New Al Qaeda Image Threatens Mid-town Manhattan

[Sean Osborne]

I have just seen a new OBL image from Jakel. (Hopefully people will recall the infamous "Jakel 23" and "Jakel-56" images). I recieved this from within the NEIN group.

This new image depicts Osama lording over a "sand table" of Mid-town and south Mid-town Manhattan island.

I looked closely by enlarging the image and what appear to be little red-yellow flashes are actually mini-nuclear fireball detonations.

Targets I see Osama pointing to on Al Qaeda's "New York City sand table" are as follows:

1. There's a big red rectangle by Hudson River docks 76 and 78, between W 34th St.; 11th and 12th Avenues and the eastern terminus of I-495 Lincoln Tunnel. This unquestionably is the Jacob Javits Convention Center

2. The Empire State Building

3. Penn Station (is shown as a blue rectangle)

4. U.N. Headquarters

5. Macy's Building

6. Grand Central Terminal/MetLife Building

7. Chase World Headquarters

8. The intersection of Broadway and 5th Avenue


In sum here's what I see in this image:

12 mini-nuke or explosions coming from the hand of OBL.

8 specific targets in mid-town Manhattan.

The Arabic script at the top begins with the english language numbers:

435, 047 and, I think, 985. Other english numbers are within the text: 885, 776, 5 (twice) and what appears to be 617.

The green-colored digital number rendering of the US mainland is more than just 1's and 0's.

top to bottom it reads something like:

01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
00 00 00 00 80 80 00 80 80 00 00
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
10 18 18 10 10 11 18 10 10 10 10
01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01

I also read it as 1, 10, 10, 1, 11, 1, 10, 11, 00, 80

The appearance of the number 8 means this is not random binary code but more like octal or some other code in which only the numbers 0, 1 and 8 are used.

This is a dead giveaway as a graphic representation of American continental internet/digital vulnerabilities.

[Ryan Ruck]

Sean,
Thanks for getting this post up!

I too took particular note of the odd numbers near the top. I'm wondering if those could perhaps be specific years. Maybe years according to the Arabic calendar? What originally caught my eye with those was the "776", could that be (1)776? Our year of Independence? To be sure, numerology plays heavily into their actions.

Maybe if there was some translation of the text in the picture, they would make more sense.

I also noticed the brown colored line coming from the left side. It seems to be on a descending path into central Manhattan. Could that be a missile track? Aircraft track? Or is that simply a walking stick OBL happened to have in the original picture he was photoshopped from? It looks like a digitally generated line to me.

Very curious…

[Malsua]

How is it this Jakel Jerkoff has any credibility?

[Sean Osborne]

How is it this Jakel Jerkoff has any credibility?

Mal,

Certainly not from the text, but stuff in the images Jakel puts together raises a few eyebrows.

The Arabic text is bogus. The imagery is something else.

These images are done by someone here in the western hemisphere who may have inside knowledge of AQ plans. Irhabi 007 (Terrorist 007) is an example of someone who was previously ignored by most folks - that is until several penetrations of official government servers occured.

There's jihadi wannabe's and then there's jihadi's who pretend to be wannabe's to deflect scrutiny. Takes serious analysis to differentiate them.

[Ryan Ruck]

Sean,
You mentioned that this new image is likely a result of a US Government data mining project.

Any chance this was related to the Able Danger data mining or is this from something else?

[Sean Osborne]

Ryan,

No, this is not Able Danger material. I've been in contact with someone who actually worked with Able Danger material and this was not part of that. This is something else and far more recent than 2000-2001.