Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 102

Thread: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

  1. #1
    Member Isaiah40:31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    43
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    Not sure if this is the right place for this or if it is posted elsewhere:

    http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/st...112409132.html

    Today: November 24, 2006 at 11:55:8 PST

    Poisoned Spy Blames Putin for His Death

    By JILL LAWLESS
    ASSOCIATED PRESS


    LONDON (AP) -
    1123dv-russian-spy-death A former KGB agent turned Kremlin critic who blamed a "barbaric and ruthless" Russian President Vladimir Putin for his fatal poisoning had a toxic radioactive substance in his body, the British government said Friday.
    In the statement dictated from his deathbed, Alexander Litvinenko accused the Russian leader of having "no respect for life, liberty or any civilized value." In his first public remarks on the allegations, Putin said he deplored the former spy's death but called the statement a political provocation.
    The Health Protection Agency said the radioactive element polonium-210, which is extremely hard to detect, had been found in Litvinenko's urine.
    Polonium-210 occurs naturally and is present in the environment at very low concentrations, but can represent a radiation hazard if ingested.
    "Only a very, very small amount of polonium would need to be ingested to be fatal, but that depends on how pure the polonium is," said Dr. Mike Keir, a radiation protection adviser at the Royal Victoria Infirmary.
    The agency's chief executive, Pat Troop, said that the high level indicated Litvinenko "would either have to have eaten it, inhaled it or taken it in through a wound."
    "We know he had a major dose," she said.
    Earlier, Home Secretary John Reid said Litvinenko's death Thursday night was "linked to the presence of a radioactive substance in his body."
    At a meeting Friday with Russian Ambassador Yury Fedotov at the Foreign Office, British diplomats asked Moscow to provide all assistance necessary to a police inquiry into the death, government officials said. Putin has pledged to cooperate.
    Peter Clarke, head of London's anti-terrorist police, said officers and military radiation experts were searching several locations in London. Traces of radiation had been found at Litvinenko's north London house, a sushi bar where he met a contact Nov. 1, the day he fell ill and a hotel he visited earlier that day, he said.
    The restaurant and part of the hotel were closed during a police search, with officers removing materials in heavy metal boxes.
    Clarke said extensive tests by forensic toxicologists on behalf of police - which began before Litvinenko's death - had on Friday confirmed the presence of Polonium-210.
    "There is no risk to the public unless they came into close contact with the men or their meals," said Katherine Lewis, a spokeswoman for the Health Protection Agency.
    Litvinenko, a vociferous critic of the Russian government, suffered heart failure late Thursday after days in intensive care at London's University College Hospital battling a poison that had attacked his bone marrow and destroyed his immune system.
    "You may succeed in silencing me but that silence comes at a price. You have shown yourself to be as barbaric and ruthless as your most hostile critics have claimed," Litvinenko said in the statement read by his friend and spokesman Alex Goldfarb. The former spy said "the howl of protest from around the world will reverberate, Mr. Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life."
    Goldfarb said Litvinenko had dictated the statement before he lost consciousness on Tuesday, and signed it in the presence of his wife, Marina.
    Litvinenko's father, Walter, said his son "fought this regime and this regime got him."
    "It was an excruciating death and he was taking it as a real man," Walter Litvinenko said.
    The Russian government has strongly denied involvement, and Putin told reporters at a European Union summit Friday in Helsinki, Finland, that British medical documents did not show "that it was a result of violence, this is not a violent death, so there is no ground for speculations of this kind."
    Putin spoke before the British government announced the findings about the presence of polonium-210 in Litvinenko's urine.
    Putin also extended his condolences to Litvinenko's family.
    "A death of a man is always a tragedy and I deplore this," he said.
    Putin said the fact that Litvinenko's statement was released only after his death showed it was a "provocation."
    "It's extremely regrettable that such a tragic event as death is being used for political provocations," he said.
    "I think our British colleagues realize the measure of their responsibility for security of citizens living on their territory, including Russian citizens, no matter what their political views are. I hope that they won't help fan political scandals which have no grounds."
    Litvinenko told police that he believed he had been poisoned while investigating the slaying of crusading journalist Anna Politkovskaya. His hair fell out, his throat became swollen, and his immune and nervous systems were severely damaged.
    He was transferred from a north London hospital to University College Hospital on Nov. 17 when his condition deteriorated.
    Doctors treating him acknowledged they could not explain his rapid decline. They discounted earlier theories that the 43-year-old father of three had been poisoned with the toxic metal thallium and cast doubt on an alternative diagnosis of a radioactive substance.
    The hospital said Friday it could not comment further because the case was being investigated by police. London's Metropolitan Police said it was treating the case as an "unexplained death" - but not, yet, a murder.
    Litvinenko's friends had little doubt about who was to blame.
    They said Litvinenko, who sought asylum in Britain in 2000, had been on a quest to uncover corruption in Russia's Federal Security Service, or FSB, and unmask the killers of Politkovskaya, another trenchant critic of Putin's government.
    Goldfarb said the attack on Litvinenko bore "all the hallmarks of a very professional, sophisticated and specialist operation."
    "The very fact that experts are still at a loss to say what poisoned him tells you it is not a sleeping pill that has been given to him," he said.
    Another friend, Andrei Nekrasov, said Litvinenko had told him: "The bastards got me, but they won't get everybody."
    He said Litvinenko believed he had been targeted by the Kremlin because he had threatened to uncover embarrassing facts.
    "The only logic is revenge, they consider him an enemy - every week he was in Putin's face, he was a tireless critic of Putin's regime ... He had a mission to uncover what he felt were crimes his former colleagues had committed," Nekrasov said.
    Litvinenko worked for the KGB and its successor, the FSB. In 1998, he publicly accused his superiors of ordering him to kill tycoon Boris Berezovsky and spent nine months in jail from 1999 on charges of abuse of office. He was later acquitted and in 2000 sought asylum in Britain, where Berezovsky is now also living in exile.
    On the day he first felt ill, Litvinenko said he had two meetings, the first with an unnamed Russian and Andrei Lugovoy, an-KGB colleague and bodyguard to former Russian Prime Minster Yegor Gaidar.
    Later, he dined with Italian security expert Mario Scaramella to discuss the October murder of Politkovskaya. Scaramella said he showed Litvinenko an e-mail he received from a source naming Politkovskaya's killers, and naming other targets including Litvinenko and himself.

    It seems to be an old fashioned never ending way of 'taking over'; killing those who oppose you and then it 'appears' you have more who support you.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    698
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Russia's Involvement With Terrorism

    Polonium - deadly, hard to make and rare poison
    24 Nov 2006 18:41:48 GMT

    LONDON, Nov 24 (Reuters) - Polonium 210, the highly toxic radioactive isotope found in the body of poisoned former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko is a very rare, exotic material that is difficult to obtain, scientists said on Friday.


    Britain's Health Protection Agency (HPA) said Litvinenko, who died on Thursday in a London hospital, had a significant amount of the radioactive isotope in his body.


    But how it got there and where it came from is a mystery.


    Although the by-product of uranium that was discovered by Polish chemist Marie Sklodowska Curie in 1898 is found in small amounts in the environment, most of it is made synthetically.


    Radiation and chemistry experts say large-scale equipment, such as a nuclear reactor, would be needed to produce sufficient amounts to cause death.


    "It is not as simple as the idea that somebody might have broken into a radioactivity cabinet at some local hospital and walked off with some polonium," Dr Andrea Sella, a lecturer in chemistry at University College London, told Reuters.


    "You can't make this at home. This is in a different league," he added.


    Although scientists would not speculate on the source of the polonium, Sella said Litvinenko's death was not the work of amateurs.


    "This is not some random killing. This is not a tool chosen by a group of amateurs. These people had some serious resources behind them," he said.


    Polonium-210 is a solid that can be dissolved in a solution. It is not a radiation hazard unless it is absorbed by the body by inhaling, eating or drinking it or if it gets in a wound, according to the HPA.


    "It decays mainly by emitting alpha particles, which are unable to penetrate a sheet of paper and so it is not a hazard unless ingested, said Professor William Gelletly of the University of Surrey.


    If radiation is going to be dangerous it has to be absorbed by the body. Long-term exposure to radiation can cause mutations and cancer. But exposure to a short, intense burst of radiation causes major damage to key control centres in cells.


    Alpha particles emitted by polonium are absorbed very quickly by the body.


    "An alpha particle strikes a strand of DNA. It snips it in two, which is bad news, or glues two strands together. Either way normal cell repair mechanisms may be unable to sort that out," said Sella.


    "The result is that essentially the cellular command and control network (in the body) falls apart. That is what radiation sickness is all about," he added.


    Professor David Ray, of the University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, said even if a high dose of radiation could not be detected externally after Litvinenko was admitted to hospital, it is still possible that a fatal dose could have concentrated in deep tissues such as bone marrow.


    "The limited information that has been released about Mr. Litvinenko's condition and the timing of his death is consistent with either radiation poisoning or chemicals that stop cell division," he said.


    Polonium-210 also has a very short half-life. The longer the half life the less radioactivity is emitted from the material.


    "Polonium 210 has a half-life of 138 days. That is long enough so you can handle it and deliver it to your target and it will pack punch. A smallish amount of material will pack a significant punch," Sella said.

    http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L24150888.htm

    Jag



  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,961
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Terrorism: News & Updates

    Given that the approximate price tag of a gram of Polonium-210 is in excess of 2 million dollars, what data could Alexando Litvinenko have held over his former godless communist masters? In the entire period of his exile the communist spymasters could not be absolutely sure he had not divulged said data to western intelligence agencies or copied it for safekeeping with the stipulation of release in the event of his death (i.e.: a life insurance policy).

    Litvinenko's death by a prohibitively expensive radioactive isotope is proof of some extraordinary circumstance. Litvinenko's investigation into the death of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya (gunned down point-blank in her apartment building elevator) does not appear to merit the expense nor the criteria of a routine Russian government contract murder. There is something more, something extraordinary involved here, and I think important clues exist within the statement he dictated to his friend Alex Goldfarb on November 21, 2006, three days before his death. The Litvinenko statement was posthumously released to the British media by Mr. Goldfarb.



    I would like to thank many people. My doctors, nurses and hospital staff who are doing all they can for me, the British police who are pursuing my case with vigour and professionalism and are watching over me and my family.

    I would like to thank the British government for taking me under their care. I am honoured to be a British citizen.

    I would like to thank the British public for their messages of support and for the interest they have shown in my plight.

    I thank my wife Marina, who has stood by me. My love for her and our son knows no bounds.

    But as I lie here I can distinctly hear the beatings of wings of the angel of death.

    I may be able to give him the slip but I have to say my legs do not run as fast as I would like.

    I think, therefore, that this may be the time to say one or two things to the person responsible for my present condition.

    You may succeed in silencing me but that silence comes at a price. You have shown yourself to be as barbaric and ruthless as your most hostile critics have claimed.

    You have shown yourself to have no respect for life, liberty or any civilised value.

    You have shown yourself to be unworthy of your office, to be unworthy of the trust of civilised men and women.

    You may succeed in silencing one man but the howl of protest from around the world will reverberate, Mr Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life.

    May God forgive you for what you have done, not only to me but to beloved Russia and its people.

    I believe that Alexander Litvinenko apparently and very recently discovered some barbaric and ruthless plot; that Vladimir Putin is at the heart of it, and that the nature of this plot is incontrovertable proof of no respect for human life or civilized existence; that Putin is unworthy of the trust other world leaders place in him (i.e.: the trust of Joe and Jane Ordinary is irrelevant to the matter), and that the result of the plot will raise a howl of condemnation and probable retribution against Russia and its innocent population - whom Litvinenko still loved dearly as a patriot upon his deathbed.

    I surmise that Alexander Litvinenko learned of a plot involving WMD, probably nuclear, and that Putin is at the heart of the plot. The plot is to be executed in the very near term (while Putin lives and retains power). The primary threat of this nature that comes to my mind is known as the "American Hiroshima". But even that may not be the full extent of the discovered plot. Upon Litvinenko's death reports coming from the UK state that the COBRA group (top-level government leadership concerned with civil emergencies) convened in an extraordinary session.

    Here is an excellent background article which prompted me into thinking outside of the box regarding the details inherent with the nuclear assassination of Alex Litvinenko:

    The Nuclear Assassins

  4. #4
    Senior Member samizdat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,498
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: Terrorism: News & Updates

    I admire Madame Curie. I've read her biography several times in "Great Lives, Great Deeds".

    Quoting Bush 1- "This will not stand". Sort of like "I've had all I can stand and I can't stands no more!"

    There is still a lot of good in humanity, and Jesus can strike any soul like lightning, quicker and stronger than polonium.

    Good thinking there Sean. Nice article. Perhaps this link will forward your investigation.

    Murdered Russian ex-spy Alexander Litvinenko passed documents to former Yukos CEO in Israel months before his death - report
    November 25, 2006, 9:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
    Leonid Nevzlin, former CEO of the oil giant and current chairman of the Diaspora Museum in Tel Aviv, says the former Russian spy came to Israel with classified documents on Yukos which may be damaging to Russian leaders. Nevzliln estimates that Litvinenko’s death was connected with this information, which he has handed to London police investigators of the murder.
    DEBKAfile’s intelligence sources add that the Russian ex-spy is believed to have been a double agent, who sold trade secrets to different parties in and outside Russia, among them some of the Russian oligarchs living in exile in the West. Livinenko served as a colonel in a Russian Federal Security Services unit which investigated and carried out special operations against businessmen.
    British police found traces of the radioactive Polonium 210 in Litvinenko’s urine.
    The London media accuse Vladimir Putin of being behind the murder which they claim was politically-motivated.

    canto XXV Dante

    from purgatory, the lustful... "open your breast to the truth which follows and know that as soon as the articulations in the brain are perfected in the embryo, the first Mover turns to it, happy...."
    Shema Israel

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    57
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Terrorism: News & Updates

    I think you have something here also. The boastings of Chavez and the prez of Iran indicationg the soon demise of the US and the UK seem to fit. I am also suspicious of the sudden wheeling and dealing going on with Iran and Syria by this new commision that Bush has set up. The upgrading of defense missiles in the ME countries by Russia and China seems also to fit in. I suppose it takes a while to get all the pieces set up but it would seem to be close to an expected confrontation.
    Sadly the population is not prepared for this conflict, too busy shopping. Surely the journalists will alert them if there was something serious. Oh thats right, thats been locked up too.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,183
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Polonium 210

    While I am not well versed in nuclear physics, it sounds as if polonium 210 is some bad stuff. Evidently the Soviets are not gaurding their power plants/stockpiles very well. Or they are willing to sell to the highest bidder. I am somewhat concerned that as of today there are 3 more reported cases of radiation like sickness being reported in the UK.
    My point being I wouldn't know a pound of polonium 210 from uranium 235 from my wifes homemade burritos. Since radiation is invisible, without a gieger counter is there any way to detect things like this? Does nuclear material really glow in the dark?
    "Still waitin on the Judgement Day"

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    710
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Polonium 210

    Luke here is two articles released bt the Bri's.

    Britain appeals for calm
    Three tested for radiation; Putin accused
    Article Launched:11/27/2006 02:47:47 PM EST

    Monday, November 27
    LONDON (AP) - The British government appealed for calm on Monday as scientists discovered more traces of radiation and three people who reported symptoms were being tested for the deadly radioactive poison that killed former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko.

    The government announced a formal inquest into his death and Home Secretary John Reid, in a special address to the House of Commons, warned against rushing to conclusions over who might be responsible for the 43-year-old former KGB agent turned Kremlin critic. He died after falling ill from what doctors said was polonium-210 poisoning.

    The substance is deadly if ingested or inhaled. Reid said the tests on the three people were only a precaution. High doses of polonium-210 — a rare radioactive element usually manufactured in specialized nuclear facilities — were found in Litvinenko's body.

    "The nature of this radiation is such that it does not travel over long distances, a few centimetres at most, and therefore there is no need for public alarm," Reid said in a special address to the House of Commons after opposition calls.

    Traces of radiation were found at a bar in London's Millennium Hotel, a branch of Itsu Sushi restaurant near Piccadilly Circus, Litvinenko's house in North London and a section of the hospital where he was treated before he fell ill on Nov. 1.

    The sushi restaurant and part of the hospital have been closed for decontamination while tests are still underway to determine if the hotel needs to be decontaminated.

    Two other sites — an office block in London's West End and the posh neighborhood of Mayfair — also showed traces of radiation, according to Scotland Yard.

    "They said there was only a trace," said Alan Humberstone, a 27-year-old computer technician at a fourth floor office building at 25 Grosvenor Square in Mayfair. "(Police) said, 'You would have to ingest something to be at risk."

    The office building near the Millennium Hotel contains a business intelligence company, Titon International Ltd. — whose CEO is a retired director of U.K. Special Forces, and a security company, Erinys UK Ltd., which has done security work for the
    In the strongest comments leveled at Moscow since the ex-spy's death, British Cabinet minister Peter Hain on Sunday accused Russian President Vladimir Putin, above, of presiding over "huge attacks on individual liberty and on democracy" and acknowledged that relations between London and Moscow were at a difficult stage as anti-terrorist police investigated the radiation poisoning that killed a former Soviet spy. (AP Photo)

    oil infrastructure in Iraq.

    The other location at 7 Down St. near the sushi restaurant is called Interpark House and reportedly is where self-exiled tycoon Boris Berezovsky — a Kremlin critic wanted in Russia on money-laundering charges — has an office. Businesses listed at the address include a fund adviser, an investment firm, an energy company and offices of the newspaper publisher Metro International.

    Berezovsky told The Associated Press on Monday he wouldn't make any comment until the investigation was over. He allegedly paid for Litvinenko's house in North London. The two knew each other in Russia.

    Hundreds of people have called a health hotline over concerns they may be at risk from radiation poisoning but only 18 people have been referred to the Health Protection Agency.

    Out of those 18, three exhibited symptoms that health officials thought should be examined at a special clinic as a precaution, said Katherine Lewis, a spokeswoman for the Health Protection Agency. She refused to elaborate on their symptoms. The tests should take about a week.

    Derek Hill, an expert in radiological science at the University College London, said the public health risk was low.

    Although an autopsy has not started yet because of concerns over radioactivity, an inquest into his death could begin as early as Thursday, according to Matt Cornish, a spokesman for Camden Council. The local government body oversees the North London Coroner's Court. The opening is a legal formality, and such inquests are almost always adjourned immediately, sometimes for months.

    Coroner's inquests in Britain are meant to determine the cause of death but they sometimes cast blame.

    British officials have avoided blaming Moscow for the death of Litvinenko but emergency talks continued Monday over the spy's death — an issue that could overshadow tough negotiations over energy issues and Russia's cooperation on Iran's nuclear ambitions.

    In the strongest comments leveled at Moscow since the ex-spy's death, Cabinet minister Peter Hain on Sunday accused Putin of presiding over "huge attacks on individual liberty and on democracy" and acknowledged that relations between London and Moscow were at a difficult stage.

    Hain, the government's Northern Ireland secretary, said Putin's tenure had been clouded by incidents "including an extremely murky murder of the senior Russian journalist" Anna Politkovskaya. Litvinenko had been investigating her murder.

    Opposition leaders demanded an explanation from the government on how the deadly polonium-210 came to be in Britain.

    "All premises in the United Kingdom that use polonium-210 are strictly regulated by the environment agencies," Reid told legislators. "There are some 130 premises that might use that. ... There has been no recent report of the loss or theft of a polonium-210 source in England or Wales."

    The ex-spy told police he believed he was poisoned Nov. 1 while investigating the October slaying of Politkovskaya, another critic of Putin's government. The ex-spy was moved to intensive care last week after his hair fell out, his throat became swollen and his immune and nervous systems suffered severe damage.

    London's Metropolitan Police said they were investigating it as a "suspicious death" rather than murder. They have not ruled out the possibility that Litvinenko may have poisoned himself.

    www.berkshireeagle.com/ci_4729313


    Briefing: What is polonium-210?
    Times Online

    Polonium, the substance discovered in the urine of the former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko before his death last night, is highly radioactive and extremely toxic.

    Discovered in 1898 by Marie Curie, the Polish-French physicist who became the first two time Nobel laureate, it was named after her homeland, Poland.

    When ingested or inhaled, polonium starts attacking organs and can cause irreversible damage to the kidneys, liver and spleen. As was the case with Litvinenko, it would also make its victims hair fall out.

    A by-product of uranium, it has the chemical symbol Po and lies in the group below oxygen in the periodic table. Chemically similar to tellurium and bismuth, it has a metallic appearance and dissolves in dilute acids, so could easily have been slipped into Litvnenko's food or a drink.

    Britain’s independent Health Protection Agency said that polonium-210 - the polonium isotope identified in the case - can represent a radiation hazard if it is ingested, through breathing, eating or in a wound. However, it is not a danger so long as it remains outside the body and as such, would have not caused any harm to those using it as a poison.

    Professor Dudley Goodhead, of the Medical Research Council & Genome Stability Unit, said that polonium has a half life of 138 days which makes it relatively easy to identify. This also means there is easily enough time for someone to use it as a poison, compared with other radioactive materials, some of which have a half life only as long as three minutes.

    "There are very small amounts of polonium-210 in the natural environment from decay of uranium in the earth and in fact everyone has a small amount of polonium 210 in their body," Professor Goodhear said.

    "But to poison someone, much larger amounts are required and this would have to be man-made, perhaps from a particle accelerator or a nuclear reactor."

    Small amounts of polonium-210 are made every year in specialist laboratories and it has been studied for the possible use of heating spacecraft. A great deal of energy is released by its decay and a single gramme generates 140 watts of heat energy. It has also been used in devices that eliminate static in textile mills and on brushes to remove accumulated dust from photographic films.

    When Maria Curie chose to name her discovery after Poland, it was in the hope it would bring notoriety to her homeland. At the time, Poland was under Russian, Prussian and Austrian domination.


    www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2470023,00.html

  8. #8
    Senior Member samizdat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,498
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: Polonium 210

    burritos
    : that's the common Mexican term for drug pusher.

    There are radiation detection keychains sold rather cheap for urban areas prone to a dirty bomb.

    Soviets are not guarding their power plants/stockpiles very well
    sell to the highest bidder
    ...
    Let's see, Iran, China- yeah we're talking big bucks. N. Korea had to mooch their nuke mat from Clinton.

    canto XXV Dante

    from purgatory, the lustful... "open your breast to the truth which follows and know that as soon as the articulations in the brain are perfected in the embryo, the first Mover turns to it, happy...."
    Shema Israel

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  9. #9
    Senior Member samizdat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,498
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: Polonium 210

    Her are two links on Madame Curie- the first is brief and decent, the second is darn good, and thorough.

    http://myhero.com/myhero/hero.asp?hero=madameCurie

    On July 4, 1934, Marie Curie died of aplastic anemia, a blood disease that often results from getting too much radiation.

    http://www.aip.org/history/curie/brief/index.html

    canto XXV Dante

    from purgatory, the lustful... "open your breast to the truth which follows and know that as soon as the articulations in the brain are perfected in the embryo, the first Mover turns to it, happy...."
    Shema Israel

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  10. #10
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    This is a compilation thread for all discussion related to the murder of Alexander Litvenenko.

  11. #11
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    How Many More Were Poisoned?
    As the deadliest poison known to man was revealed to have killed Russian exile Alexander Litvinenko, the question last night was: How many more lives could it claim?

    The 43-year-old former KGB officer was the victim of polonium 210, a radioactive element used as a trigger in nuclear weapons.

    It is so powerful that a lethal dose can be passed on through the body in sweat or saliva.

    So his widow Marina, 44, and ten-year-old son Anatole could have been contaminated just by kissing him as he fought for life in hospital. They are said to be at greatest risk.

    But up to 100 other contacts will be tested among hospital staff, family members and restaurant workers who came into contact with him.

    Chillingly, traces of polonium 210 have been detected at Itsu, the London sushi bar where Mr Litvinenko ate with a contact on November 1, at the four-star Millennium Hotel in Mayfair, where he met another associate that day, and at the family home in North London.

    A large quantity of radiation from polonium 210 was detected in Mr Litvinenko’s urine, apparently a few hours before his death. But last night a post-mortem had yet to be carried out because of fears that the body presented too much of a danger.

    Detectives and scientists expressed open astonishment that such an elaborate and evil Cold War-style hit could happen Britain, describing the murder as ‘unprecedented’ and ‘mind-boggling’.

    It threatened to cause a serious diplomatic rift between Britain and Russia, at a time when relations are at their worst since the end of the Cold War.

    Security sources said MI5 believes the Russian intelligence services assassinated Mr Litvinenko. Britain made a formal request to Moscow for help in the murder investigation. But Mr Putin left diplomats open-mouthed with claims that the former spy did not die ‘a violent death’.

    On a day of extraordinary developments in the murder investigation: • Mr Litvinenko condemned President Putin from beyond the grave as ‘barbaric and ruthless’ in a statement dictated before his death. • His grieving father said he had been killed by a ‘little tiny nuclear bomb’ and warned that the Russian regime was a ‘mortal danger’ to the rest of the world. • The Government’s Cobra special emergencies committee met every few hours to discuss the crisis. • The Foreign Office ordered the Russian Ambassador to pass on a demand for information. Alexander ‘Sasha’ Litvinenko died in intensive care at London’s University College Hospital on Thursday night after suffering heart failure.

    At a dramatic press conference in London the Health Protection Agency (HPA) revealed that he had been killed by a ‘large dose’ of radioactive polonium 210, and not thallium as previously thought.

    Only a speck of it would have been enough to prove fatal once it got into his system, probably by being slipped into his drink or on to food.

    Whoever did this must have been expert in the dosage because giving him too much would have caused almost instant death while it took weeks for him to become gravely ill, giving the killer ample chance to escape.

    Although there is no cure for polonium poisoning – with Mr Litvinenko thought to be the first human victim – experts stressed that the risk to others was low because the substance must be ingested to become harmful.

    HPA chief executive Pat Troop said: ‘The people who are likely to be at risk are those who have come into contact with his bodily fluids.

    There would be a potential radiological hazard to people who could have ingested or breathed in the contaminated body fluids but this hazard is likely to be restricted to those who had very close contact with Mr Litvinenko.

    ‘Normal hygiene and cleanliness practice in hospitals should have reduced the likelihood of any significant intake by NHS staff and others and therefore any radiation hazard.

    Describing the case as ‘unprecedented in the UK’, Mrs Troop added: ‘As far as the sushi restaurant is concerned we have found some radiation there. It was in a fairly limited area around the table where he was sitting.

    ‘The key people are the ones who had close contact with him.’

    Dr Michael Clark, also of the HPA, said: ‘There is no antidote for polonium 210. The number affected could be approaching 100.’

    In a statement composed two days before he died, Mr Litvinenko blamed President Putin for his illness. He said: ‘You have shown yourself to be as barbaric and ruthless as your most hostile critics have claimed.

    ‘You may succeed in silencing one man, but the howl of protest from around the world will reverberate, Mr Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life.’

    The dead man’s father Walter Litvinenko broke down outside University College Hospital as he said ‘a terrible thing’ had happened to his son.

    ‘My son died yesterday and he was killed by a little tiny nuclear bomb,’ he added. ‘It was so small that you could not see it. But the people who killed him have big nuclear bombs and missiles and those people should not be trusted.’

    The extraordinary nature of Mr Litvinenko’s murder increased speculation that he had been killed by his former KGB employers as a warning to other ex-spies who might want to criticise the Russian regime.

    Mr Litvinenko had openly criticised President Putin and had been investigating the assassination of a Russian journalist who had, in turn, spoken out against Russia’s policies in Chechnya. Downing Street was at pains to avoid fingering Russia as the culprit, amid fears of a potentially explosive diplomatic confrontation.

    But the Foreign Office said officials had discussed the issue with the Russian Ambassador, Yuri Fedotov, at a meeting yesterday afternoon.

    ‘The ambassador was asked to convey to the authorities in Moscow a request to provide any information they might have which would assist the police with their inquiries.’

    In Moscow, however, President Putin said: ‘As far as I understand from the medical statement, it does not say this was the result of violence, this was not a violent death.’

    British security sources revealed that MI5 has identified as the most likely culprit the FSB – the Russian Federal Security Service which succeeded the KGB.

    But they ruled out suggestions that Russian assassins remain at large in London, armed with lethal radioactive material.

  12. #12
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    A British Citizen: Putin Must Prove By Deeds He Is Not Linked To Litvinenko’s Murder
    Alexander Litvinenko’s final testament, released after his death on Thursday evening, is deeply moving. It is also political dynamite. He thanked the hospital that battled to save him. He thanked his friends and the British authorities and paid tribute to the country that had granted him citizenship a month before his death. And dramatically accusing President Putin of having no respect for life, liberty or any civilised value, he said the Russian leader may have succeeded in silencing one man, “but a howl of protest from around the world will reverberate in your ears for the rest of your life”.

    His death could not have come at a more awkward time for Mr Putin, who was meeting European Union leaders at an annual summit in Finland. During a tense press conference, he attempted to play down the case, offering condolences to the family but accusing Mr Litvinenko’s associates of playing politics with his death. But although his hosts did not bring up the murder in the talks on Russia’s long-term relations with the EU, it has strengthened suspicions of Mr Putin’s authoritarian administration and added to the ugly list of political murders and harassment of opponents that has heightened EU concern over Russia.

    Those who should be pressing Moscow hardest to explain its role in this squalid assassination are the British police. This must now be a murder investigation. The hospital discovery that Mr Litvinenko was probably killed with polonium 210, a radioactive isotope, points to a sophisticated plot and to assassins able to obtain a substance not readily available except to those with considerable backing. The suspicion must fall on the FSB, the successor agency to the KGB. It had motive, means and opportunity. In exile in London, Mr Litvinenko, himself a former FSB agent, taunted and mocked the present head of Russia’s spy agency as well as Mr Putin. Goaded into a vendetta against a traitor, they may well have reacted as Henry II’s knights did on imagining their King’s desire to be rid of Thomas Ã* Becket.

    Two other factors increase the suspicion. First, the Russian parliament recently voted specifically to allow the FSB to undertake assassination missions abroad fighting terrorism. In doing so, it widened the definition of terrorists to include those who gave moral support to Chechen rebels and others seeking to undermine the State. FSB operatives, freed from any constraint, may well have seen Mr Litvinenko in that category.

    Secondly, the FSB, though politically accountable, has been given an almost free hand by the President, who grew up in that same culture. It had no need to seek permission from the top. It knew that Mr Putin needed to maintain plausible deniability of all its actions. At the same time, it could easily point — as it now has — to the murky world of Russian exiles, some of whom are unsavoury characters and who are widely believed to have had links with organised crime groups while enriching themselves in Russia.

    That murky world aside, Mr Putin has been deeply embarrassed by the murder. His open quest to make Russia respected again around the world is not helped by accusations of running a gangster state. He must, therefore, offer British investigators full co-operation and total access to all those they might want to question. A refusal or even prevarication must be taken as evidence of complicity. Nor should Russia be given the impression that this is a small episode that will be forgotten in a few weeks. Any policy of trying to tough it out should be met with an even tougher response from Britain. Mr Litvinenko was a citizen of this country. His murder is an affront to our laws, our democracy and our way of life.

  13. #13
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    Why The West Must Stand Up To Putin's Thugs
    The Russian president, Vladimir Putin, could order the assassination of all his exiled opponents in Britain, including me, unless Tony Blair and George W Bush end their appeasement of his authoritarian regime.

    I have no doubt that the man who tried to kill my friend Alexander Litvinenko is back in Moscow and will walk free in its streets for as long as the current regime, which is dominated by ex-members of the KGB, controls the Kremlin.

    Alexander was a high-profile critic of Moscow who often spoke in strong language of the state's abuses of power. His most recent investigations were driven by his belief that Mr Putin had ordered the execution of Anna Politkovskaya, the journalist who was shot in the doorway of her apartment building last month.

    The attempt to kill Alexander, who had only last month been granted British citizenship, could not have been carried out without the express approval of the president.

    London is known around the world as a friendly haven for many Russians — not all of them billionaires as the media coverage often implies — who believe that the country needs a viable opposition and the restraints of democratic politics.

    As Alexander clings to life in the intensive care ward at University College Hospital, every Russian who expresses any criticism of the government of our homeland knows that distance offers little protection from the vengeful Russian state.

    When I spoke to Marina, Alexander's wife, she was convinced that the assassination attempt was carried out by a man I shall not name but his identity is widely known in Russian business circles.

    This man was for a time a close associate of Boris Berezovsky, the billionaire businessman driven out by Mr Putin who now lives in exile in Surrey. After a spell in prison, the former subordinate emerged as a KGB agent and became very rich.

    By arranging a meeting with Alexander and administering a dose of the deadly poison thallium, he has repaid his debt to the state. He is now safely back in Russia and is thus safe from any attempt to hold him accountable for his actions.

    Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the KGB, my old employer, has been renamed the FSB. But I know its methods are unchanged from those perfected in the darkest hours of Stalin's reign of terror. President Putin is, like myself, a former KGB operative in Western Europe.

    As such, he is fully aware of the potential hostile reaction of British public opinion to reports that Russia tried to murder a dissident in London. But President Putin is unlikely to lie awake at night worrying about the negative publicity the attack on Alexander has generated.

    He knows that the west has failed to call his government to account for the suspicious circumstances surrounding Ms Politkovskaya's murder. Indeed on the day she died, President Bush trumpeted Russia's acceptance into the World Trade Organisation.

    Yet Mr Putin is eliminating his opponents with the same ruthless determination displayed by Adolf Hitler in the 1930s. Western leaders are pursuing a hypocritical policy of appeasement that is encouraging the ruthless instincts of Russia's leaders.

    I refused to allow a Russian television crew to come to my home yesterday to interview me. The Russian journalists who have visited me over the last 15 years are all swindlers and spies.

    I know that today the KGB has tried to kill my friend. Tomorrow it could be me and the day after it could be another London-based critic of Mr Putin's government.

    The British government must view this episode as provocation and use the opportunity to stand up to Mr Putin. It must recognise that all the worst aspects of contemporary Russia are spreading unchecked in this country. Steps must be taken to protect us, the Russian exiles, and the population of Britain as a whole from the dictator in the Kremlin.

    • Oleg Gordievsky was a KGB colonel and its London station chief. In 1985 he became the highest-ranking spy to defect to the West.

  14. #14
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    Kremlin Poison
    By J.R. Nyquist

    It appears that the Kremlin has attempted to assassinate Russian defector Alexander Litvinenko, whose warnings to the West have been repeatedly cited in this column.

    A former lieutenant colonel of the KGB/FSB, Litvinenko wrote a book titled Blowing Up Russia: Terror From Within. During an interview with Rzeczpospolita in July 2005 he explained that al Qaeda’s number two man, Ayman al-Zawahiri was trained by the FSB (KGB) in Russia along with other al Qaeda leaders. According to Litvinenko, “[there is] only one organization which has made terrorism the main tool of solving political problems.” And that organization, he said, “is the Russian special services.” The KGB trained terrorists all over the world. “The specially trained and prepared agents of the KGB,” said Litvinenko, “have organized murders and explosions, including explosions on tankers, the hijacking of passenger jets, attacks on diplomats, as well as state and commercial organizations worldwide.” Litvinenko added: “The bloodiest terrorists of the world were or are agents of the KGB-FSB. They are well known [like] Carlos Ilyich Ramiros, nicknamed ‘the Jackal,’ the late Yassir Arafat, Saddam Hussein … [and others].” According to Litvinenko, “All of them were trained by the KGB, received money from there, weapons and explosives….”

    It is being reported that Litvinenko was poisoned with thallium, described by the Telegraph (UK) as a colorless and odorless liquid “that is often used to kill rats.” The poisoning occurred in London while Litvinenko was gathering information on the assassination of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya. Litvinenko has argued that Chechen terrorism is a KGB-inspired provocation used to legitimize Putin’s dictatorship, and that Russia is pretending to fight terrorism with one hand while guiding it with the other. A man brave enough to risk his life to warn others, to lay an accusation against the most dangerous criminals in the world, deserves to be taken seriously. But the fact that his message has been systematically ignored, that no newspaper or politician will discuss his testimony concerning Ayman al-Zawahiri, is a sociological artifact of great significance. The Kremlin’s grand deception strategy has been effective, and there is no danger that the West will figure it out, because the truth is economically inconvenient for politicians and businessmen alike. Things have advanced so far that the Kremlin sees no danger in murdering people outright, as in the days of Stalin. In this way a message is sent to all writers, and all those with bits and pieces of the great puzzle.

    The Russian strategy should be obvious by now. We know that China and Iran are being armed with Russian weapons – including Russian nuclear technology. Such moves deserve an explanation, but nobody wants an honest discussion of the problem. Given the economic logic of U.S. statesmanship, a confrontation with Russia is to be avoided. The Left/Right political divide paralyzes any and all realistic analysis because one side of this political divide is incapable of acknowledging a Russian threat while the other has attached itself to claims of victory and the prospect of “open” markets in “former” communist lands. We know that Russia is working to form various alliances with countries like Brazil, India, Venezuela, etc. We know that Russia and China have formed an intimate partnership, that they have conducted joint military exercises, and that China has been cultivating Mexico as a strategic partner. The balance of power is shifting, perhaps decisively, and the results of that shift may soon become apparent to everyone. The Iranian nuclear crisis serves to dramatize this shift. Three years ago President Bush would have bombed Iran. Today he is timid, hesitant and beleaguered. Many of the president’s supporters have turned against him. Perhaps President Bush realizes that a preemptive attack on Iran will divide the United States politically, with further consequences to the Republican Party.

    Looking back at the long row of fallen dominoes, from South Africa and the Congo to Venezuela and Germany, the fall of the Israeli domino stands in prospect. The Israelis believe the neutralization of Iran’s nuclear project is essential to Israel’s security. Israeli analysts are already warning that Iran could destroy Israel without launching a single nuclear weapon, because many Israelis will leave Israel if Iran becomes a nuclear power. The morale of the Jewish state would suffer a crippling blow. But the plight of Israel does not move the American public. Just as the American consumer abandoned Vietnam to the Communists, some believe that Israel will be abandoned to the Islamists. Many observers expect that the Americans will not remain loyal to their allies, choosing instead to “cut and run” when things become difficult. After all, it was the Americans who abandoned Southeast Asia. It was the Americans who pushed for the Communist takeover of Rhodesia, and the Communist-ANC takeover of South Africa; and who allowed the Communist victories in Angola and Congo. The African Communists have won the long war for the mineral rich sub-Saharan region. And the Americans don’t care in the least. In fact, we are about to watch the United States Congress cut the legs out from under the government of Colombia as it struggles to contain a growing Communist insurgency.

    The suicide of the West is happening before our eyes. From the assassination of Anna Politkovskaya to the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko, from the fall of South Africa to the electoral victory of Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua, the same old Communists continue to kill their enemies as they advance from victory to victory. The KGB rules Russia openly, flooding China with weapons, encouraging Iran’s nuclear ambitions, arming Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan, subverting the Western alliance through economics, neutralizing Germany by way of German unification, undermining NATO as one Warsaw Pact country after another joins under false democratic colors. Do the Americans have eyes? Do they have sense?

    Yesterday American strategy was based on a false victory. Today the logic of retreat takes hold as the party of retreat takes Congress. In terms of Iran’s WMDs, American politicians see no other choice than to sacrifice Israel to the “peace process.” It will prove to be a slow and grinding death, similar to that of white South Africa. The grim prospect is so real that former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has already compared his country’s fate to that of Czechoslovakia (sold out to appease Hitler). The West will do nothing to punish Vladimir Putin for assassinating and intimidating journalists, for poisoning Alexander Litvinenko. The West will do nothing about the Iranian bomb. The Americans will eventually leave Iraq, and America’s cities will be attacked by nuclear weapons. In this sequence one failure leads to another. Weakness, lack of resolve, stupidity and incompetence add up to defeat.

    From outward appearances it would seem that the old Soviet Union has returned. A thing crucified, dead and buried has been resurrected. Four weeks after Vladimir Putin’s re-election, a procession led by the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church arrived at the Church of Christ the Redeemer in Moscow. In keeping with ancient tradition the doors of the church were shut, symbolizing the sealed cave where Christ’s body was placed following crucifixion. “After midnight,” noted Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, “the Orthodox faithful taking part in the procession await the opening of the church doors. The patriarch stands on the steps at their head and is the first to enter the empty temple where the Resurrection of Christ has already occurred.” In due course the Patriarch offered up a prayer, the doors of the Church of Christ the Redeemer were opened and out stepped President Vladimir Putin. If any Christians were present for this ceremony they offered no protest to this blatant sacrilege. The woman who reported this event for the benefit of Western readers has since been assassinated. The KGB defector who was investigating the circumstances of her death has been poisoned (i.e., Litvinenko). The West thinks it an amusing spy story, something out of fiction. But the situation is hardly amusing. As Russian dissident Yuri Yarim-Agaev recently explained to Jamie Glazov of Frontpagemag.com, “That in foreign policy, the U.S. remains for them [Russia] enemy number one, and that they would support anyone who tries to undermine American power whether it be North Korea, Iran, you name it. That in domestic policy they consider their major enemies democracy, human rights, and the free market, and they will try to suppress them by all means, and the bring back under their control most parts of the former Soviet Union.”

    Russia is a big player, despite what we’ve been told about “the fall of communism.” The Kremlin now acts boldly, in the open, so that every Russian understands. It is a case of terrorism. It is a case of instilling fear. Writers are being killed, and now intelligence defectors have been targeted. Decisive cards are being played, and the international press, the public and many politicians are clueless.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    57
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    A British Citizen: Putin Must Prove By Deeds He Is Not Linked To Litvinenko’s Murder
    That murky world aside, Mr Putin has been deeply embarrassed by the murder. His open quest to make Russia respected again around the world is not helped by accusations of running a gangster state. He must, therefore, offer British investigators full co-operation and total access to all those they might want to question.

    Oh, ha ha, its a joke right?

    Kremlin Poison
    Russia is a big player, despite what we’ve been told about “the fall of communism.” The Kremlin now acts boldly, in the open, so that every Russian understands. It is a case of terrorism. It is a case of instilling fear. Writers are being killed, and now intelligence defectors have been targeted. Decisive cards are being played, and the international press, the public and many politicians are clueless.

    Now, there you go, the bear awakens. THe prey ignore the aggresive behaviour thinking it is still only a toy.

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,961
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    Polonium 210 and Q
    NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS

    November 27, 2006: The recent death, in Britain, of KGB defector Alexander Litvinenko, via polonium 210 poisoning, was a rare use of a highly radioactive substance to assassinate someone. Polonium 210 can only be produced by a nuclear reactor, using special laboratory procedures. Russia has the nuclear facilities and labs to do it. Russia also has a history of using exotic poisons to assassinate individuals, outside the country, who are acting contrary to Russian interests.

    So far, traces of radiation have been found at Litvinenkos home, two hotel rooms, a hotel bar where he met someone, before going to a restaurant where he ate on November 1st,. Police technicians are checking other locations of evidence of polonium 210 being present. Polonium 210 is only deadly if it gets inside you. In the past, the KGB has developed ingenious devices for getting exotic poisons into victims. Polonium 210 kills by emitting alpha particles, which cause damage to living tissues. So when it gets inside you, it spreads, destroying organs as it does so. A gram (there are 28.5 grams to the ounce) of polonium 210 would be enough to kill someone. If sprayed onto food or drink as a mist, it would not be noticed. A small, specially designed, container could safely hold the polonium 210, and deliver it to the substance to be ingested. While this is the sort of thing you'd only expect to see in a James Bond movie, keep in mind that the James Bond flicks are based, albeit loosely, on actual espionage operations. The CIA, MI-6 and KGB all have their "Q" characters, who develop special tools and weapons. Many of those devices are never declassified. A gadget that could carry and deliver a fatal dose of polonium 210 would certainly be one item you would never let the public get a look at.

  17. #17
    Repeatedly Redundant...Again
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,118
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    HOLY COW!
    But last night a post-mortem had yet to be carried out because of fears that the body presented too much of a danger.
    Man, this was an absolutely outrageous crime.

    Anybody know: do they put markers in polonium-210?

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,961
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    Quote Originally Posted by Backstop View Post
    Anybody know: do they put markers in polonium-210?
    Backstop,

    "Polonium 210 can only be produced by a nuclear reactor, using special laboratory procedures."

    What this means is the the Po210 can be traced to the specific reactor it was bred in. Nuclear forensics. Nuclear fingerprints.

  19. #19
    Repeatedly Redundant...Again
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,118
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    Thanks, Sean. I figured there had to be some way to trace it. Not knowing much about the nuclear field...

    That's kinda what I meant by "outrageous crime." It is so brazen, I’m almost wondering if the perpetrator wants to be found.

    Then there’s the public outrage, fear, etc. from such a visible crime.

    Man, no kidding; I’m almost speechless about this.

  20. #20
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: The Murder of Alexander Litvenenko

    The Kremlin’s Killing Ways
    A long tradition continues.

    By Ion Mihai Pacepa

    There is no doubt in my mind that the former KGB/FSB officer Alexander Litvinenko was assassinated at Putin’s order. He was killed, I believe, because he revealed Putin’s crimes and the FSB’s secret training of Ayman al-Zawahiri, the number-two in al Qaeda. I know for a fact that the Kremlin has repeatedly used radioactive weapons to kill political enemies abroad. In the late 1970s, Leonid Brezhnev gave Ceausescu, via the KGB and its Romanian sister, the Securitate, a soluble radioactive thallium powder that could be put in food; the poison was to be used for killing political enemies abroad. According to the KGB, the radioactive thallium would disintegrate inside the victim’s body, generating a fatal, galloping form of cancer and leaving no trace detectable in an autopsy. The substance was described to Ceausescu as a new generation of the radioactive thallium weapon unsuccessfully used against KGB defector Nikolay Khokhlov in West Germany in 1957. (Khokhlov lost all his hair but did not die.) Its Romanian codename was “Radu” (from radioactive), and I described it in my first book, Red Horizons, published in 1987. The Polonium 210 that was used to kill Litvinenko seems to be an upgraded form of “Radu.”

    Assassination as Foreign Policy

    The Kremlin’s organized efforts to assassinate political enemies abroad (not solely by means of poison, of course) started a couple of months after the XXth Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, held in February 1956, at which Khrushchev exposed Stalin’s crimes. The following April, General Ivan Anisimovich Fadeyev, the chief of the KGB’s new 13th Department, responsible for assassinations abroad, landed in Bucharest for an “exchange of experience” with the DIE, the Romanian foreign intelligence service to which I belonged. Before that, Fadeyev had headed the huge KGB intelligence station in Karlhorst, East Berlin, and he was known throughout our intelligence community as a bloodthirsty man whose station had kidnapped hundreds of Westerners and whose troops had brutally suppressed the June 13, 1953, anti-Soviet demonstrations in East Berlin.

    Fadeyev began his “exchange of experience” in Bucharest by telling us that Stalin had made one inexcusable mistake: He had aimed the cutting edge of the state security apparatus against “our own people.” When Khrushchev had delivered his “secret speech,” the only thing he had intended was to correct that aberration. “Our enemies” were not in the Soviet Union, Fadeyev explained. The bourgeoisie in America and Western Europe wanted to wipe out Communism. They were “our deadly enemies.” They were the “rabid dogs” of imperialism. We should direct our sword’s cutting edge against them, and only against them. That was what Nikita Sergeyevich had really wanted to tell us in his “secret speech.”

    In fact, Fadeyev said, one of Khrushchev’s very first foreign-policy decisions had been his 1953 order to have one such “rabid dog” secretly assassinated: Georgy Okolovich, the leader of the National Labor Alliance (Natsionalnyy Trudovoy Soyuz, or NTS), one of the most aggressively anti-Communist Russian émigré organizations in Western Europe. Unfortunately, Fadeyev told us, once in place, the head of the assassination team, Nikolay Khokhlov, had defected to the CIA and publicly displayed the latest secret weapon created by the KGB: an electrically operated gun concealed inside a cigarette pack, which fired cyanide-tipped bullets. And because troubles never came alone, Fadeyev added, two other KGB officers familiar with the assassination component had defected soon after Khokhlov: Yury Rastvorov in January 1954, and Petr Deryabin in February 1954.

    This setback, Fadeyev said, had led to drastic changes. First, Khrushchev had ordered his propaganda machinery to spread the rumor worldwide that he had abolished the KGB’s assassination component. Then he baptized assassinations abroad with the euphemism “neutralizations,” rechristened the 9th Section of the KGB — as the assassination component had been called up to that time — as the 13th Department, buried it under even deeper secrecy, and placed it under his own supervision. (Later, after the 13th Department became compromised, the name was once again changed.)

    Next, Khrushchev had introduced a new “methodology” for carrying out neutralization operations. In spite of the KGB’s penchant for bureaucratic paperwork, these cases had to be handled strictly orally and kept forever secret. They also had to be kept completely secret from the Politburo and every other governing body. “The Comrade, and only the Comrade,” Fadeyev emphasized, could now approve neutralizations abroad. (Among those in top circles throughout the bloc, the term “the Comrade” colloquially designated a given country’s leader.) Regardless of any evidence that might be produced in foreign police investigations, the KGB — along with its sister services — was never under any circumstances to acknowledge its involvement in assassinations abroad; any such evidence was to be dismissed out of hand as a ridiculous accusation. And, finally, after each operation, the KGB was surreptitiously to spread “evidence” abroad accusing the CIA or other convenient “enemies” of having done the deed, thereby, if possible, killing two birds with one stone. Then Khrushchev ordered the KGB to develop a new generation of weapons that would kill without leaving any detectable trace in the victim’s body.

    Before Fadeyev left Bucharest, the DIE had established its own component for neutralization operations, which was named Group Z, because the letter Z was the final letter of the alphabet, representing the “final solution.” This new unit then proceeded to conduct the first neutralization operation in the Soviet bloc under Khrushchev’s new rules. In September 1958 Group Z, assisted by a special East German Stasi team, kidnapped Romanian anti-Communist leader Oliviu Beldeanu from West Germany. The governments of East Germany and Romania placed the onus for this crime on the CIA’s shoulders, publishing official communiqués stating that Beldeanu had been arrested in East Germany after having allegedly been secretly infiltrated there by the CIA in order to carry out sabotage and diversion operations.

    Exporting a Tradition

    Vladimir Putin appears to be only the latest in the long line of Russian tsars who have upheld the tradition of assassinating anyone who stood in their way. The practice goes back at least as far as the XIVth century’s Ivan the Terrible, who killed thousands of boyars and other people, including Metropolitan Philip and Prince Alexander Gorbatyl-Shuisky for having refused to swear an oath of allegiance to his eldest son, an infant at the time. Peter the Great unleashed his political police against everybody who spoke out against him, from his own wife, to drunks who told jokes about his rule; he even had the political police lure his own son and heir, the tsarevich Aleksey, back to Russia from abroad and torture him to death.

    Under Communism, arbitrary assassinations became a state policy. In an August 11, 1918, handwritten order demanding that at least 100 kulaks be hanged in the town of Penza to set an example, Lenin wrote: “Hang (hang without fail, so the people see) no fewer than one hundred known kulaks, rich men, bloodsuckers ... Do it in such a way that people for hundreds of [kilometers] around will see, tremble, know and scream out: they are choking and strangling to death these bloodsucking kulaks.” (This letter was part of an exhibit entitled “Revelations from the Russian Archives,” which was displayed at the Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., in 1992)

    During Stalin’s purges alone, some nine million people lost their lives. Out of the seven members of Lenin’s Politburo at the time of the October Revolution, only Stalin was still alive when the massacre was over.

    What I have always found even more disturbing than the brutality with which those crimes were carried out is the Soviet leaders’ deep involvement in them. Stalin personally ordered that Leon Trotsky, the co-founder of the Soviet Union, be assassinated in Mexico. And Stalin himself handed the Order of Lenin to the Spanish Communist Caridad Mercader del Rio, whose son, the Soviet intelligence officer Ramón Mercader, had killed Trotsky in August 1940 by bashing in his head with an ice axe. Similarly, Khrushchev with his own hands pinned the highest Soviet medal on the jacket of Bogdan Stashinsky, a KGB officer who in 1962 had killed two leading anti-Communist émigrés in West Germany.

    My first contact with the Kremlin’s “neutralization” operations took place on November 5, 1956, when I was in training at the ministry of foreign trade for my cover position of deputy chief of the Romanian Mission in West Germany. Mihai Petri, a DIE officer acting as deputy minister, told me that the “big boss” needed me immediately. The “big boss” was undercover KGB general Mikhail Gavrilyuk, Romanianized as Mihai Gavriliuc and the head of the DIE.

    “Is khorosho see old friend, Ivan Mikhaylovich,” I heard from the man relaxing in a comfortable chair facing Gavriliuc’s desk. It was General Aleksandr Sakharovsky, who got up out of the chair and held out his hand. He had created the DIE and, as its chief Soviet intelligence adviser, had been my de facto boss until a couple of months earlier, when Khrushchev had selected him to head the almighty PGU (Pervoye Glavnoye Upravleniye, or First Chief Directorate of the KGB, the Soviet Union’s foreign intelligence service). “Let me introduce you to Ivan Aleksandrovich,” he said, pointing to a scruffy peasant-type sporting gold-rimmed glasses. He was General Ivan Serov, the new chairman of the KGB. Both visitors were wearing flowered Ukrainian folkshirts over baggy, flapping trousers, in stark contrast to the gray and buttoned-up Stalin-style suits that had until recently been a virtual KGB uniform. (Even today it is still a mystery to me why most of the top KGB officers I knew would take such pains to imitate whatever Soviet leader happened to be in power at the moment. Was it merely an oriental inheritance from tsarist times, when Russian bureaucrats went to inordinate lengths to flatter their superiors?)

    The visitors told us that the previous night Hungarian premier Imre Nagy, who had announced Hungary’s secession from the Warsaw Pact and asked the United Nations for help, had sought refuge in the Yugoslavian Embassy. Romanian ruler Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej and Politburo member Walter Roman (who knew Nagy from the war years when both had been working for the Comintern in Moscow) agreed to be flown to Budapest to help the KGB kidnap Nagy and bring him to Romania. Major Emanuel Zeides, the chief of the German desk, who spoke fluent Hungarian, would go with them as translator. “When Zeides Vienna you chief nemetskogo otdeleniya,” Gavriliuc told me, finally clarifying why I had been summoned. That meant I was to hold the bag as chief of the DIE’s German desk.

    On November 23, 1956, the three Soviet Politburo members who had coordinated from Budapest the military intervention against Hungary sent an enciphered telegram to Khrushchev:

    Comrade Walter Roman, who arrived in Budapest together with Comrade Dej yesterday, November 22, had long discussions with Nagy. … Imre Nagy and his group left the Yugoslavian Embassy and are now in our hands. Today the group will leave for Romania. Comrade Kadar and the Romanian comrades are preparing an adequate press communiqué. Malenkov, Suslov, Aristov.

    A year later, Nagy and the principal members of his cabinet were hanged, after a showtrial the KGB organized in Budapest.

    In February 1962 the KGB narrowly missed assassinating the shah of Iran, who had committed the unpardonable “crime” of having removed a Communist government installed in the northwestern part of Iran. The DIE’s chief razvedka (Russian for foreign intelligence) adviser never told us in so many words that the KGB had failed to kill the shah, but he asked us to order the DIE station in Tehran to destroy all its compromising documents, to suspend all its agents’ operations, and to report everything, including rumors, about an attempt on the shah’s life. A few days later he canceled the DIE plan to kill its own defector Constantin Mandache in West Germany with a bomb mounted in his car because, the adviser told us, the remote control, which had been supplied by the KGB for this operation, might malfunction. In 1990 Vladimir Kuzichkin, a KGB officer who had been directly involved in the failed attempt to kill the shah and who had afterwards defected to the West, published a book (Inside the KGB: My Life in Soviet Espionage, Pantheon Books, 1990) in which he describes the operation. According to Kuzichkin, the shah escaped alive because the remote control used to set off a large quantity of explosives in a Volkswagen car had malfunctioned.

    Silencing Dissent


    On Sunday, March 20, 1965, I paid my last visit to Gheorghiu-Dej’s winter residence in Predeal. As usual, I found him with his best friend, Chivu Stoica, Romania’s honorary head. Dej complained of feeling weak, dizzy, and nauseous. “I think the KGB got me,” he said, only half in jest. “They got Togliatti. That’s for sure,” Stoica squeaked ominously.

    Palmiro Togliatti, the head of the Italian Communist party, had died on August 21, 1964, while on a visit to the Soviet Union. The word at the top of the bloc foreign intelligence community was that he had died from a rapid form of cancer, after having been irradiated by the KGB on Khrushchev’s order while vacationing in Yalta. His assassination had been provoked by the fact that, while in the Soviet Union, he had written a “testament” in which he had expressed profound discontent with Khrushchev’s failures. Togliatti’s frustrations expressed not only his personal view but also that of Leonid Brezhnev. According to Dej, these suspicions were confirmed by the facts that Brezhnev had attended Togliatti’s funeral in Rome; that in September 1964 Pravda had published portions of Togliatti’s “testament”; and that five weeks later Khrushchev was dethroned after being accused of harebrained schemes, hasty decisions, actions divorced from reality, braggadocio, and rule by fiat.

    I saw Dej give a shiver. He had also been critical of Khrushchev’s foreign policy. Moreover, a year earlier he had expelled all KGB advisers from Romania, and the previous September he had expressed to Khrushchev his concern about Togliatti’s “strange death.” During the March 12, 1965, elections for Romania’s Grand National Assembly, Gheorghiu-Dej still looked vigorous. A week later, however, he died of a galloping form of cancer. “Assassinated by Moscow” is what the new Romanian leader, Nicolae Ceausescu, whispered to me a few months after that. “Irradiated by the KGB,” he murmured in an even lower voice, claiming, “That was firmly established by the autopsy.” The subject had come up because Ceausescu had ordered me immediately to obtain Western radiation detection devices (Geiger-Müller counters) and have them secretly installed throughout his offices and residences.

    Soon after the Soviet-led invasion of Prague, Ceausescu switched over from Stalinism to Maoism, and in June 1971 he visited Red China. There he learned that the KGB had organized a plot to kill Mao Zedong with the help of Lin Biao, the head of the Chinese army, who had been educated in Moscow. The plot failed, and Lin Biao unsuccessfully tried to fly out of China in a military plane. His execution was announced only in 1972. During the same year I learned details about that Soviet plot from Hua Guofeng, the minister of public security — who in 1977 would become China's supreme leader.

    “Ten,” Ceausescu remarked to me. “Ten international leaders the Kremlin killed or tried to kill,” he explained, counting them off on his fingers. Laszlo Rajk and Imre Nagy of Hungary; Lucretiu Patrascanu and Gheorghiu-Dej in Romania; Rudolf Slansky, the head of Czechoslovakia, and Jan Masaryk, that country’s chief diplomat; the shah of Iran; Palmiro Togliatti of Italy; American President John F. Kennedy; and Mao Zedong. (Among the leaders of Moscow’s satellite intelligence services there was unanimous agreement that the KGB had been involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.)

    On the spot, Ceausescu ordered me to create a super-secret counterintelligence unit for operations in socialist countries (i.e., the Soviet bloc). “You have one thousand personnel slots for this.” His added caveat was that the new unit should be “nonexistent.” No name, no title, no plate on the door. The new unit received only the generic designation U.M. 0920/A, and its head was given the rank of chief of a DIE directorate.

    Ordered to Kill

    On the unforgettable day of July 22, 1978, Ceausescu and I were hiding inside a pelican blind in a remote corner of the Danube Delta, where not even a passing bird could overhear us. As a man of discipline and a former general, he had long been fascinated by the structured society of the white pelicans. The very old birds — the grandparents — always lay up on the front part of the beach, close to the water and food supply. Their respectful children lined up behind them in orderly rows, while the grandchildren spent their time horsing around in the background. I had often heard my boss say he wished Romania had the same rigid social structure.

    “I want you to give ‘Radu’ to Noel Bernard,” Ceausescu whispered into my ear. Noel Bernard was at that time the director of Radio Free Europe’s Romanian program, and for years he had been infuriating Ceausescu with his commentaries. “You don’t need to report back to me on the results,” he added. “I'll learn them from Western newspapers and …” The end of Ceausescu’s sentence was masked by the methodical rat-a-tat of his submachine gun. He aimed with ritual precision, first at the front line of pelicans, then at the middle distance, and finally at the grandchildren in the back.

    For 27 years I had been living with the nightmare that, sooner or later, such orders to have someone killed would land on my plate. Up until that order from Ceausescu, I had been safe, as it was the DIE chief who was in charge of neutralization operations. But in March 1978 I had been appointed acting chief of the DIE, and there was no way for me now to avoid involvement in political assassinations, which had grown into a main instrument of foreign policy throughout the Soviet bloc.

    Two days later Ceausescu sent me to Bonn to deliver a secret message to Chancellor Helmut Schimdt, and there I requested political asylum in the U.S.

    The Killings Continue


    Noel Bernard continued to inform the Romanians about Ceausescu’s crimes, and on December 21, 1981, he died of a galloping form of cancer. On January 1, 1988, his successor, Vlad Georgescu, started serializing my book Red Horizons on RFE. A couple of months later, when the serialization ended, Georgescu informed his listeners that the Securitate had repeatedly warned him that he would die if he broadcast Red Horizons. “If they kill me for serializing Pacepa’s book, I’ll die with the clear conscience that I did my duty as a journalist,” Georgescu stated publicly. A few months later, he died of a galloping form of cancer.

    The Kremlin also continued secretly killing its political opponents. In 1979, Brezhnev’s KGB infiltrated Mikhail Talebov into the court of the pro-American Afghan premier Hafizullah Amin as a cook. Talebov’s task was to poison the prime minister. After several failed attempts, Brezhnev ordered the KGB to use armed force. On December 27, 1979, fifty KGB officers from the elite “Alpha” unit, headed by Colonel Grigory Boyarnov, occupied Amin’s palace and killed everybody inside to eliminate all witnesses. The next day Brezhnev’s KGB brought to Kabul Bebrak Kemal, an Afghan Communist who had sought refuge in Moscow, and installed him as prime minister. That KGB neutralization operation played a role in generating today’s international terrorism.

    On May 13, 1981, the same KGB organized, with help from Bulgaria, an attempt to kill Pope John Paul II, who had started a crusade against Communism. Mehmet Ali Aqca, who shot the pope, admitted that he had been recruited by the Bulgarians, and he identified his liaison officers in Italy: Sergey Antonov, deputy chief of the Balkanair office in Rome, who was arrested; and major Zhelvu Vasilief, from the military attaché office, who could not be arrested because of his diplomatic status and was recalled to Sofia. Aqca also admitted that, after the assassination, he was to be secretly taken out of Italy in a TIR truck (in the Soviet bloc the TIR trucks were used by the intelligence services for operational activities). In May 1991 the Italian government reopened its investigation into the assassination attempt, and on March 2, 2006, it concluded that the Kremlin had indeed been behind it.

    On Christmas Day of 1989, Ceausescu was executed at the end of a trial in which the accusations came almost word for word out of Red Horizons. I recently learned from Nestor Ratesh, a former director of RFE’s Romanian program, who has spent two years researching Securitate archives, that he has obtained enough evidence to prove that both Noel Bernard and Vlad Georgescu were killed by the Securitate at Ceausescu’s order. The result of his research will be the subject of a book to be published by RFE.

    Strong Arms and Stability

    When the Soviet Union collapsed, the Russians had a unique chance to cast off their old Byzantine form of police state, which has for centuries isolated the country and has left it ill-equipped to deal with the complexities of modern society. Unfortunately, the Russian have not been up to that task. Since the fall of Communism they have been faced with an indigenous form of capitalism run by old Communist bureaucrats, speculators, and ruthless mafiosi that has widened social inequities. Therefore, after a period of upheaval, the Russians have gradually — and perhaps thankfully — slipped back into their historical form of government, the traditional Russian samoderzhaviye, a form of autocracy traceable to the 14th century’s Ivan the Terrible, in which a feudal lord ruled the country with the help of his personal political police. Good or bad, the old political police may appear to most Russians as their only defense against the rapacity of the new capitalists at home.

    It will not be easy to break a five-century-old tradition. That does not mean that Russia cannot change. But for that to happen, the U.S. must help. We should stop pretending that Russia’s government is democratic, and assess it for what it really is: a band of over 6,000 former officers of the KGB — one of the most criminal organizations in history — who grabbed the most important positions in the federal and local governments, and who are perpetuating Stalin’s, Khrushchev’s, and Brezhnev’s practice of secretly assassinating people who stand in their way. Killing always comes with a price, and the Kremlin should be forced to pay it until it will stop the killings.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •