EMERGENCY; Warning to All U.S.A. Citizens - Obama and Ayers

[Beetle]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GrCHctYyWA

The above is a link to testimony from Larry Grathwohl. Grathwohl was a undercover operative who became a weatherman. Mass murder and re-education is mentioned. Very disturbing. Makes me wanna cling to my guns and Bible.

[Ryan Ruck]

Re-education camps and political genocide? Hmm... Sounds familiar...

Posting again from Anatoliy Golitsyn's The Perestroika Deception:

Conservatives are confused about Gorbachev and 'perestroika'. The old assumptions have been upset. They are out of ideas. They have lost perspective. The Soviet strategists, however, are concerned that the conservative crisis and confusion are temporary affairs. They believe the conservatives may recover and resist 'restructuring'. For this reason, strategic objectives of Soviet political warfare include:

• First of all, the neutralization of anti-Communist influence, especially in the conservative parties, as an important factor in the political life of the United States, West Germany, France, and Britain.
• Secondly, securing the victory of the radical Left in the next presidential elections in 1992 in the United States and the victory of the Socialist and Labour parties in the national elections in West Germany, France, and Britain in the 1990s. The Soviets plan to hold the International Conference on Human Rights in Moscow in 1991; and their keen interest in American participation in it is due to their desire to influence the outcome of the elections in favour of the radical Left. In their assessment, the Left will be prepared to carry out and accelerate 'restructuring' in the United States.

The Soviet strategists believe that an economic depression in the United States would provide even more favourable conditions for the execution of their strategy. In that event, the Soviets and their allies would shift to the doctrine of class struggle and try to divide the Western nations along crude class lines.

The final period of 'restructuring' in the United States and Western Europe would be accompanied, not only by the physical extermination of active anti-Communists, but also by the extermination of the political, military, financial, and religious elites. Blood would be spilled and political re-education camps would be introduced. The Communists would not hesitate to repeat the mass repressions of their revolution in 1917, of the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe in the Second World War or of the Chinese Communist victory of 1949..

This time, they would resort to mass repressions in order to prevent any possibility of revolt by the defeated, and to make their victory final. The Author bases this conclusion in part on the following information. While the long-range strategy was being formulated in the late 1950s, the Soviet strategists asked for a KGB estimate of the number of West Germans who would need to be isolated in order to turn West Germany into a neutral country. The KGB estimate was 150,000 Germans.

That Barack Obama, an individual that wants to take the reigns of our nation, is tied at the hip to a guy that would want this plan put into action is unfathomable!

None of this will faze his worshipers though.

[Beetle]

The worshipers will blindly follow their master.

I found the following web page, pretty interesting:

http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/gov_ph...y/pt1_shot.htm

"And Not A Shot Is Fired!"
Transition To Socialism

Albert V. Burns
September 25, 2002

To the average American, those words would not make much sense or have much meaning. They are, however, a very accurate description of just how our governmental system has been and is being changed before our eyes. The technique is not new, in fact it dates back millennia. The current name given to the technique is called "parliamentary revolution." Nikita Krushchev in his report to the Communist 20th Congress, February 14, 1956 noted: "In this connection the question arises of whether it is possible to go over to socialism by using parliamentary means...." About a year later, a conference on theory was held at the Communist party’s political University in Prague, Czechoslovakia. The results of that conference became a communist document which British intelligence heard about and tried hard to obtain. They tried through several channels but were always advised that it was "out of print." Three years later, a copy was finally obtained in 1961. It was translated into English and was published in the United States in October, 1961. The English title assigned to the document is : "And Not A Shot Is Fired." The original Czech title, translated to English is: "How Parliament Can Play a Revolutionary Part In The Transition To Socialism, And The Role Of The Popular Masses." Certainly not something you would pick out at the local bookstore for an evening’s casual reading. The author of the document was Jan Kozak, a Czech. At the time he wrote the document he was a member of the Secretariat of the Czech Communist Party. It is not easy reading by the furthest stretch of the imagination. Its enormous value lies in its complete authenticity. The dull text presents a fascinating story of the peaceful revolution which transferred Czechoslovakia over to the Communists. In an ideal world, once the information became known, it is a tale which would have been taught to every American citizen in high school or even earlier. The fact that it has been denied to the American people is an indictment of our mass media and our education system. To quote from the Introduction to the U.S. version of the book: "How does the technique work? It may, for instance, be applied to some easily discoverable public concern. To answer the need, a piece of "enabling legislation" is suggested, carrying no authority, expressed or implied. It sets up an "agency." The agency, once established, follows normal agency behavior. The need becomes more precisely defined. A modicum of authority is requested. Pressures are organized, artificial and real, from "above" and from "below." The requested authority is voted, and pressures wane. In due course, further authority is suggested, and new coalitions of pressure appear. All in good time an Authority is there, self-contained; a new instrument of power has arisen, sufficient unto itself. This instrument may be local, regional or nationwide. Its key word is Authority. In the beginning, this word is seldom employed. "By such parliamentary means a democratic and representative government can be made authoritative, legally, and piece by piece. The form remains, an empty shell. Its philosophy and its content are gone. The person, the individual, who one year is free and independent, is next year just a little more restricted. Then a little more, and a little more. Suddenly, overnight, he no longer is a person. He is a cog, being moved inexorably by the monolithic machinery of the State. "And not a shot is fired!" The Founding Fathers clearly understood the dangers of placing power in the hands of Congress. In The Federalist, No 47; Par. 5, Madison wrote: "...it is against the enterprising ambition of this department [the Congress} that the people ought to indulge all their jealousy and exhaust all their precautions." Those who wrote the Constitution based their hopes for the future of this country on the people. They placed an inescapable responsibility on the citizens: the will of the people, who would elect legislative bodies, to watch over and restrict the activities of those they would elect. As long as the balance between legislative greed for power and the will of the people to restrict that thirst remained active, no legislative body whether national, state or local, could vote the people’s freedoms away. The technique Jan Kozak wrote about takes those opposing forces and uses them for exactly opposite ends. Both the legislature AND the people are deliberately manipulated to destroy the balance. To quote again from the Introduction: "Parliament" (the legislature) is slowly maneuvered "into a direct instrument for the victory of the socialist revolution", and the technique is precisely illustrated. (P.15) "First, the legislative power, at all governmental levels, — local, state and national — is manipulated as pressure ‘from above’; then the people’s power is manipulated as ‘pressure from below’. Concurrently, a ‘wide popularization of the demands and slogans of the policy of the Communists’ is promoted, serving ‘as a means of revolutionary education of the popular masses.’ (P. 19) Gradually, and by cooperative legislative action, business, industry, agriculture, finance, the professions, and even living conditions come under the domination of The State. (P. 20) (Emphasis in the original.) "Thus, by ‘a democratic and constitutional course’, the legislature is reconstituted ‘into an instrument of the transformation of the whole state and its machinery...[and the] revolutionary transformation of capitalist society into a socialist one...[proceeds] absolutely legally." (P. 33) The brilliant mechanisms of self-government our Founding Fathers established for us have been (and ARE) being used to destroy its very character. The revolution has been developed very quietly and stealthily with due respect for the legal forms. None of this is dramatic. Indeed, those who have been knowingly subverting our government and stealing our freedom avoid publicity and drama like the plague. Slowly, insidiously, one bit of our governmental structure has been removed and a different piece slipped unobtrusively in its place, ALWAYS maintaining the appearance and form of the original. Does anyone out there recognize just how far this process has been advanced in the United States? In our next column, we will examine just how this technique is applied. AND NOT A SHOT IS FIRED!

Part II

Pressure From Above...
And Pressure From Below

Albert V. Burns
October 1, 2002

Back in the 1930s when I was a teen, (yes, I’m that old) we would cut grass, deliver papers, sell magazines, shovel snow and other things to make a bit of money. One of the prime causes of the need for money was to have a dime to go to the Saturday movie matinee. For the ten cents we got two feature length movies, a news reel, a cartoon and, most important, that week’s installment of the current serial. We just had to find out if the hero or heroine, the good guys (White Hats) had been able to escape from the intentionally fatal predicament which the bad guys (Black Hats) had placed them in. Waiting a whole week was torture to our young minds. The Black Hats were always trying to injure, maim or kill the White Hats. One day the realization finally came to me that BOTH the good guys AND the bad guys were being PAID by the same people, along with all the others connected with the movie, and that after the day’s filming was done, both the White Hats and the Black Hats were really good friends. Somehow that knowledge changed how I viewed the movies. In talking about pressure from above and pressure from below, as described by Jan Kozak in his treatise "And Not A Shot Is Fired," it is likewise extremely important to keep in mind that in the majority of cases BOTH groups applying the pressure are being funded by the same shadowy influences. You didn’t really believe that most of the left wingers in Congress got there using their own funds, did you? Similarly, has the question never entered your mind how so many supposedly grass root organizations can suddenly appear full blown from nowhere? Somebody is putting up a lot of money to finance the organization and operations of these groups. It is known as "playing both ends against the middle!" From a condition where the federal government could only own enough land for forts, magazines, dockyards, and then only with the consent of the state involved, we have "progressed" to a situation where the federal government supposedly "owns" over 43% of the nation’s land. If we add in the land owned by state and local governments, the people now own LESS than 50% of this nation’s resource base. The most rapid increase in the ownership and CONTROL of land and resources has come since the establishment of the so-called "environmental" movement. Under the guise of "protecting" endangered species, endangered habitat, wild rivers, old growth timber, clean water, clean air and myriad other frauds, the American people have been led to accept the spurious dogma that resources, in and of themselves, possess some mystic values, not previously recognized, and that only collective control by government can protect them. Private property, wealth and personal freedom are being confiscated by the federal government at an accelerating rate. Most Americans have forgotten, if they ever knew, that the Environmental Protection Agency was created, not by Congress but by EXECUTIVE ORDER in 1970. The environmental movement has achieved two major objectives since 1960: it has been largely successful in driving domestic mining, oil and timber companies off the land and transferring ownership into the hands of international companies which do NOT have the interests of U.S. citizens at heart; second, it has been increasingly effective in forcing the transfer of private land into the ownership of government. Few of those who are activists in the environmental field have ever thought to look into the financing of the groups which they belong to. When you follow the money trail, you find that these groups are, in general, being financed by major corporations, banks and foundations. This is where the money comes from to finance the litigation, legislation and propaganda which is forcing this country ever closer to socialistic totalitarianism. It is critically important to keep ALWAYS in your mind the truth that left-wingers, including the Communists themselves, are NOT against capitalism. Their main disagreement with constitutionalists is WHO is going to CONTROL the capital! Hence the financing of legislators to enact into law the controls which have been "forced upon the legislators" by public pressure generated by the non-governmental organizations also financed by the same internationalist financiers who gain mastery over people and countries through the laws they have maneuvered into existence. Sometimes it is strange where you find confirmation of your knowledge. Not too many people today would remember the name James Simon Kunen or how he came to the public’s attention. In 1968 the Students For A Democratic Society (SDS) virtually brought Columbia University in New York City to a halt. They occupied various buildings on the campus, disrupted classes, etc. Mark Rudd was one of the leaders. James Kunen was also directly involved in the troubles. Later he wrote a book about his experiences titled "The Strawberry Statement." The book was later made into a movie which was not too popular. In the book, Kunen quoted a report about a convention which the SDS had had during the Columbia unrest. The quote stated that: "Also at the convention, men from Business International Round Tables — the meetings sponsored by Business International for their client groups and heads of government — tried to buy up a few radicals. These men are the world’s leading industrialists and they convene to decide how our lives are going to go. These are the guys who wrote the Alliance For Progress. They’re the left wing of the ruling class. "They want McCarthy in. They see fascism as the threat, see it coming from Wallace. The only way McCarthy could win is if the crazies and young radicals act up and make Gene look more reasonable. They offered to finance our demonstrations in Chicago. "We were also offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move to the left." (Emphasis added.) Can you imagine a better one-line description of pressure from above and pressure from below? Now we come to the real core question of why these internationalists would be doing these things. Are they after more money? Do they really believe that socialism is the wave of the future? I am sure that virtually every person who reads these columns is abundantly aware that every place where socialism has been tried, for millennia, it has been a colossal failure. It produces nothing but shortages, hunger, misery and death. If WE know this is, is there any possibility whatsoever that these captains of industry, controllers of the mass media, bankers, etc. DON’T know it? Are they stupid? Uninformed? Do they truly believe that socialism can be made to work by THEM? I seriously doubt all of those possibilities. The possible exceptions might be the leftist professors at our institutions of higher leaning! (Misspelling deliberate!) I leave you with the question: WHY are these world leaders so hell-bent on imposing socialism on our country and the rest of the world? In my next column, we will examine what I believe to be the real reasons for their actions.

Part III

The Evil That Men Do...
Insiders Work Toward Socialism

Albert V. Burns
October 2, 2002

The vast majority of Americans, indeed people all over the world, have been carefully indoctrinated with the idea that the existing political spectrum has Naziism on the right end and Communism on the left end with the doctrine of "democratic socialism" somewhere near the middle. An extremely clever propaganda ploy! If you remember, Naziism was National Socialism, Communism is international socialism and democratic socialism is just that. Accept that spectrum and you will have socialism anywhere along it. A more correct political spectrum, and one which I believe in, has total government on the left and zero government on the right. Note that total government includes Naziism, Socialism, Communism and any other form of total autocratic control. Zero government would be anarchy which really isn't a form of government at all but which is used to institute some form of total control. The political spectrum is closer to being a horseshoe than it is to a straight line since the jump from anarchy to dictatorship is a very short move. Using this form of political gradation, the constitutional republican form of government which our Founding Fathers gave us would lie closer toward the no government end of the spectrum. We Constitutionalists are NOT far right wing, we are actually middle-of-the-road. The second thing which needs to be looked at before getting into the discussion of just WHY the internationalists, bankers, etc. are moving the world toward socialism is a discussion of logic. Somehow logic isn't being taught much any more for obvious reasons: if you can think logically you are not as easy to control. There are three basic rules in beginning logic: 1. If you start out with a valid premise and use correct logic your conclusion must be correct; 2. If you start out with an invalid premise and use correct logic your conclusion must be false; 3. If you start out with either a valid or an invalid premise and use faulty logic you cannot know whether your conclusion is true or false. There you are: College Logic Course 101! Now to get to our question of the day: Why would the super-rich and other Insiders want to subject the world to socialism? Don't they know it has failed everywhere it has been tried? Are they uninformed, misinformed or stupid? Inherent in those questions is the unspoken premise that these people are dedicated to improving the lot of the poor, downtrodden masses; that they want to stamp out poverty, ignorance and disease, etc. as we are told over and over. If you start with this premise and use ordinary logic then their actions make absolutely no sense whatsoever, hence the confusion in the minds of thinking persons. Remember the second rule of logic above? Believing that those who manipulate the world's affairs behind the scenes really want to improve the living standards of the world is, in my opinion, a totally false premise. These people KNOW that socialism is a failed economic system, which is precisely WHY they are driving relentlessly toward its establishment. That sounds totally paradoxical and insane, doesn't it? Perhaps that is because you don't understand how their minds work! The United States became the world's mightiest economic and military power precisely because our people were free to innovate, invent, work hard and KEEP the benefits of their ingenuity. We became a nation of plenty with millions of salesmen trying to move the "too much." After almost 6000 years of man's history of recurrent famines suddenly here in one place on the earth we have never had a famine! (Yet!) I have read that between 1860 and about 1920 the gross national product of the United States was DOUBLING every eight years in a geometric progression which moved us from being essentially an agrarian economy to being the richest nation in the world. We were on a roll! Unfortunately, by 1920 the seeds of destruction of that economy had already been sown. By about 1908 the idea of "tax free foundations" had been established to protect the wealth of the rich from the devastating effects of their own plans for this country. In 1913, a disastrous year, three things took place which were to prove catastrophic for us: the 16th Amendment was passed to allow for an income tax on the American citizen's wages; the Federal Reserve was instituted to control all banking in this country, and the 17th Amendment was passed to change the manner of election of Senators who were supposed to represent the individual states rather than the people in the states. These changes to our system were made deliberately and with malice aforethought! The big question is still WHY? Again, the answer comes from an unusual source. In 1937, Leon Trotsky, one of the big three in the Russian revolution of 1917, wrote a book called The Revolution Betrayed." On page 112 of that book he stated: "The basis of bureaucratic rule is the poverty of society in objects of consumption....When there is (sic) enough goods in the store, the purchasers can come whenever they want to. When there is (sic) little goods, the purchasers are compelled to stand in line. When the lines are very long, it is necessary to appoint a policeman to keep order. Such is the starting point of the power of the Soviet bureaucracy. It "knows" who is to get something and who has to wait." I submit that there you have a perfect explanation of why these Insiders work toward socialism. In place of an economy where there are millions of salesmen trying to move the "too much," you will have an economy with millions of ration clerks trying to apportion the "too little." These megalomaniacs promote socialism because they know that socialism MEANS control over people! If we become dependent on the government for our food, clothing, housing, transportation, all means of commerce, then we will be totally at the mercy of the government. We will be controlled much more effectively than if they used guns. G. Edward Griffin made a 16mm movie of a speech he gave back in the late 60s called "More Deadly Than War." In that talk he reported on an anti-Communist refugee he had talked with. In that conversation the refugee explained how the Communist regimes, after the first burst of violence, didn't need soldiers everywhere because the people were controlled much better through economic means. Then the refugee said, and this is aimed at everyone reading this column: "You know, I came to America expecting to find a nation of free men. But, instead, I find exactly the same thing. Everywhere I look I see men and women who know that the Communists are making headway in this country. They know that something must be done and that someone must stand up to them. But they, themselves, do nothing. They remain silent, because they're afraid that if they speak out or take a stand publicly, it'll be bad for business. They may lose a client. They may even lose their jobs. Or perhaps they're already receiving a regular government check, and are already too dependent upon some of the very people and programs they know they should oppose. "These men have voluntarily gone behind the Iron Curtain. They're already taken over by the Communists. The only difference is that, for the present at least, they can still get out anytime they really want to. We could not." (Remember that was way back in 1969!) It is long, LONG past time for the American people to wake up to the reality of the fate which is rapidly approaching them. Every dictator must have control over the economic life of his citizens. That is true of all such regimes, whether they be Fascism, Naziism, Communism and, yes, Socialism! Total government control is totalitarianism — that's what the word means. Are you going to spread this message far and wide among all your friends, relatives and acquaintances? Or are you content to try to live out your own remaining time span in the hope that it won't affect YOU too badly? As a first step in furthering your own education and then that of those around you, I highly recommend that you purchase your own copy of "More Deadly Than War" now available on video tape. Although it was originally produced in 1969, it is even more valuable today since it covers precisely what we have been talking about in these last three columns. Mr. Griffin is in business as "Reality Zone", P.O. Box 4646 Westlake Village, CA 91359. You can also order by phone at 1-800-595-6596 or via the internet at www.realityzone.com. The last I knew, the video was selling for $19.95. You really should consider also getting his video "The Grand Design — The Hidden Plan Behind U.S. Foreign Policy." Although this was originally given in 1968, it is incredibly pertinent today as he shows how BOTH political parties have been working toward world government ever since World War II. The last I heard, if you buy both at once, each is cheaper.

[Ryan Ruck]

The worshipers will blindly follow their master.

[Beetle]

Also, I posted this link out here before. When you watch this, listen to Bezmanov when he says, 'to educate one generation of students'. Now, he is talking about Russia educating one generation of our students. How is that possible? Have our learning institution been over run by commies already? I think so.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k6KUDv1wzraWhwlBt1

And I put it out here because Bezmanov talks about how the commies will get rid of useful idiots.

[Beetle]

Imust have been excited when I posted those articles. I somehow posted them twice. My bad. On me. My foul.

[Malsua]

Rofl Ryan. That smilecom is probably hatespeech.

[Ryan Ruck]

Oh well, off to the re-education camps for me I suppose.

Oh wait... NOPE!

[Beetle]

Hey Ryan,

I have a few sayings for just such an occassion:

Give me liberty, or give me something to aim at.

You can take my guns from a large pile of empty brass.

A monster lies in wait for me
a stew of pain and misery
but fiercer still in life and limb
the me that lies in wait for him

and last, but not least:

They will need an airstrike to take me out.



Which reminds me. I need to get me one of these:

http://feedlot.blogspot.com/2007/10/...onversion.html

[Ryan Ruck]

I've seen video of that truck in action and it is very accurate!