Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Scientist thinks invisibility possible in future

  1. #1
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,602
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts

    Default Scientist thinks invisibility possible in future

    Scientist thinks invisibility possible in future
    Reuters ^ | July 31, 2006 | Patricia Reaney

    LONDON (Reuters) - It's unlikely to occur by swallowing a pill or donning a special cloak, but invisibility could be possible in the not too distant future, according to research published on Monday.

    Harry Potter accomplished it with his magic cloak. H.G. Wells' Invisible Man swallowed a substance that made him transparent.

    But Dr Ulf Leonhardt, a theoretical physicist at St Andrews University in Scotland, believes the most plausible example is the Invisible Woman, one of the Marvel Comics superheroes in the "Fantastic Four."

    "She guides light around her using a force field in this cartoon. This is what could be done in practice," Leonhardt told Reuters in an interview. "That comes closest to what engineers will probably be able to do in the future."

    Invisibility is an optical illusion that the object or person is not there. Leonhardt uses the example of water circling around a stone. The water flows in, swirls around the stone and then leaves as if nothing was there.

    "If you replace the water with light then you would not see that there was something present because the light is guided around the person or object. You would see the light coming from the scenery behind as if there was nothing in front," he said.

    In the research published in the New Journal of Physics, Leonhardt described the physics of theoretical devices that could create invisibility. It is a follow-up paper to an earlier study published in the journal Science.

    "What the Invisible Woman does is curve space around herself to bend light. What these devices would do is to mimic that curved space," he said.

    Although the devices are still theoretical, Leonhardt said scientists are making advances in metamaterials -- artificial materials with unusual properties that could be used to make invisibility devices.

    "There are advances being made in metamaterials that mean the first devices will probably be used for bending radar waves or the electromagnetic waves used by mobile phones," he said.

    The devices could be used as protection mechanisms so the radiation emitted from mobile phones does not penetrate electronic equipment. It is guided around it.

    "It is very likely that the demonstration for radar would come first and very soon. To go into the visual will take some time but it is also not so far off," Leonhardt said.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Scientist thinks invisibility possible in future

    I actually remember seeing an article on this with Japanese scientists. The guy was wearing some suit (it looked like aluminum foil) and you could see faint images that were supposedly going through / around him. That was about a year ago.

    See, and they said Star Trek wasn't possible.

  3. #3
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,602
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts

    Default Re: Scientist thinks invisibility possible in future

    Haha. Star Trek IS possible. Everything and anything is possible.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  4. #4
    Forum General Brian Baldwin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,869
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default Re: Scientist thinks invisibility possible in future

    Isn't more akin to a cloaking device rather than invisibility. I seem to recall the Philadelphia Experiment was based on such a thing. It's not only possible it's plausible. (not the movie thingy) Many gasses when excited have a profound effect on lightwaves. I figure it shouldn't be too difficult to apply that to a potential cloaking device.

    But what good is basic cloaking if other detectors will just point you right out? No. I'll get excited when they create a comprehensive cloaking device that hides from everything. Phase Shifting I think it's called.
    Brian Baldwin

    Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death I shall fear no evil.... For I am the meanest S.O.B. in the valley.


    "A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in... And how many want out." - Tony Blair on America



    It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us freedom of the press.

    It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech.

    It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given us the freedom to demonstrate.

    It is the soldier who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag.

    -Father Denis O'Brien of the United States Marine Corp.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Scientist thinks invisibility possible in future

    But, let's even suppose a cloaking device that's developed is only able to cloak one from light detection. There would still be a huge advantage on the field.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •