Page 36 of 36 FirstFirst ... 263233343536
Results 701 to 708 of 708

Thread: Will America Break Up?

  1. #701
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    24,319
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 60 Times in 59 Posts

    Default Re: Will America Break Up?


    What Will It Take To Make You Understand And Accept That They Hate You?

    January 28, 2019
    By Kurt Schlichter

    You need to die because of your smile.

    That’s the position of our enemies, and we know it because they told us – openly, proudly, in the garbage public forum that is Twitter and elsewhere. Oh, they backtracked a little when the extent of their killing fantasies got exposed, scampering like their insect analogy, the roach, when someone flips on the kitchen light. But that kid in DC with the Frigidaireborne reefer ranger banging that drum in his baffled mug? They wanted that kid to die for having a Wrong Smile.

    Cue the excuse chorus: “That’s nonsense! We just wanted to pummel that kid and then destroy him, his family and and all his classmates! Don’t look behind the curtain at the woodchipper comments and bomb threats, you cisnormative monsters!

    Think of what they would do with real power…

    Accept that that kid was you, and me. If they’ll ice a kid for not having the right grin, they’ll waste you or me in a heartbeat. Murder is, after all, how leftists roll. The USSR, Red China, Cambodia, North Korea, Cuba – that cadaver-strewn litany teaches what’s lurking at the bottom of the slope we’re sliding down. The Dems are spooning with socialism, and the goal of socialism is written in blood on the pages of history. The unapproved must be liquidated, and they are making no secret that you are unapproved.

    Understand that and accept it.

    I know it’s hard. It goes against everything you’ve been taught to believe to acknowledge that that a significant and influential group of other Americans – not that they identify that way – want you dead or enslaved. But they do. The Fredocons will scoff, but the conservaquisling collaborators’ actions speak louder than their weasel words – they’re currying favor with the enemy, betting that their abject groveling and supine submission will mean that they get the chop last.

    You better get your head in the game or you’ll find your head in a guillotine – definitely figuratively, maybe literally.

    You want to reject this reality, to dismiss it, to wave it off as crazy talk. But listen to what they say. Watch what they do. Have the strength to accept the harsh truth that is punching you in the face.

    They hate you for not submitting, for being an obstacle to their rule.

    The problem is that you are nice, and you project your niceness. Projection is human nature. So while leftist spittle-spewing sociopaths project their own shriveled morality when they shriek about how we’re all racist fascists of fascist racism when racist fascism is actually their jam, we Normals tend to project our decency when we assume that our opponents are just confused friends who are in the throes of a grievous misunderstanding about us that we can remedy with facts and evidence.

    That’s 100 percent wrong. Facts and evidence don’t matter because the trial is already over and you’ve already been condemned because of who you are. You can’t ever clear yourself with the left because they don’t hate you for what you did or will do, but for who you are. That’s where the babble about “white privilege” comes from – if you’re white and conservative you’re wrong, and if you’re not white and conservative, you’re even…wronger.

    It’s not about race or gender or orientation, but about power – they want to take yours, to strip you of your sovereignty and make you kneel. Their SJW posturing is all a lie and a scam. They don’t care about ending racism, sexism, homophobia, or any of the myriad other -isms and -phobias they blather about. Those poses are just weapons to be used to capture what they really want – total power over you. They seek to shame you into submission, and if that won’t work, then they’ll do whatever it takes.

    Do you think the Democrats of yesterday spent a lot of time weighing the evidence before lynching black men? Those Democrats murdered black men for two reasons – because they wanted to send a message to other black men about the price of resistance, and because they enjoyed doing it.

    Orwell wrote about the daily “Two-Minute Hate,” and how is this any different? These unloveable losers have nothing else in their lives, no connection with anything, so they find meaning by joining together with other misfit psychopaths so they can lose themselves in a frenzy of hatred where they get to play the role of righteous avengers.

    Think of what they would do with real power…

    And understand that they might get it. The Democrat Party is not just listening to them. It’s being transformed by them. Name the prominent Democrat politician who stood up and said, “This Covington Kid crucifixion is wrong!”

    Cue the tumbleweeds…

    Not one. Not one senior Democrat said that this was wrong. In fact, the big names joined in. Big Chief Lizzy tweeted about how these designated monsters from Kentucky, with their MAGA hats and audacity to march in support of their political beliefs, had disrespected a “Vietnam War veteran.” Even as this is written, and even after garbage outlets like the garbage Washington Post have had to confess their credulous reporting of Dick Blumenthal’s Saigon battle buddy’s garbage lies, Senator 1/1024th’s demonstrably false Twitter smoke signal is still up.

    Think of what they would do with real power…

    Do you think that a leftist Supreme Court majority won’t construe the First Amendment to exclude protection for “hate speech,” by which I mean any thoughts you might wish to express that they object to?

    Do you think they won’t turn the federal bureaucracy – including law enforcement – against their political enemies a thousand times harder than before, having been rewarded for the last decade of doing so?

    Do you think they won’t start tossing dissenters into prison? They do in England. You can go to jail for a tweet there – and do you think the left thinks that’s a bad thing, or a creative European innovation that needs to be imported?

    How about the Second Amendment? Are you kidding? The idea that our citizenry maintains the ultimate veto over tyranny drives them bonkers.

    Do you think they won’t use violence to make you conform? Hell, Democrat presidential candidate Eric Swalwell is willing to nuke you for not giving up your guns. We know that because he said so.

    It’s time to stop pretending that people who hate our guts don’t hate our guts, and that given the chance they won’t act exactly like people who hate our guts would act.

    The time to stop them is now, while we still can peacefully, before they quit tweeting about killing and start doing it beyond the occasional Bernie Bro at a ball field. We need to purge the weakhearts and Fredocons from positions of authority in our movement and be all-in for victory in 2020. In the meantime, we need to aggressively push our campaign to remake the courts. And it sure would not hurt to follow the Founders‘ advice to exercise our Second Amendment rights to reinforce the deterrent to tyranny that is an armed citizenry.

    Just remember to smile as you fight to keep your freedom, because that shows them that they don’t get to win.

    Now, if you want to see in more (action-packed and often hilarious) detail what will happen if they ever do get real power, check out my latest novel, Wildfire, and my earlier installments People’s Republicand Indian Country. Those 100 million corpses generated by socialism in the last century are not a hypothetical.

  2. #702
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    24,319
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 60 Times in 59 Posts

    Default Re: Will America Break Up?


    Exterminating Whitey

    The end game of identity politics

    January 28, 2019

    In case anyone still needs confirmation, the rage and frenzy surrounding the supposed standoff caught on video last week between Covington Catholic High School students and an anti-Catholic, Native American activist demonstrates as nothing else has lately that the political left’s primary aim, the end game of identity politics, is the demonization of white Christian men.

    Covington student Nicholas Sandmann (pictured above) was the unfortunate epicenter of this tempest-in-a-teapot concocted entirely by the activist media, in which he and his classmates were falsely portrayed as racist bullies surrounding and taunting a frail Native American “elder,” Nathan Phillips. The truth – that it was the schoolboys who were verbally assaulted by Black Hebrew Israelite activists, and that Sandmann did and said nothing but stand his ground and smile in the face of Phillips’ provocation – swiftly came to light, but not before the entire country had squared off over the lie.

    It wasn’t that the news media got the story wrong, which would imply that they made a mistake, but that they didn’t care about getting it right. They didn’t care, because they saw an opportunity to dehumanize a white male wearing that triggering symbol of white supremacy, the “Make America Great Again” cap, and decided to run with a narrative that could be weaponized against President Trump and his “angry white male” supporters. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it,” master strategist Saul Alinsky once taught, and Catholic white boy Sandmann became the left’s target of the moment.

    Some media outlets gradually and quietly backed off from their original rush to judgment as more video and context emerged, but the damage was done, the political divide between Americans was widened, and the more fervent leftists clung to their bigoted view that Sandmann represents the toxic, Christian white male underbelly of an America that bears racism in its very DNA, as Barack Obama once declared.

    The media hurricane was reminiscent of the crazed spectacle of last October’s confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a devout Catholic who was viewed as the poster boy for the left’s favorite bogeyman, “white privilege.” Based on a single, decades-old, evidence-free allegation, the Alinsky-trained left smeared Kavanaugh as a drunken sexual predator (and even pedophile) whose addition to the Court would hurl women into a misogynistic dystopia straight out of The Handmaid’s Tale.

    Sandmann is the left’s new Kavanaugh. On Twitter, BuzzFeed senior culture correspondent Anne Helen Petersen made that connection explicit by pairing Sandmann’s photo with one of Justice Kavanaugh’s smiling face and called their expressions “the look of white patriarchy.” Ebony Elizabeth Thomas, a University of Pennsylvania associate professor in education, tweeted that Sandmann represents “the smiling face of whiteness.” So “Smiling While White” is now essentially a hate crime. In fact, Smiling While White is not even considered a smile; it’s a “smirk,” and smirking is now seen as something only whites do. Has no one ever seen Barack Obama’s face?

    Last month Democrat Senators Kamala Harris and Mazie Hirono grilled Trump judicial nominee Brian Buescher over his membership in the Catholic fraternal organization, the Knights of Columbus. Both hard-left Senators referred to the KoC’s “extreme positions” and Harris complained that it was an “all-male” institution – because any Christian-based institution that is all-male must be a hotbed of rapey patriarchs. Last week, Dan Levin, a reporter from the New York Times, went on Twitter with the hashtag “ExposeChristianSchools” digging for dirt on Christian educators. The day after his confrontation with Covington Catholic students, Nathan Phillips and his drum-and-chant ensemble, who demand reparations from the Catholic Church for indigenous peoples, tried to disrupt a Mass at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington D.C.

    What all this comes down to is identity politics, the Marxist-inspired ideology of divide-and-conquer. It shrewdly posits that the dynamics of Western society can be reduced simply to the conflict between oppressor and oppressed, and thus the most effective way to resist and ultimately overcome the oppressor is to define and categorize people not by their individual character but collectively by the immutabilities of race and sex. In America as well as elsewhere in the Western world, the oppressor is seen as the Christian white male, and all other identities belong to one or more categories of the oppressed. The end game is not unity of the body politic, not e pluribus unum, but the overthrow of the oppressor.

    In this worldview, if you are, say, black, then you are defined as an oppressed class regardless of what you think and believe, regardless of your economic stratum, regardless of your life experience. If you are a black who resents being lumped in with other blacks simply because of your skin color, and you resist the expectation to consider yourself a victim of white supremacy, then in the view of identity politics you aren’t really black. You are ostracized as a race traitor. Likewise for members of other designated victim groups.

    But for all the left’s obsession with victims, the demographic facing far-and-away the most open bigotry today is the oppressor class, white Christian men. Nowhere is this more evident than in the indoctrination mills of our universities, where entire Women’s Studies and Ethnic Studies departments extol the righteous victimhood of the oppressed classes, alongside proliferating programs on “deconstructing whiteness” and “toxic masculinity.” In response to the Covington controversy, Kevin Allred, a white man and purported educator who teaches a course in “Politicizing Beyoncé,” tweeted that “white people really are terrorists. whiteness is terrorism.” Substitute "blackness," "Jewishness," or "Muslims" for "white people" in that tweet and there would be a flood of hate speech accusations and a Twitter ban. But because the left has made it culturally acceptable to spew hatred at whites, Allred will face no consequences. Whites who object to this are dismissed by the left as whining snowflakes – proving the point that blatant bigotry against them is acceptable.

    None of this is new. Western civilization and the Christian white males with whom it is identified have been targeted increasingly for decades in the name of diversity and multiculturalism (recall Rev. Jesse Jackson in the 1980s leading Stanford protesters in the chant, “Hey ho, hey ho, Western Civ has got to go”?). As far back as twenty years ago, David Horowitz published a collection of essays called Hating Whitey about this dangerous phenomenon and its “growth industry” of anti-white activists and academics. Getting from hating whitey to literally exterminating whitey may be a bridge too far, but dismantling the purported white power structure by dehumanizing white males, inculcating a deep sense of guilt and self-hatred in them, and squeezing them out of positions of authority and influence is manageable and already underway.

    Especially with the onset of Trump Derangement Syndrome, the left has ramped up this offensive against the Christian white male “oppressors” such as 16-year-old Nicholas Sandmann who stand in the way of their “inclusive” Marxist utopia. And like Sandmann, we must stand our ground.

  3. #703
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    24,319
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 60 Times in 59 Posts

    Default Re: Will America Break Up?


  4. #704
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    20,881
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 60 Times in 55 Posts

    Default Re: Will America Break Up?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Ruck View Post



    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.
    We won’t have to fight you."
    We’ll so weaken your economy until you’ll fall like overripe fruit into our hands."




    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    Fitting this lib-tard is on 'Russia Today'.

    He said "A lot of people think I'm an idiot" @7:30 mark...yeah, one of the 'USEFUL IDIOTS'!

    This guy is part of the Cloward and Piven infestation out to destroy America, a Russian strategy planned years ago to take down the West.


    Nikita Khruschev while visiting the United States in 1956 said to Vice President Nixon that his grandchildren would live under communism.

    Two months later while Nikita Khrushchev visited the United States he told U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ezra Taft Benson:

    Quote:
    “You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism. We won’t have to fight you. We’ll so weaken your economy until you’ll fall like overripe fruit into our hands .”
    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    Ezra Taft Benson-Warning



    This is a excerpt from a talk given at BYU in 1966 entitled "Our Immediate Responsibility" by former U.S Secretary of Agriculture, Ezra Taft Benson for eight years under President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

    Benson believed that a communist/socialist conspiracy was working within our country to subtly drive us, like cattle, into communism...



    Who said 'The US will fall without a shot being fired'?

    This quote is taken from a speech Nikita Khrushchev made before the U.N. in the early years of the Cold War. "America will fall without a shot being fired. It will fall from within."
    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    This falls into place, after Joseph Stalin became frustrated after FDR and the Progressives lost their hold on the Executive Branch. Nikita Khrushchev had to change the Soviet Strategy to take down the west, to 'Grind America Down' you have to erode it's strengths from within, the very pillars that made it great.

    The Communist Takeover of America: 45 Declared Goals



    Vice President Nixon and Soviet P Minister Nikita Kruschev, 1959
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Ruck View Post
    In light of the events in Ferguson and other cities, this video was brought to my attention.

    It is an hour and fifteen minutes long so be prepared to allot that time.

    Here's the description on the video:

    It is very worth the watch.



    Quote Originally Posted by Ryan Ruck View Post
    Building on the original posting of this video with what has happened in South Carolina, fast forward to 31:22...
    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    Five stages of Urban Guerrilla Warfare - 2016 Edition: A Two Front Assault on America


    In light of the recent Black Lives Matter turmoil, a repost seems appropriate.

    Originally published June 21, 2016.


    PZ Comments: The history of urban guerrilla conflict informs understanding of contemporary American political discourse and protest, which is exclusively done in urban areas as seen on your nightly news. Our founder and intrepid staff writer/researcher YTZ unearthed a RAND report by terrorism and security expert Brian Michael Jenkins from the dusty recesses of 1971 to highlight elements of this dynamic.



    To refresh your memory or to give context to those younger, in 1971 gas cost 40 cents a gallon, postage was 8 cents per stamp, the NASDAQ appeared and fresh turkey was 43 cents a pound.

    Vietnam was winding down, Apollo 14 made the 3rd moon landing, Nixon was President, the Weather Underground led by Bill Ayers (of Obama buddy fame) bombs the U.S. Capitol Building and the legal decision Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education establishes the failed federally mandated public policy of “busing”.



    Link to Jenkins' Full 1971 Rand Report (pdf)

    Into this volatile domestic political mix, Americans experienced riots, mass protests, the publishing of “The Pentagon Papers” and numerous signs that the American age was changing direction under the leadership of Richard Nixon. Interestingly, the reclusive RAND think tank issued this paper into that environment. Tellingly, it elucidated upon the failures of the Maoist rural rebellions and shone a light upon the emerging focus of guerrillas into the cities.

    What was forecast back then has become solid reality today – the Islamist massacres in Paris and Orlando, 2016 Marxist political mob riots in San Jose and Chicago and the urban core violence perpetrated by ethno-militias acting as the armed wing of the Progressives who now control the Democratic Party.


    Watch: Ferguson 2014: Stepfather of deceased Michael Brown exhorts the mob to "burn this bitch down"


    The upcoming convention of Republicans in Cleveland this summer likely will show this phenomenon in 1080i HD to a rapt audience. That the forces for such can assemble, perform actions on the objective and disperse with full media coverage should indicate to all but the densest that it is a coordinated, well funded effort at political intimidation.

    What characteristics do modern American political/guerrilla entities exhibit? How will you know them to recognize what is happening? YTZ has distilled the source document in her inimitable fashion to its essence, a politico-military bullion cube for some strong thought on your part. Let it steep and infuse your mind with the flavor of the times. Without further delay, for your review and consideration, here is YTZ's summation and contemporary spin on Jenkin's hypothesis:

    YTZ notes: I had found an old RAND report that according the footnotes

    "this paper was written originally for presentation to the working group on Military Operations in Urban Areas of the Military Operations Research Symposium at the Naval Postgrad school, Monterey, California, November 17th, 1970. Subsequently it was requested for use in course work by the United States Army Institute for Military Assistance, Fort Bragg, North Carolina".

    It has been my observation for quite some time now that we are under attack by an urban guerilla insurgency and that it is a two front war - the first is by Collectivists of the Progressive/Fabian flavor who seek to destroy the foundations of private property, free markets and individual liberty to impose their marxist utopia, headed by elite technocrats who know how to make the "best" decisions for everyone enforced in a unilateral, top-down manner. The pointy tip of the spear for this front is Black Lives Matter and Social Justice Warriors. The second front is an attack by Totalarian forces, who seek to weaken/threaten/intimidate the West to bring it under the umbrella of the worldwide Caliphate they are seeking to build. The shock troops for this front are Islamic jihadists and refugees funded by the Saudis and exported worldwide. The two groups for the moment are allies for the moment as a free and open West is their common enemy. Jenkins' paper lays out a foundation for action that both Progressives and Islamists within the West, and in particular, the US, are exploiting and "community organizing" around.




    Stage 1: Violent Propaganda Stage

    Publicity for the guerrillas is the key objective of the first stage.

    “The World is watching”. Consider that almost all guerrilla operations are really “armed propaganda” for mass consumption to convince a population to accept the "new consensus". Public relations "experts" and their handmaidens in the media craft a "narrative" that they relentlessly project through all channels of mass media. As a contemporary update, look at the "narrative" myth created by Ryan Julison that Trayvon Martin was an innocent, unarmed child ruthlessly gunned down by a white vigilante and to this day has resonance as "truth" in many communities. Everyone has a personal electronic device at this point and any event can make it onto the “news”.



    Targets are chosen for maximum propaganda effect. Most are symbolic of perceived "economic exploitation" or "oppression" (World Trade Center in '93 and on 9/11) and some meet other objectives for funding, resources, etc. In Latin America, several guerilla groups conducted bank robberies to fund their activities until they co-opted university students and gained access to student funds that were redirected to the "cause". Compare and contrast this with the recent Black Lives Matter occupation of university campuses, and their ever-escalating demands, usually centered around funding of "black only" faculty, support staff and "scholarships".

    Breitbart: 25 Nutty Demands from Black Lives Matter


    "We demand several black financial advisors whose sole purpose is to find and distribute scholarships and financial aid to and for black students specifically"



    I would post that the Black Grievance Industry is well past this checkpoint.

    I would further postulate that the Saudi financed Islamic hijra movement has reached this milestone as well, with the high resale propaganda value of the 9-11 attacks, as well as the Ft Hood massacre and other attacks on US soil designed to signal their presence and intent to "fundamentally transform" America and fold it into the arms of the worldwide caliphate they are attempting to build.

    Stage 2: Organizational Growth Stage


    Propaganda and delegitimization of the government or culture remains a key priority. The “Government” has taken it on as a mission to auto-delegitimize under the guidance of radicals, leftists and fellow travellers deeply embedded in the infrastructure of the current Regime and each day brings a fresh outrage to average citizens at a criminal and corrupt Administration that is out of control, out of touch and untethered to any chains that may have tied it to the precepts of the Constitution. "Sanctuary cities" are another example of Fabian propaganda and delegitimization at work.

    Misdirection and forcing of resource allocation. Section 8 and the new HUD/DOJ diktats mandated "disadvantaged" groups be resettled into successful, stable majority white communities is one modern disruptor that is a 2016 spin on an old doctrine. Another contemporary example is the “1.9 Billon for Zika” and "Green Jobs" funding (Solyndra et al) ... pray tell, to do what with? Any emotionally tugging news story that is answered by vague Federal and State programs that cost Billions, with no elucidated realistic plan of action and milestones is, to put it bluntly, a mass extortion and graft scheme that enables selected groups and individuals to launder vast sums in a massive wealth redistribution scheme and further fund the American downfall.

    Make conditions intolerable in order to precipitate a coup by disaffected elements within the government. The purging of white, Christian heteronormative male career military especially within the intelligence and operations/combat arms elements and their replacement with ideologically pure “affirmative action” but not necessarily competent selections echoes the strategies of Leftist Latin American guerrillas. As an example of how the existing organizational structure of the military is exploited to conduct the actual takedown of the existing structure, Jenkins outlines in 1944 young Army officers worked directly with student groups to coordinate street demonstrations, sit-ins and occupation of radio stations and other key targets as a joint covert operation to overthrow the government by the military. The emplacement of loyal unquestioning partisans within the structure of the military, and specifically, intelligence and operations communities, is not by accident. Remember, unlike Latin guerillas, modern Fabians advance their agenda incrementally and with great patience. There is a reason the "turtle" is the unofficial symbol of the Fabian socialist ideology.



    Violence is also deployed as a means of coercing the government (or culture) into refraining from or emplacing policies and procedures, such as gun control, banning conceal carry rights, ending "Stop and Frisk" street searches, etc. Contemporary examples in Ferguson, Baltimore and other vibrant locales illustrate this exact point. The most recent example is the complaint of a co-worker of jihadist Omar Mateen that although complaints about him were lodged with HR, the company did nothing "because he was muslim". The rush to (over)charge in recent political trials (George Zimmerman, Baltimore PD) is deliberate in order to provoke riots, inflame already aggrieved minority communities and to disrupt the normal judicial process as well as delegitimize it. Heavy handed DOJ "civil rights investigations" compel local police departments to sign "Consent Decrees" making equal application of statutes untenable. The end to New York City's successful "Stop and Frisk" policy has caused gun violence to soar in the city.



    In this stage, to grow the organization, the guerrillas need access to money and weapons. This is interesting, as American small arms sales have increased year on year since Obama ascended into office. America is now flooded with arms, some of which are redirected by the Obama regime to arm their proxies (Mexican drug trafficking organizations, Islamic terrorists and urban thugs. See example of Fast and Furious BATFE arms smuggling and trafficking operation).

    This also explains the new emphasis on occupying university campuses with demands for funding for "blacktivist" services and students, which will be used as a giant slushfund for street operations of the wider campaign. The fact that student activity fees are mandatory and generated mainly from "white, privileged" students makes the confiscation and redirection even sweeter in the eyes of the guerillas - an updated racial Robin Hood scenario.

    In my view, the Black Grievance Industry has passed these milestones successfully.

    Reports that the Islamists have been smuggling and stashing weapons into both Europe and the US should give any rational person pause, once it is placed into the bigger picture/timeline. Mosques are used as indoctrination centers, weapons caches, logistics nodes and sources of funding for operations. They also insert agents into front line positions at airports for intelligence gathering.



    Stage Three: The Guerrilla Offensive

    Real, rather than symbolic targets become the objective. When Police Departments and other “control” points such as National Guard Armories start getting attacked, you know that you are in this phase. This has already happened in Ferguson, Missouri in a limited fashion.



    Armed assaults grow in frequency and intensity. Note the demographics of who is assaulting whom and that the absence of racial category information in mainstream news indicates that the perpetrators are not of a group that helps the progressive cause or advances the narrative. This is so common in the current year that it almost does not bear mentioning. That armed attacks happen notably in very restrictive zones for firearms hints that the real purpose of “gun free zones” and restrictive firearms legislation is paradoxically TO PROVIDE UNARMED VICTIMS that will drive fascist control efforts.

    *Update: As we were finishing this up to post, an Islamic jihadist attacked a prominent and popular "gun free zone" gay nightclub in Orlando, FL. The Mayor was quick to declare a "state of emergency" which fits with the template to force the state into over reaction and creation of discomfort for the innocent residents of the area attacked.


    Read: 50 Dead in Orlando, State of Emergency Declared



    Police and other security forces withdraw into garrisons, allowing the guerrillas to control the streets and begin to construct a shadow government-in-waiting.



    Controlling the narrative and communicating the guerrillas' long term aims to the masses becomes the main focus of propaganda. This happens DAILY in contemporary America by a fawning, collaborationist press.
    50 people are reported killed in the #PulseNightclub attack, making it the deadliest gun violence incident in US history.

    — Newsweek (@Newsweek) June 12, 2016

    Arms are stashed in anticipation of an armed uprising. Complementary to the guerillas' actions, middle class America is arming itself at a rate that boggles the uninformed mind but is perfectly logical in light of decades of progressive programs to dispose and disenfranchise them - a not irrational reaction to the insane policy choices made by our current radical Marxist, Islamic leadership. To paraphrase Bill Ayers, you don't need a weather forecast to tell which way the wind is blowing.

    Stage Four: Mobilization of the Masses

    Provoking repression becomes a key objective in order to generate mass support and momentum. This is also part of the aforementioned auto-delegitimization.

    They must force the government (or culture) to act as oppressor to convince others of the righteousness of their cause and that the government is no longer an ally but an enemy. This is the forcing of a Fort Sumter moment upon the people, who will be strongly encouraged to grant moral superiority to the guerrilla cause and all its minions. Think on this point with every “police brutality” incident or “dindu nuffins gets shot in da hood” news item.



    The judicial system is a core target. If documents can be destroyed, witnesses intimidated, evidence tampered with etc then the government is forced into extraordinary measures to carry out justice, giving rise to claims of repression, corruption, illegitimacy etc. Also consider the role of racial Balkanization within the Judiciary, particularly relevant to the current Judge Curiel/Donald Trump brouhaha. With radicalized, activist judges embedded within the structure, biased judgments to achieve political ends are ever more common.

    Continued violence directed at police to induce them to become “trigger happy” allow the guerrillas to claim that the police unilaterally brutalize the population without cause and goad the government into punitive measures such as curfews, which inflame the larger resident populations inconvenienced by such decisions. In Obamerica this has resulted in a rising toll of Police duty deaths as urban enclaves and whole cities relaxed any policy of policing deemed “racist” by the political charlatans that activate the guerrilla forces and other radical agitators.



    The guerrillas may launch waves of terror against their opposition and pin it on the governments internal security forces. This is a standard operating procedure in the Third World and is called a “false flag”. It also happens among allies and Western nation states. One need look no further than the “Years of Lead” in Italy perpetrated by Operation GLADIO operatives, and one may even suspect it in the FLQ Crisis (kidnap/murder of Pierre LaPorte).

    General strikes are called so that unoccupied workers may be converted into street fighters. Long term deliberate and systemic unemployment achieves the same ends. Consider that America's labor involvement of working age people shows 100 Million or so people who could work as out of the labor force, supplying a vast manpower pool as the guerrilla forces will require. A simple look at official vs actual unemployment illustrates the point that Americans are now the primary psychological operations target of their own “government”. Idle hands are the Devil's plaything.



    Riots occur with increasing frequency as a means of misdirection and to provide cover for the guerrillas so that they can carry out other operations, such as assassinations and armed assaults. The goal of riots is also to provoke the government into over reaction and taking heavy handed measures that affect the population at large, triggering discontent and anger. Paid agitators are deployed, and barricades are constructed so that the guerrilla forces can direct the mob and deny the government easy access to their own lines of supply. This template was carried out during the ongoing “Ferguson” manufactured unrest. Ponder when “riot” came to be something you were no longer surprised by. Note the year of your observation.




    Widespread riots quickly wear out the police, allowing the guerrillas greater freedom of action and movement. The police may even be driven out of entire areas of the city, ceding control to the guerrillas. The better organized guerrillas will move among the mob, further inflaming them and directing them to specific targets. Rioting is by nature "directionless" and requires intervention by guerrilla forces to keep them motivated and on target. That professional agitators are at work in contemporary riots is undeniable. Local governments act as professional agitators in their own communities for personal political aggrandizement at no cost to themselves- witness the shameful display of civic leaders in Baltimore in the wake of the Freddy Gray riots. Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake and her “space to destroy” ideology doomed the city.

    Even more recently, there was the shameful coordination of the Mayor of San Jose and the police forces to redirect Trump rally goers INTO the center of the mob.

    Stage Five: Full on Armed Urban Uprising

    The masses are armed. The guerrillas are in control of the media to give directions to dissidents, and in control of the Narrative. The guerrillas occupy or destroy key government facilities. The objective is take over of the government, with a shadow government already staffed and in place.



    Note before the final stage - full armed uprising and overthrow - that the shadow government already is in place. Let that sink in. The unhelpful bureaucrat at the DMV, the guidance counselor in your child's school, the Human Resources director at your firm. As the last vestiges of civilization retire or are forced to resign, those sympathetic to the guerillas will be free to overtly engage in what they up until recently had to accomplish on the down-low.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  5. #705
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    20,881
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 60 Times in 55 Posts

    Default Re: Will America Break Up?

    Members Of An Antifa “Gun Club” Are Fishing For Death With This Fake Gun Stunt







    In March of 2017, Free Market Shooter exposed the “Phoenix John Brown Gun Club”, which, according to many observers showed anti-Trump “counter protesters” showing up to a pro-Trump rally in Phoenix, Arizona openly carrying what appeared to be fake firearms:

    The only reference to firearms training was in their “events” page, which had an event that took place on March 5th, titled “Introduction to Tactical Firearms”. It had 46 guests. There were no upcoming events, and the prior four events had absolutely nothing to do with firearms.
    Not much of a “gun club” at all, is it? Would you really be surprised to find out that many of their members didn’t even carry real firearms to an “open carry” demonstration against a Trump rally?

    The group has appeared to respond to criticisms of “LARPing” with fake guns by releasing a YouTube video entitled “Phoenix John Brown Gun Club – Range Day”. But this video ends up exposing not only the group’s laughable lack of experience with firearms, it all but confirms the (even more difficult to deny) accusation that their “open carry” demonstration did include several fake firearms.
    The video (still up on YouTube when this article was published) is below:




    The shooting “range” in question during this video appears to be a spot in the desert. The “range” is littered with trash, as it appears PJBGC doesn’t bother to pick up after themselves. With a maximum distance of about 50 meters, most shooting takes place at what appears to be about 50 feet, if that… including the rifle “shootout” segments of the video.

    Bear in mind, the US Army Field Manual on marksmanship indicates that the weapon is zeroed (sighted) at 25 meters, with qualified training taking place at 50 meters or further, and a maximum scored distance of 300 meters. Then again, even at the shorter distances, PJBGC doesn’t even seem particularly concerned with zeroing their weapons at all.

    This is evident in their “shootout” starting at 2:09. I counted a number of shots completely missing the targets, at a distance that was no greater than 25 meters, most likely much closer than that. Bear in mind what the US Army Manual states on 25-meter “zeroing”:

    After completing Phases I and II, the Soldier conducts a firing event (Table 7-29) to zero or confirm the zero on his weapon and reinforce the fundamentals of marksmanship. This firing event will be conducted on a 25-meter range. If the Soldier cannot zero within 18 rounds, the trainer recommends retraining, retesting, or possible removal from the course. After the weapon is zeroed, any additional rounds will be fired and the coach will observe the Soldier for deficiencies in his marksmanship fundamentals.



    But don’t worry, certainly the PJBGC has other marksmanship qualifiers outside of the US Army Manual, right?

    Take a closer look at two of the people who participated in said “shootout”:



    The one on the left appears at many points throughout the video, including a bayonet “intimidation” charge which will be discussed later. He appears to be the same man who appeared in the above photos from the March rally in a blue shirt, and can be seen wearing what appear to be the same pants, shoes, bandana and accessory pouch at the PJBGC “Range Day” as he did in March, only with a white shirt this time.

    What’s different about him this time besides the shirt? The firearm, of course… because at no point in the video does any “drum” magazine appear to be used at all, by anyone. In fact, the “blue shirt” man in question from the top “counter protest” photo (on the left) appears to be using the wooden SKS-style rifle carried by the guy on the right of the first photo throughout the entire “Range Day” video.

    As for the one circled on the right? She is seen firing an AK-style rifle during the video, and when her rifle appears to jam, she appears to not only perform several “dry” trigger pulls, she also appears to have no idea how to clear the jam. Which is hardly surprising, as she is seen later in the video at 4:21 firing a completely different rifle, under supervision of a man in camo gear, who appears to supervise nearly all of the “Range Day” participants.


    Yes, the SKS appears to be the one of the only real rifles from the entire group that appeared in the March photos above, as the others made no appearance whatsoever at the PJBGC “Range Day”. The only other exception is the large scoped AR-derivative rifle (note the ultra-lite stock) which would likely be designed for ideal use at 100+meters… being fired at a distance at no more than 10 meters. It appears to be fired by the dreadlocked red bandana girl from the above photos which also appears to be the rifle she she toted in March, at 1:08:



    Notice: not only does she need to fire said rifle with supervision from the man in camo overlooking; just seconds earlier, the same exact rifle with the low-profile stock in question was seen being carried by another participant at the “arming table”, while she was standing right next to the person



    …and the rifle in question is later seen appearing to be fired by the above girl in red stripes during the other “shootout” at 5:14. If this is indeed a real rifle, it is almost certainly not owned by the woman who toted it at the open carry “counter protest”, even if the owner let her fire off a few rounds for appearance’s sake.

    In fact, with the exception of the aforementioned SKS, and the scoped AR with the low-profile stock, none of the other weapons pictured at the “counter protest” appear anywhere in the “Range Day” video. While there are clearly many real rifles sprinkled into the group, three out of four of the “fake ones” in the second photo of the “counter protest” have all but confirmed to be fake after all, including the one carried in March by Mr. Bayonet Charge…



    …who is the aforementioned “white shirt” guy who toted a fake gun at March’s “counter protest”, this time executing a “bayonet charge” on a thoroughly shot-up “Pepe the Frog” target with the SKS he is seen shooting earlier… of course, with supervision:



    Do not take this the wrong way – there is absolutely nothing wrong with first-time and/or beginner shooters learning how to both handle firearms and the proper fundamentals of marksmanship. In fact, you’ll notice most shooters welcome first-timers to shooting ranges, and teach them how to handle firearms properly and safely… which appears to be the one thing PJBGC gets right – safe usage of firearms under controlled conditions. The more people who understand safe operation of firearms, the better off we all are.


    Still, it was clearly far too easy to expose the inexperience and overall lack of firearms proficiency this “gun club” chooses to assign to itself, all while shooting a video intended to intimidate its adversaries. These are clearly beginners, with a glaring lack of general marksmanship skills, masquerading as a trained combat-ready group, openly carrying firearms in an attempt to show pro-Trump supporters just how tough they are… or in this case, aren’t.

    Take note, PJBGC… real “gun guys” are not fooled. It is rather easy to see how capable (or incapable) you are with a firearm after watching your “intimidation video”. You can strap up and act tough, but you better be careful if you plan on making yourself a target… when the bullets start flying, that firearm you’re toting isn’t going to do you much good (beyond putting a big bulls-eye on your back) if you can’t fire it accurately. Of course, that all assumes the gun is even real in the first place, and not one of the fake ones exposed being carried in March.

    But, good luck trying to explain that to PJBGC… in spite of the negative response they’ve received to this video, it is rather difficult for you to explain that to them – they made sure to disable comments for the video.






    https://www.theburningplatform.com/2...ake-gun-stunt/



    Antifa “Gun Club” Responds To Fake Gun Critics With Laughable “Range Day” Intimidation Video

    The group has appeared to respond to criticisms of “LARPing” with fake guns by releasing a YouTube video entitled “Phoenix John Brown Gun Club – Range Day”. But this video ends up exposing not only the group’s laughable lack of experience with firearms, it all but confirms the (even more difficult to deny) accusation that their “open carry” demonstration did include several fake firearms.

    The video (still up on YouTube when this article was published) is below:



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CywFbSdMVx0

    It was clearly far too easy to expose the inexperience and overall lack of firearms proficiency this “gun club” chooses to assign to itself, all while shooting a video intended to intimidate its adversaries. These are clearly beginners, with a glaring lack of general marksmanship skills, masquerading as a trained combat-ready group, openly carrying firearms in an attempt to show pro-Trump supporters just how tough they are… or in this case, aren’t.

    Take note, PJBGC… real “gun guys” are not fooled. It is rather easy to see how capable (or incapable) you are with a firearm after watching your “intimidation video”. You can strap up and act tough, but you better be careful if you plan on making yourself a target… when the bullets start flying, that firearm you’re toting isn’t going to do you much good (beyond putting a big bulls-eye on your back) if you can’t fire it accurately. Of course, that all assumes the gun is even real in the first place, and not one of the fake ones exposed being carried in March

    http://fmshooter.com/antifa-gun-club...idation-video/

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  6. #706
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    24,319
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 60 Times in 59 Posts

    Default Re: Will America Break Up?

    I love seeing these Commies with their guns!

    Now,


  7. #707
    Postman vector7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Where it's quiet, peaceful and everyone owns guns
    Posts
    20,881
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 60 Times in 55 Posts

    Default Re: Will America Break Up?

    The Young Turks' Hasan Piker: Redistribution of Wealth Is Coming, "By Policy Or By Pitchforks"

    Posted By Ian Schwartz
    On Date February 7, 2019



    'The Young Turks' commentator Hasan Piker explains why 'billionaire' is a dirty word and warned that a more equitable redistribution of wealth is coming, "by policy or by pitchforks."
    HASAN PIKER, THE YOUNG TURKS: Technological advances have rendered globalism an unstoppable force so we have to adapt to it. One immediate way of doing that is through drastic wealth redistribution and that starts with banning billionaires. Part of the point of having a society, of having government is to "promote the general welfare." Welfare -- it's literally right there in the preamble in the Constitution.

    Yet for some reason, we've been propagandized into believing that the purpose of the government is to clear the path for individuals to acquire and hoard ungodly amounts of wealth, regardless of the consequences to the rest of us or the health of the society as a whole. And now people all around the world are waking up. They are coming to the realization that this is no way to run a society and perhaps that's why 'billionaire' is becoming a bad word.

    Look, this may scare you. But a more equitable distribution of wealth is coming, whether it is by policy or by pitchforks. So it's up to you guys. Which one is it going to be?
    Last edited by vector7; February 8th, 2019 at 00:13.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
    "Your grandchildren will live under communism."
    “You Americans are so gullible.
    No, you won’t accept
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    ."
    We’ll so weaken your
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    until you’ll
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    like overripe fruit into our hands."



  8. #708
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    24,319
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 60 Times in 59 Posts

    Default Re: Will America Break Up?

    This just came across my Facebook feed. Not sure how I missed it in September since I try to keep an eye on TTAG.

    The Violent Left Says They Want a Civil War: Antifa Forming A ‘Red Army’

    September 1, 2018

    A year ago, I wrote about the left’s civil war heating up in America. Since then, Antifa and company continue their armed marches against freedom and liberty. Initially, Antifa groups got away scot-free, beating Trump supporters bloody while, of course, calling them fascists and Nazis. More recently though, Antifa’s masked thugs have been the ones suffering the thumpings in direct confrontations.

    In response, radicals have ramped up their efforts to form what they’re calling a “Red Army.” Why? To “annihilate” their enemies, of course.

    Really. From one of the Red Guards Austin manifestos, posted August 19th and still online:

    Oppose the Counterfeit! Antifascism Must Take On a Paramilitary Character!

    …The fact that no fascists were harmed in the making of this “counter-protest” only proves that the main organizers have no stomach for antifascism—for us antifascism is concrete—it does not mean simply voicing a disagreement it means stopping fascists in their tracks and hurting their efforts to the point where they stop organizing.

    …On the basis of our principled united front work, fascists and their collaborators can be drowned out, run out, routed, beaten bloody, and even annihilated. These are our principles and we aim to hold them to the very finish.

    The twisted minds of these radical leftists view their unlawful, unprovoked violence against their political enemies as self-defense. In reality, their “self-defense” looks a whole lot like textbook fascism. In other words, using force and violence to suppress opposing points of view.

    One thing seems perfectly clear. If the authorities do not stop and prosecute this sort of political violence, peace-loving American gun owners will. The will have no choice but to protect themselves, as is their right.

    Looking back to the 2016 elections, the radicals in Antifa and their Black Bloc BFFs freely “drowned out, run out, routed, beaten bloody, and even annihilated” their fellow Americans. Local cops, some ordered to stand down, allowed the political violence to go effectively unchecked.

    Or worse yet, cops in some places acted in concert with the violent left. In San Jose, Ninth Circuit appellate court justices have allowed a lawsuit against the police to proceed. Cops there not only failed to protect Trump supporters at an organized rally, but actually routed them into a mass of violent “counter-protesters.”

    How did these Antifa types get away with this for so long? Sympathetic local government leaders, coupled with Americans’ reluctance to settle political disagreements via violence allowed this to happen.

    It goes without saying that Antifa has no reservations about using violence to achieve their political goals. In fact, these masked thugs who fancy themselves anti-fascists live by Alinski’s Rules for Radicals.

    “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.”
    “Never go outside the expertise of your people.”
    “Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy.
    “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”
    “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
    “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”
    “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”
    “Keep the pressure on.”
    “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
    “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”
    “If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside”
    “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”
    “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

    Particularly when it comes to violence, the left loves Rule #4 by counting on their fellow Americans not to risk possibly breaking the law to defend themselves. The left knows that everyday Americans will avoid resorting to violence, sometimes even when attacked. Since childhood, our society has taught people to eschew, and not embrace violence. And decent, well-adjusted, civilized people do indeed avoid violence.

    Couple the reluctance to fight back with Rule #9, “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself,” this allows bullies to make threats to bully and intimidate others into silence. In other words, using the threat of violence is enough to suppress opposing viewpoints. That’s fascism.

    Antifa never really believed that conservative Americans might actually answer violent attacks…with violence. It’s one thing for bullies to intimidate through force of numbers. It’s another when bullies see and taste their own blood.

    This past summer, the right has organized and successfully pushed back against masked troublemakers. In most cases, it hasn’t gone well for the true fascists. Masked toughs don’t respond well when their intended victims don’t run, but fight back instead. In fact, masked tough guys tend to break and run pretty quickly when faced with violent resistance.

    Take Mr. Masked Antifa, who tried to wield an expandable baton in Oregon earlier this summer. One punch and he was down for the count. Here’s the video.

    In the streets where I live, attacking someone with a baton – with or without a mask – carries the risk of getting shot and taking the room temperature challenge.

    Speaking of Portland: the battle of Portland his summer resulted in a near complete rout for the Black Bloc.

    At another Portland event, an Antifa member’s crash course in kung fu got him knocked out cold. He learned that going hands-on carries risks. Especially when the other person is not intimidated by a group of Black Bloc bullies.

    So faced with these humiliating defeats, the Antifa crowd now apparently is seeking an arms race.

    From that same Red Guards Austin manifesto:

    …we encourage the formation of paramilitary organizations on two levels. The first being those who are mainly unarmed but are prepared and trained to carry out fist fighting or using blunt weapons like axe handles or flagpoles as well as shields and basic armoring. The second level is the more advanced embryo of a Red Army, which is trained militarily and operates as soldiers all the time, engaging in production and mass work among the proletariat and the oppressed nation’s people.

    I know from experience participating in and teaching Appleseed shoots that gun ownership doesn’t make a skilled marksman any more than piano ownership makes a skilled musician. At the same time, we know that bad music won’t kill innocent people.

    Hopefully this is nothing more than fanciful talk from the radical left and will go nowhere. However, they have already demonstrated a willingness to tool-up and to use violence to suppress opposing viewpoints. If and when these “Red Guards” put their two acts together, they may win the first round of bloodshed.

    Shortly thereafter, sanity will prevail and they will learn first-hand what Americans are willing to do to defend their freedom.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •