Page 12 of 13 FirstFirst ... 28910111213 LastLast
Results 221 to 240 of 256

Thread: Obama, Now Biden, Guts the Military

  1. #221
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    21,663
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 73 Times in 68 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Ruck View Post

    Obama: Reallocate Defense Resources to Foreign Aid

    February 9, 2015

    President Obama says the United States should reallocate defense resources to foreign aid efforts. He also added that most Americans misunderstand how much of the federal budget goes to diplomacy.

    "[I]f you look at our foreign assistance as a tool in our national security portfolio, as opposed to charity, and you combine our defense budget with our diplomatic budget and our foreign assistance budget, then in that mix there's a lot more that we should be doing when it comes to helping Honduras and Guatemala build an effective criminal-justice system, effective police, and economic development that creates jobs," Obama said in an interview with Vox.com, a liberal news site.

    "So you're saying it would make sense to reallocate those resources?" asks Matthew Yglesias of Vox.com.

    "Well, and part of the challenge here is just public awareness. Time and time again, when they do surveys, and they ask people what proportion of the foreign budget is spent on foreign aid, they'll say, '25 percent.' They're pretty sure all their hard-earned money that they pay in taxes is somehow going to other folks. And if we can say, it varies between 1-2 percent depending on how you define it," Obama responds. "And if we were to make some strategic investments in countries that really could use our help, we would then not have to deploy our military as often and we would be in a better position to work with other countries to stand down violent extremism."

    Watch the video of the exchange below:


    So Obama redirects NASA to become an outreach to Muslims to make them feel good...

    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    Barack Obama: NASA must try to make Muslims 'feel good'

    The head of the Nasa has said Barack Obama told him to make "reaching out to the Muslim world" one of the space agency's top priorities.

    By Toby Harnden in Washington
    Published: 8:00PM BST 06 Jul 2010



    Barack Obama wants Nasa to acknowledge Muslim achievements and contributions to science maths and engineering Photo: AFP/GETTY

    Charles Bolden, a retired United States Marines Corps major-general and former astronaut, said in an interview with al-Jazeera that Nasa was not only a space exploration agency but also an "Earth improvement agency".

    And now wants to reallocate the Military Budget....






    to Foreign Aid...

    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    No, it was lost with the election of Barack Hussein Obama where he has worked to give the Russians a leading edge.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  2. #222
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    21,663
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 73 Times in 68 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    Quote Originally Posted by American Patriot View Post
    Actually, Obama doesn't understand how much funding it takes to run a military.

    What he THINKS he knows is how to make a Socialist-Marxist-Utopian-Progressive society love him and want him to remain in office, and that the Constitution is outdated.
    This won't end well for us.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  3. #223
    Senior Member samizdat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,498
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    I was bitten by a spider last year. I call it "Litveninko's ghost", since since it remained identified as a member of the stenoid family, yet not the wandering Brazilian. It was gory enough, I hid the results from kids & never posted the fotos on face, except for a "snake-bite medicine toast". I still have numbness a year later, and belong to a couple insect ID groups. Actually the one that sent me the following "ID", was inflicted by "pass interference"..."friendly fed-monitors or somesuch". Here it be brothers....Obama in living color.
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...ladislavii.jpg


    canto XXV Dante

    from purgatory, the lustful... "open your breast to the truth which follows and know that as soon as the articulations in the brain are perfected in the embryo, the first Mover turns to it, happy...."
    Shema Israel

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  4. #224
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    And so it begins...


    Navy To Pull Carrier From Central Command This Fall

    June 5, 2015

    The Navy plans to pull its carrier presence out of the Middle East temporarily this fall, which will sideline the Navy's premier airstrike platform for the first time since the outbreak of Operation Inherent Resolve.

    The break in presence will likely last from one to two months after the carrier Theodore Roosevelt departs U.S. Central Command this fall. Theodore Roosevelt will be replaced by Truman and its escorts in 5th Fleet early this winter, according to Navy officials who spoke on background to discuss future operations.

    The break in carrier presence in the middle of a fight with the Islamic State group is a setback, but Navy officials say it's a consequence of years of strain placed on the fleet by increasing demands and decreasing budgets.

    The gap in carrier presence in 5th Fleet, if it materializes, is a strong indication that Navy leaders are following through on their commitment to scale back marathon deployment lengths that have taken a heavy toll on morale and on the material condition of its ships.

    "The increased frequency and extension of carrier strike group deployments increased wear on the force, which led to increased maintenance and repair requirements and lengthened maintenance availability periods," said Navy spokesman Cmdr. William Marks.

    "As a result of meeting increased [combatant commander] demand in previous years, sequestration's impact on our shipyards, and having a force structure of 10 (rather than 11) carriers, the Navy is not scheduled to provide a continuous carrier presence in some operating regions in fiscal year 2016."

    The gap in presence is not a done deal, and Theodore Roosevelt could still be extended if requested by Central Command and approved by Defense Secretary Ash Carter. But leaders including Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jon Greenert have been vocal about the need to get deployments back to a sustainable length.

    Since 2011, the Navy has seen ever-longer deployments, some more than 10 months. The Navy partially blames the onerous deployments on having to provide two carriers at all times in the Persian Gulf between 2011 and 2013. The requirement forced the service to extend deployments while critical maintenance was performed on stateside carriers and escort ships.

    The second big hit to deployment lengths was work stoppages in the public shipyards, the result of furloughs after the first round of across-the-board budget cuts, known as sequestration, in 2013. That set already strained maintenance schedules even further behind.

    The Navy's top officer told Navy Times in March that even with another round of cuts pending, the Navy had no choice but to get back on track.

    "It is not my plan to go back to long deployments," Greenert said in the exclusive March 24 interview. "It is not my intent to go back to eight- or nine-month deployments: I believe they are unsustainable."

    A Navy official who spoke on background said Navy leaders have said repeatedly that the heavy demands placed on the fleet would impact its ability to provide presence down the road. The service projects that it will take until about 2020 to get back on track with its normal presence schedule, and that it will likely be necessary to gap presence again while the service resets, the official said.

    Still, the Navy will not be leaving Central Command barren. The Essex Amphibious Ready Group, with its Harriers, is deployed and will likely be in Central Command through most of the rest of the year. In the meantime, the Air Force's land-based fighters will pick up the slack in Operation Inherent Resolve for the missing carrier air wing.

    Jerry Hendrix, a retired captain and analyst with the Center for a New American Security, said the plan to gap CENTCOM is a sign the Navy is serious about getting its deployments shorter, but said the forces remaining in CENTCOM can cover for the lack of a super carrier.

    "The Navy is trying to remain true to its commitment to bring deployment lengths down," Hendrix said. "But it also shows that the Navy recognizes the utility of its force. The [landing helicopter dock] is a highly capable platform, it has helos and Harriers on board, and it will be enough to meet the immediate tactical requirements of the area."



    The extensive deployments are what happens when you don't have enough men and enough carriers to go around.

  5. #225
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military


    U.S. Army To Cut 40,000 Troops Over Next Two Years

    July 7, 2015

    The U.S. Army plans to cut 40,000 troops over the next two years, affecting all its domestic and foreign posts, USA Today reported on Tuesday, saying the Army also planned to cut 17,000 civilian employees.

    The cuts would reduce the active-duty Army from its current size of about 490,000 soldiers to about 450,000, its smallest number since before the United States entered World War Two.

    The troop reductions were initially announced in February 2014 when then-Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel unveiled the Pentagon's budget for the 2015 fiscal year. The figures were also included in the Pentagon's four-year planning document, the Quadrennial Defense Review 2014.

    Defense officials confirmed on Tuesday the Army was moving ahead with the plan to reduce uniformed and civilian personnel and was expected to announce details on Thursday about which units would be affected by the cuts.

    The personnel cuts come as the Pentagon is attempting to absorb nearly $1 trillion in reductions to planned defense spending over a decade.


    Just wanted to share a little insight from people in the know that was posted along with this story:
    So we're gonna cut 4000 or so per active Division

    That's smart, now if they cut a good bit out of TRADOC it will be less


    If they offered a get out in 30 days to every soldier, that number will be met
    In 2 months
    That is generous. If they offered it right now 35-40% people I know would take it.
    I could not agree more. I'd say it's much higher than 35-40%, even with the crappy civilian economy these people would be entering. Morale is absolutely in the dumps from my observations. I'd wager they would have 40K people that would be willing to leave at the drop of a hat. The problem is, the people that want to get out are the people we should be keeping and massive amounts of useless dead weight will stay and move into leadership positions. The entire situations is one big sh*t sandwich.

    Even those of us that are Army civilians have about had it with all the BS. I think more than half of our time is now dedicated to SHARP, suicide training, DAU, CLPs, EEOC silliness and now I hear we are going to be required to go to sensitivity training for LBGT acceptance or some BS like that next year.


  6. #226
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    I would say that, given the circumstances, this is a very, very, VERY bad thing.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  7. #227
    Senior Member Toad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Minot, ND
    Posts
    1,409
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    Chuck Hagel made that 40k reduction announcement in 2014 when proposing the 2015 budget. The pentagon goal for the Army is to get back to pre-9/11 troop numbers due to budget and dwindling resources, so they say.

  8. #228
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    21,663
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 73 Times in 68 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Ruck View Post

    U.S. Army To Cut 40,000 Troops Over Next Two Years

    July 7, 2015

    The U.S. Army plans to cut 40,000 troops over the next two years, affecting all its domestic and foreign posts, USA Today reported on Tuesday, saying the Army also planned to cut 17,000 civilian employees.

    The cuts would reduce the active-duty Army from its current size of about 490,000 soldiers to about 450,000, its smallest number since before the United States entered World War Two.

    The troop reductions were initially announced in February 2014 when then-Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel unveiled the Pentagon's budget for the 2015 fiscal year. The figures were also included in the Pentagon's four-year planning document, the Quadrennial Defense Review 2014.

    Defense officials confirmed on Tuesday the Army was moving ahead with the plan to reduce uniformed and civilian personnel and was expected to announce details on Thursday about which units would be affected by the cuts.

    The personnel cuts come as the Pentagon is attempting to absorb nearly $1 trillion in reductions to planned defense spending over a decade.


    Just wanted to share a little insight from people in the know that was posted along with this story:



    2008 Flashback:
    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    No, it was lost with the election of Barack Hussein Obama where he has worked to give others a leading edge over America.

    2012 Flashback:
    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    Russian President Says He Wants Obama To Be Re-elected To Avoid America’s “Conservative Wing”



    Why wouldn't the Russians want their advocate in the White House? They know Obama is out of his league, not negotiating in America's self interest, and giving away the store. They have outplayed Obama (at the expense of our allies) more than once. Of course they want that quisling in the White House.

    Russian President Medvedev Says He Wants Obama To Be Re-elected To Avoid America’s “Conservative Wing” (thanks to Weasel Zippers)


    Along with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Hugo Chavez, ChiComs etc.

    (AFP) — Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Monday he wanted his US counterpart Barack Obama to win re-election next year, fearing that the two men’s efforts to improve ties may lose steam under a new administration.

    “I can tell you directly — I would like Barack Obama to be re-elected president of the United States maybe more than someone else,” Medvedev said in an interview with the Financial Times whose full transcript was released by the Kremlin early Monday.

    “If another person becomes US president then he may have another course,” he said.

    “We understand that there are representatives of a rather conservative wing there who are trying to achieve their political goals at the expense of inflaming passions in relation to Russia, among other things.

    “But what use is criticising them? This is simply a way of achieving political goals.”











    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  9. #229
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military


    The U.S. Is Running Out Of Bombs To Drop On ISIS

    December 4, 2015

    The U.S. Air Force has fired off more than 20,000 missiles and bombs since the U.S. bombing campaign against ISIS began 15 months ago, according to the Air Force, leading to depleted munitions stockpiles and calls to ramp up funding and weapons production.

    As the U.S. ramps up its campaign against the Islamist terror group in Iraq and Syria, the Air Force is now "expending munitions faster than we can replenish them," Air Force chief of staff Gen. Mark Welsh said in a statement.

    "B-1s have dropped bombs in record numbers. F-15Es are in the fight because they are able to employ a wide range of weapons and do so with great flexibility. We need the funding in place to ensure we're prepared for the long fight," Welsh said in the statement. "This is a critical need."

    The bombing campaign has left the U.S. Air Force with what an Air Force official described as munitions depot stocks "below our desired objective."

    The official told CNN that the Air Force has requested additional funding for Hellfire missiles and is developing plans to ramp up weapons production to replenish its stocks more quickly. But replenishing that stock can take "up to four years from time of expenditure to asset resupply," the official said.

    "The precision today's wars requires demands the right equipment and capability to achieve desired effects. We need to ensure the necessary funding is in place to not only execute today's wars, but also tomorrow's challenges," the official said.

    The Air Force's publication of the number of missiles and bombs dropped comes amid continued criticism from Republicans -- in particular those running for president -- who insist the Obama administration has been too timid in the fight against ISIS, with many on the right calling for the U.S. to loosen the rules of engagement and lead a more aggressive fight against the militant group.

    American pilots have fired weapons in less than half of the nearly 18,000 sorties they have in the first 10 months of 2015, according the latest figures available.

    That's up from 2014, when pilots fired their weapons just one third of the time.

  10. #230
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military


    Super Stallion Helicopters Worn Out After Years Of War, Internal Military Report Concludes

    February 23, 2016

    The internal military report leads with a warning, typed in bold: If called to war tonight, the Marine Corps could only meet operational demands by deploying nearly every heavy-lift transport helicopter remaining in its inventory.

    That would mean activating all aircraft that are down for long-term maintenance and three-quarters of those reserved for training new pilots.

    One problem with that: The majority of these helicopters aren’t in condition to fly and would need weeks, maybe months, of work to get ready. Plus, the aviators who would pilot them into harm’s way would need time to train.

    After more than a decade of relentless combat – a period marked by repeated deployments to the Middle East, ballooning procurement costs and cuts to defense spending – the Marine Corps’ workhorse helicopter, the CH-53E Super Stallion, is worn out and in need of serious attention.

    That’s according to an independent study conducted on behalf of the Marine Corps last year. The report, the Super Stallion Independent Readiness Review, is classified “For Official Use Only” and has not been made public. Sources with access to the document have briefed The Virginian-Pilot and the Investigative Reporting Program on its detailed findings.

    Among them:

    • Not enough Super Stallions remain in service. The Marine Corps purchased more than 230 CH-53Es from Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. between the late 1970s and early ’90s, but after decades of flying and more than two dozen crashes, only 146 remain, more than 50 below what’s needed.

    • “Operational commanders challenged with this astonishingly depleted inventory are further hamstrung by unacceptably poor readiness.” Because of parts shortages, maintenance backlogs and years of wear, only 23 percent of remaining Super Stallions were ready to fly this time last year, far below the military’s standard 75 percent readiness requirement.

    • “Aircraft were not properly reset during and after the war.” The Marine Corps, according to the report, spent only about $100,000 per aircraft to restore its Super Stallions after the Afghanistan drawdown. The service hired temporary contractors who spent about a month on tune-ups for each helicopter. The Army, in contrast, has spent about $1.2 million restoring each of its transport helicopters, investing more than 100 days of work and 6,000 man hours per aircraft.

    With so few functioning Super Stallions, pilots and aircrew aren’t flying enough to stay proficient. “Poor CH-53E availability is costing the Marine Corps an entire generation of aircrew and contributing to the destruction of community morale. … Anecdotes are rampant of pilots returning from six-month deployments with only 30 total flight hours and pilots completing their first operational tours with too few hours to become aircraft commanders.”

    Armed with the report, the Marine Corps announced sweeping plans last month to overhaul its Super Stallion fleet as part of its annual aviation plan. The goal is to return each helicopter to “full-mission-capable status” over the next three years and give squadrons resources needed to maintain them.

    “I’m not happy at all where we are with the (Super Stallion) right now, but I do believe we have a recovery strategy that will work,” said Lt. Gen. Jon M. Davis, the Marine Corps deputy commandant for aviation, in an interview with The Pilot. “I’m proud of what we’re doing to fix this, but I’m not proud of where we’re at right now. The taxpayers should be unhappy.”

    The Super Stallion is the Marines’ primary option for moving troops and cargo on land and at sea, where it operates aboard amphibious Navy ships. It remains in high demand more than 35 years after entering service, but the Cold War-era aircraft hasn’t received the resources needed to keep it operating at a high level.

    Davis ordered the Super Stallion review a year ago, part of a broader effort to improve combat readiness after more than a decade of fighting. Similar studies have been conducted or are ongoing for other Marine Corps aircraft, including the MV-22 Osprey and AV-8B Harrier.

    Many of the Super Stallion’s problems can be traced to the decision not to do a full reset after years of fighting in Afghanistan, Davis said.

    “We were trying to get maximum readiness at the time, and the best way to do that was to do it in theater (in Afghanistan),” Davis said. “Frankly, we needed to do what the Army did. That would have given us less aircraft to fly then, but we’d have more aircraft to fly now. … We made a mistake. But now we’re recovering from that.”

    Of more than $650 million budgeted to reset Marine Corps programs, about half is being spent on the Super Stallion fleet, Davis said. That work has already begun.

    The Super Stallion reset comes during a period of increased scrutiny for the aging helicopter and the Navy’s MH-53E Sea Dragon, a nearly identical variant used primarily for minesweeping. The Super Stallions and Sea Dragons must remain in service years longer than planned because of delays in developing replacements. Each has dealt with poor readiness and above-average crash rates in recent years, grabbing headlines and spurring brass to reinvest in the programs.

    Many of the helicopters were grounded for months last year while crews made thousands of repairs to potentially unsafe wires and fuel lines, a problem that came to light after a Sea Dragon caught fire and crashed off the coast of Virginia Beach two years ago, killing three sailors. More than a year after that mishap, The Pilot and IRP reported in an exclusive story that the Marine Corps and Navy had failed to adequately address the safety hazard.

    Davis said he first learned of the lingering safety issue last year from The Pilot story and “had a small meltdown.” He temporarily grounded the fleet and called for the most comprehensive one-time inspection and repair process in the helicopter program’s history.

    “A lot of people thought that was overkill,” Davis said. “I wanted to make sure we had safe airplanes.”

    As a result, Super Stallions spent only about 21,500 hours in the air in 2015, down from a total of more than 32,000 hours a couple of years ago. It was the fewest flight hours logged by the aircraft in any year since 1988, when the military was still buying new Super Stallions.

    The poor state of the Super Stallions has occasionally put a strain on other Marine Corps aircraft: A CH-53E squadron couldn’t deploy to Nepal in April, leaving earthquake relief efforts to helicopters with smaller payloads, including a UH-1Y Huey that crashed in the Himalayas, killing six Marines and five Nepali civilians.

    The Super Stallion’s problems are a symptom of a systemic issue plaguing the military, said Todd Harrison, director of budget analysis at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. Delays and cost overruns for new weapons systems – including the CH-53K, which initially was expected to begin replacing the Super Stallion last year but won’t be ready until at least 2019 – are putting a strain on the upkeep of existing assets, Harrison said.

    “This is becoming more common across the services,” he said. “It’s a balancing act between dealing with the needs of today and the needs of the future, and in a zero-sum budget environment, there’s no easy answer.”

    The danger, Harrison said, comes when service leaders try to squeeze more years out of existing aircraft without giving them proper resources or lowering readiness expectations.

    “That’s the kind of situation that would give a commander incentive to take unnecessary risk,” Harrison said. “That’s an incentive for disaster.”

    Safety is not covered in the internal Super Stallion readiness review, though it’s widely accepted among military aviation experts that a decline in flight hours can degrade pilot skills and make flying more dangerous.

    Retired Navy Cmdr. Chris Harmer, an analyst at the Institute for the Study of War, said the link between flight hours and safety is indisputable.

    “Absolutely,” Harmer said. “A pilot who gets 10 hours of flight time a month is more likely to be involved in a pilot-induced error than a pilot who gets 30 flight hours a month.”

    The Super Stallion has seen a spike in crashes in recent years, even as it flies less. The result is a rate of 7.9 crashes for every 100,000 flight hours since 2013, nearly four times higher than the Super Stallion’s historical average.

    In September, a Marine from Hampton Roads was killed, and 11 others were injured when their Super Stallion experienced a “hard landing” during a fast-rope training exercise at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina.

    Four months later, in January, two Super Stallions crashed into the ocean off the coast of Hawaii, killing a dozen Marines.

    The causes of both mishaps are under investigation.

    A few days before the Hawaii crash, that squadron’s commanding officer was relieved of duty because of “a loss of confidence in his ability to continue to lead,” a Marine Corps spokesman told The Pilot.

    A Marine official familiar with Lt. Col. Edward Pavelka’s removal told the Marine Corps Times that the commander was “not able to maintain material readiness standards … for optimal use of manpower, material, facilities and funding.”

    Another source familiar with the squadron’s troubles told the newspaper that “they were not flying enough” in the months before the mishap – flight hours were “way, way low.”

    Davis, the general, said he was familiar with the squadron’s struggles and supported the decision to dismiss the commander.

    None of his squadron commanders “have all the resources they need to do all that I’m asking of them,” Davis said, “but that one was even lower than the others. That one stuck out as an underperforming unit.”

    The string of mishaps, combined with reports of historically poor material readiness and limited flight hours, is frustrating some Super Stallion pilots, aircrews and maintainers.

    Anne Scott, a former Marine captain and Super Stallion pilot who left the service in 2014 and knew crew members killed in Hawaii, summarized the prevailing sentiment among friends who are still serving:

    “It’s just unacceptable at this point,” Scott said. “They expect Marines to put their lives on the line without supporting us. They demand flight hours, but the helicopters are in terrible shape, and our maintainers haven’t been given the support they need to do the job.”

    Davis said the service is taking steps to get the fleet back to readiness, and he expects morale will follow.

    “I understand how they feel,” Davis said. “These guys joined the Marine Corps to fly and serve their nation. … We need to do better for them.”

    In addition to resetting each aircraft, the service is paying a contractor $6.6 million to restore two retired Sea Dragons that have spent the past decade in storage at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona, also known as the “aircraft boneyard.” The helicopters will be converted for use as Super Stallions and used by a Marine training squadron, freeing two aircraft to rejoin an operational squadron, officials said.

    Also, Davis said, the service is spending millions of dollars on tools and equipment. Over the years, Super Stallion squadrons have had to deal with a shortage of equipment and parts needed to perform standard maintenance, further hindering an already strained fleet.

    The Super Stallions should be fully restored by 2019, Davis said.

    The helicopters will be needed for at least a decade after that.

  11. #231
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military


    Budget Cuts Leaving Marine Corps Aircraft Grounded

    April 17, 2016

    Since 1775, the U.S. Marine Corps has prided itself on being “The Few" and "The Proud." But while the Corps takes pride in doing more with less, senior Marine officers are warning that the Corps' aviation service is being stretched to the breaking point.

    Today, the vast majority of Marine Corps aircraft can’t fly. The reasons behind the grounding of these aircraft include the toll of long wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the fight against ISIS and budget cuts precluding the purchase of the parts needed to fix an aging fleet, according to dozens of Marines interviewed by Fox News at two air stations in the Carolinas this week.

    Out of 276 F/A-18 Hornet strike fighters in the Marine Corps inventory, only about 30% are ready to fly, according to statistics provided by the Corps. Similarly, only 42 of 147 heavy-lift CH-53E Super Stallion helicopters are airworthy.

    U.S. military spending has dropped from $691 billion in 2010 to $560 billion in 2015. The cuts came just as the planes were returning from 15 years of war, suffering from overuse and extreme wear and tear. Many highly trained mechanics in the aviation depots left for jobs in the private sector.

    “Quite honestly, it is coming on the backs of our young Marines,” Lt. Col. Matthew “Pablo” Brown, commanding officer of VMFA(AW)-533, a Hornet squadron based at Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort in South Carolina. “They can do it, and they are doing it but it is certainly not easy.”

    Brown's squadron is due to deploy to the Middle East in the coming days.

    Lack of funds has forced the Marines to go outside the normal supply chain to procure desperately needed parts. Cannibalization, or taking parts from one multi-million dollar aircraft to get other multi-million dollar aicraft airborne, has become the norm.

    To get one Hornet flying again, Marines at Beaufort stripped a landing gear door off a mothballed museum jet. The door, found on the flight deck of the World War II-era USS Yorktown, was last manufactured over a decade ago.

    “Imagine taking a 1995 Cadillac and trying to make it a Ferrari,” Sgt. Argentry Uebelhoer said days before embarking on his third deployment. “You're trying to make it faster, more efficient, but it's still an old airframe … [and] the aircraft is constantly breaking.”

    Maintaining the high-performance Hornets is a challenge with 30,000 fewer Marines, part of a downsizing that has been ongoing since 2010.

    “We don't have enough of them to do the added work efficiently. We are making it a lot harder on the young marines who are fixing our aircraft,” said Maj. Michael Malone of Marine Aviation Logistics Squadron 31.

    Sometimes it takes the Marines 18 months to get parts for early model F-18 jets whose production was halted in 2001.

    “We are an operational squadron. We are supposed to be flying jets, not building them,” said Lt. Col. Harry Thomas, Commanding Officer of VMFA-312, a Marine Corps F/A-18 squadron based at Beaufort.

    The cuts include those made by the Obama administration as well as the sequestration cutbacks agreed to by Congress.

    Asked about the Marines’ concerns on Friday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest put the onus on Congress to right the problem – and said Republicans have blocked spending reforms that would have helped military readiness. He said Republicans “championed” the sequester cuts.

    Lt. Col Thomas, call sign “Crash,” deployed to the Pacific with 10 jets last year. Only seven made it. A fuel leak caused his F/A-18 to catch fire in Guam. Instead of ejecting, he landed safely, saving taxpayers $29 million.

    Thomas has deployed eight times in all, including six to Iraq and Afghanistan. Right now only two of his 14 Hornets can fly. His Marines deploy in three months.

    “We are supposed to be doing the type of maintenance like you would take your car to Jiffy Lube for replacing fluids, doing minor inspections, changing tires, things of that nature, not building airplanes from the ground up,” he added.

    The aircraft shortage means pilots spend less time in the air.

    “This last 30 days our average flight time per pilot was just over 4 hours,” said Thomas.

    Ten years ago, Marine Corps pilots averaged between 25 and 30 hours in the air each month, according to one pilot. “This is the worst I’ve seen it,” he added. Another pilot who asked to remain nameless told Fox News that Chinese and Russian pilots fly more hours each month than Marine Corps pilots.

    Marine Corps F/A-18 Hornets are supposed to have a shelf life of 6,000 hours, but they are being refurbished to extend the life to 8,000. There is talk that some aircraft might be pushed to 10,000 hours while the Marine Corps waits for the 5th-generation Joint Strike Fighter, which is slated to replace the F-18, but has been plagued by cost overruns.

    “Our aviation readiness is really my No. 1 concern,” Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Robert Neller told Congress last month. “We don’t have enough airplanes that we would call ‘ready basic aircraft."

    Col. Sean Salene oversees nine helicopter squadrons at Marine Corps Air Station New River in North Carolina.

    “Unlike previous wars, we did not have a period of time afterwards where we did not have tasking,” said Col. Salene. “There was no time to catch our breath.”

    Maj. Matt Gruba, executive officer of HMH-461, a Super Stallion squadron at New River took Fox News reporters inside one of the large helicopters, which has sent thousands of fully loaded Marines into combat over the past three decades.

    Inside, hundreds of small wires cover every surface of the helicopter except the hard non-skid deck. It’s up to the Marine maintainers to inspect each one. One failure could be catastrophic, as happened in 2014 when a Navy MH-53E Sea Dragon crashed off the coast of Virginia after a fire engulfed the aircraft due to faulty fuel lines.

    "It would be easy to miss some small minute detail, some small amount of wear [which] could potentially, eventually cause a fire,” Gruba said

    Lt. Gen. Jon M. "Dog" Davis is the Marine Corps' deputy commandant for aviation, tasked with getting his aircraft back in the air.

    Davis ordered the Corps to refurbish all of the old CH-53E helicopters to their pre-war condition, including fixing the chafing wires and jerryrigged fuel lines that were repaired in theater.

    "The biggest thing is right now after 15 years of hard service, of hard fighting and deploying around the world, is we don't have enough airplanes on the flight line,” Davis said.

    The cuts have not sat well within the military leadership. Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates told Fox News’ Bret Baier in a recent interview that he felt betrayed when told to cut billions from the budget after having already done so.

    “I guess I’d have to say I felt double-crossed. After all those years in Washington, I was naïve,” he said.

    And last week, the Army’s top officer, Gen. Mark Milley, said cuts could mean more American troops could lose their lives.

    “If one or more possible unforeseen contingencies happen, then the United States Army currently risks not having ready forces available to provide flexible options to our national leadership. ... And most importantly, we risk incurring significantly increased U.S. casualties,” Milley testified last week on Capitol Hill.



    Not mentioned in the article is that supposedly, worn out C model F/A-18s are getting sent to the boneyard while less worn out A models are getting pulled out to replace them.

  12. #232
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    21,663
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 73 Times in 68 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    Everyday America is being ripened to lose the next real conflict with the Axis.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  13. #233
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    21,663
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 73 Times in 68 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    Retired Air Force General: Obama ‘Unilaterally Disarmed America’ [VIDEO]

    Ginni Thomas

    10:27 PM 05/21/2016

    Russian and Chinese militaries are increasingly trying to bully American forces because they are “taking advantage of our weakness” and “publicly humiliating us,” according to a respected retired Air Force general and Fox News military analyst.

    “It’s a slap in the face” to the United States, Retired General

    says, and President Barack Obama “should not accept that kind of behavior.”

    The president “unilaterally disarmed America,” adding “we have all these social experiments,” according to McInerney’s 18-minute exclusive video interview for The Daily Caller News Foundation. By transforming America’s foreign policy, McInerney says Obama’s America is known as a nation that will “protect your enemies and deny your allies support.”

    Running through the world’s hot spots accentuated by Obama’s failed foreign policy, McInerney says he is “very worried” that Israel has not gotten the weapons and protection it needs from the United States for its survival.

    McInerney has been a steady watchdog of the Benghazi incident, serving his country as a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi. He commends Judicial Watch for its tenacious efforts to uncover the facts of why Americans were left to die that fateful night on the anniversary of 9/11 in 2012. He is “disappointed” with the efforts made to date by House Chairman Trey Gowdy to uncover the facts of what went wrong in Benghazi.

    McInerney decries the administration’s lack of response when asked “what difference does Benghazi make.” To him, it was a “dereliction of duty” for not providing adequate force protection before and during the attack.

    Obama wrongly attacked Libya because a small force of radical Islamists were threatening Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi, who, albeit flawed, had become an ally to America in the war on terror, the respected retired general says.

    America’s military had plenty of warning and should have been at a higher state of readiness. Watching the last scene from the Benghazi movie, “13 Hours,”

    McInerney was offended of the reminder a Libyan charter plane came to take away the survivors and the fallen. He ashamedly asks, “Where was our great Air Force? Where was America to help these people?”

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private, unaccredited server to conduct government business “put at risk our national security and she knew that.” The president, he adds, is culpable for those emails since his former Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel would have told him of her conduct.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  14. #234
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military


    Tune In To FNC For 'Fox News Reporting: Rising Threats - Shrinking Military'

    April 1, 2016



    When President Obama took office, he promised to be a new type of commander-in-chief. Many now fear that’s exactly what has happened.

    Critics see the American military downsizing, and its influence in world affairs waning, creating a dangerous power vacuum. "Fox News Reporting: Rising Threats - Shrinking Military," airing Friday at 10 p.m. ET, Saturday at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET and Sunday at 9 p.m. and midnight ET on Fox News Channel and anchored by Bret Baier, investigates the phenomenon that is the Obama military.

    One of the signs of the president’s new approach is his deep budget cuts. Numerous defense programs have been scrapped, and the troops are being cut back—the Army’s active force threatens to drop below pre-World War II levels. As former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates tells Fox News, after he worked hard to cut hundreds of billions from the Obama military budget, he was then told to cut hundreds of billions more. Gates fears less money today will mean more American blood later.

    President Obama isn’t just making the military smaller, however--he’s changing its very essence. He’s introduced numerous policies designed to further social justice within the ranks, such as regulations to allow women to serve in combat. But military experts are concerned that all these new rules end up doing is lowering standards and destroying morale. They worry that fighting efficiency is being sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.

    On the international front, this slimmed-down military seems designed to match the administration’s slimmed-down foreign policy. Obama, critics contend, wants an America more humble in its approach, more willing to listen to others.

    But how has this lighter footprint worked out? "Fox News Reporting Rising Threats - Shrinking Military examines how Obama’s policies have played out on the world stage:

    Russia, where the administration made conciliatory gestures, after which Putin’s forces became more aggressive and took over Crimea.
    Iraq, where Obama decided upon a precipitous withdrawal of U.S. military presence, after which the formerly pacified nation descended into chaos.

    Syria, where Obama threatened but then failed to take action, after which the region continued to grow into one of the most dangerous spots in the world.

    Libya, the one place where America did take action in a UN-approved military intervention, after which the nation split apart and become a breeding ground for terrorism.

    "Fox News Reporting: Rising Threats - Shrinking Military" features the three former secretaries of defense to serve under Obama—Robert Gates, Leon Panetta and Chuck Hagel—as well as other high-ranking officials. We also go on the ground in Alaska to meet the men in uniform who serve there, and see how they deal with aging equipment and a disappearing budget, even as the threats from Russia and China grow.

    President Obama inherited a world-class, battle-hardened military. The next president, facing a complex world with many threats, will inherit the new Obama military. Watch "Fox News Reporting: Rising Threats - Shrinking Military" to discover what that may mean for the country.



    Here's the full episode:


  15. #235
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    I guess if you slash and burn personnel, you're going to end up with a bunch of empty buildings...


    Pentagon To Congress: We Need Base Closures

    April 15, 2016

    Pentagon officials say the Defense Department is wasting money on excess facilities and needs Congress to step in and close them, but they face an uphill fight.

    Pointing to 22 percent excess capacity across DoD, a senior Pentagon official is urging lawmakers to consider a new round of the politically unpopular Base Realignment and Closures process, known by the acronym BRAC. According to a DoD report to Congress on the need for BRAC, the Army’s excess capacity is 33 percent; the Air Force's is 32 percent; the Defense Logistics Agency's is 12 percent, and the Navy's is 7 percent.

    “As Department of Defense leadership has repeatedly testified, spending resources on excess infrastructure does not make sense,” Deputy Secretary of Defense Bob Work said in an April 12 letter that accompanies the report. “Therefore, we urge Congress to provide the Department authorization for another round of BRAC. Our recently submitted BRAC legislative proposal responds to congressional concerns regarding cost.”

    The letter was made public Friday, days after Sen. Kelly Ayotte, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Readiness and Management said she will not include the authority to conduct a BRAC round in her subcommittee’s mark of the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act. She said that amid tight DoD budgets, the military cannot afford BRAC, whose costs ballooned 67 percent during the last round, in 2005.

    “I do not want to give the department the open-ended authority to pursue another BRAC round that will potentially incur significant upfront costs when we do not have the room in our budget in the next few years to afford many fundamental readiness investments that are right before us,” Ayotte, R-N.H., said in an April 12 hearing.

    The subcommittee’s ranking Democrat, Sen. Tim Kaine, backing Ayotte's decision, called BRAC a “massive lobbyist and lawyer effort” that’s parochial and unnecessary. He said he would like to see a better way of rationalizing DoD infrastructure.

    The SASC's version of the 2017 defense policy bill must be reconciled with its House counterpart. A BRAC advocate on the HASC — its ranking Democrat, Rep. Adam Smith, of Washington — hailed the DoD report. In a statement Friday, Smith said saving money by closing unneeded facilities will provide more for national security.

    “This report makes clear that DoD maintains a large amount of infrastructure that it does not need,” Smith said. “Disposing of excess infrastructure through a transparent, deliberative and independent process, such as another round of Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC), can be done in a responsible manner hat enhances military readiness and frees up funds that can be used to strengthen our military in other ways.”

    The powerful House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, did not condemn BRAC itself, but blasted the report as unequal to its mandate under the 2016 defense policy bill. The report came two months late and used a projected force size for 2019, and not the proscribed 2012 size, Thornberry said.

    "The capacity report the Pentagon belatedly delivered to Congress simply doesn’t tell us what we need to know," Thornberry said in a statement. "In envisioning a military far smaller than anyone thinks is wise, it fails to comply with the law as badly as it fails to justify a BRAC round."

    While military leaders condemn planned force cuts, planning around them, "makes no sense," Thornberry said. "It would lock in a future where our stressed military becomes permanently gutted."

    Work’s call comes a month after DoD officials offered in Congressional testimony that DoD could save as much as 25 percent savings in some missions, and that a closing round in 2019 would save about $2 billion annually.

    In recent congressional testimony, Pentagon officials made their fifth request for another BRAC round. At the House Appropriations Military Construction Subcommittee last month, lawmakers responded with skepticism and invoked problems with the 2005 round, which was considered the largest, most complex and costliest since the first in 1988.

    In Work's letter this week, he argued DoD’s recently submitted BRAC proposal answers lawmakers’ concerns, aiming to yield a net savings within five years and limit recommendations that take longer than 20 years to implement. He acknowledged “socioeconomic impacts” of such closures, but argued as unpalatable as they are, the best course is to target them through the BRAC process.

    “Under current fiscal restraints, local communities will experience economic impacts regardless of a congressional decision regarding BRAC authorization,” Work's letter said. “This has the harmful and unintended consequence of forcing the Military Departments to consider cuts at all installations, without regard to military value. A better alternative is to close or realign installations with the lowest military value.”

    “Without BRAC, local communities' ability to plan and adapt to these changes is less robust and offers fewer protections than under BRAC law. Further, because the cost of operating installations is relatively fixed, the magnitude of savings from efficiency measures are less than that from closing a base," the letter said.

    DoD completed its last BRAC round in 2005, and in the interim, major force reductions began. DoD’s report argues it has been 14 years since Congress authorized the DoD to conduct a BRAC round and 12 years since it conducted a thorough analysis of its capacity.

    Army personnel will shrink to 450,000 from 570,000; Marine Corps personnel will decline from 202,000 to 182,000. Since 2005, the Air Force has already reduced its force structure by eliminating 500 aircraft from its inventory and 50,000 personnel, and the Navy has already reduced its force structure by eliminating I carrier and 36,000 personnel.

  16. #236
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military


    Internal Email Shows Air Force Pilot Shortage at “CRISIS” Level

    May 31, 2016

    For years, the Air Force has struggled to come to grips with a looming pilot shortage that many predicted would be severe enough to cripple the service harm national defense. Until recently, senior leaders responded to the issue by denying its existence, rationalizing it as a function of the civilian economy to the extent they admitted it might be a problem at all. They also marginalized those who elected to bail out. “Someone will step into your place,” they remarked on infinite loop, as if gesturing toward a bottomless well of aviation expertise.

    This was, of course, all wrong. There has been a growing shortage of pilots for a long time, and it’s been worsening at an accelerating rate, notwithstanding “pretty darn good” denials to the contrary.

    The shortage is not driven by money or airline opportunities, but by an ailing organizational culture, a lack of mission focus, and excessive operational tempo. These things might be mitigated by strong leadership, but commanders have employed doublespeak and senseless personnel policies worsening these underlying problems. Trust has hemorrhaged at the same time that a once vibrant and battle-thirsty aviation culture has withered, replaced with a soulless, bureaucratically approved authority structure masquerading as a combat organization.

    Pilots have had their support systems removed, their training gutted, and their voices muzzled. Once heralded as the “tip of the spear,” they’re now instructed that there is no spear … just a collection of equally important and interchangeable individuals pursuing officially approved self-interests. In summary, it’s not a combat team anymore … just a collection of government workers following orders that occasionally involve airplanes. On the best days, it’s a shadow of its formerly great self. On the worst days, it’s insufferable. Most days, it’s merely joyless.

    The sad thing is that Gen. Mark Welsh knew this problem was developing before he became Chief of Staff … yet under his watch, it’s gotten much worse. And while airmen understand much of the blame for the mess of the contemporary Air Force lies with elected politicians, they don’t forgive the generals entrusted with sacred responsibility who haven’t committed in word or in deed to do what’s right for airpower or go down swinging in the attempt. Welsh and his colleagues have allowed the Air Force to come up more than 700 fighter pilots short. That doesn’t reflect an airline hiring problem … it reflects a failure of leadership and policy.

    Now the problem is finally outrunning the radar coverage of official denial. In an internal email from earlier this month, Colonel Farley Abdeen (Chief of Total Force Aircrew Management at the Air Staff) calls the growing shortage of fighter pilots a “CRISIS” (his all caps) … also labeling the situation “DIRE” (again, his caps) and appeals to the operations community to reevaluate the basic assumptions governing fighter pilot training in order to “save our [fighter pilot] community!”

    The text of the email (highlights are mine):

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Abdeen, Farley A Col USAF AF-A3 (US)
    Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 9:48 AM
    Subject: HOT//ACTION// 11F Crisis production increase

    AMEC and Fighter Enterprise Tiger Team (FETT) Members,

    As discussed at the FETT yesterday, I’ve set the (new/adjusted/CRISIS) REQUIREMENT for production needed from all the 11F FTUs. In the attached spreadsheet, you will see the FY17 GPGL distribution of training that was agreed to at the GPGL and that was signed and sent out by the AF/A35. In the column next to it is what we need to adjust to, for FY17 and across the FYDP.

    Again, I understand that this is non-standard and not accomplishable within the standard assumptions. However, this is a CRISIS! We need to break into the assumptions and attack those to get to the solution.

    The HAF, at the O-6 working group for now (and it will go to the GO level later) is tasking the production of the increased FY17 Crisis Production numbers for FTUs. HAF is not asking IF you can do it but rather what you need to do to produce it. As you (AETC and ACC) are the experts, I am not trying to give you the answer, but rather here are some of my brainstorm ideas of assumptions to break into and see if which ones will add up to give you the solution:

    – Maintenance: More UTE? What more can you do if you had more UTE out of your jets? What do you need from Maintenance right now to do that? Can we contract more help for Maint?

    – Syllabi: We can NOT shoot for the “Gold-Plated” standard in this period of crisis … what can the squadrons/COCOMs accept as risk if students didn’t receive certain training? (2vX?, 4vX, etc) How/when do they get the rest of the training (in Ops squadrons?, top-offs?)

    — Do we need a CRISIS RTRB to discuss this? (figure out what is required versus desired or what/where can we accept risk?)

    – Flying schedules: Can there be more flying accomplished? Fly Weekends? (I know that it is a probably non-starter…but it has to be asked. You can put your Ops/Maint on staggered 5 day work weeks that include the weekend for lighter but productive flying. All the support may be the issue (ranges, Tower, RAPCON, Base support, etc. BUT this is DIRE can we push it up? Maybe just Saturday?)

    – ANY OTHER IDEAS? (please chime in)

    Please work on this and have as much background/detail accomplished so we can discuss the next FETT meeting. We will determine the battle rhythm then to meet the tight timeline … we want to have the answers on how the 2017 20% increase WILL be accomplished for the 2-Star Aircrew Management GOSG mid- July.

    I look forward to discussion, concerns, banter and solution! We are going to save our 11F community!

    Thanks

    VR

    Farley “Sweet” Abdeen, Colonel, USAF
    Chief, Total Force Aircrew Management (TFAM) Integration Division, AF/A3OI

    Forget the silly acronyms, here’s the translation: we’re falling too short of fighter pilots and our best/only idea is to start watering down how we train them in order to produce more in the short term, even if it means building risk into the future. Oh by the way, we (the Air Staff) are not assuming any responsibility … we’re simply limiting you to a single option and forcing you to select it. Later, when it is exposed as a terrible idea, you’ll be at least as accountable for it as we are. Oh, and this is such a “DIRE” “CRISIS” that we might involve the 2-stars sometime in July.

    The email makes reference to a spreadsheet reflecting increased production targets for FY17. Here’s the relevant excerpt:



    What this means is that the Air Force is about to (further) court mediocrity in its training model and accept something less than the established standard in how it makes fighter pilots … so it can produce a grand total of 58 more in a year’s time. This against an expected loss of 387 fighter pilots in FY16 that will leave the service a staggering 723 short of requirements.

    With a shortage this severe, even perfect prosecution of Abdeen’s proposed targets wouldn’t put a dent in the problem. It would take the Air Force a dozen years at “crisis” production levels to catch up to sustainable manning, and this assumes retention doesn’t get worse. This is a vulnerable assumption, because nothing will make fighter pilots bail out more quickly than feeling like they’re playing for the junior varsity team. Start sending dubiously trained new wingmen to squadrons and watch the shortage sprout an exponent.

    This slide, also part of Abdeen’s email, is excerpted from a presentation detailing the shortage. Pay close attention to the “why short” block, which almost totally misses the point about why this is all happening.



    The Air Force still thinks its pilots are getting out because of airline hiring, or maybe because of deployments. The reasons are much more unsettling and much more within the service’s direct responsibility, which is what makes the severity and multiple-year entrenchment of this crisis nigh on unforgivable.

    They’re not getting out because they can get airline jobs. They’re getting out because the Air Force has become a miserable work environment and other opportunities now mean they don’t have to stay. For years, the service relied on sluggish airline hiring to avoid the tougher organization, climate, and culture issues that were laying the groundwork for this crisis. It didn’t need to do anything because it was retaining people despite a declining service culture and abusive management practices.

    Now that things have returned to normal in the civilian economy, the generals and personnel “experts” are still trying to pretend the airlines are a universal and deterministic hinge of retention.

    It’s just not the case. Hiring is a contributing factor. Self-support, red tape, queep, slighted training, do-nothing deployments, chiefings, the unexplained firing of good leaders coupled with the inexcusable promotion of bad ones, and obligatory social science education masquerading as “ancillary training” … these are the causal factors. Together they are killing squadron life. When you kill squadron life, you kill the United States Air Force. The current crop of generals and their predecessors across the last decade are doing a much better job of it than the Russians ever could. Don’t tell that to the geniuses at the Air Staff. They still think the service can hope its way to sustainability.

    The shortage itself is startling. It is, in fact, a national defense crisis largely unrecognized beyond the high walls of the Air Force. But just as disturbing is the total lack of imagination concerning how to fix it. This has been going on for years, and there may have been a time that simply augmenting production would have supplied marginal gains sufficient to quell the problem.

    But we’re well past that now. This is a structural-systemic problem that can’t be addressed with tweaks to the training model, even if those tweaks weren’t representative of a terrible idea whose juice isn’t nearly worth the squeeze. The fact it’s the only idea being suggested says something damning about how the service detects and solves problems.

    Agree or disagree about the causes, we can probably all agree that breaking the training model to make a show of doing something is an inappropriate response to this crisis. Seems to me the Air Force needs not just a “down day” but a week or month wherein the generals clear their calendars, bring together their smartest squadron-level leaders, and commit to solving this problem … even if it means breaking glass … even if it means losing face by admitting to Congress the actual state of things … and even if it means sacred cows are slain. Importantly, this is a street-level problem that can’t be left to the cubicle-dwellers on headquarters staffs. Their proximity to Caesar makes them too fearful of bold suggestions … without which this crisis will not be tamed.

    So just how does this get fixed? Well, three things can be done. Reduce requirements (which has been done about as much as possible), produce more fighter pilots (which can’t be done at this point without sacrificing quality or impracticably restructuring the entire Air Force), or increase retention. This last point is where the service must focus.

    With about one third of the fiscal year remaining, just 60 of 195 eligible fighter pilots have signed up for a retention bonus and committed to staying. In other words, 135 more fighter pilots — more than twice the number the Air Staff hopes to produce by reducing training quality — are waiting to be persuaded to a career. They’ll be persuaded by strong leadership at the top committed to restoring sustainable squadron life, and not by money. The amount of cash required to buy them in the absence of organizational improvement would be too exorbitant to bear, and would only delay implosion of the service rather than preventing it.

    One way to almost certainly dissuade mid-career pilots from staying, on the other hand, is to force them to fly with inexperienced wingmen riding the razor-thin line between undertrained and unsafe. Hopefully this “pre-decisional” bad idea will remain indefinitely pre-decisional, and the service will instead lead and improve its way through this problem.

    No matter what, Congress and the DoD need to get really interested really quick … unless they want to press the red button sometime in the future and find out only then that they don’t have an Air Force capable of answering the call.

  17. #237
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    This is... Interensting.


    USMC IMPROVISE – A BONEYARD, AND A WASP

    HOME / BREAKING NEWS / MILITARY / USMC IMPROVISE – A BONEYARD, AND A WASP






    USMC IMPROVISE – A BONEYARD, AND A WASP

    By Faye Higbee
    In Military

    0






    USMC Improvise – A Boneyard, and a WASP
    The US Marine Corps and Navy haven’t been in the best of shape for readiness, no thanks to budget cuts. But in true USMC manner, the “improvise” part of the Marine Corps motto, they’ve reached into the past to prepare. At the airplane boneyard, they’re having F/A Hornets refurbished. The Navy has called up a 27 Year old WASP – Amphibious Assault Ship and sent it on its way with the 22nd MEU to fight ISIS.
    Bring back the Hornets
    The promised new F-35 Jets did not arrive on time, due to delays and issues. They were supposed to be ready in 2006.
    The ‘Boneyard’ at Davis-Monthan Airbase in Tucson, Arizona- photo by Tech. Sgt. Bennie J. Davis III/Air Force

    With the Marine Corps down to only 32% of their Hornets operational, they were stuck between a rock and a hard place. So they went to the Boneyard – decommissioned aircraft – at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona to find some planes they could use.
    “I consider it a pretty smart move on the U.S. Marine Corps side. The F/A-18C and D are very reliable airframes that are quite easy to maintain and operate. Once upgraded to the C+ standard, these ‘gap fillers’ are more than enough to conduct combat operations in low-lethality scenarios like those that see the USMC at work these days.” David Cenciotti, The Aviationist
    [“Low-lethality means scenarios where there is little to no risk of being shot down by surface-to-air missiles, MANPADS, anti-aircraft warfare or manned interceptors.” David Cenciotti in an email to Uncle Sam’s]Boeing is refurbishing a planned 30 of the Hornets. They have completed two of them up to the C+ level.
    The WASP, an Amphibious Assault Ship (Photo by Cpl John Hamilton, USMC)

    Sending out the WASP- A warship going to war



    The Navy resurrected a WASP from mothballs. The last real deployment of the WASP was in 2004. But with a little TLC, some new systems, and some prepping for life on an older ship, it’s battle ready and headed for ISIS.


    Many of the crew of this ship are sailors and Marines on their first deployment.
    “We’re going to launch aircraft off with weapons and they’re going to come back having dropped them on somebody. If we have to send Marines ashore, they will be in the thick of it…That’s the mindset you have to have — this is a warship, and it is going to war.” Ship’s Commander, Captain Andy Smith
    The Marine Corps Times reported,


    The 27-year-old gator, which last deployed in 2004, got underway Saturday morning as part of a 4,000-strong Amphibious Ready Group that includes dock landing ship Whidbey Island and amphibious transport dock San Antonio. The trio will carry the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit out of Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, on a planned six-month pump to 5th Fleet, where ARG commanders fully expect to tangle with ISIS.


    Though among the oldest in the fleet (all three are first-of-class), the ships carry some of the newest sailors and systems — and a palpable readiness.


    [“Gator” refers to the ‘gator navy’, the Amphibious Assault Ships, with landing craft that transport Marines to shore.]

    The crew of the WASP trained for nearly a year prior to this deployment. They learned their ship, oversaw installation of new systems, and “busted the rust.” They had to figure out how to go without some of the creature comforts of newer vessels. But they are ready, according to their commander.


    Marines from the 1st Battalion, 6th Marines train on the WASP (Photo by Cpl.Ryan Coleman, USMC)


    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  18. #238
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  19. #239
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    Wasp gets underway on its first major deployment in more than a decade

    Lance M. Bacon, Marine Corps Times2:58 p.m. EDT June 26, 2016


    7609CONNECTTWEET 34LINKEDIN 13COMMENTEMAILMORE

    NAVAL STATION NORFOLK, Va. — Wasp is back in the fight.
    The 27-year-old gator, which last deployed in 2004, got underway Saturday morning as part of a 4,000-strong Amphibious Ready Group that includes dock landing ship Whidbey Island and amphibious transport dock San Antonio. The trio will carry the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit out of Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, on a planned six-month pump to 5th Fleet, where ARG commanders fully expect to tangle with ISIS.
    Though among the oldest in the fleet (all three are first-of-class), the ships carry some of the newest sailors and systems — and a palpable readiness.
    "This team is ready," said Capt. Byron Ogden, who commands the ARG as well as Amphibious Squadron (PHIBRON) 6. "We've been put through the paces, we've gone through a very extensive training cycle, and have hit the mark time and time again. I have the utmost faith and confidence in every one of those sailors and Marines on all three of these mighty warships that we will do our nation's bidding."
    He reiterated the flexibility of his team, and the likelihood its skills will be put to the test in a wide variety of missions and locations. Disaggregated operations have been a hallmark of work ups. Ogden said he fully expects to disperse different leadership teams to the appropriate ships to provide "the right level and scalable force necessary to accomplish the desire task."

    MARINE CORPS TIMES
    This aging amphib will soon take on ISIS. Here's how sailors and Marines got it ready for the fight





    In that light, the MEU placed significant emphasis on building “a very strong relationship” with special operations forces, and even enabled a real-world MARSOC mission with cryptologic linguist support, Col. Todd Simmons, MEU commander, told Marine Corps Times days before departure. The Marines are well prepared for the likelihood of disaggregated ops, he said, which has become increasingly common for ground forces. The Corps has been pushing the company landing team concept, and has tested the integration of artillery in direct support of such a team. A prime example is Task Force Spartan. Its roughly 170 Marines remained in Iraq after the 26th MEU’s April departure, and didn’t return to Camp Lejeune until June 3. The detachment stayed in country to man the guns of a firebase near Makhmour in northern Iraq until U.S. Army artillery could provide relief.
    The MEU also has some new items in the kit. Notably, it will be the first to deploy with the MQ-21 Blackjack unmanned aerial vehicle. It entails one system but the MEU will carry five vehicles. Though it is a Marine Corps program of record, the UAV is certain to provide maritime security for the ships, especially as they transit challenging and contested waters.
    Moments before the ship set sail, its skipper noted the emotion and excitement within her aging gray hulls.
    "This crew has worked very, very hard over the last year and a half to get this ship ready to go back into the fight," said Capt. Andy Smith, who took Wasp's helm two months ago after fleeting up from the XO's seat. "They are very excited to go do the nation's business, and do what they joined the Navy to do — see the world."
    The majority of crew members are on their first deployment, and most were not in the Navy when Wasp last deployed. Still, a primary focus has been the shift in mindset from Fleet Week to forward deployed. A 1980s-era advanced combat direction system — and an unwillingness by the Navy to make costly upgrades — all but shelved Wasp. For a decade, she was relegated to goodwill port visits and used as a gaining platform. As such, assignment to this gator has long meant little time at sea. Smith described Wasp as “basically a pre-commissioning crew on a 27-year-old ship.”
    But the amphibious assault ship came out of the shipyard in late 2014 after an extensive maintenance availability. Adjustments were made to accommodate operational testing of the Joint Strike Fighter. Further work was done to meet the demand that would be faced in preparation for and execution of a forward deployment to the Middle East.
    The ship received upgrades to the Ship Self Defense System MK 2, SPQ-9B, MK 57 NATO Sea Sparrow Missile System, and Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services.
    In addition, significant maintenance included extensive repair of the cargo weapons elevator and boilers; repair/replace of tanks, waterborne shafting, and stern tube seal; preservation of underwater hull, uptake/intake, freeboard, and well deck overhead; and replacement of 6,000 feet of CHT piping as well as the main condenser expansion joint.
    The blue-green team has spent much of the year busting off rust and getting everything aligned. Leading the task is Lt. Cmdr. Joe Towles. He reported aboard two years ago as the main propulsion assistant and fleeted up to chief engineer, or CHENG, in November. The engineering plant wasn't much of a problem, the mustang said. Though short, the ship's sporadic deployments kept main propulsion up and running. The real challenge came with large numbers of people came aboard, which proved more problematic for the auxiliary and electrical plants.
    The MEU is comprised of Battalion Landing Team 1st Battalion, 6th Marines, Combat Logistics Battalion 22, Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 264 (reinforced) , and the MEU Headquarters Command Element. Additional embarked units include Navy Beach Group (NBG) 2 with detachments from Assault Craft Unit 2, ACU 4, Beachmaster Unit 2, Tactical Air Control Squadron 22, Fleet Surgical Team 2, and Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 22.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  20. #240
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: Obama Guts the Military

    gettyimages-109691684
    RED ALERT: GENERAL James Mattis FIRED After He REFUSED To TAKE UP ARMS AGAINST US CITIZENS … IT’S HAPPENING!!
    July 18, 2016 readconservatives News Leave a comment
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Subscribe


    Over the weekend, this columnist spoke with an old friend who has spent much of his life in the military. Though he spoke on the condition of anonymity, I can tell you that he was in the U.S. Air Force, and served at Strategic Air Command Headquarters.


    During the course of our conversation, I asked his opinion on the belief that Obama is considering using the military to implement martial law against the American people.
    This highly respected veteran looked me dead in the eyes, and said: “What do you think these purges have been about?”


    VIA USA Politics Today


    Over the last couple of years, Obama has ordered hundreds of officers to leave the military.
    In fact, on October 9, 2013, Vice Admiral Timothy Giardina, Deputy Commander of U.S. Strategic Command was relieved of duty. Two days later, the man in charge of the nation’s nuclear missiles, Major General Michael Carey was also relieved of his command.


    Perhaps, the most infamous example of Obama’s purge, came with the forced exit of Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis.
    So, when this reporter inquired about his dismissal, my source very calmly said:
    Mattis hates Obama, and the word is, the general really gave him hell over the NDAA, he called him a dictator.
    This is in line with what another highly respected patriot said two years ago…
    In January 2013, renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made a shocking claim about what we can expect to see in Obama’s second term


    Garrow made the following Facebook post:
    I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not. Those who will not are being removed.”
    So, who is that source?


    Garrow replied: “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”
    Understand, this did not come from Alex Jones or even Glenn Beck, or from anyone else the left often dismisses with great ease.


    Garrow is a well-respected activist and has spent much of his life rescuing infant girls from China, babies who would be killed under that country’s one-child policy. He was also nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for his work.


    His bio on Amazon.com reads:
    Dr. James Garrow is the author of The Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China. He has spent over $25 million over the past sixteen years rescuing an estimated 40,000 baby Chinese girls from near-certain death under China’s one-child-per-couple policy by facilitating international adoptions. He is the founder and executive director of the Bethune Institute’s Pink Pagoda schools, private English-immersion schools for Chinese children. Today he runs 168 schools with nearly 6,300 employees.


    Garrow’s claim came on the heels of a report in the Washington Free Beacon (WFB) that the head of Central Command, Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis was being dismissed by Obama and would leave his post in March 2013.


    The WFB article stated:
    Word on the national security street is that General James Mattis is being given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of Central Command, and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.
    Did Gen. Mattis refuse to “fire on U.S. citizens?”


    Like us on Facebook – READ CONSERVATIVES


    What do you think of this? Leave your comment below.


    SOURCE: USA Politics Today
    Comments

    http://readconservatives.news/2016/0...ens-happening/
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Biden - World Class Bozo
    By Malsua in forum World Politics and Politicians
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: April 10th, 2015, 12:43
  2. Joe Biden likened tea partiers to terrorists
    By vector7 in forum In the Throes of Progressive Tyranny
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: August 4th, 2011, 14:03
  3. Hillary rumoured to replace Joe Biden as Obama's vice president
    By vector7 in forum World Politics and Politicians
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: October 7th, 2010, 23:35
  4. Palin-Biden debate
    By samizdat in forum World Politics and Politicians
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: October 3rd, 2008, 16:56
  5. Ross Perot Has Guts
    By Backstop in forum General Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 23rd, 2007, 04:52

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •