U.S. Forms Team to Help Coordinate Enforcement of North Korea Sanctions
Monday, June 29, 2009
The Obama administration said Friday it plans to establish a group of officials from various agencies to work with other nations to enforce recent U.N. sanctions against North Korea, the Washington Post reported (see GSN, June 26).
"There is a broad consensus about the need to have a focused and engaged effort to see that these sanctions are implemented ... and that we're sharing information with each other," said one U.S. official.
The team would include officials from the White House, State Department, National Security Agency, and Treasury Department, among others. Philip Goldberg, the former U.S. ambassador to Bolivia, has been tapped to preside over the group.
"We wanted somebody who woke up every morning and thought about nothing but sanctions implementation," said another official.
The United States already has a special envoy to North Korea -- Stephen Bosworth -- but he only works part-time (Michael Shear, Washington Post, June 27).
The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations yesterday said she is confident the new sanctions will have an "impact," Agence France-Presse reported. The U.N. Security Council resolution bans all arms exports and imports by North Korea, and urges member states to seek inspections of ships suspected of carrying banned items.
Despite grumblings in Congress about the hurdles to inspecting North Korea shipments for contraband cargo, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice emphasized that intercepting ships is "but one piece of a very tough, very comprehensive sanctions regime that we are going to pursue fully and implement and enforce fully and effectively."
"When this resolution is fully enforced -- not only in terms of potential vessels that might be violating the sanctions but the financial sanctions, the arms embargo, the asset freezes -- this will be a very, very tough package that will have an impact on North Korea," Rice told CBS News.
As for the North Korean ship believed to be en route to Myanmar, "We're pursuing and following the progress of that ship very closely," Rice said. The Kang Nam 1 has been involved in Pyongyang's weapons trade and is suspected of currently carrying small arms or other weapons material.
Rice did not indicate whether the United States is planning on intercepting the ship. (Agence France-Presse I/Yahoo! News, June 29).
Another high-level U.S. official on Friday reiterated that the United States would not forcibly board the North Norean ship, the Associated Press reported.
"The U.N. resolution lays out a regime that has a very clear set of steps," Defense Undersecretary Michele Flournoy told the Yonhap News Agency. "This is not a resolution that sponsors, that authorizes use of force for interdiction."
While the United States is not licensed to enforce the sanctions with military force, Flournoy said, Washington still has "incentives and disincentives that will get North Korea to change course" (Kwang-Tae Kim, Associated Press I/Washington Times, June 27).
Flournoy acknowledged that North Korea has acted no less belligerently since the United Nations stepped up pressure against its nuclear-weapon and missile activities, Yonhap reported.
"Their actions have been very provocative," she said. "Their rhetoric has been very provocative. We have not yet seen any definitive signs of change."
However, she suggested that as long as the United Nations stays committed to staunching the North's efforts to develop its nuclear arsenal, change is on its way.
"The more the international community remains unified and firm in calling for North Korea to denuclearize and change its course," the more likely it becomes that North Korea would relent, Flournoy said.
Still, the United States and China -- which has frustrated Washington with its reluctance to support tough sanctions against its Stalinist neighbor -- are still struggling to find common ground from which to launch a bilateral plan for applying pressure to Pyongyang, said Flournoy, who met with officials in Beijing last week.
"We had a good exchange of views on how best to deal with that threat, but those conversations have yet to yield a common strategy," she said. "So we have to keep working on that" (Sam Kim, Yonhap News Agency, June 27).
North Korea, meanwhile, yesterday repeated its promise to augment its atomic arsenal despite the sanctions, AFP reported.
"We will strengthen our nuclear deterrence further for our self-defense to cope with outright U.S. nuclear threats and nuclear war attempts," the government said through its state-run newspaper, Rodong Sinmun (Agence France Presse II/Spacewar.com, June 28).
The North claimed earlier this month to be developing not only plutonium-based nuclear weapons, but uranium-based ones as well, AP reported yesterday.
Shortly after the United Nations passed its new round of sanctions, Pyongyang announced that it had been developing uranium-enrichment technology, despite vehemently denying such activity for the better part of a decade.
During that time, Washington and its allies have been focusing primarily on blocking the Stalinist state's production of plutonium at its Yongbyon nuclear complex.
The North claims to have as much as 26 million tons of natural uranium in its territory, including 4 million that could be easily mined. Building a bomb powered by highly enriched uranium is less difficult than building one that uses reprocessed plutonium, said Ivan Oelrich, vice president of the Federation of American Scientists.
Still, enriching the uranium to weapon-grade levels requires operation of 1,000 and 3,000 centrifuges for one year, according Seoul-based nuclear expert Lee Choon-geun.
The advancement level of the North's uranium-enrichment program is not known, but Oelrich guessed it is probably "in its infancy." However, Seoul-based analyst Daniel Pinkston speculated that the North might be able to make quick progress toward a uranium bomb with help from Iran.
"I don't believe they have a commercial-scale plant up and running, and it will take them some time," said Pinkston. "However, they could cooperate with Iran and reduce the time required to build and operate a large-scale facility since Iran has made significant progress and is already operating a large facility" (Kwang-Tae Kim, Associated Press II/Breitbart.com, June 28).
Bookmarks