushing to grant the several nations involved in the Trans-Pacific deal the same privileged status, according to the Thursday letter.
"We do not believe this approach is in the best interests of U.S. manufacturers and U.S. workers," the letter reads. "Of special concern is the prospect that firms established in TPP countries, such as the many Chinese firms in Vietnam, could obtain waivers from Buy American policies.
This could result in large sums of U.S. tax dollars being invested to strengthen other countries' manufacturing sectors, rather than our own."
The letter from members of Congress to the administration marks a rare glimpse inside the typically secretive trade negotiation process. The terms of the free trade negotiations, including the Trans-Pacific pact, are withheld from the public, even though the governments of all the countries involved have access to them. Many major U.S. corporations have access to the draft negotiation texts through their positions on advisory boards to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the White House agency which negotiates trade deals.
"Buy American" provisions do not help all U.S. firms equally. Corporations headquartered in the U.S. that offshore most of their manufacturing operations do not benefit from the system designed to promote domestic production in the way that companies with actual U.S. manufacturing operations do.
Public interest groups also worry that the same trade policies that could ban Buy American breaks will also prevent the U.S. government from making environmental or public health stipulations in federal contracts. The current language barring preferential treatment for American goods is so broad as to limit government specifications on goods to purely functional aspects.
When contracting for paper, for instance, the government could specify that it wants to buy paper of the dimensions 8.5" by 11" -- but it could not require that the paper be composed of recycled materials or use non-toxic dye.
The potential "Buy American" ban also conflicts with a top theme of Obama's re-election campaign -- boosting U.S. manufacturing. In February, the administration proposed fixing a tax loophole that has been exploited by oil and gas companies in order to provide breaks to domestic manufacturers. The tax proposal is not expected to gain any traction during an election year, however, although prospects for the trade agreement are much stronger. Last year, Congress approved three free trade deals initially negotiated by President George W. Bush that Obama had decided to support.
The White House was not immediately available for comment.
USTR spokeswoman Carol Guthrie told HuffPost that the administration is seeking "fair, transparent, predictable and non-discriminatory" contracting rules.
"The U.S. aim in covering government procurement under the TPP is to provide new market opportunities for U.S. goods, services, and suppliers," Guthrie said.
• First president to intentionally disable credit card security measures in order to allow over-the-limit donations, foreign contributions and other illegal fundraising measures.
• First president to propose budgets so unreasonable that not a single representative from either party would cast a vote in favor ("Senate unanimously rejected President Obama's budget last year in 0-97 vote", Politico, "House Votes 414-0 to Reject Obama’s Budget Plan", Blaze)
But remember: he will not rest until all Americans have jobs, affordable homes, green-energy vehicles, and the environment is repaired, etc., etc., etc.
Today’s announcement that Hosni Mubarak is now gravely ill and apparently on his death-bed prompted me to remember the events of last year. I remember vividly turning on Fox News around 5:30am, clutching my cup of French vanilla/breakfast blend coffee. I was greeted by an incredible scene– thousands of Egyptians in the streets, rioting/protesting. Four or five hours later, I also recall the White House held a briefing with Robert Gibbs (the then-Press Secretary). I honestly cannot remember which reporter asked him the question, but it went along these lines: Mr. Gibbs, can you tell us who or what group is behind these protest in Cairo? The response was simply, “No.” Next question, please.
Less than two hours later, our fearless leader himself appeared in the White House press room. From the podium, he informed the world that The United States of America supports the students in Cairo. This statement, of course, prompted me to have a wagonload of questions. Who truly is behind this very obviously-orchestrated uprising, since it is on such a large scale?
How can this President speak with such conviction, when only hours ago his staff claimed to be in the dark? Why would this President throw a thirty year ally like Mubarak under the proverbial Greyhound Bus, then proceed to back over him?
In hindsight, I truly believe the answer is now sitting in front of us– like the two ton elephant in the room.
First I will just say it, then I will give you what I believe to be irrefutable evidence. You be the Judge and Jury!
President Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim!
There, I said it. Now I will back it up with the facts to prove it. This can no longer be a matter of conjecture. There simply is too much evidence. On the surface, to be candid, it would not be a big deal that he was a Muslim, if he loved America and her allies. But the evidence shows otherwise.
Barack Obama, in my opinion, is an enemy of not just our state, but half (or more) of the world. To make matters worse, he’s using America’s might to further his Anti-Colonialism beliefs.
By stating that America was behind the Egyptian students, Barack Obama in effect, instantly cut the heart out of Hosni Mubarak. Mubarak was the one man who kept the Suez Canal open so that Europe didn’t freeze or starve to death. He kept peace and stability in the Middle East by maintaining a very large military. He kept all the treaties with Israel, and never once did any saber-rattling (at least not that I am aware of). Can the same be said for Those who were really behind those riots/protest that overthrew the Mubarak government? What Obama has done is give one of the most strategically-vital countries in the Middle East to a group of Muslim thugs.
Why would Obama do this? Why would anyone purposely give away Egypt to the Muslim Brotherhood? Remember now, this group is the grandfather to Hamas, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda. These guys support and fund all of those Anti-Israel and Anti-American folks who burn our flag while chanting, ” Death to America”! There isn’t time or space to give all the reasons, but I’ll reference a great book that will provide them for you. I don’t normally plug a book, but this one defines Barack Obama’s thinking quite clearly. Let me assure you, this guy is bad news for America and the rest of the free world. Go out and purchase ” TheRoots of Obama’s Rage” by Dr. Dinesh D’Souza.
In the last two years, Lebanon, Tunisia, Libya, Yemen and now Egypt were seized by The Muslim Brotherhood. In every case, Obama stood by and watched. He watched as Syria turned into a burning ash heap. And now of course, we know that our old friend Vladimir from Moscow was involved in that human fiasco. Obama has allowed the maniac in Iran to all but acquire nuclear weapons, while listening to him tell the world what he was going to do with them.
Returning to our shores, let’s now take a look at President Obama’s domestic policy. He has essentially shut down our own ability to pump oil.
Again, keep in mind that we have a thousand-year supply. In the middle of a major recession, he didn’t just compound the fuel problem– he more that doubled our prices, further crippling our economy. He allowed our nation to run for nearly four years now without a BUDGET! He gathered the nation’s best economic minds to the White House early in his tenure, then threw all their collective advice out the window. And now we learn that he is pushing to allow the military budget cuts to take hold. Do you have any idea what a 40% cut in our military funding is going to do to America? It’s going to crush our military capabilities, which it now appears is exactly what he wants.
Obama has imposed such stringent regulations on banking in America that he is effectively crushing that industry as well. He has allowed the EPA to attack our farming and ranching industries with a massive club. He has gone after Christianity unmercifully, and has plunged a knife through the heart of the health care industry with his ObamaCare. He has piled trillions upon trillions of dollars worth of debt on our grandchildren’s children.
For me, there is only one explanation for this sort of treatment of our nation and our friends. Every word of the D’Souza book is true. This man does in fact hate America, a basic tenant of his true faith. His minister in Chicago has stated that he knew Barack Obama was a Muslim. Barack Obama is on a quest to harm not just America, but Britain, Israel and all of the descendants of the British Empire. This man must be stopped before it is too late. I truly pray that we are allowed to have elections this November. With the course we’re currently on, I now doubt this will even happen.
June 22nd, 2012, 18:56
American Patriot
Re: Is Barack Obama a real Manchurian candidate?
So? The Muslim Brotherhood is going to come here and cause riots and uproar and cause him to be removed from office?
Exclusive: Jack Cashill shares shocking secret president tried to keep under wraps
In late March 2008, on a local New York City show called “Inside City Hall,” the venerable African-American entrepreneur and politico, Percy Sutton, told host Dominic Carter how he was asked to help smooth Barack Obama’s admission into Harvard Law School 20 years earlier.
The octogenarian Sutton calmly and lucidly explained that he had been “introduced to [Obama] by a friend.” The friend’s name was Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, and the introduction had taken place about 20 years prior.
Sutton described al-Mansour as “the principal adviser to one of the world’s richest men.” The billionaire in question was Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal.
Given, the game-changing nature of this revelation when it surfaced in late August 2008, the Obama camp and its allies in the media, particularly Politico and Media Matters, shifted into overdrive to kill the story. Through a series of denials, lies and slanders about Sutton’s mental health, they succeeded.
The story, however, has come back to life. The elusive al-Mansour was a guest on the BlogTalkRadio show, “The National and International Roundtable,” Sept. 19, 2012.
In his introduction, the host openly acknowledged that al-Mansour “made news in 2008 when it was revealed that he had been a patron of President Barack Obama and had recommended him for admission to Harvard Law School.”
The host goes on to describe al-Mansour as “co-founder of the International law firm of al-Waleed, al-Talal and al-Mansour and special adviser to Saudi Arabian prince, his royal highness Prince Al Waleed bin Talal bin Abdulazziz.”
This meshed completely with what Sutton had said in 2008. According to Sutton, al-Mansour had asked him to “please write a letter in support of [Obama] … a young man that has applied to Harvard.” Sutton had friends at Harvard and gladly did so.
Although Sutton did not specify a date, this would likely have been in 1988 when the 26-year-old Obama was applying to Harvard Law School.
Khalid al-Mansour was a piece of work. Although impressively well connected, the Texan-born attorney and black separatist had not met the paranoid racial fantasy unworthy of his energy.
Several of his speeches can still be seen on YouTube. In one, “A Little on the History of Jews,” he lectures the world’s Jews, “God gave you nothing. The children from Poland and Russia were promised nothing. But they are stealing the land the same as the Christians stole the lands from the Indians in America.”
For the record, bin Talal was the very same Saudi who had offered New York $10 million to help the city rebuild after 9/11, but who had his gift refused by Mayor Rudy Guiliani. In September 2001, Giuliani was in no mood to hear even a billionaire blame America for inciting the attacks with its pro-Israel stance, no matter how deep his pockets.
For deeper background into why bin Talal might have been helping Obama, read Frank Miele’s excellent piece in the unlikely Daily Interlake of Kalispell, Mont.
Ben Smith, then of Politico, took the lead in killing the story. Shortly after the story broke, Smith ran the disclaimer that “Barack Obama’s campaign is flatly denying a story told by former Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton.”
The Obama camp, in fact, denied that Obama even knew al-Mansour. Smith then talked to al-Mansour. At first, al-Mansour avoided contradicting Sutton’s story out of respect for Sutton, “a dear friend.” When pressed, however, al-Mansour disowned Sutton’s story. “The scenario as it related to me did not happen,” he reportedly told Smith.
A self-appointed “spokesman for Sutton’s family” by the name of Kevin Wardally put the penultimate nails in this story’s coffin with an email to Smith that read in part: “As best as our family and the Chairman’s closest friends can tell, Mr. Sutton, now 86 years of age, misspoke in describing certain details and events in that television interview.”
For Smith, even though Wardally had gotten Sutton’s age wrong by two years, this emailed slander was proof enough that Sutton’s highly specific claim was manufactured. Media Matters, meanwhile, scolded those conservative bloggers that did not accept the various denials at face value.
Independent journalist Ken Timmerman, now running for Congress in Maryland, followed up with Wardally. Unconvincingly, Wardally claimed that a nephew of the elder Sutton had retained his services.
Sutton’s son and daughter, however, told Timmerman that no one in their family even knew who Kevin Wardally was, let alone authorized him to speak on behalf of the family.
When Timmerman contacted al-Mansour, he repeatedly declined to comment on what Sutton had said and, contrary to the line from the Obama camp, claimed to know Obama personally.
With Hillary out of the race, no newsroom in America felt compelled to follow up on Timmerman’s research. At the time this story was gelling, in early September 2008, the media were doing all their digging in Alaskan dumpsters. The 89-year-old Sutton died in December 2009.
The Obama media will try to ignore this new revelation or, if not, kill it. Their best argument now is that al-Mansour was not on the air when his introduction was read. That is true enough.
Yet from the casual tone of the introduction, the listener senses that within black nationalist circles, the story Sutton told is believed to be true. If so, it should absolutely matter that a Saudi billionaire and his black nationalist cohorts have been promoting Obama from the beginning.
Ben Smith is now editor of Buzzfeed. If he ever wants to be taken seriously as a journalist, the onus is on him to follow up. If he wants to throw his peers a bone, he can report that bin Talal owns 7 percent of News Corp., the parent company of Fox News.
October 9th, 2012, 00:22
vector7
Re: Is Barack Obama a real Manchurian candidate?
68% of web traffic donations on Obama.com come from foreign sources http://cdn6.teapartytribune.com/wp-c...ne-300x226.jpg President Obama leisurely strolling through his new America. Well not really, but you get the point. source: freerepublic.com
Just when you think the Obama juggernaut has reached new lows in corruption and fraud out pop new allegations that are in the realm of science fiction. It would appear that 68% of web traffic donors on Obama.com may come from foreign sources a clear violation of Federal law. And if that is not bad enough, Obama administration officials may be storing its correspondence on private computers so that they can destroy incriminating evidence as quickly as it is created.
What the hell is happening in this country? Who is running the country when we do not know who is supporting the Obama administration and this same administration is hiding its records on off site computers away from government archives. It is really impossible to find the words to describe just how serious these allegations are. It is as if the Obama administration may have turned on the country it professes to serve and wants to destroy it. There is no other way to say it, if this is true.
What do they have to hide so badly?
Enter Robert Roche. He is a former resident of Chicago ( What else!) co-founder and Chairman of the Board of Acorn International Inc, a media and branding direct sales company based in Shanghai, China. If this does not make your head dizzy, click here for the full biography, but this is not all. Roche also owns the web site Obama.com which is chartered with raising campaign cash for President Obama. What is noteworthy and completely alarming is that 68% of the web traffic from Obama.com comes from foreign sources.
“ To begin with, Obama.com is owned by Shanghai executive and former Chicago resident Robert Roche, a powerful Obama bundler with enough financial clout to break bread with the President, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and even Chinese President Hu Jintao, at the same time.
Breitbart elaborates on Roche: In 2011, Mr. Roche obtained one of the most sought-after pieces of real estate in Washington, DC: a seat at the head table for President Obama’s State Dinner for Chinese President Hu Jintao. How Roche—a man whose infomercial company hawks fitness equipment, cell phones, and breast enhancement products—landed a seat alongside Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former President Bill Clinton, Sen. John Kerry, former President Jimmy Carter, and Chinese President Hu Jintao remains unclear. Since 2009, White House Visitor Logs list the name Robert Roche at least 19 times, despite the fact Mr. Roche’s primary residence is in China.” More…
If you get the impression that Roche may have figured out a way to illegally funnel foreign contributions from who knows where you are on the right track. Now add another piece to this appalling fact.
It would appear at the same time that the Obama administration may be keeping all of its correspondence off government computers and onto private ones whose whereabouts are completely unknown.
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...b1ce9d496f.jpg
Barack Obama speaks during the announcement of the Cesar E. Chavez National Monument to honor the late Latino farm worker and labor and civil rights activist on October 8, 2012 in Keene, California.
Credits: Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
According to a 109-page report released Monday by the Government Accountability Institute (GAI), the Obama campaign has solicited donations from a number of foreign nations, including China, Vietnam and Azerbaijan.
"Using a collection of online research tools, the Government Accountability Institute analyzed a portion of the foreign links that lead to the Obama campaign website, my.barackobama.com," the report said. "The Institute found a wide variety of instances in which apparent foreign nationals either received solicitation emails or posted links to my.barackobama.com."
According to the report, a Chinese blogger reposted letters he received from the Obama campaign, each of which contains a solicitation for $3 or $5. The report observed that the "smaller donations don’t require the campaign to keep any record..."
The report says that the Obama campaign "sent a solicitation letter to 'Hikemt Hadjy-Zadh,' an Azerbaijani citizen," in August 2012.
"A writer in Vietnam writes on a website for the Vietnam Institute for Development Studies (a government-backed think tank) and posts emails he has received from my.barackobama.com with more than 24 total links to the campaign’s donate page embedded in the emails," the report added.
The report notes that one letter came from Mitch Stewart, Director of Obama's campaign arm, “Organizing for America.”
"Ironically," GAI reported, "Stewart laments that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is reportedly taking money from foreign sources. The reader is then prompted to give his name and email address and thereafter begins receiving solicitation letters for donations."
The campaign has also sent solicitation letters to a Dutch blogger, a "member of the Italian Radical Socialist movement," a Japanese blogger, a Norwegian blogger and a "blogger in Egypt who serves on the board of the Union of Arab Bloggers."
The Egyptian blogger says that while "Arabs and Muslims” support the “Democratic party, compared to the Republican Party,” they find his support for gay marriage "unacceptable," calling it "immoral and disgusting." They also oppose what they see as Obama's alignment with Israel.
The lengthy report also details security issues with credit card donations on candidate websites, and notes that in 2008, "Obama.com was purchased by an Obama fundraiser living in Shanghai, China, whose business is heavily dependent on relationships with Chinese state-run television and other state-owned entities."
Worse yet, the report says that "approximately 68% of Internet traffic going to Obama.com comes from foreign locations," according to data from Google Analytics.
"An examination of the backlinks going to Obama.com reveals that a strong majority is from foreign language or foreign-based websites," the report said.
"These websites do not appear to be catering to American expatriates."