Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Mexico ambassador: We need N. American Union in 8 years

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    710
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Mexico ambassador: We need N. American Union in 8 years

    Mexico ambassador: We need N. American Union in 8 years
    U.S. 'investment,' EU-style merger key to better relations, says diplomat
    Posted: November 5, 2006
    5:14 p.m. Eastern


    © 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

    There have been conferences, academic papers, mock student parliaments and secret meetings on a confederation of the U.S., Canada and Mexico into future North American Union, but, until now, few officials of any of the three countries have publicly called for the creation of a European Union-style merger.

    In a panel discussion on U.S.-Mexico relations last Tuesday at the University of Texas at San Antonio, Enrique Berruga, Mexico's ambassador to the United Nations, came right out and said a North American Union is needed – and even provided a deadline.

    Berruga said the merger must be complete in the next eight years before the U.S. baby boomer retirement wave hits full force.

    The discussion of was organized by the UTSA Mexico Center and the San Antonio campus of Mexico's National Autonomous University.

    Noting that both countries depend on each other economically, Berruga urged leaders to put petty politics aside for the region's benefit. He said the U.S. should abandon plans to build border fences and instead "invest" more in Mexico so the country can do a better job standing on its own.

    "We will be together forever and we need to make the best out of it," Berruga said, as reported in the San Antonio Express News.

    Another panelist, economist Mauricio Gonzalez, who works for the North American Development Bank, created as part of the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, explained that illegal immigration was actually good for the U.S. economy. While it's true, the said, that the immigrants bring down wages in the U.S., it is only by about 2 percent. In addition, he cited studies showing illegal immigrants do not drain U.S. social services.

    "NAFTA was a very important first step, but we need to start thinking outside the NAFTA box," Gonzalez said.

    Panelist Robert Rivard, editor of the Express-News and a former Newsweek correspondent in Latin America, spoke of the lingering impact of 9-6 – that is, Sept. 6, 2001, five days before the terrorist attacks, when the U.S. and Mexican governments were on the brink of a far-reaching immigration deal. In the wake of the terrorist attacks five days later, there was little chance Americans would accept more open borders and pardons for illegal aliens already in the country.

    "People of peace can't build walls between each other," Rivard said of the move to build the border fence. "It's a wall meant to corral Republican voters, not to keep out Mexican workers," he added.
    www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52788

  2. #2
    Senior Member samizdat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,495
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: Mexico ambassador: We need N. American Union in 8 years

    Noting that both countries depend on each other economically, Berruga urged leaders to put petty politics aside for the region's benefit. He said the U.S. should abandon plans to build border fences and instead "invest" more in Mexico so the country can do a better job standing on its own.
    True

    Sept. 6, 2001, five days before the terrorist attacks, when the U.S. and Mexican governments were on the brink of a far-reaching immigration deal. In the wake of the terrorist attacks five days later, there was little chance Americans would accept more open borders and pardons for illegal aliens already in the country.
    True, strange timing, no?

    "We will be together forever and we need to make the best out of it,"
    1. The Soviet + SCO gang is a team, but quite naturally, the players are not all united. Each faction has different goals, and the Islam team is a "false prophet" fiend or friend of the loosly contolled commie alliance. No strategic interference, short of charity, is needed for the scissors to put an end to their fiendish goals.

    2. The tripartite alliance, SCO, Soviet and Islam al-quaida appear to have based their American ops in the devils triangle-

    According to government intelligence, Middle Eastern aliens from countries known to harbor terrorists are smuggled to staging areas in places like Venezuela and the tri-border region between Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay. Then they're smuggled again through Mexico and our border right into the U.S.


    3. The gramshcian equation- My belief is that both commie camps prefer convergence, and "allow" with loose control, terrorist behavour of maximum disruption particularly in Mexico and the border region.

    4. The commies would be without reason if they nuked or invaded US presumptuously, when they can provoke more anamosity between Mexico and US, or simply and somewhat safely annex Mexico; Venezuela is already bought.

    5. Elections: The 2008 election might be more significant. Christmas surprise is another idea- maybe this year, maybe in 2008.


    6. Convergence and collusion, caution so as to bite into the gramchian cracker with plenty of sweet goodies like white chocolate cookies. Methinks the commies wish for a smiling, serene surrender, not even blipped over mass media.

    7. I think it would be beyond reason to imagine that the soviets and chinese do not rely rather heavily upon soothsayers, divination experts and satanic pros, from the east, west, north and south. They certainly take into account both false and legitemate Hebrew and Christian prophecies.

    conclusion- Israel, Golan, Gaza etc. seem to be the Act I scene 3 scenarios. Serious unrest politically with NAU, border war, the great china (breakable) border wall, attempting complete breakdown of US Mexican relations. Oil boycotts in winter, maybe a few dirty bombs. Mexico is easier to churn up than the US, so you can look for the American war to begin there.

    The msm war on US Mexican relations is successful.

    Many times I've stated and feared that an emp over Mexico would be - well sadly stated- Act I scene 5.

    That would be quite a mess, with Texans searching for tortillas, while Mexicans graze southward, N. Dakota freezing, and slow shopping south of Kansas, since the chip was swiped. Can you imagine cash registers? Ching ching. China already bought the Mexican ports, now they'll be glad to replace infrastructure damaged by those nasty terrorist al qQQ?

    If US - Mex relations continue downhill, one can expect Mexico to invite the Chinese and Soviets.
    Last edited by samizdat; November 6th, 2006 at 07:28. Reason: html

    canto XXV Dante

    from purgatory, the lustful... "open your breast to the truth which follows and know that as soon as the articulations in the brain are perfected in the embryo, the first Mover turns to it, happy...."
    Shema Israel

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •