Page 1 of 18 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 456

Thread: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS - GRAPHIC PG. 15

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS - GRAPHIC PG. 15

    Revealed: Chilling ISIS recruitment video features 20-year-old medical student from Cardiff as his family say they are heartbroken that he and 17-year-old brother have gone to fight in Syria

    • British jihadist who featured in the video named as Nasser Muthana
    • Is a 20-year-old medical student from Cardiff and has gone to Syria
    • Went to the country with his 17-year-old brother Aseel Muthana
    • Family say they are heartbroken and currently have no contact with them
    • Older brother featured in a chilling ISIS recruitment video
    • In the video, two of the men claim to be British, while two say they are from Australia
    • They plead with Muslims to travel to Iraq and Syria to join ISIS militants
    • Tell viewers they are 'going to die anyway' and say must make sacrifices
    • Also describe ISIS' brutal campaign in Iraq and Syria as 'golden times'

    By John Hall and Jennifer Newton
    Published: 05:32 EST, 20 June 2014 | Updated: 13:56 EST, 20 June 2014


    995 shares
    714
    View
    comments

    A young British jihadist who featured in a chilling recruitment video urging Muslims to join them in Iraq and Syria have been revealed to be a 20-year-old medical student from Cardiff.

    Nasser Muthana can be seen in the footage wearing a white turban and is labelled in the video as 'Brother Abu Muthanna Yemeni from Britain'.

    His heartbroken family from the Cardiff area told ITV News that his 17-year-old brother Aseel Muthana is with him too and that the pair went to Syria because 'they feel guilty' about the country.

    ITV News has also been told that police visited the family two weeks ago and that is when they found out the brothers had gone.
    Scroll down for video

    +6

    Recruiting: Three men in the video identify themselves as Abu Muthana Al Yemeni (centre), who has been revealed to be a 20-year-old medical student from Cardiff, Abu Bara' Al Hindi (right) and Abu Dujana Al Hindi (left). They all claim to have come from Britain and speak with English accents

    A spokesperson for the Muthana family said: 'They are not happy with Nasser going. We didn’t know he was going. We wouldn’t let him go if we knew.

    'My family were more devastated that Aseel went. It is heartbreaking because we don’t know if we will see them again.


    More...



    'Currently we don’t know where they are and we don’t have contact with them.

    'Nasser and Aseel went because they feel guilty about Syria but we were surprised they were talking about those things we saw on YouTube. Both were pious and religious and interested in the faith.'

    The 13-minute video, which features the older brother is professionally shot and edited, and shows a group of young men sitting in a circle, holding weapons and reciting militant Islamist slogans and passages from the Qur'an.




    +6

    Encouragement: At several points the man identifying himself as Abu Bara' Al Hindi claims joining ISIS will alleviate the stress and 'depression' of living in the West



    Three British militants call for others to join the fight in Iraq





    The video - which is titled 'There is No Life Without Jihad' - appears to have been professionally edited, and was published on YouTube by ISIS' Al Hayat Media Center.

    Among those speaking on the video are men identifying themselves as Abu Muthana Al Yemeni, and Abu Bara' Al Hindi - both of whom claim to have travelled to the Middle East from Britain.
    Another man, Abu Dujana Al Hindi, also says he is from Britain - with all three speaking in clear English accents.
    The footage is intersected with sections of music and religious chanting, as the men instruct viewers to leave their lives in the West behind and join ISIS' brutal campaign in Iraq and Syria.
    The men appear to be sat in a lush grove while they speak - the greenery juxtaposing the terror, death and brutality the militant group has brought to parts of Syria and Iraq in recent weeks.




    +6

    Propaganda: Among those speaking in the video is a man identifying himself as Abu Muthana Al Yemeni (right) - who claims to have travelled to the Middle East from Britain




    +6

    Global: Another man making an appearance in the chilling video is Abu Yahya ash Shami (pictured) - who speaks with a strong Australian accent


    44 WORKERS KIDNAPPED BY ISIS 'RELEASED' AFTER NEGOTIATIONS

    A group of 44 workers who were kidnapped by ISIS in northern Iraq have been released after four days captive, a Turkish diplomat claims.
    The hostages, of various nationalities, were captured on Tuesday after militants raided a construction site of a hospital near Kirkuk.
    Following days of negotiations, the deputy security chief of Kirkuk secured their release and they are now travelling to a safe house, according to reports.
    The workers - believed to be from Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Turkmenistan - were captured as the extremists continued their sweep down towards Baghdad.
    On Thursday, Turkey's foreign office told all citizens to leave Iraq as a further 80 Turkish nationals were kidnapped by militants.


    At several points the man identifying himself as Abu Bara' Al Hindi claims joining the group will alleviate the stress and 'depression' of living in the West.
    'Are you willing to sacrifice the job you've got, the big car you've got, the family you have? Are you willing to sacrifice this, for the sake of Allah?,' he says.
    'Then definitely, if you sacrifice something for Allah, Allah will give you 700 times more than this,' he adds.
    Another man making an appearance in the video is Abu Yahya ash Shami - who speaks with a strong Australian accent.
    The video was heavily promoted by supporters of ISIS on Twitter this morning, as they launched a massive propaganda drive across social media.
    Using the hashtag #AllEyesOnIsis, hundreds of accounts were encouraged to post messages of support for the brutal Islamist group.
    In an uncontrollable stunt - that cannot be moderated or blocked - extremist fighters vow to 'spread the truth' behind their brutal attacks that even Al Qaeda have condemned.
    It comes just hours after President Barack Obama announced plans to unleash air strikes on Iraq as world leaders warn of 'a catastrophe of unprecedented scale'.
    Twitter refused to speak about ISIS' propaganda drive on the social media site this morning. Nobody from the Home Office or Scotland Yard was available to comment.



    +6

    Message: The 13-minute video is professionally shot and edited, and shows a group of young men sitting in a circle holding weapons, while reciting Islamist slogans and passages from the Qur'an






    +6

    Jihad: The professionally-edited footage is intersected with music and religious chanting, with the men instructing viewers to leave behind their lives in the West and join their brutal campaign in Iraq and Syria


    'WE LOVE YOU ISIS': FROM USA TO ROME TO AUSTRALIA - DISTURBING NOTES FROM EVERY CONTINENT SHOW GLOBAL SUPPORT FOR ISLAMIST MILITANTS

    Twitter users across the world have pledged their allegiance to ISIS in slew of disturbing posts to the extremist group.
    The Jihadis launched a blitzkrieg hit on the site at 10.30am, vowing to 'spread the truth' behind their brutal attacks that even Al Qaeda have condemned.


    Messages of support for ISIS were sent from all over the world this morning - including the Colosseum in Rom




    Using the hash tag #AllEyesOnIsis, extremist fighters flooded the social media site with propaganda, luring vulnerable people to join them in Iraq.
    And within minutes, their stunt - which Twitter is powerless to block or moderate - was met with chilling messages of support from countries all over the globe - from Rome to Australia, Switzerland to America, Kenya to Nepal.
    It comes just hours after President Barack Obama announced plans to unleash air strikes on Iraq as world leaders warn of 'a catastrophe of unprecedented scale'.


    Threat: Another message support the Islamic extremists was posted several thousand feet in the air from within an airplane




    Concern: One particularly chilling note - apparently sent from Kosovo - was written in childish handwriting in what appeared to be a school exercise book


    In a manifesto for the 'storm', released this morning, ISIS members vowed to describe ISIS, give answers to 'allegations against ISIS', and tweet speeches by their leaders.
    In one chilling tweet, a member wrote: 'Today is dedicated to giving support to Isis here in Tweeter. The English hash tag is: #AllEyesOnIsis'.
    They aim to translate everything into English, sparking fears that British internet users will be the targets of the storm.



    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  2. #2
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    'More Extreme Than Al Qaeda'? How ISIS Compares to Other Terror Groups


    The leader of the Islamist fighters sweeping across northern Iraq has been called the heir apparent to Osama bin Laden. But there are big differences between his group - the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - and bin Laden's al Qaeda.
    ISIS is a more conventional fighting force, rolling in with tanks and capturing whole cities with brutal force rather than staging spectacular, carefully planned, one-off bomb attacks.



    Think of ISIS as more of a Goliath than a David.
    Sign up for breaking news alerts from NBC News
    “Why do a car bomb when you can take 50 trucks and take the city?” said Patrick M. Skinner, director of special projects for the Soufan Group, a security consulting company. “Terrorism is when you don’t have that option.”
    ISIS found fertile ground to grow in the civil war in Syria and the aftermath of the U.S. occupation of Iraq. Last week it made a lightning advance across the Iraqi north, capturing large cities. The group immediately ordered women to stay home, banned smoking and drinking and warned of harsh consequences under Sharia or Islamic law.
    Demonstrating their growing hold, ISIS militants on Thursday hung black banners on watchtowers at the biggest oil refinery in the country, a critical source of domestic energy.
    The ISIS power grab has raised concerns about a wider Sunni-Shiite war in the Middle East.



    “They represent a threat to every country in the region,” Secretary of State John Kerry told TODAY in an interview that aired Thursday. “They’re more extreme even than al Qaeda. And they are threatening the United States and Western interests.”

    John Kerry on Iraq crisis: Working with Iran 'not on the table'

    TODAY







    ISIS is operating more as a traditional insurgency than al Qaeda did, setting up checkpoints and seizing territory and equipment, said Colin P. Clarke, an associate political scientist at the Rand Corp. who has studied insurgency for more than a decade.
    Technically, the two groups have voiced a similar goal: The establishment of an Islamic caliphate, governed by Sharia.
    But for al Qaeda, that was always more of a pipe dream — stretching from the Middle East to Asia and North Africa, incorporating Chechens and Uzbeks, Uighurs in China, the disputed Kashmir region straddling India and Pakistan.
    ISIS is more hardened and has a more limited objective. It is concerned, at least for now, only with Syria and Iraq. And it already has something al Qaeda only dreamed of — a land base.




    US to send up to 300 military advisors to Iraq

    TODAY







    Even in its pre-Sept. 11 heyday, al Qaeda was essentially a guest in Afghanistan. But ISIS is what al Qaeda might have become had the United States not spent more than 10 years decimating it.
    “If al Qaeda central ever had the opportunity to take Mosul, they would have,” Skinner said, referring to the ISIS-captured second-largest city in Iraq.
    “If al Qaeda could do what ISIS did, they would do it in a heartbeat,” he said. “But we spent a trillion dollars just destroying them. The worst job on the planet for 10 years has been the No. 3 guy in al Qaeda.”
    Like al Qaeda at its peak, ISIS is thought to be good at recruitment, appealing to disaffected youth and Sunni Muslims with perceived or actual grievances. It has proved skillful at leveraging social media, including Twitter, to attract fighters.
    Its leader is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who was captured by American forces in Iraq in 2005. He was known as savvy, more of a battlefield tactician than bin Laden, and not especially dangerous.




    U.S. State Department via Reuters
    Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi appears on a U.S. State Department wanted poster.
    He was released to Iraqi authorities in 2009 and by 2010 rose to lead ISIS, the successor group to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s al Qaeda in Iraq.
    That is not to be confused with al Qaeda central, the global network that was behind 9/11 and is headed by Ayman al-Zawahiri.
    Zarqawi, a Jordanian, fled Afghanistan for Iraq in 2001, joined forces with a Kurdish separatist group and began recruiting Iraqis, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. The group flourished as Iraq sank into civil war.
    Today, ISIS membership is believed to number in the thousands, probably similar to al Qaeda at its peak. For the moment, it is believed to be a more localized threat than al Qaeda was, concerning itself with Syria and Iraq.




    Obama Firmly States US Troops Not Going to Iraq

    NBC News







    But if ISIS is successful in warding off the Shiite Iraqi security forces of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, and in holding territory, that could change, Clarke said.
    Of course, that's a big if: Besides the Maliki government, the United States and Iran have interests in stopping ISIS.
    “One would think, over time, its objectives may expand from being just satisfied with more parochial interests to taking the fight to the American homeland,” he said.
    Al Qaeda cut ties with ISIS earlier this year after Zawahiri couldn’t resolve a fight between ISIS and an al Qaeda affiliate, Jabhat al-Nusra. An al Qaeda statement characterized ISIS as stubborn and unconcerned with consultation and teamwork, The Washington Post reported.
    The split has been portrayed as ISIS’ being too brutal for al Qaeda, but Skinner said that perception is overblown.
    “Their ideology is exactly the same. The only difference is who they swear allegiance to,” he said. “They’re fighting over power and prestige. They’re equally bad. It’s not like one is the Peace Corps.”




    Oil companies pull staff as Iraq requests help

    TODAY








    First published June 20th 2014, 3:16 am
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  3. #3
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    Americans too???

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1837013

    Home-grown terror: American jihadist wannabes flock to ISIS-like groups in Iraq and Syria

    Muslim American extremists from coast to coast, including New York City, head overseas to train for jihad — and NYPD's terror chief is concerned about when they come back.

    BY Dan Friedman , Corky Siemaszko
    NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
    Thursday, June 19, 2014, 10:14 PM

    • A
    • A
    • A

    Share this URL




    ABACA The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria is among the groups that actively recruit foreigners to join their jihadist ranks. Muslim American extremists have joined similar groups.

    They're the potential killers next door learning to become jihadists in a factory of terrorists whose ultimate target is New York City.
    More than 100 young home-grown Muslims, including some from Gotham, are being trained to become an enemy within by Al Qaeda-inspired groups like ISIS operating in disintegrating Syria and Iraq, the NYPD’s terror chief estimated.
    “I would be hyper-concerned about the people over there from New York City on the presumption they’re going to return to New York City,” John Miller, said Thursday.
    New York Daily News American jihadis: Moner Mohammad Abu-Salha (top) and his suicide attack in Syria. Abdirahmaan Muhumed (bottom) left Minnesota to join ISIS fighters in Syria in bid to overthrow President Bashar Assad.


    Miller said he is just as worried about American jihadists from “Chicago, Minnesota, Portland, you name it.”
    “If their mindset is to return to America and to engage in terrorist activities, they’re likely going to end up in New York anyway,” Miller said.
    They’ll be fanatics with friendly faces like Abdirahmaan Muhumed, a 29-year-old dad from Minneapolis who personifies “Jihad Cool” and who is learning in Syria to kill so-called infidels.
    And they are monsters who could be mistaken for good guys, like 22-year-old Moner Mohammad Abu-Salha, a Florida college dropout who was photographed petting a kitty shortly before he died in a suicide attack on Syrian troops in May.
    “There’s a factory over there” in Syria and Iraq that turns out terrorists,” Miller said. “The situation in Syria is a cancer and now that has spread to Iraq . . . They’re going over, getting training, getting radicalized.”
    Miller laid out the frightening scenario during a meeting with the Daily News Editorial Board — and as President Obama announced he was sending several hundred military advisers to help the hapless Baghdad government stop radical ISIS from gobbling up the rest of the country.
    Julia Xanthos/New York Daily News NYPD terror chief John Miller met with the Daily News Editorial Board and expressed concerns over Americans who seek jihadist training overseas.


    The NYPD’s intelligence chief did not say how many New Yorkers are being schooled in terror by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, but he said they have a good idea who they are.
    It is very important, he added, to deny ISIS any “sanctuary.”
    “Why did we have 9/11? Because Al Qaeda controlled real estate in Afghanistan where they had camps that allowed them to have a logistical infrastructure,” he said. “You don’t want that kind of sanctuary.”
    So far, there has been no known successful terror attack on U.S. soil by an American who was radicalized overseas.
    ABACA Children fill out the ranks of ISIS as they work to overthrow governments in Syria and Iraq.


    The closest thing to that was failed Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad, a Connecticut man who was already infected with Islamic fanaticism before he went to a terrorist training camp in Pakistan.
    “Bin Laden’s ideology of going after the far enemy was never broadly enacted, even by other radical jihadists,” said Paul Pillar, who was the CIA’s chief of analytic units covering the Near East and Persian Gulf.
    But New York Sen. Chuck Schumer warned there’s a first time for everything.
    FBI Cabdulaahi Ahmed Faarax recruited Somali Americans to be jihadists.


    “So we’re going to have to readjust,” the Democrat said. “So far we’ve been able successfully to readjust every circumstance. It’s not an accident we haven’t had a terrorist attack in New York, praise God, since 9/11.”
    Americans constitute a tiny percentage of the estimated 12,000 to 15,000 foreign fighters from 81 countries who have flooded in to help ISIS try to oust Syrian despot Bashar Assad — and who are now marching toward Baghdad, said experts like Richard Barrett of the Soufan Group, an intelligence organization.
    They have been lured into the fight by rap-filled videos that romanticize the “revolution” and help turn middling Muslims into radicals willing to die for Allah.



    In recent months, over a dozen young Somali-Americans from Minneapolis and St. Paul like Muhumed have traveled to Syria to join the ranks of ISIS, according to Minnesota Public Radio.
    “A Muslim has to stand up for (what’s) right,” Muhumed wrote in a Jan. 2 post obtained by MPR. “I give up this worldly life for Allah.”
    Muhumed and the others are now being chased by the FBI.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  4. #4
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    Now Even ISIS Has Its Very Own Whistleblower

    By Alice Speri
    You know you have made it as a para-government when you get your very own leakers — and ISIS, which aspires to set up an Islamic State of Iraq and Syria in the growing swathe of territory it controls, has been having some problems containing the spill of sensitive and strategic secrets.
    While the group mastered the art of social media, they have yet to figure out a way to control the information they do not want shared online — from the identity of its leaders to its alliances with other groups across the region.
    ISIS fighters and their friends are total social media pros. Read more here.
    There is one Twitter account in particular, @wikibaghdady, which seems to have access to a whole lot of information about the group, the Daily Beast reported yesterday.
    Nobody knows who’s behind it — whether one, or many, disgruntled former member of ISIS, a rival Islamist, or a foreign government’s intelligence agent. But the handle @wikibaghdady has been on the radar of those monitoring the Syrian war on social media for several months.
    'He’s someone close to the group, providing the kind of details that only come from intimacy.'
    The account, active since last December, has been spewing details ISIS would presumably prefer to keep confidential to its nearly 38,000 followers.
    Among its leaks, @wikibaghdady reportedly outed the identity of ISIS’ mysterious leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. More recently it highlighted the group’s connection with Iraq’s Baathists — Saddam Hussein’s former party.
    “In the event that Baghdad falls there’s an agreement that Izzat al Douri will become the de-facto leader as an alternative to ISIS that the international community cannot refuse,” the account, which seems to have a penchant for predicting ISIS’s next moves, tweeted as late as last week.
    Al Douri, a former army commander under Saddam Hussein who has escaped American and Iraqi capture, has been missing in action for years, and is now reportedly leading ex Baathists in an alliance with the ISIS.
    7
    June
    @wikibaghdady sounds like he knows what he's talking about — some observers pointed out. And while the account tweets in Arabic, translated collections of his posts are also available online.
    "Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is a real person who has a fake nickname and title. This is also the case with everyone around him and there isn’t a member of Al-Baghdadi’s inner circle with a real name. Every person in Al-Baghdadi’s inner circle is 100% Iraqi and he doesn’t accept any other nationality because he does not trust anyone," the account spilled back in December. "The number of members in the Al-Baghdadi’s military council is about 8 to 13 people. The Military Council is headed by three people from Saddam's army who also belonged to the former Baath Party. The main leader is Brigadier General Haji Bakr who was previously an officer in Saddam's Baathist army. Who exactly is Haji Bakr?! What is his relationship to Al-Baghdadi and when did it start?"
    '@wikibaghdady is based in Saudi Arabia and is managed by Saudi intelligence.'
    On other occasions, @wikibaghdady spilled the beans about internal fighting within ISIS.
    "There were about twenty to thirty fighters who split from the ISIS on a daily basis. They found that fighters from Saudi Arabia were the most likely to split and that Tunisians were the least," he revealed in January. "This is when [Al-Baghdadi] ordered that the suicide bombers should be Saudi as much as possible, and that Tunisians shouldn’t be involved since they’re the most loyal."
    If accurate, that's a lot of detail for someone with no ins on the organization.
    “Whoever @wikibaghdady is, two things about him are clear,” Jacob Siegel wrote in the Daily Beast: “He’s a fellow Islamist who has a beef with ISIS, and he’s someone close to the group, providing the kind of details that only come from intimacy.”
    Jihad selfies: These British extremists in Syria love social media. Read more here.
    But not everyone’s buying that — with some critics saying the mysterious account might not be all that privy to the inside decisions of the group.
    'There are several accounts that spread misinformation, and some of them pretend to be former ISIS members.'
    Abu Bakr al Janabi, a prolific ISIS supporter who often translates and distributes the group’s messages, told VICE News that @wikibaghdady is “based in Saudi Arabia and is managed by Saudi intelligence” — a claim that is as unverified as any other about the mastermind of the account.
    “There are several accounts that spread misinformation, and some of them pretend to be former ISIS members. They spread info in a nasty way,” he said, acknowledging that some of the tweets are accurate. “They can’t lie openly, so what they do is they mix truth with falsehood to deceive people.”
    Syria’s foreign fighters are here to stay. Read more here.
    “One lie that they spread is that the ISIS council is only Iraqis, which is a pure lie, the council members are Iraqis, Syrian, Saudis and from Chechnya,” he added. “Another lie is that nobody in ISIS has seen Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, which is also a pure lie, he has shown himself many times. The third lie is that Abu Muhammed Al-Adnani — a spokesman for ISIS — is Iraqi, which is false; Adnani is a Syrian from Idlib.”
    VICE News could not independently verify al Janabi’s claims — nor @wikibaghdady’s.
    But some analysts agree with the ISIS supporter.
    “The account does seem to offer credible insider information about ISIS,” Hassan Hassan, an expert on radical groups in the region, told The Daily Beast. “But it is not wholly accurate…and should be taken with a pinch of salt.”
    Up next, ISIS's very own NSA.
    Follow Alice Speri on Twitter:@alicesperi
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  5. #5
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    Iraq crisis: ISIS or ISIL – what’s in a transliterated name?

    By Nick Logan Global News



    ABOVE: Millions of people have fled areas the conflict areas in northern Iraq and in some places there’s a scramble for basics, like food and gasoline. Foreign Editor Stuart Greer reports from Erbil, Iraq.



    You consider yourself a pretty well-informed person. You read a wide range of articles on foreign affairs.
    And you don’t know what to call the Sunni militants taking over wide swaths of Iraq.

    Related Stories





    Sometimes they’re called the Islamic State of Iraq in the Levant (ISIL). Or the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (all shortened to ISIS).
    READ MORE: Iraq crisis: A look at ISIS’s propaganda machine
    The Arabic name for the group is Al-Dawla al-Islamiya fi al-Iraq wa al-Sham, whose acronym DAIISH isn’t used in English-language reporting.
    Many western officials – including Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, U.S. President Barack Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry and the United Nations – use ISIL.
    News outlets including CNN, the New York Times and BBC have been using ISIS, although BBC is calling the jihadist group the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant but shortening it to ISIS.
    “The final ‘S’ in the acronym ISIS stems from the Arabic word “al-Sham”. This can mean the Levant, Syria or even Damascus but in the context of the global jihad it refers to the Levant,” BBC explained in a post profiling the organization, which formed in 2006 and went on to become one of the principal groups fighting government forces (and rival rebel groups) in Syria’s civil war.
    “The Washington Post has been referring to the organization as ISIS, shorthand for the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. This is how most news organizations that operate in English began identifying the outfit when it emerged as a dangerous fighting force two years ago, launching terror strikes and carving out territory amid the Syrian civil war,” Washington Post foreign affairs writer Ishaan Tharoor wrote.
    READ MORE: Iraqi soliders battle Sunni militants for third day over oil refinery
    Global News, for its part, is using ISIS moving forward.
    “The group’s most influential presence is in Syria and Iraq,” said Ron Waksman, the Senior Director of Online, Current Affairs and Editorial Standards and Practices at Global News. “ISIS more clearly identifies for the audience the areas where the conflict has been raging and has spread. The Levant is not familiar to most people, though it is historically accurate.
    The Associated Press, meanwhile, believes ISIL is the most accurate translation of the group’s name and reflects its aspirations to rule over a broad swath of the Middle East,” AP vice president and senior managing editor or international news John Daniszewski wrote.
    The group’s ostensible goal is to establish a caliphate or Islamic state in Iraq and al-Sham, whose broadest geographic definition – which would include not only Syria but Jordan, Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Cyprus, part of Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula and a small area of southern Turkey – is close to the now-defunct term “Levant.”
    “Saying just ‘Iraq and Syria’ suggest incorrectly that the group’s aspiration are limited to these two present day countries,” AP standards editor Tom Kent argued.
    Then again, given the Levant’s colonial origins, that likely isn’t a term the group would choose, either, the New York Times notes.
    Quartz, a digital news outlet that has chosen to use ISIL, notes the same debate is happening in Spanish, German and Russian media.
    Still confused? It’s ok: So is everyone else.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  6. #6
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    Why the Iraqi army can't defeat ISIS

    Updated by Zack Beauchamp on June 20, 2014, 8:00 a.m. ET @zackbeauchamp zack@vox.com
    Tweet Share LinkedIn Email Print


    Newly-recruited Iraqi security forces train outside Karbala MOHAMMED SAWAF/AFP/Getty Images


    Don't miss stories. Follow Vox! Follow

    The math seems so simple. The Iraqi army has 250,000 troops; its enemies, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), somewhere around 7,000. The Iraqi army has tanks, planes, and American training. ISIS has never fielded a tank or a plane and its troops didn't get formal training from an advanced military. Yet ISIS is demolishing the Iraqi army on the battlefield, seizing a massive swath of the country's northwest. Why?
    It comes down to two things: training and professionalism. ISIS learned how to fight, while the Iraqi army has long been a weak fighting force. All the weapons in the world won't matter if you don't know how to wield them. And ISIS's victories, not to mention the Iraqi army's repeated failures, tell you a lot about the country's larger crisis.


    The Iraqi army has never been disciplined

    In Mosul, Iraq's second most populous city, about 800 ISIS fighters invaded and sent 30,000 Iraqi army troops running. That's been portrayed as a sudden collapse of the Iraqi army, but that's not quite right. "The Iraqi army has been collapsing for months now," Yasser Abbas told me.
    Abbas, originally from Baghdad, is an analyst at the private research and consulting firm Caerus Associates. Before that, he served as a linguist in for the military in Iraq from 2005 to 2009. "At the end of 2006, I was involved in training the Iraqi national police in Baghdad," he said. "The amount of corruption and under-training was [astounding] ... insubordination became widespread."

    Ahmad al-Rubaye/AFP/Getty Images
    So, for Abbas, the military's collapse "didn't happen at once. It's been happening for a very long time." For instance, the governor of Mosul ordered the military units in the area to go to a particular town, and "the battalion commander said no, it was too dangerous." It's the same insubordination problem the army has had for years.
    And even when they do fight, many units aren't all that effective. "They'll stand up with a PKM [machine gun] and blast off 250 rounds" says Phillip Smyth, a researcher at the University of Maryland. "What is that doing?"
    This isn't true of all Iraqi units, some of which, particularly around Baghdad, are quite well-trained. But many of the ones in the northern, Sunni-held regions of Iraq where ISIS made such large gains were some of the worst.
    insubordination became widespread
    How did the Iraqi army get this bad? One explanation is sectarianism: the Iraqi government is dominated by Shia Muslims, whereas ISIS and its allies are Sunnis. Perhaps Sunni soldiers in the mostly-Sunni northwest simply ran because they didn't want to fight for a Shia government.
    There's some truth to this theory, but "it's been overblown," according to Abbas. Two other things stand out. First, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki significantly weakened the army. He replaced effective Sunni officers with Shia ones and well-trained generals with loyalists. As Slate's Joshua Keating explains quite well, this was an attempt to protect his own political position. A strong, independent army could launch a coup d'etat. An army filled with your cronies is safer.
    But, as the decade-long history of Iraqi army failures suggest, it's not just about Maliki. Rather, it's that the modern Iraqi army simply has never been a particularly strong institution. From the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s to the Gulf War to the 2003 American-led invasion, Iraqi units have performed pretty poorly. When the US military tried to rebuild the Iraqi army essentially from scratch after disbanding it in 2003, it just didn't have a lot of raw material to work with.
    ISIS advantages: training and experience

    ISIS wasn't always strong enough to take real advantage of the Iraqi military's intrinsic weakness. "When the US fought ISIS in 2007, they were very weak," Abbas explained. "North of Baghdad, it took less than 24 hours for the whole organization to collapse in the face of a few soldiers and tribal militias."
    But between 2007 and now, something changed. "When you like at the [ISIS] training videos from the mid 2000s, and compare them to ones from 2010, they're moving from terrorist tactics like how do you create an IED to things that include operations, strategy tactics," Nathaniel Rosenblatt, the head of Caerus' Middle East division, says.

    Ahmad al-Rubaye/AFP/Getty Images
    Rosenblatt and Abbas say there's been an influx of skilled Saddam-era military leaders and soldiers into ISIS' ranks. "When you look at some of the reports about the leadership under [ISIS commander Abu Bakr] al-Baghdadi," Rosenblatt said, "those second-in-command guys have very strong ties to Saddam's army." Acquiring lots of weapons, money, and experience over the course of the Syrian war allowed them to translate that new training into real military effectiveness.
    It's hard to overstate how much of advantage this training and professionalism gives the Islamist group. "ISIS knows how to use smaller units" effectively against larger forces, says Smyth. They're "very efficient, and you have to deal with that."
    This matters greatly. An undisciplined force, one whose movements aren't well coordinated or can't deploy proper tactics for taking city blocks, can be beaten by a much smaller opponent that knows what it's doing.
    This puts the conflict into a weird sort of violent stasis
    Superior training and motivation can also give defenders an extra edge. Smyth points to the World War II Battle of Wake Island as an example, where US troops held off a much larger Japanese force by digging in and creatively using their environment and dwindling resources. The Iraqi army has had a similarly tough time making progress in ISIS-held territory.
    This leaves the conflict locked in a violent stasis. The Iraqi army will press ISIS-held territory, and possibly push them back on the margins, but it isn't strong enough to roll back ISIS all the way. "Bottom line: I think ISIS will be able to hold Mosul for some time," Rosenblatt says. "Unless Maliki is really pushed, I don't think he's going to be able to march all the way to Mosul with a Shia force. The political aspects are too sensitive."
    Meanwhile, ISIS doesn't have the strength to challenge the more effective Iraqi army units defending Baghdad and the other largely Shia areas. "Technically, they do [want to take Baghdad]," Smyth says. "But I don't think they're stupid. They won't jump into the open jaws of the crocodile."
    Three things could transform the conflict

    There are three critical factors that could break this bloody status quo.
    First, a collapse in ISIS' popular support. ISIS has a long history of brutal treatment of civilians, and every analyst I spoke to agreed that a loss in Sunni civilian support would be a back-breaker for ISIS. "Insurgencies can make do with passive support from the bulk of the population, but if an ideology is too radical, it risks sparking a backlash," said Jason Lyall, an expert on counterinsurgency at Yale University. "Given the size of the outflow of people from Mosul, it is apparent that ISIS' ideology may find little support among the civilian populace."

    Karim Sahib/AFP/Getty Images
    Second, either side's allies could alter the military balance dramatically. ISIS fights with a broad range of Islamist, tribal, and Saddam-loyalist groups; if those groups turn on ISIS, which they very well might, it could break the group's hold on the territory.
    On the flip side, the Iraqi army is backed by Iran and several Shia militias. It's also recruited thousands of Shia volunteers — about 200,000, by All Iraq News Agency's count — for impromptu anti-ISIS militias. According to Abbas, this "massive Shia recruitment" could potentially shift the balance of power dramatically.
    it's far, far too early to count ISIS out
    Third, an unexpected military intervention by a third party. The semi-autonomous Kurdish area in northwest Iraq is adjacent to ISIS' stronghold. Their powerful military, which has already had small clashes with ISIS-aligned forces, could challenge ISIS. And who knows what effect large-scale a American air campaign against ISIS would have on the balance of power.
    You may have noticed that all three of these scenarios trend badly for ISIS. That's true, and it's because ISIS has put itself in a precarious political position. It doesn't have any real reliable friends, and it's challenging a government that represents the Iraqi religious majority that also has backing from the United States and Iran.
    But it's far, far too early to count ISIS out on the basis of hypothetical scenarios. Their military record in Iraq proves that they can outperform expectations.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  7. #7
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    Joel Richardson: What The New Caliphate Means For The World Is “Absolutely Profound”

    07/03/2014


    “Another significant reality now that the caliphate has been restored is that it is actually mandatory for the caliphate to engage in perpetual jihad until there are literally no non-Muslims left throughout the world, or they submit to being subjected peoples.” Sounds a little like something that a man named John once described about 2,000 year ago. Are we witnessing before our very eyes the fulfillment of the second Beast that will ultimately be destroyed forever by the Lord Himself as prophesied by Daniel? It certainly looks that way today. As such, “let us not sleep, as others do, but let us watch and be sober” …



    Revelation 13:15-18, “The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate ['psēphizō' - reckon] the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is χξς.”



    By Joel Richardson, WND – “Two weeks ago, our illustrious President Obama stood in the White House and made the following statement:


    ‘[T]he truth of the matter is that for all the challenges we face, all the problems that we have, if you had to be – if you had to choose any moment to be born in human history, not knowing what your position was going to be, who you were going to be, you’d choose this time. The world is less violent than it has ever been. It is healthier than it has ever been. It is more tolerant than it has ever been. It is better fed then it’s ever been. It is more educated than it’s ever been.’


    On Sunday afternoon, my Twitter account lit up, as the various radical Muslims I follow erupted with jubilant declarations that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, or ISIS) had officially declared a caliphate – an Islamic state ruled by Islamic Shariah. No longer is it ISIS, but simply the Islamic State (IS). After an official meeting of ISIS’ shura (religious) council, they named their shadowy leader, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, to be the Emir al-Mu’minin, or the commander of the faithful – the first ‘caliph’ in roughly 90 years. The caliph is essentially a Muslim pope, president and general all rolled into one.


    The potential implications for the world are absolutely profound. First, according to Islamic jurisprudence, once a caliph has been declared, it is mandatory upon all Muslims to make a pledge of allegiance to the sitting caliph, known in Arabic as the bay’ah. The bay’ah translated is as follows:


    ‘I pledge my allegiance to the Commander of the Faithful, to hear and obey, in hardship and in blessings, to establish the religion of Allah, and to enforce Allah’s Shariah, and to expand the order of Allah, to establish the global Islamic state.’


    According to various hadith (Muslim sacred traditions found outside of the Quran), if one does not make the pledge, he will die the death of jahiliyya, or as a non-Muslim, and should be treated as a non-Muslim:


    ‘[W]hen he stands before Allah on the Day of Judgment, and one who dies without having bound himself by an oath of allegiance (to an Amir) will die the death of one belonging to the days of Jahillyya.’ (Abu Muslim 20: 4562)


    Already, there have been numerous tribal leaders and jihadi groups that have pledged their allegiance to the caliph with their lives. What groups will follow? What might it look like if various groups such as Boko Haram in Nigeria, al-Shabab in Somalia and Kenya, al-Qaida in Yemen, al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Hamas in Gaza and the West Bank, and perhaps even segments of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and throughout the world begin swearing allegiance to the caliph? The dangers of a snowballing trend is profound. Rather than having an Islamic State spanning segments of Syria and Iraq, there could be smaller segments of the Islamic State in numerous other nations.


    Consider the fact that even here in the United States, Mohamed Elibiary, one of three senior fellows on President Obama’s Homeland Security Advisory Council, is an open supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood, the goal of which is the re-establishment of the caliphate.” Read more.


    Self-Declared ‘Caliph’ Wants To Rule World And ‘No One In Iraq Or Any Neighboring Country Will Be Safe From These Plans’ – “Based on recent battlefield victories in Iraq and Syria, the Iraqi militant and his followers believe that the world’s Muslims are going to flock to their cause… [but] while many kings and rulers styled themselves as caliphs, they didn’t have the religious authority that implied… Time will tell if Baghdadi’s grab for power will allow him to hold on to a piece of Iraq and Syria… The Ottoman Sultan declared himself a caliph in 1880, partly in the hopes that Indian Muslims would turn on the colonial British administration there. It didn’t work … The Taliban’s Mullah Omar tried the caliph gambit too. In 1996, shortly after after conquering Kandahar and on the verge of controlling Afghanistan, he wrapped himself in a cloak purported to have been worn by the prophet Mohamed and declared himself the leader of the world’s Muslims. Today, Omar lives in Pakistan.” Read more.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  8. #8
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    A self-declared Iraqi 'caliph' wants to rule the world. Can he? (+video)

    Almost certainly not, as a look at recent writing on the question shows.


    By Dan Murphy, Staff writer

    • AP
      View Caption




    Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has a big job cut out for him. Over the weekend, the Iraqi militant declared himself the supreme authority for all the world's 1.5 billion Muslims and changed his name – not that al-Baghdadi is his real name – to Caliph Ibrahim.


    Based on recent battlefield victories in Iraq and Syria, the Iraqi militant and his followers believe that the world's Muslims are going to flock to their cause. Even before the recent Sunni Arab uprising in Iraq, the group had laughably breathtaking ambitions, as this year-old map shows:
    Again, people advertising this as IS' 'Five-Year Plan' have to realize this is almost a year old; catch up: pic.twitter.com/d4SQjAjSGL
    — Aymenn J Al-Tamimi (@ajaltamimi) July 1, 2014
    There is much discussion of the historic caliphate and the unlikelihood of its revival in the hands of a jihadi group that now goes the name of Islamic State (its previous iterations include Al Qaeda in the Land of Two Rivers, the Mujahideen Shura Council, the Islamic State in Iraq.) Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said today that the group's unilateral declaration of a caliphate is a threat to the entire region. "No one in Iraq or any neighboring country will be safe from these plans," he said.




    Historian Juan Cole looks at the history of caliphates, and their varying meaning over time.

    Let us please call it the “so-called Islamic State,” since it bears all the resemblance to mainstream Islam that Japan’s Om Shinrikyo (which let sarin gas into the subway in 1995) bears to Buddhism.


    ... After Ali’s assassination, the Umayyad kings ruled (661-750), and though some scholars have found that they claimed religious charisma, they were just Arab kings. A branch of the family of the Prophet tracing itself back to his uncle Abbas began making claims to rightful rule, however, and they were popular among the new converts from among the Persians in Iran, and in 750 they made a revolution against the Umayyads. They became the Abbasid caliphate, ruling until the Mongol conquest of Baghdad in 1258.
    Following that defeat by the Mongols, the caliphate in its original form was pretty much dead. Cole writes that while many kings and rulers styled themselves as caliphs, they didn't have the religious authority that implied. Though the Ottoman Sultan declared himself Caliph in 1880, he was not always seen that way by the world's Muslims. While the Turkish state's abolishment of the caliphate claim in 1924 is generally seen as a great tragedy, it rests on revisionist history, in Cole's telling.
    The end of the caliphate did not matter to most Muslims. You don’t need a caliph to pray five times a day or fast Ramadan. In Egypt, Ali Abd al-Raziq, a court judge, argued in modernist fashion that no caliph is necessary. Some Egyptian clerics were uncomfortable with the idea, but they lost the argument. There was some jockeying to resurrect the caliphate in the mid-1920s, and the Egyptian king, Fuad I, threw his crown in the ring. But the fact is that none of the newly forming nation-states wanted a transnational authority like that, and no consensus could be reached, and the caliphate (such as it was, since I don’t think most Muslims bought into Abdulhamid’s project) lapsed again.


    Small groups of cult-like fundamentalists ever after hoped for a restored caliphate, but it isn’t something on the minds of 99% of the world’s 1.5 billion Muslims. Sunni Islam has come sociologically to resemble Protestant Christianity, lacking a formal center and largely organized on the basis of the nation-state.
    Col. (Ret.) Pat Lang, the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency's Middle East desk, is on the same page.
    IMO, this declaration of the caliphate of Ibrahim is a terrible blunder for ISIS. The Islamic world will unite in hostility against such ambitions and claims. Most people in these countries want to retain their local national ientities or at least to have states that may better reflect their ethnic identity. Even the Saudis, who have toyed with the notion of absulute authority given to their wahhabi faith, will recoil in horror from the evident threat presented by the idea of an umma ruled by the likes of these people.
    To be sure, Brigadier FB Ali, a retired Pakistani officer and frequent contributor to Lang's blog, says there is cause for concern.
    Undoubtedly, governments in Muslim countries will reject this declaration. However, this 'caliphate' may well appeal to the many Muslims all over the world who want Islam to govern their lives and the countries in which they live, but who reject their present governments as not being Islamic. Especially vulnerable to such ideas would be young men in the Muslim diaspora, many of whom feel this need more acutely than their brethren back home. ISIS can expect an increase in Muslim recruits from the West.

    What lends substance to this declaration by ISIS is its capture of a large piece of territory in the Muslim heartland, something the other jihadi outfits cannot match.
    Writing at the Long War Journal, Thomas Joscelyn points out that 9 major jihadi groups in Syria have already rejected Baghdadi's claim.
    In a series of tweets in both English and Arabic, Abu Sulayman al Muhajir, a top sharia official in the Al Nusrah Front, sharply criticized the Islamic State's announcement. While using the hashtag #Khilafah_Proclaimed in his tweets, Abu Sulayman argued that the Islamic State's failure to consult jihadi leaders before making the announcement "is a clear breach of Islam."


    "The situation has not changed at all here," Abu Sulayman said in one tweet, referring to Syria. "Only difference I see is there is a stronger 'Islamic' justification for them [the Islamic State] to kill Muslims." The Islamic State has long justified the killing of other rebel fighters and leaders by arguing that it is the only legitimate authority in Iraq and Syria.


    Abu Sulayman, who is from Australia, served as a mediator during al Qaeda's early attempts to reconcile the ISIS with other jihadist groups in Syria. When those efforts failed, he became a vocal critic of the ISIS and is now a staunch opponent of the Islamic State.
    Time will tell if Baghdadi's grab for power will allow him to hold on to a piece of Iraq and Syria. The smart money is that he won't, if history recent and distant is anything to go buy. The Ottoman Sultan declared himself a caliph in 1880, partly in the hopes that Indian Muslims would turn on the colonial British administration there. It didn't work - and during World War I, Indian Muslim troops under British command helped defeat the Ottoman Empire in what was to become Iraq.


    The Taliban's Mullah Omar tried the caliph gambit too. In 1996, shortly after after conquering Kandahar and on the verge of controlling Afghanistan, he wrapped himself in a cloak purported to have been worn by the prophet Mohamed and declared himself the leader of the world's Muslims. Today, Omar lives in Pakistan.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  9. #9
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    What the Fall of Saigon Teaches Us About the Latest ISIS Offensive


    Evacuation of CIA station personnel and Vietnamese citizens from Saigon, April 29, 1975 (Wikimedia Commons)



    The capture of Mosul and Tal Afar by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) throughout the month of June coupled with the terrorist group’s press towards Baghdad via Samarra and recent declaration an independent caliphate last Sunday has led some foreign policy analysts to worry that Iraq may be on the verge of a sectarian civil war. Barbaric images from the areas captured during the ISIS campaign are near-ubiquitous online, and feed concerns that a similar fate awaits the Iraqi capital.


    While the uniqueness of the ISIS challenge cannot be underestimated, and while no wars are exactly alike, historical parallels between what happened in South Vietnam in 1975 and the current situation in Iraq are striking. The targeting of Iraq’s capital city by an extremist jihadist group from the north just two-and-a-half years after the formal withdrawal of American combat troops recollects the successful North Vietnamese Army (NVA) offensive to capture the South Vietnamese capital city of Saigon two years after President Nixon ordered the evacuation of the last U.S. combat troops from the country. Four critical parallels between the two cases may help inform the American and Iraqi response to ISIS as well as articulate the challenges that confront both countries as the crisis progresses.


    First, in both 1975 Vietnam and today’s Iraq, the inheritance of foreign entanglements resulted from the departure of American troops. A year after the United States, North Vietnam, and South Vietnam signed the Paris Peace Accords of 1973, North Vietnamese Communist leaders in Hanoi drew up a two-year campaign to capture South Vietnam. The NVA’s push to reunify the country began with the capture of the province of Phuoc Long. By the time Ban Me Thuot fell in March 1975, the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) was in disarray. Although President Richard Nixon had repeatedly promised President Thieu that the United States would “not tolerate violations of the Peace Agreement,” his resignation and succession by Gerald Ford ultimately meant that the United States was unable to “make good on Nixon’s promises to Saigon.”

    Similarly, the fact that ISIS has set its sights on Baghdad so soon after the formal withdrawal of American combat troops suggests that a hasty administrative handover from Washington left critical Iraqi institutions vulnerable to terrorist attacks.


    Secondly, political unrest and weak leadership were also legacies of the United States’ military withdrawal from both South Vietnam and Iraq. In response to the NVA blitzkrieg, South Vietnamese President Nguyen Van Thieu adopted the so-called “enclave policy” of holding on to coastal urban centers in hopes that U.S. B-52 bombers would come to the rescue. A series of confusing orders from Thieu—who feared a possible coup against him—coupled with mounting political instability within South Vietnam ultimately resulted in Saigon’s capitulation. As tensions increase with Iraq’s Sunni and Kurdish population over a lack of political representation, the country’s ruling Shiite sect, spearheaded by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, may face a similar situation to that of the South Vietnamese four decades prior.


    Avoiding further military entanglement is as much on President Obama’s mind in 2014 as it was on Nixon’s and Ford’s forty years ago. The dispatch of 300 U.S. Army Special Forces combat advisers to Iraq echo President Obama’s commencement speech given at the United States Military Academy last month, in which he stated that “[on issues] that do not pose an existential threat to the United States…we must mobilize allies and partners to take collective action.” On this matter, Obama seems to be walking a fine political line between collaboration with the Iraqi government and direct military intervention. Indeed, it should be noted that the president dispatched the advisers with a cautiously worded directive “to assess how we can best train, advise, and support Iraqi security forces going forward.” It will be critical for these advisers to balance multiple objectives on the ground, including setting up a joint operations center and supporting the Iraqi Army. And, while these are very noble pursuits, it will likely require a projection of Iraqi nationalism via American soft power to unify a people whose sectarian lines run deep.


    ISIS militants menace captured Iraqi
    soldiers in Tikrit (The Daily Mail)



    Thirdly, as with South Vietnam in 1975, the Iraqi government faces more than just the threat of violent removal by ISIS. Even more important than their military campaigns, the NVA effectively employed so-called Armed Propaganda Teams who made use of storytelling and dramatic theater in rural areas to propagandize an idealized image of communist postwar rule. While ISIS does not yet field a fully conventional army able to physically overrun Baghdad, the terrorist group possesses a dangerous, modernized propaganda machine potentially capable of dismantling the city from the inside. Whereas the NVA used theater, ISIS is waging its propaganda war through Twitter and online videos.


    Through a Western lens, ISIS’s psychological warfare is decidedly distorted—underpinned by exaggeration, inflated resources, and augmented by the violence of documented extrajudicial killings and summary executions. The extremist group employed these tactics to secure its territorial expansion among an already shell-shocked Iraqi population. Violence coupled with social media successfully thwarted potential resistance against ISIS fighters, which could have formed in Iraq’s Al-Anbar, Nineveh, Diyala, or Salah al-Din provinces.


    The ISIS propaganda campaign has also received an external boost from several factions in the region hostile to Washington. The notable emergence last week of the decidedly anti-American Muqtada al-Sadr, whose Mahdi Army kept Sadr City under siege from 2003-2007, rekindled anti-interventionist fervor at the mere suggestion of American involvement. Ayatollah Khomeini’s recent accusation that the Obama Administration is attempting to “exploit sectarian rivalries” to influence events in the Middle East may also suggest that the United States’ ability to exert leverage in the region has diminished. Given these circumstances, communication may be the only way for the Obama administration and its combat advisers to maximize their effect. In addition to their military endeavors, these advisers must assist in the running of a successful counterpropaganda mission as vocal opposition to the perceived reprise of U.S. military involvement intensifies.


    A fourth and final parallel concerns the nature of political extremism itself. Despite marked differences in their governing philosophies, communism and religious radicalism behave similarly when it comes to justifying and implementing retaliation against perceived foreign occupations and sectarian rivals. Eric Hoffer’s 1951 book, The True Believer, instructively notes the ease with which even manifestly different forms of fanaticism can be whipped up among marginalized masses through similar means. As in the case of protracted communist struggles against foreign occupiers in South Vietnam, communication will likely be key to winning over marginalized Muslims whose mistrust of American influence may be their one commonality. Given that Iraq’s anti-American sentiment crosses sectarian lines, U.S. military advisers and the Obama administration must acknowledge that the al-Maliki government cannot appear heavily dependent on the United States.


    Just before South Vietnam fell, President Thieu blamed Americans for “r[unning] away and l[eaving] us to do the job that you could not do.” As the fall of South Vietnam demonstrates, early vulnerabilities—including the effects of foreign military intervention, real or perceived presidential or political weakness, the withdrawal of military support from one’s principal military ally, a successfully executed propaganda campaign, and the nature of political radicalism—conspire to create an environment ripe for exploitation by extremists. Almost four decades later, facing a similar crisis, the United States cannot expect its junior allies in Iraq to perform miracles in the hope of successfully creating a functioning democratic government. It can, however, assist in countering the effective propaganda war waged by ISIS by empowering marginalized religious and ethnic groups to create a “cross-sectarian” government. Ultimately, it is up to the Iraqi government to gradually achieve political legitimacy in the eyes of its own people in order to stall or blunt ISIS’s advance.


    Jeong Lee is a freelance international security blogger and a member of the Center for International Maritime Security (CIMSEC). Lee’s writings have appeared in the Naval Institute’s blog, East Asia Forum, and the World Outline, as well as GJIA Online. He will begin a Master of Arts program in International Security Studies at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies in September 2014.
    Stephanie Chenault is the Chief Operating Officer of Venio Inc. and a Strategy Consultant for the Department of Defense. She holds a BS in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M University and an MS in Astrophysics from the Naval Post Graduate School.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  10. #10
    Senior Member Avvakum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    830
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    Here's a reminder; from ISIL! Months ago as to who and what is the real 'trans-asian axis' we should be worried about;

    http://youtu.be/raXGPCLxpi8




    Here's a youtube video of the new Caliph's sermon at the Great Mosque of Mosul;



    http://youtu.be/Fxawa6VnSTM


    Last edited by Avvakum; July 5th, 2014 at 20:23.
    "God's an old hand at miracles, he brings us from nonexistence to life. And surely he will resurrect all human flesh on the last day in the twinkling of an eye. But who can comprehend this? For God is this: he creates the new and renews the old. Glory be to him in all things!" Archpriest Avvakum

  11. #11
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: ISIS - Al Qaeda is afraid of ISIS

    British Isis fighter al-Britani threatens executions in Trafalgar Square

    British extremist Abu Rahin Aziz believed to be using the alias Abu Dugma al-Britani used Twitter to threaten that the Islamic State would capture Downing Street and hold executions in Trafalgar Square


    A Brit fighting in Syria has vowed to bring terror to the UK – and stage public executions in London’s Trafalgar Square, the Sunday People reports.


    Using the name Abu Dugma al-Britani, the fanatic has issued a series of chilling online vows to wage “holy” war on home soil.


    The father-of-one, who claims to be fighting for Isis , used Twitter to warn: “Downing Street will be a base for Muslims. Trafalgar Square is where public executions will take place. Army of Islamic State is coming.”


    He bragged extremist forces were set to “conquer” America’s White House.


    He demanded the release of jailed “Muslim brothers and sisters” in Britain.


    And he warned David Cameron and Home Secretary Theresa May they’d be “annihilated” because of the “filthy dogs” at the centre of an alleged paedophile network in Westmister.


    Al-Britani is understood to be an alias of Abu Rahin Aziz, 32, who fled the UK in March after he was charged over a gang attack on a *football fan in London. He was jailed for 36 weeks in his absence.

    Daily Mirror
    ISIS MAP

    He ran jihadist websites in the UK and was part of a mob called Muslims Against Crusades, who torched a wreath of poppies on Armistice Day in 2010, yelled appalling insults during the *two-minute silence and held placards saying: “British soldiers burn in hell.”


    Aziz is now thought to be associating with ISIS leaders fighting to create a Sunni Muslim caliphate in Syria and Iraq.


    On Wednesday he warned of a terror strike like the 2001 bloodbath at New York’s World Trade Center against any state that helped the Iraqi government take on Isis.

    Map of the proposed regions of an Islamic state, translated into English.


    He tweeted: “USA your interference will trigger many more 9/11 twin towers attacks and your brave boys returned in body bags.”


    Meanwhile, UK spy chiefs have angered *ministers by stepping up airport security at the busiest time of year.


    The 24 million people set to fly this summer face long delays after the US claimed al-Qaeda had developed an explosive invisible to scanners.


    But Whitehall sources believe our intelligence chiefs are just “covering their backs”.



    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...#ixzz36mhr7zRa
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  12. #12
    Super Moderator Malsua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8,020
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts

    Default Re: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS

    Those Islamotards really are dumb.

    If they leave us alone, Obama will support them. If they attack us, he has to do something.
    "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat."
    -- Theodore Roosevelt


  13. #13
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS

    Why Use of Nuclear Weapons Against ISIS Should be Authorized

    Posted on 2014/08/08 by Jim Lantern
    THE LANTERN JOURNAL – Editorial Article by Jim Lantern – 12:30 p.m. CT Friday 8 August 2014


    It is my opinion that the United States of America should withdraw from the No First Use pledge, and take the same position as NATO. NFU refers to a pledge or a policy by a nuclear power not to use nuclear weapons as a means of warfare unless first attacked by an adversary using nuclear weapons. Earlier, the concept had also been applied to chemical and biological warfare. NATO has repeatedly rejected calls for adopting NFU policy, arguing that preemptive nuclear strike is a key option. In 1993, Russia dropped a pledge given by the former Soviet Union not to use nuclear weapons first. In 2000, a Russian military doctrine stated that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons “in response to a large-scale conventional aggression”.


    U.S. Congress should immediately vote to withdraw from NFU.


    U.S. Congress should immediately authorize the use of nuclear weapons against ISIS.


    President Obama as Commander-in-Chief should cooperate with U.S. Congress and give the order only he can give, for nuclear strikes on all known ISIS locations. Yes, there will be significant collateral damage – deaths and serious permanent injuries to innocent people. If ISIS isn’t stopped, then I believe those victims will be killed by ISIS anyway. By stopping ISIS now, we will save millions of lives they will take if not stopped.


    ISIS is like a virus upon the world. It is more deadly than the current Ebola virus. It is a killing machine. It’s purpose is to kill all Christians, all Jews, all Shia Muslims, all people of all other religions, all infidels – all nonbelievers, all people who do not accept their extreme version of Sunni Islam. ISIS must be exterminated. It has no comprehension of diplomacy. It can’t be negotiated with. There can be no peace with ISIS. It can’t be reasoned with. Sanctions will not have any effect on it. We must kill it before it kills us. ISIS has threatened to invade the U.S. and hang its flag of the Islamic State in the White House. The threat should be taken seriously.


    IF not use of nuclear weapons, then I urge U.S. Congress and President Obama as Commander-in-Chief to authorize a full attack on ISIS with our most powerful non-nuclear bombs and missiles. I’m opposed to “boots on ground” to put our soldiers in harms way, except as needed for spotters. However, I strongly support use of drones, not only to locate ISIS locations but also to attack ISIS wherever it is found.


    There can be no mercy. No taking of prisoners. Every member of ISIS must be immediately executed. A virus does not have any legal rights, especially like the rights granted to suspects of crimes. What ISIS is doing is worse than what we normally refer to as war crimes. It amounts to willful evil.


    Any religion, which seeks to exterminate the people of all other religions, must itself be exterminated.


    No one, anywhere on this world, should be killed because they do not accept a specific religion or any religion. Freedom of religion, and freedom from religion, must be the law of the world. No exceptions. Sunni Muslims may be free to live the way they want to on their own land, but they must not be allowed to execute or torture or punish people who disagree with them. They can, however, banish and deport from their countries all those who disagree with them.


    Make your choice. Us, or them. Be civilized, or live like barbarians.


    I choose us, and our way of life – our freedom.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  14. #14
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS

    ISIS Caliphate Threatens America: “We Will Raise The Flag Of Allah In The White House”

    08/08/2014 ICA Leave a comment Go to comments






    [COLOR=#]1 Vote[/COLOR]


    Considering who is already occupying the White House today, there are some days when I feel like its already been raised. Nevertheless, thanks to the Obama Administration and it’s myopic foreign policy, ISIS believes it is already well on its way to achieving that goal itself …


    Hadith, Saheeh Muslim 2889, “Verily Allah has shown me the eastern and western part of the earth, and I saw the authority of my Ummah (Islamic nation) dominate all that I saw.”

    The Daily Caller – “The terror group President Barack Obama threatened to strike in Iraq Thursday evening is itself threatening to strike the American homeland.
    ‘I say to America that the Islamic Caliphate has been established,’ Abu Mosa, a spokesman for the terror group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), told VICE Media in a video interview posted online Thursday. ‘Don’t be cowards and attack us with drones. Instead send your soldiers, the ones we humiliated in Iraq.’
    ‘We will humiliate them everywhere, God willing, and we will raise the flag of Allah in the White House,’ he added.
    The video is the first of a multipart series on ISIS VICE Media says it plans to release. VICE Media reporter Medyan Dairieh recently spent three weeks in the ISIS-controlled Syrian city of Raqqa, which the terror group has proclaimed the capital of its newly declared Islamic caliphate.
    ISIS’s threat to conquer the United States came before President Obama’s Thursday announcement that he may authorize airstrikes against the terror group in order to protect American personnel in Iraq.
    ‘Today I authorized two operations in Iraq,’ the president said in a speech from the White House. ‘Targeted airstrikes to protect our American personnel, and a humanitarian effort to save thousands of Iraqi civilians who are trapped on a mountain without food and water, and are facing almost certain death.'” Read more.
    Qur’an Sura 58:20, “Those who resist Allah and His Messenger will be among those most humiliated.”
    Flashback: ISIS Caliphate To Hamas: Before We Support Your Fight Against Israel, We Must Attack America First – “The Islamic State, or ISIS, has responded to critics who have questioned why its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is not actively supporting Hamas in fighting Israel… In a statement a spokesperson for the group, Nidal Nuseiri reaffirmed that conquering ‘Bayt el-Maqdis’ (Jerusalem) and destroying the State of Israel is central to the group’s ‘jihad’, or holy war. However, he pointed out that ISIS has been taking a systematic approach in its campaign, and outlined six specific stages it said needed to be fulfilled before taking on Israel. Some of those ‘stages’ – building a firm base for an Islamic state in Iraq, and using it as a springboard to wage war in Syria and Lebanon – have already been achieved. But he said a number of other criteria still needed to be fulfilled before challenging Israel directly. Among them, Nuseiri said that the US – seen as Israel’s greatest ally – needed to be weakened politically and economically via attacks on the American mainland …” Read more.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  15. #15
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS

    these guys really are asking for it, huh?

    [VIDEO] Trash-Talkin’ ISIS Punk Bitch-Slaps U.S. Leadership: ‘Don’t Be Cowards and Attack Us With Drones…Send Your Soldiers’

    Posted: August 8, 2014 | Author: Pundit from another Planet | Filed under: Mediasphere, War Room, White House | Tags: Allah, Andrew Johnson, Caliphate, Global Panic of 2014, Iraq, ISIS, Islam, United States, White House |1 Comment “I say to America, that the Islamic Caliphate has been established, and we will not stop. Don’t be cowards and attack us with drones. Instead send your soldiers, the ones we humiliated in Iraq.”

    From The Corner, Andrew Johnson writes:
    The jihadist group in control of much of northern Iraq right now is confident it can defeat the United States, and eventually take over the White House, but they don’t want the U.S. using any of its advanced military weaponry.
    “We will humiliate them everywhere, God willing, and we will raise the flag of Allah in the White House.”

    The United States began air strikes, using manned fighter-bombers, against the jihadist group this morning…(read more)

    National Review Online
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  16. #16
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    21,663
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 73 Times in 68 Posts

    Default Re: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS

    ISIS Terror Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Was Released By Obama from Camp Bucca in 2009

    Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, June 12, 2014

    Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), has transformed a few terror cells on the verge of extinction into the most dangerous militant group in the world.

    Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi or Abu Dua was once held by the US in Camp Bucca Iraq.
    abu dua



    (The Telegraph)
    But the Obama administration shut down the Bucca prison camp and released its prisoners, including Abu Dua in 2009.

    The Telegraph reported:

    The FBI “most wanted” mugshot shows a tough, swarthy figure, his hair in a jailbird crew-cut. The $10 million price on his head, meanwhile, suggests that whoever released him from US custody four years ago may now be regretting it…

    …Well-organised and utterly ruthless, the ex-preacher is the driving force behind al-Qaeda’s resurgence throughout Syria and Iraq, putting it at the forefront of the war to topple President Bashar al-Assad and starting a fresh campaign of mayhem against the Western-backed government in Baghdad.

    On Tuesday, his forces achieved their biggest coup in Iraq to date, seizing control of government buildings in Mosul, the country’s third biggest city. Coming on top of similar operations in January that planted the black jihadi flag in the towns of Fallujah and Ramadi, it gives al-Qaeda control of large swathes of the north and west of the country, and poses the biggest security crisis since the US pull-out two years ago…

    …“This guy was a Salafi (a follower of a fundamentalist brand of Islam), and Saddam’s regime would have kept a close eye on him,” said Dr Michael Knights, an Iraq expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

    “He was also in Camp Bucca for several years, which suggests he was already considered a serious threat when he went in there.”

    That theory seems backed by US intelligence reports from 2005, which describe him as al-Qaeda’s point man in Qaim, a fly-blown town in Iraq’s western desert.

    “Abu Duaa was connected to the intimidation, torture and murder of local civilians in Qaim”, says a Pentagon document. “He would kidnap individuals or entire families, accuse them, pronounce sentence and then publicly execute them.”

    Why such a ferocious individual was deemed fit for release in 2009 is not known. One possible explanation is that he was one of thousands of suspected insurgents granted amnesty as the US began its draw down in Iraq. Another, though, is that rather like Keyser Söze, the enigmatic crimelord in the film The Usual Suspects, he may actually be several different people.


    Al-Qaeda ISIS members from ISIS celebrate in Diyala Province, Iraq.

    Democracy Now added this on the closing of Camp Bucca in 2009.
    The US meanwhile has closed Camp Bucca, once its largest prison in Iraq. The Pentagon says it’s transferred Bucca’s remaining 180 prisoners to two jails near Baghdad. US Lieutenant Colonel Kenneth King said the prison’s closure comes as part of the US-Iraq security deal.
    Lieutenant Colonel Kenneth King: “As a show of progress for the security agreement and moving forward the government of Iraq, we’re going to put the theater internment facility as a piece of history. And we’re going to — it will be history, and we’ll move forward from here and progress.”
    Camp Bucca once hosted thousands of prisoners without charge, with many allegations of torture and abuse by US guards.

    Related:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...et-him-go.html
    Iraq crisis: the jihadist behind the takeover of Mosul - and how America let him go
    The march of al-Qaeda-linked militants towarsds the Iraqi capital is a coup for the shadowy leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi - a former US detainee


    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013...settle-in-u-s/
    Obama Funds Al-Qaeda Syrian Rebels And Imports Syrian Refugees to U.S.
    Posted by Gateway Guest Blogger on Tuesday, June 18, 2013
    Guest Post by Mara Zebest

    In an article about Obama-backed Syrian jihadists who beheaded a Christian and fed him to the dogs, Pamela Geller stated it best:

    “If you need a fail-safe formula for determining who the bad guys are — ask what side is Obama on: [...] Christian Andrei Arbashe, 38, was kidnapped and beheaded by rebel fighters in northern town of Ras Al-Ayn on the Turkish border [...] Syrian rebels beheaded a Christian man and fed his body to dogs, according to a nun who says the West is ignoring atrocities committed by Islamic extremists. She said his headless corpse was found by the side of the road, surrounded by hungry dogs. He had recently married and was soon to be a father.”

    Every day presents more proof that Obama is on the side of the Islamic caliphate to rule the world and destroy Western civilizations which includes Israel and America. Obama is the enemy within.

    Obama recently announced he will be giving away another $300 million of our taxpayer money to the al-Qaeda Syrian rebels which now brings the total to $815 million. Proof that these rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda presented by USA Today.

    JihadWatch reports the following:

    “Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of” — New York Times, April 28, 2013

    Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda — USA Today, April 11, 2013

    Bringing the total to $815 million for the allies of al-Qaeda and proponents of jihad and Sharia. “Obama announces extra $300 million in aid for Syrians, refugees,” by Ian Johnston for NBC News, June 18:

    The U.S. is to give more than $300 million in additional “life-saving humanitarian assistance” to Syrians caught up in the country’s civil war, Barack Obama has announced, taking the total amount given since the conflict began to nearly $815 million.

    At the G-8 summit in Ireland, President Obama spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss his goals in intervening in the Syrian conflict. Meanwhile polls show the American public does not want to arm Syrian rebels. NBC’s Chuck Todd reports.

    And if this wasteful and dangerous use of our taxpayer dollars isn’t infuriating enough, also consider Obama’s plans to import 9,000 of these Al-Qaeda “refugees” into the U.S. What are the odds Obama will give a background check on these Syrians when he refuses to allow the NSA to spy on the mosques.

    The Hill reports the following on the Syrian refugees to settle in U.S.

    The Department of Homeland Security on Monday issued new regulations that will allow more Syrian refugees to temporarily settle in the United States.

    The department estimates that about 9,000 people will be eligible to come to America under the 18-month extension to March 2015 of the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Syrians. Another 2,600 or so Syrians already here will be able to apply to renew their status. The Obama administration first gave TPS designation to Syrian citizens and residents last year, and the status was set to expire on Sept. 30.

    Related Articles:
    http://pamelageller.com/2013/06/obam...he-dogs-.html/
    Obama-Backed Syrian jihadists beheaded a Christian and fed him to the dogs
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/w...ction/2075323/
    Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda
    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/06/ob...rian-jihadists
    Obama gives $300 million more to the Syrian jihadists
    Robert Spencer Jun 18, 2013
    http://thehill.com/policy/internatio...-united-states
    Obama allows more Syrian refugees to settle in US
    By Julian Pecquet - 06/17/13

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  17. #17
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS

    Tell me something, how is this even possible? Why isn't there a moratorium on Muslims entering the West now? Seriously. Close them down. Deny access to airplanes, boats, ships, ingress to your country, or egress from the country. Shut down the Muslim population. Prevent them from leaving on "pilgrimages" unless they choose to REMAIN in their "country of origin" - or the "Holy Lands".

    Screw them, their religion and their bank accounts.

    You want to kill a plant? You prevent it from getting water, food and light. If you cut off their ability to communicate with the "radicals", visit terror training camps or prevent their entry to your country, they can't bomb can they?

    If you lock their bank accounts (cuz you KNOW they would seize ours for back taxes...) they can't spend money. They will starve.

    So - notice to Muslims.... get out of America now, before we get a President in office with balls. I promise... if *I* am elected to the Presidency, I'll put a stop to the senseless slaughter - of Westerners.


    More British Muslims fight for Islamic State than Britain







    LONDON — It is likely that there are now more British Muslims fighting for the Islamic State than for Britain's military.


    Britain's Ministry of Defense confirmed to USA TODAY that there are approximately 600 British Muslim soldiers in its armed forces of almost 200,000 people. Official government estimates put the number of British Islamic State fighters operating in Syria and Iraq at 500 to 800. The Foreign Office cautioned Thursday that it is difficult to provide precise numbers.


    The militant who beheaded American journalist James Foley in a horrifying video released this week spoke with a British accent. United Kingdom Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond acknowledged that the militant shown in the video could be a British national.


    Khalid Mahmood, a British member of Parliament from an area with a high proportion of Muslim residents, said government estimates of the number of British IS fighters currently in the Mideast is far too conservative. He told Newsweek magazine this week that at least 1,500 extremists are likely to have been recruited to fight in Iraq and Syria over the last three years. "There are an unacceptable number of Britons fighting for jihadist forces," he said.


    Raffaello Pantucci, a researcher at Royal United Services Institute in London, said many young men facing poor job prospects in the U.K.find the IS narrative of defending Islam hard to resist. Americans who are radicalized have a long way to go to join the fray. Syria and Iraq are relatively accessible from England.


    "These people can go look online and just decide to participate," he said. "With it's proximity to Europe it's just so easy to do."


    Ghaffar Hussain, of the Quilliam Foundation, a counter-extremism think tank in Britain, said the lure could be empowerment for many Muslims with grievances over their treatment in a predominantly non-Muslim society.


    "It makes them feel like they are part of something that is important to the world," he said. "If you feel like you don't really fit in or if Muslims are being attacked and a narrative comes along that explains all that away in a simple way, that is attractive."


    Hussain said a task force was set up – called Channel – to identify people who have been flagged in schools and institutions as being at risk of being drawn into extremism. Channel then pairs them with a mentor who assesses their needs and tries to offer support. But he said that a major failing of the program is that it only works if you are flagged by the system.


    "When it comes to the hard-edge, counterterrorism stuff, a lot of good work has been done by the government in terms of thwarting a hell of a lot of plots in recent years, but there are a lot of gaps outside of Channel," Hussain said. "Taking it seriously is one thing. Knowing what to do is another," Hussain said.


    Hussain said that extremism of the kind that is leading British nationals to Iraq and Syria is not limited to Britain but is a Western European phenomenon seen in Holland, France, Denmark and other places. He said would-be fighters probably enter Syria through Turkey, though it's not clear exactly how.


    Christopher Davidson, a Mideast expert at Durham University, said there's been a massive lack of attention to the flow of Westerners headed to the region. "As long as they have been supposedly fighting the (Syrian President Bashar) Assad regime authorities have turned a blind eye to it. Now that they are going to Iraq we are starting to experience the blow back," he said.


    "This is something we have been tracking and dealing with for many, many months and I don't think this video changes anything," Foreign Secretary Hammond said. "It just heightens awareness of a situation which is very grave."
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  18. #18
    Senior Member Avvakum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    830
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS - GRAPHIC PG. 15

    The Islamic State, 'DAESH', whatever you want to call them, are the biggest threat to all Mankind and Civilization since 1939-45, I kid you not;

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...ted-Dirty-Bomb


    And despite the BS and spin from the media and the military lapdogs of Obama, the Islamic State is actually gaining ground on certain fronts;

    http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/islamic-...yria-1.2135895


    We need to ally with whoever we have to, marxist Kurds, the Russians, Syrian Baathists, and yes even the Iranians, to stop these Salafist/Wahhabai Nazi dogs in their tracks and beat them into total annihilation.
    Last edited by Avvakum; December 9th, 2014 at 05:29.
    "God's an old hand at miracles, he brings us from nonexistence to life. And surely he will resurrect all human flesh on the last day in the twinkling of an eye. But who can comprehend this? For God is this: he creates the new and renews the old. Glory be to him in all things!" Archpriest Avvakum

  19. #19
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    21,663
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 73 Times in 68 Posts

    Default Re: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS

    Looks like they already succeeded.

    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    Obama’s Muslim Founding Fathers

    July 30, 2014 by Robert Spencer





    In his message to Muslims on their holiday Eid al-Fitr, issued Sunday, Barack Obama asserted that “Eid also reminds us of the many achievements and contributions of Muslim Americans to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.” He did not, unfortunately, provide even a single example of these “many achievements and contributions” that Muslims have made to “building the very fabric of our nation,” but he said that there were many, so they shouldn’t be hard to list a few, right?

    You remember a few of them, don’t you? Remember the Muslim signers of the Declaration of Independence? With Yahya al-Hanqoq’s large signature front and center, so that the infidel King George III could read it without his spectacles? And then there was Ibrahim Clark of New Jersey and El-Bridge Gerry of Massachusetts. Remember also the Muslims who gave James Madison information about Muhammad’s Constitution of Medina – which, as we all know, granted equal rights to women and religious minorities, predating such documents in the West by 1,000 years. Madison, of course, used the Medina Constitution as a model when framing the U.S. Constitution.

    Then there were the Muslims who fought so valiantly during the War of 1812 and the Mexican War. And in the titanic struggles over slavery, Muslims were front and center: remember the Muslim abolitionist Senators who faced down the South in the antebellum Senate, the Senate chamber ringing with their oratory about how the Qur’an says to free slaves and so the U.S. government should, too? Remember the Muslim regiments in the Civil War (all on the Union side, of course!)? Then in the aftermath of the Civil War came the Muslim industrialists who brought us railroads, the telegraph, the telephone.
    Not to be forgotten are the Muslims who also fought courageously in the Spanish-American War, World War I and World War II, and the Muslim entertainers who kept us laughing on the Vaudeville circuit and on the home front during those terrible world wars with their jokes from the Hadith.

    None of this rings a bell? Not to worry. Before too long it will be taught in all the textbooks. Absurd? Maybe – but no more than Obama’s statement itself. And even if they don’t go so far as to Islamize John Hancock and imagine Muslim Americans fighting against slavery and defending America in world wars, public school textbooks already present a ridiculously rosy picture of Islam. A study by the American Textbook Council, an independent national research organization that evaluates the quality of textbooks, found that ten of the most widely used middle school and high school social studies textbooks “present an incomplete and confected view of Islam that misrepresents its foundations and challenges to international security.”

    The books present highly tendentious constructions as undisputed truth, making common cause with West-hating multiculturalists to bowdlerize the presentation of Islam, denigrate or downplay Christianity and Western civilization, and transform numerous public school textbooks into proselytizing tracts.

    Meanwhile, even though the Constitution of Medina is of highly doubtful authenticity and is contradicted both by Islamic law and by Islamic traditions about Muhammad’s actions, it is already becoming common for Islamic apologists to invoke it as evidence that Islam and democracy are not only compatible, but that Islam originated the idea of republican rule. Ahmadi Muslim apologist Qasim Rashid recently wrote in the Huffington Post that “when Prophet Muhammad was popularly appointed Medina’s ruler, he entered into a pact with the Jewish communities of Medina. Through this pact, he granted equal political rights to non-Muslims. They were ensured complete freedom of religion and practice.” Undercutting Rashid’s case are the facts that Muhammad ended up exiling two of the Jewish tribes of Medina and massacring the third, and that the Qur’an mandates that Jews (and Christians) in the Islamic state, rather than enjoying “equal political rights,” must “pay the jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued” (9:29).

    But facts just get in the way of the narrative, and so the facts must go. It feels so good and multicultural to imagine Muslims at the founding of this nation, contributing to its very fabric, doesn’t it? Heck, speaking of fabric, probably Betsy Ross was a Muslim. And doesn’t the flag of South Carolina have a crescent moon on it?

    Likewise regarding slavery – I imagine Muslim abolitionists above in pre-Civil War America above, in trying to give some substance to Barack Obama’s absurd statement. In reality, of course, there were no Muslim abolitionists, or Muslims, in the antebellum United States. What’s more, there were no Muslim abolitionists anywhere. Islamic apologists in the West routinely claim that Islam forbids slavery, but in fact the Qur’an takes slavery for granted, and according to Islamic tradition, Muhammad hallowed the practice by owning slaves himself. In some Muslim nations, it is still practiced, even though it is against the law (laws that initially began to be adopted in Muslim countries under Western pressure). Mauritania, for example, abolished slavery in 1981 and made it a crime in 2012, but it is still widespread — because it has Islamic sanction. Yet I myself remember being taught in high school, way back in the 1970s, that the last country to abolish slavery was Brazil, in 1889. There was no mention of Saudi Arabia’s abolishing slavery in 1962, or of the persistence of the practice in some Muslim countries. And that was forty years ago, showing that whitewashing of Islam in the textbooks, now rampant, had begun even then.

    So when it comes to Barack Obama’s claim that Muslim Americans have made contributions to “building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy,” if there were no Muslim Founding Fathers scrutinizing the Constitution of Medina for material they could use in the charter document of their new nation, then they have to be invented. The textbooks have already departed from reality regarding Islam – what could possibly be the problem with a few more steps into fantasy? What difference, at this point, does it make? Yahya al-Hanqoq, grab your quill!

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/rob...nding-fathers/

    Mosa's statement to America starts at the 4:40 minute mark in the VICE video below
    ...




    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  20. #20
    Senior Member Avvakum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    830
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham - ISIS

    The Islamic State and it's Caliph are the greatest threat to human civilization since Ghengis Khan. They are the greatest threat to Christianity since Nero, the greatest threat to the Jewish people since Adolph Hitler. Potentially.

    We need to act against them before millions and millions of people die. But we won't.
    "God's an old hand at miracles, he brings us from nonexistence to life. And surely he will resurrect all human flesh on the last day in the twinkling of an eye. But who can comprehend this? For God is this: he creates the new and renews the old. Glory be to him in all things!" Archpriest Avvakum

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Air Strikes Against ISIS/Khorasan Targets In Syria and Iraq
    By Ryan Ruck in forum The World at War
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: July 18th, 2016, 14:36
  2. Rome will be conquered next, says leader of ‘Islamic State’
    By American Patriot in forum The Middle East
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 22nd, 2014, 12:21
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 16th, 2014, 12:22
  4. Islamic translations
    By Luke in forum World Politics and Politicians
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: November 18th, 2006, 13:10

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •