The Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated both the Clinton and Obama Administrations

[Avvakum]

These people need to be removed in handcuffs and tried for treason.

The irony is that their allies don't trust them either, and if the Islamists win (and they really might-I have no illusions about the matter), these people would be the first to be tortured and executed.

[vector7]

Hillary made a secret deal with Huma Abedin (whose Family co-founded the Muslim Brotherhood) to keep Weiner quiet

By Emily Smith and Ian Mohr

June 25, 2014 | 10:35pm
Modal Trigger


Hillary Clinton (from left) and Huma Abedin plan on keeping Abedin's husband, disgraced Twitter crotchshot enthusiast Anthony Weiner, out of the spotlight. Photo: (Left) AP, (center) David McGlynn, (right) Reuters

MORE ON:

Anthony Weiner

Huma Abedin opts for a chop

Weiner serenades son Jordan with 'Itsy Bitsy Spider'

Weiner: Hillary 'most qualified candidate for president' ever

Anthony Weiner lashes out at broker over apartment hunt

Hillary Clinton has a “secret deal” with her top aide Huma Abedin to keep Abedin’s troublesome husband, Anthony Weiner, out of the spotlight, sources tell Page Six, as the former secretary of state mulls a run for president.

Clinton aides have insisted Weiner “stay out of public life for two years” and that he “avoid causing any further embarrassment to Huma or Clinton,” according to our sources.

The former sexting pol has been noticeably absent at recent public events attended by Abedin, including the Gordon Parks Foundation Awards Dinner in Manhattan earlier this month. Nor has he appeared at the recent plethora of New York galas and awards dinners attended by the Clintons, such as the Wildlife Conservation Society Gala on June 12 and the Carnegie Hall Medal of Excellence Gala on April 24.

While a spokesman for Clinton insists the talk of a deal with Weiner is “1,000 percent absurd,” a well-placed source told us, “He has been put on notice by Clinton aides to keep a low profile and remain out of sight and out of trouble.”

Weiner caused a stir earlier this month when he favorited a tweet that said, “Tinder will now be the ultimate sext machine.” He later tweeted it was an accident: “OK, to recap my day. I accidentally hit the star thingy on a @voxdotcom story about Tinder. Sorry.”

The Democrat’s 2013 mayoral bid collapsed when he repeatedly sexted a woman after resigning from Congress for similar behavior.

While Abedin has been accompanying Hillary on a tour to promote her book “Hard Choices,” Weiner has been making a few hard choices of his own.

He’s kept his social media activity clean and is keeping himself discreetly busy with consulting work, appearing on NY1’s “Inside City Hall” and writing for a few publications about politics.

But he’d better not say, tweet or write anything revealing about Hillary, our source added. His rep didn’t get back to us last night.

FLASHBACK:
July 25, 2012 4:00 AM
Huma Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood Ties

Michele Bachmann has every right to ask questions.

By Andrew C. McCarthy



Huma Abedin

Comments 6
Andrew C. McCarthy

Despite mounting evidence of close ties between the Muslim Brotherhood and Huma Abedin, Secretary of State Clinton’s close aide, Republican congressional leaders — particularly Senator John McCain and House Speaker John Boehner — continue to target their ire not at the State Department but at Representative Michele Bachmann.

Representative Bachmann is one of five House conservatives who have raised concerns about Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of our government. Glenn Beck reported Tuesday that GOP leadership is trying to extort an apology out of Bachmann by threatening to boot her from the House Intelligence Committee if she fails to submit.

That got me to wondering: Any chance Speaker Boehner might take just a couple of minutes out of his busy jihad against Bachmann to focus on how the State Department — during Ms. Abedin’s tenure — has cozied up to Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief sharia jurist?

Sheikh Qaradawi is a promoter of jihadist terror. His fatwas endorse terrorist attacks against American personnel in Iraq as well as suicide bombing — by both men and women — against Israel. He is a leading supporter of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch. He also runs an umbrella organization called the Union for Good (sometimes referred to as the “Union of Good”), which is formally designated a terrorist organization under American law. The Union for Good was behind the “Peace Flotilla” that attempted to break our ally Israel’s blockade of the terrorist organization Hamas (the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch) in 2010.

That’s rather interesting — at least to me, though apparently not to Speaker Boehner — because Huma Abedin’s mother, Saleha, who is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s female division (the “Muslim Sisterhood”), is a major figure in not one but two Union for Good components. The first is the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief (IICDR). It is banned in Israel for supporting Hamas under the auspices of the Union for Good.

Then there’s the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC) — an organization that Dr. Saleha Abedin has long headed. Dr. Abedin’s IICWC describes itself as part of the IICDR. And wouldn’t you know it, the IICWC charter was written by none other than . . . Sheikh Qaradawi, in conjunction with several self-proclaimed members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

[vector7]

Companion Threads:

• Top Obama aide invites head of terrorist-linked org to join
• Obama swears in another radical Muslim to Homeland Security Post
• 2nd DHS Domestic Extremism report, guess who they define as a terrorist
• Homeland Security: You’re All ‘Militia Extremists’ Now
• Obama works to release another Muslim terrorist in custody - Omar
• Secret State Police Report: Ron Paul, Bob Barr, C Baldwin,
• White House Quietly Courts Muslims in U.S.

Obama Appoints Terrorist Supporter to Head Up New Counterterrorism Messaging Center



In yet another stunning development in Obama’s plan to turn the war on terror over to the terrorists, he’s ramping up a counter-defense headed up by a terror-tied operative, Rashad Hussain. Over 80 people will staff the newly-empowered center.

It seems Obama is turning the war on terror over to the terrorists.

Rashad Hussain is a hafiz, one who has committed the Quran memory. He currently serves as Obama’s special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. I wrote about Hussain’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood back in 2010 when Obama first appointed him as special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.

Rashad Hussein, White House official and President Obama’s newly appointed Special Envoy to the Organization of Islamic Conference, has a history of participation in events connected with the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood as well as support for Brotherhood causes, once having called prosecution of the U.S. leader of a Palestinian terrorist organization one of many “politically motivated persecutions.” Mr. Hussain’s official biography states:

Rashad Hussain is presently Deputy Associate Counsel to President Obama. His work at the White House focuses on national security, new media, and science and technology issues. Mr. Hussain has also worked with the National Security Staff in pursuing the New Beginning that President Obama outlined in his June 2009 address in Cairo, Egypt. Mr. Hussain previously served as a Trial Attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice. Earlier in his career, Mr. Hussain was a legislative assistant on the House Judiciary Committee, where he focused on national security-related issues. Mr. Hussain received his J.D. from Yale Law School, where he served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. Upon graduation, he served as a Law Clerk to Damon J. Keith on the U.S. Court of Appeals. Mr. Hussain also earned his Master’s degrees in Public Administration (Kennedy School of Government) and Arabic and Islamic Studies from Harvard University. He attended college at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

However, in October 2000 Mr. Hussain spoke at a conference sponsored by the Association of Muslim Social Scientists (AMSS) and the Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University (CMCU). The conference was titled “Islam, Pluralism, and Demoracy and featured many leaders of the global Muslim Brotherhood including former German diplomat Murad Hoffman, and International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) leaders Louay Safi, Jamal Barzinji, Hisham Al-Talib, and AbdulHamid Abusylayman. The AMSS was founded in 1972 as an outgrowth of the Muslim Student Association and has long been associated with the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.

In June 2002, Mr. Hussain was listed as part of a Congressional Staffers panel at the American Muslim Council’s (AMC) 11th annual convention. The AMC was headed at that time headed by Abdurahman Alamoudi, a leader in the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood and currently imprisoned as part of a plot to assassinate the Saudi head of state, Crown Prince Abdullah. Other important leaders of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood such as Jamal Barzinji were also part of the AMC.

While at Yale Law School, Mr. Hussain was listed as part of the organizing committee for an April 2004 conference organized by a student organization known as the Critical Islamic Reflections (CIR) group. Among the CIR sponsors listed on the their web site was IIIT and the Fairfax Institute, the IIIT educational arm. IIIT is an important component of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood and three of the key IIIT/Fairfax leaders Jamal Barzinji, Hisham Al-Talib, and Yaqub Mirza; were also associated with what has been called the SAAR network (Safa Group), a network of Islamic organizations located in Northern Virginia that was raided by the Federal government in March 2002 and which, until at least mid 2007, had been the subject of an ongoing investigation. Also listed as a CIR sponsor was ALIM, most likely referring to the American Learning Institute for Muslims and whose list of instructors includes some of the most important leaders of the U.S./global Muslim Brotherhood including Tariq Ramadan, Jamal Badawi, and Taha Al-Alwani.

In September 2004, while still a Yale law student, Mr. Hussain participated in a session at the annual conference of the Muslim Student’s Association (MSA) of the U.S. and Canada. The MSA has long been associated with the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood and at the session, Mr. Hussain appeared along side the daughter of Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Sami Al-Arian and labeled Al-Arian’s prosecution “politically motivated persecution.” According to an archived notice in the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs:

A session on civil rights called “Get up, Stand up; Stand up for your Rights: The State of Contemporary Civil Liberties” was held Sept. 5 at the annual conference for the Muslim Students Association of the United States and Canada, held alongside the Islamic Society of North America’s 41st annual convention in Chicago. Laila Al-Arian, daughter of civil and political rights activist and Muslim leader Sami Al-Arian, opened the session with her father’s story.

She gave a heart-wrenching, emotional account of an innocent man targeted for free-speech activities, whose rights were stripped thanks in part to the PATRIOT Act. Al-Arian, who has not yet been to trial, has been held in a federal penitentiary for over a year and a half. Al-Arian’s situation is one of many “politically motivated persecutions,” claimed Rashad Hussain, a Yale law student. Such persecution, he stated, must be fought through hope, faith, and the Muslim vote.

(It should be noted that in the latest version of the above report, the two sentences pertaining to Mr. Hussain have been removed, sometime after October 2007 according to the Internet Archive.)

In 2013 an Egyptian magazine reported about Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the Obama administration at the highest level. They wrote of Rashad Hussain that he “maintained close ties with people and groups that [the magazine] says comprise the Muslim Brotherhood network in America.”

“Obama Appoints Terrorist Supporter to Head Up Counterterrorism Messaging,” February 18, 2015 by Daniel Greenfield, FPM



Nothing to see here. Just lots of lectures on how we can best fight Islamic terrorism by covering up its Islamic basis. The arsonists are in charge of training firemen to fight fires.

The Obama administration is revamping its efforts to combat Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) propaganda. ISIS and its supporters produce “as many as 90,000 tweets and other social media responses every day,” reports The New York Times.

We’ll tweet against them on the beaches. We’ll curate content against them on the landing grounds.

The Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications, a component of the U.S. State Department, will spearhead the new campaign to fight the ISIS propaganda machine.

Rashad Hussain will replace Alberto Fernandez, the center’s director, according to The Times.

So a terrorist supporter will head up our counterterrorism messaging.

Why not just turn over the whole operation officially to the Muslim Brotherhood. Then the groups of Jihadists can debate each other on Twitter and we won’t have to pay for it. Or become corrupted by their messaging.

- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/02/obam....mEzrvsmp.dpuf

[vector7]

The Betrayal Papers, Part IV of V: A New Genocide

Part I of The Betrayal Papers explained the history and context of the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence in the American government.

Part II looked at the associations of seven Obama officials with Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in the United States.

Part III traced the Muslim Brotherhood’s and the State of Qatar’s influence on domestic policy and Obama administration scandals.

Part IV will examine foreign policy under Obama. It will explain how the Obama administration and U.S. Department of State have used the American military and standing in the world as tools to kick start the creation of a new Islamic Caliphate. Obama’s unconscionable enabling of and silence regarding a new genocide will be revealed. Finally, this article will offer a cursory reassessment of America’s allies, and which countries we have lost as friends.



“The transformation of America has been in the full swing ever since 2008. President Obama’s no-show in Paris was an embarrassment for all Americans. But it also was a signal to the Islamic jihadis. It’s one of the many signals he’s sent over the years while he’s in office. Now there’s no question: We got a hell of a job ahead of us… with the Muslim Brotherhood penetration in every one of our national security agencies, including all our intelligence agencies.”

Admiral James ‘Ace’ Lyons, speaking at the Center for Security Policy

Is Obama a Muslim?

This is the question that many Americans and people around the globe are asking themselves lately. From his refusal to label the Islamic State “Islamic,” to his lecture about the Crusades at the National Prayer breakfast, what once was taboo is now starting to be verbalized.

Yet this may be the slightly wrong question to ask. The ruling establishment of Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s holiest sites, Mecca and Medina, is rightly considered an authoritative voice of Islam. In case you missed it, the Saudis have emerged as some of Obama’s biggest critics.

In doing so, the Saudis also revealed the truth regarding the Arab Spring.

Writing in the Saudi daily Al-Jazirah, columnist Dr. Ahmad Al-Faraj, while supporting Israeli’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech before Congress, not only called Obama “one of the worst U.S. presidents;” he also exposed the nature of so-called “democratic revolutions” in the region. Stated al-Faraj:

“Since Obama is the godfather of the prefabricated revolutions in the Arab world, and since he is the ally of political Islam, [which is] the caring mother of [all] the terrorist organizations, and since he is working to sign an agreement with Iran that will come at the expense of the U.S.’s longtime allies in the Gulf, I am very glad of Netanyahu’s firm stance and [his decision] to speak against the nuclear agreement at the American Congress despite the Obama administration’s anger and fury.”

Translation: Obama served as a mouthpiece for, and armed, the Muslim Brotherhood (i.e., “political Islam”) revolutionaries in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, and Syria. He was aided in this incredibly destructive policy of jihad by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton until her resignation in 2013, and has been further aided by her successor, John Kerry.

The original Muslim Brotherhood, the Ikhwan, was banished from Saudi Arabia in 1927. The conservative Wahhabi Saudi royals have traditionally had little use for exporting jihad, and indeed are one of the United States’ oldest strategic allies in the region. Despite Americans’ revulsion at Saudi Arabia’s application of barbaric sharia (i.e., Islamic) law in their own country, outside the Kingdom Saudis have every reason to maintain the status quo with neighbors, including Israel, Jordan, and Egypt. That means keeping the Muslim Brotherhood out of power.

The pertinent question is not whether Obama is secretly a Muslim, per se, but rather if Obama is a secret Muslim Brother. That is the real question.

The Words of Obama, Dalia, and Rashad

If we take the Saudis, the most influential Gulf country, seriously, then it follows that Obama and his administration must have had a plan for the Arab Spring that goes back several years, i.e. 2008.

Part II of The Betrayal Papers identified seven Obama administration officials who had/have associations with several Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in the United States (CAIR, ISNA, MSA, etc.). It also tracked their associations with Georgetown University and the Brookings Institution, both recipients of significant amounts of money from the State of Qatar, the home of many prominent Muslim Brothers.

One of those officials is Rashad Hussain, who is Obama’s Special Envoy to the Organisation of the Islamic Conference. In August 2008, Hussain co-authored a paper for the Brookings Institution called Reformulating the Battle of Ideas: Understanding the Role of Islam in Counterterrorism Policy. The paper, which calls Islam the “strongest ally” in the “global effort to end terrorism,” explicitly calls for the American government not to reject political Islam, but to utilize Islamic scholars and Islamic “policymaking” to reject “terrorism.” It also recommends that “policymakers should reject the use of language that provides a religious legitimization of terrorism such as ‘Islamic terrorism’ and ‘Islamic extremist.’”

Is it any wonder now why Obama says that the Islamic State “is not Islamic?” This is the deceptive language of the Muslim Brotherhood, recently welcomed to the White House.

Let’s now turn our attention at a report co-authored by Dalia Mogahed, who was a member of Obama’s Advisory Council of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships and influential in writing Obama’s nefarious 2009 speech in Cairo. Additionally, Mogahed is currently listed as a member of Georgetown’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, & World Affairs.

Mogahed was part of the Leadership Group on U.S.-Muslim Engagement. Other members of the group were former Secretary of State Madeline Albright, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf (of World Trade Center Mosque notoriety), and Muslim Public Affairs Council’s Ahmed Younis. The report issued by the group called for engagement and cooperation with political Islam, and specifically with the Muslim Brotherhood:

“The U.S. must also consider when and how to talk with political movements that have substantial public support and have renounced violence, but are outlawed or restricted by authoritarian governments allied to the U.S. The Muslim Brotherhood parties in Egypt and Jordan are arguably in this category. In general, the Leadership Group supports engagement with groups that have clearly demonstrated a commitment to nonviolent participation in politics.”

Indications of a plan to work with the Muslim Brotherhood were evident as early as June 2009, when the President went to Cairo’s Al-Azhar University to address the Muslim World. The audience included prominent members of the Muslim Brotherhood that Obama insisted on having seated in the front row. Said Obama, “[The] partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”

With the statements of the Saudi journalist, Hussain, Mogahed, and Obama himself in mind, presented below is a thumbnail sketch of the Arab Spring and its consequences, and the intersection between the Obama administration and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is only a fraction of the evidence that proves Obama has worked hand-in-hand with the Muslim Brotherhood to transform the Middle East.
Tunisia
In Tunisia in 2011, the government of Ben Ali fell after a man self-immolated, sparking a wave of protests. Subsequently, Tunisia elected the Muslim Brotherhood Ennahda party, with a plurality of 37% of the vote. In October 2014, Tunisia elected a secular government.

Libya

Libya exemplifies the essence of the so-called Arab Spring, an anarchic Muslim Brotherhood revolution that thrives on violence and chaos.

In such ungovernable disarray are significant parts of Libya today, that it is actually being used as a staging ground by ISIS for an invasion of Europe.

Despite repeated warnings and advice by the United States military to leave Muammar Gaddafi in power, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Obama launched a disastrous war against the Gaddafi regime, leaving a power vacuum for Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood to fill.

Practically, Libya served as armaments bazaar for the Muslim Brotherhood and all associated terrorist groups. Libyan weapons have ended up in the hands of jihadis across North Africa, potentially contributing to the stockpile of arms of Boko Haram. These weapons were also sent to Syrian rebels, including groups who are now part of ISIS.

Currently, an ongoing proxy war rages in Libya. The anti-Muslim Brotherhood countries of Egypt and the United Arab Emirates battle Qatar and Turkey (close allies of the Obama administration) and the local Islamic terrorists.

Benghazi

Benghazi and all the mystery that surrounds it can mostly be dispelled in a few short paragraphs. A few facts will inform the reader, and then the attack that killed four Americans on September 11, 2012 can be then put in the larger context of a Muslim Brotherhood-guided American agenda.

First, the February 17 Martyrs Brigade, aka Ansar al-Sharia, was hired to guard the compound by the American government. In a word, they are a jihadi militia.
Second, the compound in Benghazi was crawling with CIA agents. According to CNN’s Jake Tapper, there were “dozens” of CIA personnel present the night of the attack, and the Obama administration has gone to “great lengths” to obscure their activities. Many speculate that Ambassador Stevens was a CIA asset in the State Department.

Third, only hours before the attack, Stevens met with a Turkish ambassador at the compound. Turkey, it should be recalled, was a transshipment point for some Libyan weapons that were shipped out of the country to jihadis elsewhere.
Fourth, the Muslim Brotherhood Morsi government of Egypt was involved with the attack. In fact, some of the terrorists were caught on video saying “Don’t shoot! Dr. Morsi sent us!”
These facts beg the question: If Ambassador Stevens was in fact overseeing a gun running operation to Islamic/jihadi/Muslim Brotherhood militias, why would the same people kill him?
Given the above evidence, the prominent theory that Stevens was going to be a trade for the Blind Sheikh, Omar Abdel-Rahman, seems a plausible explanation. (Morsi was dedicated to the release of Rahman.) And this theory is endorsed by no less an authority than retired four star Admiral James Lyons.
Once this plan went spectacularly wrong, a number of other things occurred, which again, fit into the larger picture of a Muslim Brotherhood-control Obama administration.

In an alarming breach of protocol and duty, Obama’s Special Advisor, Valerie Jarrett, issued the order to the military “stand down.” In other words, she ordered that Stevens and the other Americans be left to fend for themselves against a well-armed jihadi militia.

Regarding the now infamous Talking Points scandal involving Susan Rice, et. al., that blamed the attack on obscure and poorly produced movie, an MSA member from George Washington University was copied on the email sent by Ben Rhodes (who, recall, wrote Obama’s 2009 Cairo Speech).

Finally, George Soros is also connected to this scandal. The Obama-appointed lead investigator for the attack was Ambassador Thomas Pickering, who has ties to CAIR, a well-known Muslim Brotherhood front group in the United States. At the time of the investigation, Pickering was the co-chair of the Soros’ International Crisis Group. He is still a trustee.

Egypt

So much has been written about Obama’s decision to force the resignation of Hosni Mubarak, and the subsequent election of Mohamed Morsi to the Egyptian Presidency, that the space here will be used only to reinforce some key and lesser known points.

Mubarak was the lynchpin of regional stability, the president of the most populous Arab country who maintained not only peace but a strong relationship with Israel and the United States.

Mohamed Morsi likely joined the Muslim Brotherhood through the Muslim Students Association in America, while he was a student at University of Southern California.

The wife of Mohamed Morsi was a long-time friend of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

When Morsi came to power and began to implement sharia law, Obama promised the Morsi government $8 billion in exchange for land in the Sinai for Palestinians (Hamas). Once Morsi was removed, following a brief, murderous, and highly destructive reign of power, Obama immediately withheld military aid to Egypt.

Through 2013, the Clinton Foundation received between $1 million and $5 million from Qatar.

It appears likely that close Obama friends, the domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and wife Bernadine Dohrn, played a significant role in fomenting the protests which led to the resignation of Mubarak. Terrorist birds of feather flock together.

In case you were wondering, Obama advisor Dalia Mogahed considered the ouster of Morsi a “coup,” and CAIR and ISNA were likewise critical of the restoration of secular law in Egypt, which no doubt has prevented the slaughter of countless Coptic Christian lives.

Syria, Iraq, and ISIS – A Lost War, a Genocide, and a Rape of Humanity

Say what you will about Bashar al-Assad, he and his father Hafez have always strongly opposed the Muslim Brotherhood. Indeed, Mustafa Setmariam Nasar, aka Abu Musab al-Suri, a lieutenant of Osama bin Laden and architect of the Madrid train bombings, spent most of his life trying to overthrow the Assads and implement sharia law. (Not only is Nasar Syrian, his nom de guerre “Al-Suri” means “the Syrian.”) As late as 2008, none other than Nancy Pelosi was hobnobbing with the secularly minded Assads. John Kerry and his wife Teresa Heinz Kerry also dined with and were entertained lavishly by the Assads in 2009.

What Obama has unleashed in Syria by supporting jihadi rebels is an apocalyptic force of total depravity that specializes in genocide and cultural annihilation. There are few words that do justice to the evil, inhumanity, and unbelievable cruelty that define ISIS and their end-of-times approach to warfare.

Not only do they set people on fire, but they also behead and torture children. Americans are bombarded with these images regularly. Equally as atrocious and appalling, they openly and gleefully destroy everything pre-Islamic. Much like the Buddhas in Afghanistan that the Taliban dynamited, ISIS believes in the Islamic concept of Jahiliyyah, which demands that all traces of civilization before the time of Mohammed the Prophet be erased.

ISIS is literally rampaging across the cradle of civilization, Mesopotamia, laying waste to some of humanity’s oldest faith communities, artifacts, and landmarks. Simultaneous to the modern day Holocaust that is happening to ancient Christian communities in the occupied regions, ISIS trumps even the art-hoarding Nazis in their total disregard for all things that make us human.

In the face of this unspeakable crime against humanity, Obama has not once mentioned the ongoing genocide, much less the irreplaceable loss of culture and tangible history. The airstrikes ordered by Obama and his advisor Valerie Jarret against ISIS have been described as “pin-pricks.” This shows that they are either lackadaisical in the face of the genocide, or more likely do not wish to be bothered. So committed is Obama to America’s defeat in the Middle East that he has appointed the above-mentioned Rashad Hussain, a documented supporter of political Islam, as a social media “warrior” to lead the cyber charge against these subhuman savages.

In time, the enormity of this crime will be examined through a historical lens. A few decades from now people will wonder how the liberty-loving United States elected a hollow, morally insipid man named Barack Hussein Obama, who armed and trained a jihadi army that destroyed our common human heritage and murdered entire tribes by the thousands.

Of great concern, domestically the soulless ISIS is now operational in all 50 states (according to the FBI), and ISIS training camps have been discovered in various states. A not-so-unexpected consequence of Obama’s open borders policy, indeed.

Regarding Iraq, it is no surprise and it is not hyperbole to simply state the obvious: Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood surrendered Iraq to the enemy, willingly and consciously. Into this void steps an emboldened and rejuvenated Iran.

Afghanistan

Much like Iraq, Afghanistan is in the process of being surrendered to the Taliban. Not only has the administration and (Afghan President) Karzai negotiated with the Taliban, they also idly watched as the same terrorists who hosted Osama bin Laden set up an embassy in Doha, Qatar. A national intelligence estimate as early as December 2013 predicted that all progress would be lost once a military drawdown began.

True to form, seven months after this estimate was released Obama swapped one American deserter, Bowe Bergdahl, for five high ranking Taliban commanders released from Guantanamo Bay, and a significant sum of money.

Following Obama’s policies, all the American blood and treasure spent liberating Afghanistan will be sacrificed by Obama, to the absolute benefit of the Muslim Brotherhood.

As a postscript, it will be noted that a primary source of Taliban funding, poppies for opium, have seen record Afghan crop yields in 2013 and 2014.

Nigeria

While #BringBackOurGirls may have been a temporary PR win for the Obama administration, it obscured the fact that the administration has been consistently enabling the growth of the jihadi army of Boko Haram by downplaying them as a threat. As if on cue, last week Boko Haram pledged allegiance (bayah) to the Islamic State.

According to one report that rings true, Boko Haram began with a $3 million grant from Osama bin Laden. One senior U.S. intelligence official stated, regarding the matter, “There were channels between bin Laden and Boko Haram leadership… He gave some strategic direction at times.” This connection evidently does not phase the Obama administration and U.S. Department of State.

As Andrew McCarthy wrote regarding the Clinton State Department’s position on Boko Haram:

“Instead, ignoring what Boko Haram pronounces its goals to be, the Obama administration portrayed it as a diffuse organization with no clear agenda that was ascendant due to the policies of the Nigerian government (which is under Christian leadership).”

Hillary Clinton’s successor at State, John Kerry, sings the same tune, while thousands of Nigerians are massacred. Following air strikes by the Nigerian government, Kerry urged restraint, warning Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan “to respect human rights and not harm civilians.”

Meanwhile, this African scourge has amassed a “massive army” that is reportedly stronger than the Nigerian Army. Defeating Boko Haram will likely take the coordinated efforts of Nigeria and neighboring Cameroon, which has close ties to a very sympathetic Israel. The French Army is right now operating out of Mali in Nigeria, contributing to the fight against the jihadis.

Israel

There is so much in the news regarding Obama’s falling-out with Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu that little needs to be added here. The likely breaking point in the relationship was Obama’s and Kerry’s siding with Qatar and Hamas during the war last summer; and, more recently, with the obvious intention of Obama to permit Iran to develop their nuclear arms capacities. This week, it is reported that Obama has appointed another Hamas-connected advisor, Robert Malley, to coordinate Middle East policy for the White House.

The deplorable disrespect and insults hurled at Netanyahu by the Democrats during his visit are the mirror image of an America whose college campuses have been overtaken with a virulent anti-Semitism.

Still, this chapter would not be complete without mentioning the integral part that Obama’s friends Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, terrorists themselves, played in launching the diplomatically catastrophic “Peace Flotilla” – boats from Turkey, filled with military supplies and other goodies, for Hamas.

Iran

Into the grand void, the power vacuum, created by the Arab Spring, steps a nation largely unaffected by the Arab Spring: Iran. In fact, when Iran nearly embraced modernity and secular government with its so-called “Green Movement,” Obama and the Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett stood conspicuously on the sidelines. Years in the making, the protestors and activists who challenged the Iranian mullahs paid dearly for their attempt at overthrowing the Islamic Republic while Obama’s administration remained silent and watched them get smashed.

An historic moment was totally squandered.

Whether it is in Yemen or in Iraq, Iran is the beneficiary, net-net, of the Arab Spring. Even as their Supreme Leader openly calls for the destruction of Israel, the Obama administration proceeds undaunted with negotiations that would give them nuclear capabilities and the means to strike the Middle East, Europe, and the United States with intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Conclusion

The Citizens’ Commission on Benghazi put it this way: Obama “switched sides in the War on Terror.” The evidence presented above is but a glimpse into the preponderance of open source, published information that supports the Commission’s conclusion.

We are now faced with a totally new geopolitical situation: geographically, politically, and militarily.

With the body count growing by the day, and with a far larger war looming on the horizon, one would think that the responsible parties still left in government would pause, reflect, and begin to reverse course before it is too late. Yet as recently as December, NATO hailed its partnership with terrorist financier extraordinaire, the Gulf State of Qatar. This is tantamount to openly declaring allegiance to the Muslim Brotherhood, a totalitarian and genocidal movement whose actions we see manifested daily.

The ultimate fallout from this historic, awful change in American policy may very well be a war of untold destruction. In the meantime, it is observed that some of America’s former allies have already decided that we, as agents of jihad, can no longer be trusted. Egypt is forming a closer relationship with Putin’s Russia, as is Saudi Arabia. India, which had moved closer to the United States under George W. Bush, has also turned toward Russia. France, with the rise of the National Front party, may very well be next to look east to Moscow. And Israel is openly courting new strategic alliances.

Truly, there have been few times in American history when our national commitment to morality, decency, and humanity has been so genuinely questionable. If the majority of the American people understood what has already been risked by this president and his Muslim Brotherhood-aligned administration, they would demand immediate resignation and a full investigation of the government agencies which are in league with, and give aid and comfort to, the enemy.

The Betrayal Papers is a collaborative effort by the Coalition of Concerned Citizens, which includes: Andrea Shea King, Dr. Ashraf Ramelah, Benjamin Smith, Bethany Blankley, Brent Parrish, Charles Ortel, Chris Nethery, Denise Simon, Dick Manasseri, Gary Kubiak, Gates of Vienna, IQ al Rassooli, Right Side News, Leslie Burt, Marcus Kohan, Mary Fanning, General Paul E. Vallely, Regina Thomson, Scott Smith, Terresa Monroe-Hamilton, Colonel Thomas Snodgrass, Trevor Loudon, Wallace Bruschweiler, and William Palumbo

← Betrayal Papers Part 3: Obama’s Scandals and Assaults on Freedoms Explained

[Ryan Ruck]

Bill Gertz Expose: Pentagon Docs Show Obama Supports Muslim Brotherhood

June 5, 2015

Bill Gertz, top Pentagon reporter for the Washington Times has just reported that "Obama secretly backed Muslim Brotherhood." The Brotherhood is literally a fascist Muslim radical group from the Nazi period.

Writes Gertz:

President Obama and his administration continue to support the global Islamist militant group known the Muslim Brotherhood. A White House strategy document regards the group as a moderate alternative to more violent Islamist groups like al Qaeda and the Islamic State." (Aka ISIS).

The policy of backing the Muslim Brotherhood is outlined in a secret directive called Presidential Study Directive-11[.] … The directive was produced in 2011[.] …

Efforts to force the administration to release the directive or portions of it under the Freedom of Information Act have been unsuccessful. ...

The directive outlines why the administration has chosen the Muslim Brotherhood, which last year was labeled a terrorist organization by the governments of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates as a key vehicle of U.S. backing for so-called political reform in the Middle East. …

The UAE government also has labeled two U.S. affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Muslim American Society, as terrorist support groups. Both groups denied the UAE claims. Egypt is considering imposing a death sentence on Mohamed Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood-backed former president who was ousted in military coup in July 2013.

Critics of the administration's strategy say the Brotherhood masks its goals and objectives despite advocating an extremist ideology similar to those espoused by al Qaeda and the Islamic State, but with less violence. The group's motto includes the phrase "jihad is our way." Jihad means holy war and is the Islamist battle cry.

Counterterrorism analyst Patrick Poole said the Brotherhood in recent weeks has stepped up its use of violent attacks in Egypt.

The Muslim Brotherhood is called the "Ikhwan" in Arabic, meaning "brotherhood." (Like German "ich" and "won.") It took that name in 1928, when fascist and Nazi "brotherhoods" were spreading all over Europe.

From the start, the Ikhwan actively collaborated with Hitler through the mufti of Jerusalem. One of their slogans is "All we want is to die in the way of Allah" – which means killing as many infidels as you can when you die. This is the theological basis for suicide-bombing. Today, there is no daylight between the Ikhwan and ISIS.

In 1981, an Ikhwan front group assassinated Pres. Anwar Sadat, the most important Arab peacemaker with Israel.

The Ikhwan employs Malik Obama, the president's half-brother, as a big money man.

The Ikhwan created Hamas – the terrorist group that uses children as human shields to protect rocket launchers in Gaza.

The Ikhwan helped neo-Ottoman fascist Erdoğan to take over Turkey.

The Ikhwan is almost certainly behind ISIS, together with Turkey and Qatar.

In 2011, the Ikhwan overthrew Egypt's President Hosni Mubarak – who upheld the Egypt-Israel peace treaty for four decades – in close collusion with Obama, Code Pink, and Bill Ayers. The Western media actually reported that Code Pink and Bill Ayers were protesting Hosni Mubarak in the weeks before Mubarak was overthrown. Today, millions of Egyptians believe that Obama supports their mortal enemy, the Ikhwan.

The Ikhwan is now engaged in a monumental civil war against President El Sisi, whose court just condemned its leader to death. Their leaders who are not in jail have fled to Qatar, Turkey, and Gaza, all part of the Ikhwan network.

The Ikhwan controls American front groups like CAIR, which buys up American politicians by the truckload, especially on the left.

Four-star admiral James Lyons (USN, Ret.) has gone public with the charge that the Ikhwan has deeply penetrated U.S. intelligence. That is why Obama can't even say the words "Muslim war on America." That is why our defense has been so feeble and cringing.

Hillary Clinton's closest personal aide as SecState was Huma Abedin – an Ikhwan insider. Abedin was one of the few people who had access to Hillary's illegal personal e-mail account on the night of Benghazi. Nothing has changed – Abedin is still at the top of the Hillary campaign. Probably for the first time in U.S. history, presidential candidate Hillary has stonewalled any media questions, period.

Major Ikhwan money flows have been reported going to the Clintons, the Carters, and Obama. Ikhwan penetration of American society and the U.S. government gives all the appearance of a political quid pro quo – with our survival at stake.

Bill Gertz's Pentagon documents now prove the Ikhwan connection directly. The liberal media will try to stifle the facts, as always.

Maybe this time they will fail.

[vector7]

BREAKING: Putin Prepares To “Unleash Hell” Upon ISIS Forces After Airline Bombing Attack…

Posted on November 4, 2015 by DCWhispers

Earlier today the Obama White House attempted to downplay any links to ISIS in relation to the recent Russian airline disaster that took place shortly after Metrojet Flight 9268 took off from Egypt last week on its way back to Russia, killing everyone on board. For days British officials have quietly suggested foul play while U.S. officials were noticeably tight-lipped. Now some within American intelligence are voicing very similar thoughts to their British counterparts, despite the Obama White House’s apparent desire that no official statement on the matter be made.

As for Russia’s Vladimir Putin, he is said to be at this very moment reviewing a myriad of counter-measure options – all of them intending to “unleash hell” in the form of powerful military-based retribution the likes of which ISIS militants have yet to have faced.



Putin is said to have already initiated warnings to various Middle East nations of his intent while ignoring the Obama White House, though some have suggested Russian intelligence officials have been in contact with Pentagon officials directly as a sign of professional courtesy.

Apparently it is Barack Obama himself Mr. Putin has no use and even less regard, for.

One D.C. Whispers source went so far as to suggest part of the Obama administration’s hesitation to make public statements regarding the Russian airline tragedy is based upon concerns there is a Muslim Brotherhood connection and that measures are being taken by administration officials to make certain no such connection, if in fact it exists, will become part of the investigation.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a radical and highly influential Islamic group with strong ties to the Obama White House.

DEVELOPING…

http://dcwhispers.com/putin-prepares...ombing-attack/

[vector7]

DHS Secretary to Hold Press Conference at Mosque Tied to Muslim Brotherhood

Jeh Johnson to hold brief with imam tied to organizations with links to Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas


Jeh Johnson / AP

BY: Adam Kredo
December 7, 2015 2:40 pm

The Department of Homeland Security’s top official is slated to hold a press conference Monday at a controversial Muslim center that was reportedly raided by federal agents as part of an investigation into a terror organization.

Jeh Johnson, DHS secretary, will speak Monday afternoon at the Virginia-based All Dulles Area Muslim Society, also known as the ADAMS Center. The secretary will be joined by the center’s religious director, Imam Mohamed Magid, who serves as a leading member of an Islamic organization long suspected of having ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.

Johnson will speak at the ADAMS Center along with Magid about efforts to protect the Muslim community from hate speech in the wake of a deadly mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, that was allegedly carried out by devotees of the Islamic State terror group, according to an online invitation for the event and information from DHS.

“These horrific acts [in California] moreover should NOT be permitted to vilify and stereotype the peaceful and law-abiding Muslim, Sikh and other minority communities in America,” reads an invite for the event issued by the ADAMS Center. “We must all work together to prevent hate crimes and intimidation.”

The invitation goes on to reference a fatwa, or religious edict, issued by the ADAMS Center condemning terrorism.

The event comes just days after several Democratic lawmakers attended a prayer service at another Virginia-area mosque that has been accused of acting as a front for Hamas and that served as the home of an al Qaeda terror leader.

Federal agents raided the ADAMS Center during a 2002 terrorism investigation into organizations tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, according to court documents published by the Clarion Project.

“A government affidavit said the group is ‘suspected of providing support to terrorists, money laundering, and tax evasion through the use of a variety of for-profit companies and ostensible charitable entities under their control, most of which are located at [the ADAM Center’s offices at] 555 Grove Street, Herndon, V.A.,” according to the report.

Additionally, several accused terrorists have allegedly spent time at the ADAMS Center, including Farooque Ahmed, who was arrested for planning to bomb the Washington-area subway.

Magid serves as the president of the Islamic Society of North America, which has been accused of having ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, according to federal court filings published by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, a research and news organization.

The Islamic society also was listed as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in a federal terrorism case investigating U.S. Muslim organizations attempting to finance Hamas.

Muslim Brotherhood members reportedly founded the Islamic society, which has further been accused of hosting radical preachers at its events, according to research performed by the Investigative Project.
Magid met with President Barack Obama at the White House in 2015, along with several of Muslim leaders accused of having ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Valerie Jarrett, a senior adviser to Obama, has also praised the Islamic society.

Patrick Poole, a terrorism analyst and national security reporter who has written about the ADAMS Center, called the DHS secretary’s scheduled appearance concerning.

“The ADAMS Center has been a documented hub of extremism that even in the most generous interpretation has a poor record of dealing with terrorists in their midst,” Poole said. “It was no coincidence that the Attorney General of the United States was canceling outreach meetings due solely to the presence of Mohamed Magid.”

The fatwa mentioned in the invitation to the event was signed by at least one individual “who is currently in prison in Egypt convicted of terrorism charges,” Poole noted.

Meanwhile, Congress is set to approve this week a massive yearly spending bill that will fund the Obama administration’s immigration priorities.

Lawmakers critical of the spending bill say that it amounts to a “blank check” for the administration to permit some 10,000 Syrian refugees into America and boost immigration priorities in general.

“As currently written, this year’s appropriations bills—which will be combined into a catch-all ‘omnibus’ by December 11th—amount to a blank check for the President to carry out his refugee resettlement plans,” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.), chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, said in a statement.

“Not only will the president be allowed to bring in the 85,000 refugees he has announced on top of current record immigration levels, but this will include at least 10,000 refugees from Syria who will subsequently be able to bring in their foreign relatives,” Sessions said. “All refugees are eligible for lifetime government assistance and can draw funds from Social Security and Medicare at Americans’ expense.”

Somewhere near 700,000 lifetime residency cards will be granted to migrants from Muslim-majority nations during the next five years, according to Sessions, who warned that this could pose a terrorism risk.

“Terror groups have demonstrated that they will recruit from among this inflow,” he said. “We have already identified nearly 30 foreign-born individuals charged or convicted of terrorism offenses in the last year—investigations which required the deploym.

[MinutemanCO]

It's amazing that DHS is more worried about Muslims in this country getting their feelings hurt than about the very real threat of continued Muslim aggression against US citizenry. This man along with the rest of the sitting administration needs to go, and now. I can only conclude that this type of subversion is intentional.

I wonder what it takes to cut through the deeply rooted apathy plaguing our people?

[Malsua]

It's not surprising. The fuckwits that are currently in executive branch are more concerned about their ideology than the safety of the people of the United States.

They have determined that this nation is a flawed nation and it must be destroyed so that it can be rebuilt in their image, with their ilk holding the reins of power.

It really is nothing more than a money and a power grab. It's basic greed and if they could depopulate the resistance in this country and install sharia law they would without a second thought.

[vector7]

Obama’s Deal With the Devil…Part 1 of 3

Posted on December 14, 2015 by Craig Andresen

By Craig Andresen and Diane Sori



It’s been less than two weeks since the Islamic terrorist attack in San Bernardino and new information regarding the 7th century barbarians who carried out that attack continues to roll in.

What we are learning about the two Islamists is alarming but there is more, much more to it than the revelations coming to light about Malik and Farook but before we get into that, let’s take stock in what information has been uncovered so far.

Malik, the female Islamic barbarian came to the United States from Saudi Arabia just a year ago on a K1 visa which is more commonly known as a ‘fiancée visa’ and according to government sources, it is one of the hardest visas to obtain as the vetting process for it is reportedly the most vigorous.

We also now know that Malik was “radicalized” prior to her ever coming to our country and that her “radicalization” more than likely took place in Islamabad, Pakistan years ago. Malik was, according to documents, one of only 519 Pakistanis to have obtained a K1 visa in 2014 and one of only 35,925 to have received such a visa overall in 2014 and that number comprises only 0.3% of all visas handed out that year.

Early on in the investigation, it was reported that Farook, the male half of the Islamic terrorist connection was “radicalized” by Malik but that has now been replaced by reports indicating that Farook began the process of being “radicalized” long before he ever met Malik. Farook, it now appears, was “radicalized” here at home.



We know that Malik, as per Islamic ideology, was not employed and that Farook had an income of $51,000 per year so, the some $30,000 plus worth of guns, ammo and IED supplies, seemed out of line with his income fueling speculation that the Islamic barbarian couple had some source of outside funding. It now appears that they maxed out their credit lines, including the taking out of a $28,500 loan from the on-line lender, Prosper, who issued this statement: “All loans originated through the Prosper platform are subject to all identity verification and screening procedures required by law, including U.S. anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering laws. Like all Americans, Prosper is shocked and saddened by recent events in San Bernardino.”



We have learned that Farook and Malik had been planning their Islamic terrorist attack for nearly a year and that Farook had apparently planned an earlier attack, back in 2012…at least a year before he ever met Malik but was “spooked” by a sweep of Islamic terrorist suspects by law enforcement in Southern California back then and scrapped his plan at that time.

There have now been two witnesses who have come forward to say they saw both Malik and Farook at a Riverside, California gun range, practicing their aim and shooting at paper targets for the past year and even in the days before their Islamic terrorist attack of less than two weeks ago.

We know that the two Islamists purchased thousands of rounds of ammunition and enough supplies to build dozens of IED devices and that the two Islamists purchased two handguns legally, and that a friend, Enrique Marquez, who is in the process of converting to Islam purchased two rifles that he either gave or sold to the Islamic terrorist couple.

Investigators are now looking at Malik’s past and suspect that she had been an Islamic terror operative for years. Investigators are also now looking at her family’s ties to terrorism including her possible contacts with Al Qaeda’s Syrian arm, al-Nusra, and her possible connection to the known radical Red Mosque in Pakistan. And let’s not forget that, during the Islamic terrorist attacks, Malik posted to Facebook that she had pledged her allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.



Here’s something else we now know…a report that was quickly removed from the headlines…that being the fact that San Bernardino law enforcement officials knew, within five minutes of the Islamic terrorist attack, exactly who was responsible. Yes, they were tipped off by survivors of the attack, but according to reports, Farook was a person of interest to local law enforcement before the attack and that San Bernardino police had been wanting to talk to Farook.
As if all of this isn’t bad enough…now it gets downright chilling.

According to Farook’s father…Syed Farook, the Islamic terrorist was a supporter of ISIS and that he believed Israel should be wiped from the map.

According to CV Claverie, a friend of Nicholas Thalasinos, a coworker of Farook’s who was shot and killed by Farook and Malik last week in San Bernardino, Farook had told Thalasinos that, “Islam will rule the world,” and that Farook had, for some time, been threatening Thalasinos…telling him that, “Christians and Jews deserve to die; and that he (Nicholas) was going to die.”

Perhaps the reason San Bernardino police wanted to talk to Farook, in the days before the Islamic terrorist attack, had something to do with these threats against his coworker and maybe, just maybe the reason police hesitated was because, in a world where the cops are labeled as bigots of one sort or another, and in a world where political correctness is more important than the rule of law, having contact with a Muslim, regarding potential terroristic threats, is seen as prejudiced.



It was clear that Farook and his Islamist wife had intended to do more than just commit murder at the Christmas party, and now we have learned that the terrorist had several photos of Carter High School in Rialto on his cell phone, and we know the pair had enough ammunition and pipe bombs to have wreaked havoc on any second location they chose. While it wasn’t out of the ordinary for Farook, a county health inspector, to take photos during inspections and area schools were on his work orders, according to investigators, it would have been highly unusual for any inspector to photograph the outside of any building and Farook’s photos of Carter High School were, indeed, of the outside of the building.

Now, the Department of Homeland Security is reviewing the K1 visa program, “to assess possible program enhancements,” and as Marc Rosenblum, the Deputy Director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Center put it… “This visa has been totally under the radar. The issue of marriage fraud has definitely gotten a lot of attention, just not as a security vulnerability.”

Everything listed above, everything we now know after the fact, after the Islamic terrorist attack in San Bernardino less than two weeks ago should have been a waving red flag…waving red crescent flags…flags that should have stopped what happened years before it happened but, while the portrait of the Islamist 7th century barbarians, Farook and Malik, is beyond chilling…seemingly, nobody noticed.



Clearly, Islamic terrorism is the number one threat to the world and to our lives in this country and it has been since at least September 11th, 2001 and while we’ve been told that procedures and processes are in place to protect us, with evidence that many such attacks have been prevented…how could this have happened? How could these two Islamic terrorists throw up one red crescent flag after another, for years on end, while making personal threats against the lives of American citizens and yet nobody notices and nobody does one single thing to prevent it?

Obama tells us that his strategy, a strategy of being nice to Islam, is working, and if you think that will change under any different liberal regime, think again as Hillary Clinton has told us that we must respect and understand our enemies. Respect and understand those who wish us dead? That will persuade them to seek a different path? We are supposed to respect and understand the ilk of Farook and Malik…understand why they murdered 14 and wounded another 21 in an Islamic terrorist attack?



Here’s what we understand…there is no religion on earth, engaged globally, in acts of murder and genocide and destruction of those who do not adhere to that religion. Not the Christians. Not the Jews. Not the Sikhs, not the Hindus nor any other however, there is one particular political ideology that is committing mass murders, beheadings, burning people alive and bombing any and all who don’t adhere to its political ideology…Islam.

Another fact worth noting would be that while not all Muslims are Islamist terrorists…all Islamist terrorists are Muslims but there are also differences in the political ideologies here in our country.

The liberal ideology is that Islam is a religion and therefore, must be tolerated and coddled. The Conservative ideology is that Islam is not a religion but a political ideology which cannot be tolerated. While it is politically incorrect to believe that Islam is anything but a religion, in liberal circles…it is factually correct to see it for what it truly is…an ideology of death, destruction and genocide.

We are simply left with two possibilities. Either the system, the protocols, the procedures and the processes in place to keep Islamic terrorists from perpetrating acts the likes of which were in play in San Bernardino are broken at best or non-existent at worst and something needs to be done or…they are working but were, in the case of San Bernardino…ignored.



Under the Obama regime, we have been living in a land where Republicans are seen as a more dangerous enemy than Islamists the ilk of Farook and Malik and where Conservative groups are more heavily vetted than potential Islamist barbarians. We live in a land where every keystroke we make is recorded, where if we search for an item on Google, ads for that item become part of our Facebook feed and every phone call we make is tracked and yet, the San Bernardino Islamist barbarians spent years preparing for their terrorist attack and nobody did a thing. How could this be?

We believe that under the Obama regime, key players within our intel community have been ordered to virtually stand down where possible cases of terrorism and terrorist attacks are concerned, and we believe such orders could only come from the top. Is it possible that Obama is such a narcissistic, arrogant SOB as to believe that so long as he’s running the show, his fellow Islamists won’t act on their inbred barbaric impulses?

This is Obama we’re talking about…sure it’s possible and what’s equally as plausible is the notion that Islam’s war council no longer views Obama as useful to the agenda of building the caliphate due to two major events. First, Iran got from Obama what it needed, the green light to build a nuclear arsenal and just last week, they again flaunted it in Obama’s face by testing yet another ballistic missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead in direct violation of the terms of the treaty Obama is so damned proud of.



ISIS sees Iran as their competition and/or their enemy in ruling the hoped-for future caliphate and they can’t be happy that Iran now has the power of the bomb.
Second…Obama’s glaring inability to have prevented Putin from going all in against ISIS in Syria.

Obama has been propping up ISIS in Syria and in Iraq by employing the tactic of bombing empty warehouses and the occasional truck convoy while lying to the American people, claiming that he has ISIS contained and on the run which sounds a whole lot like the crap he was telling us regarding al-Qaeda before the 2012 election. Obama has also been arming various ISIS loyal factions in Syria and allowed ISIS free run of Iraq and access to whatever weapons or war we left behind when Obama pulled our military out of Iraq.

Another key indicator, we believe, can be found in Obama’s speech to the nation after San Bernardino…it smacked of desperation. Not since 2010 had Obama delivered a speech from the oval office but, if what we suspect is true, he no longer felt he was in control and needed some way to add gravitas to his speech. Obama repeated the moniker ISIL, over and over again during that speech in an obvious signal to ISIS that he still has their backs and in what could be described as a desperate plea for them to have his.



While Obama’s love affair with ISIS may not be over…it seems that maybe ISIS’ love affair with Obama is, as it seems virtually impossible, with all the protocols and processes we, as a nation, have in place, good, bad or indifferent, that our intel community failed to see all the red flags flying around the San Bernardino Islamic terrorists, and the speed with which background information regarding their exploits has been flooding in seems to confirm that said information was already close at hand.

While we believe profiling is a valuable tool against Islamic terrorism, and one that is most likely already in play, we wouldn’t put it passed Obama to threaten members of the intel community with charges of racism should they divulge its use. It should be noted that profiling, in regards to Islamic terrorism is not racial in nature but ideological and psychological as Islam is an ideology rife with psychosis and not a race but that’s not how liberals see it and certainly not how the race-card playing Obama sees it.



What we believe is that our intel community knew a great deal about the San Bernardino Islamic terrorists well before the attack on December 2nd and we believe they failed to act against the terrorists based on Obama’s orders…not to say that Obama knew specifically of the pending attack but that he had made it clear that Muslims, despite their red flags, were to be given a free pass because, covertly, he had a deal with the absolute worst that Islam has to offer in that he, Obama, would allow safe passage and safe haven to as many Islamists as possible in return for a promise that the sort of attacks of 9/11 or the Charlie Hebdo and Paris concert hall attacks would not happen here as long as he was running the show.

Obama, in his oval office speech, looked and sounded, for all the world, like a man who’s grand plan was crashing down around him…like the man behind the curtain as it was being drawn back to reveal that he is not wizard…not a wizard at all.

Obama’s Deal With the Devil…Part 2 of 3

Posted on December 15, 2015 by admin

By Craig Andresen and Diane Sori

In Part 1of our Investigative Report: ‘Obama’s Deal With the Devil’, we presented why we believe Obama gave the speech he did and why the San Bernardino police are acting after the fact in a way they should have acted before the fact. But what is…is…and we are left not with questions per se but with facts that we can no longer afford to overlook…and those facts center around Barack HUSSEIN Obama himself and where his true loyalties lie.

To put the pieces of the puzzle together we need just look at Obama’s actions, policies, and words since he became president. Let’s start with his Cairo, Egypt, speech soon after he assumed the office of the presidency. In that speech Obama aligned himself with the muslims by saying his job as president of the United States was to “fight against negative stereotypes of islam wherever they appear.” However, that is not the job of an American president…his job is to ‘protect the health, safety, and welfare’ of the American people above all else, as it is his job to show America in a positive light where and whenever possible. An American president does not defame or dishonor his country, its military, or its people…which Obama routinely does…nor does an American president bow to any foreign leader… especially to a leader whose allegiances are still somewhat in question. And in this case we mean Obama’s bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia in whose country islam’s (supposed) holy city of Mecca lies.



Also, an American president does not during a time of war announce to the enemy when he is pulling out of said theater of war for that gives the enemy time to lay low, regroup, and reemerge stronger than ever after our troops have left. And this is exactly what Obama allowed when announcing our date of withdrawal from the Afghan and Iraqi theaters of war…and thousands of innocents who would not have died did so because of his actions.

And in doing what he did allowed ISIS to be born for in ISIS’ birth Obama…good little islamist that he is…saw what he thought would be a way to unite Sunni muslims against the secular government of Syrian Shi’ite President Bashar al-Assad. And embedded within those he helped to unite were known radical islamists who saw this union as their way to form different terrorist groups each with their own terrorist agenda…groups who morphed into the likes of Jabhad al-Nusra and into the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria…ISIS if you will…amongst others…yet all working together to create just the right mix for unifying the islamists living in not only Sunni dominated Iraq and Syria, but with the hope of drawing into the whole the entirety of the Sunnis in the Arab world…drawing them into their jihadist army…an army united in the qur’an dictated mission of killing us all.



And how does Obama fit into this beyond his allowing for ISIS’ birth…what is critical to his involvement is to know exactly who this man is. First, Obama is what’s known in some muslim circles as a ‘cultural muslim’…a muslim who might not outwardly practice the faith but a muslim whose sympathies and actions against Israel, and specifically its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, shows his loyalties lie with those in the islamic world who see themselves locked in a self-perceived life and death battle against the Jewish State.



And while it can be rightly assumed that Obama is no Christian as he has never attended a Christian church service since becoming president but has made sure to celebrate Ramadan with members of his staff and Congress…and along with his vile words against Christianity at this year’s National Prayer Breakfast there exists no record of his converting. Remember, Obama’s being a muslim can be proven by not only his Indonesian school records listing his faith as ‘islam’ for if he was not a muslim he could not have attended the madrasa school he did attend, but also by his many slips when being interviewed where for example he said, “my muslim faith.” And if somewhere there is a record of his converting that would mean that under islamic law he would be a ‘murtadd’ (apostate), an ex-muslim converted to another religion who must be executed.

Executed unless the mullahs and islamic leaders found a use for him.



And found a use for him they did for with the rise of radical islam and its hoped for prophecy of a final caliphate, they needed someone they could control to do their bidding…to basically assume the persona of a Christian in the political sense so that islam could gain a foothold into the American political arena…thus making it easier for the islamists to stop the ‘Great Satan’ from thwarting their ultimate goal. And while a devout muslim would find it hard to assume that role…to blend into a society that is counter to their principals of sharia law…a ‘cultural muslim’ would fit that role perfectly for such a muslim could pull off Bukhari (49:857) with a straight face…”He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar…” meaning lying for the fulfillment of islam’s goals is permitted when the end justifies the means.

And this is what Obama has done time and time again over these seven long years, but now it has backfired on him as the man once anointed to be the ‘savior of us all’ is now a shell of a man that even the islamists have no use for.



And why…remember the ‘good information’ Obama told us about how the Arab Spring would bring democracy to the Middle East…remember how Obama told us that the dictators…the secular dictators…had to be replaced for democracy to take hold never mentioning that he would be replacing them with his fellow Muslim Brotherhood puppets whose strings he assumed his handlers would allow him to pull. And you know how well that turned out not only in Libya, but in Yemen, and most specifically in Egypt. Egypt…who fell to the Brotherhood at first but who fought back and won against them in the end as Abdel Fattah el-Sisi became president…paid a heavy price for their rejection of the Brotherhood for soon after el-Sisi was voted in our State Department welcomed the Muslim Brotherhood hierarchy to a meeting at the White House, and soon after Egypt exploded in jihadi violence with Christian heads starting to roll.

But even with this it still was Egypt who set the stage for Obama’s fall from islamic grace…a stage that he has never been able to regain for ‘they’ are done with him as Obama promised Egypt to the Muslim Brotherhood and in the end he could not deliver on his promise.



‘Done with him’ even though Obama has allowed the Muslim Brotherhood, who has direct ties to ISIS, to infiltrate the halls of America’s government through his close personal relationship with Muslim Brotherhood ‘puppetmaster’ Valerie Jarrett pulling his strings…as well as his placing those suspected of being members or those admitting to being members of the Brotherhood in positions they have no place being…positions as high up as in the Department of Homeland Security.

Where the Deputy Mayor, Arif Alikhan, a devout Sunni muslim sidetracked the Los Angeles Police Department from monitoring potential terrorist activities within LA’s muslim community; where Mohamed Elibiary, a member of the Department of Homeland Security’s Advisory Council, and whom Obama granted access to a nationwide database that contained terror watch lists and sensitive FBI reports, ‘leaked’ a number of them to the media in order to trump up charges of ‘islamophobia’ within Texas Governor Rick Perry’s administration; and where Eboo Patel, the grandson of Muslim Brotherhood’s founder, Siraj Wahhaj, advocates for the islamic takeover of America under the banner of Sharia Law.

And lest we forget that Malick Obama, the half brother of our muslim-in-chief, is the head of the Muslim Brotherhood Finance and Arms Procurement group, but nary a word of contention or condemnation crosses Obama’s lips.



And this is just the beginning as it’s the Muslim Brotherhood who is ground zero for all the islamic terrorism going on in the world today for not only does the Brotherhood support ISIS but the Brotherhood is the model from which ISIS patterned their killing-machine after. Remember, too, that the goal of the Muslim Brotherhood is to have the Brotherhood be the the ‘brains’ of the caliphate…the Sunni caliphate…and for ISIS to be the ‘enforcers’ of the caliphate. And know that ISIS’ Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and al-Qaeda’s Ayman al Zawahiri both were Muslim Brotherhood members as was Osama bin-Laden, and that once you are in the Muslim Brotherhood you are considered always in the Muslim Brotherhood…death not withstanding.



Now here is where again Obama comes in and it’s something as simple as to whom he has our country aligning with, and in this case we are speaking about Jordan. First, it must be understood that Jordan’s King Abdullah II is not America’s friend as Abdullah’s government, as it stands now, is still pushing for a broad national dialogue, including with the Muslim Brotherhood because the Brotherhood has the support of around 30% of Jordan’s six million people…90% of whom are Sunni muslims and it’s the Sunnis who are aligned with ISIS.

Andd the Muslim Brotherhood has well-infiltrated Jordan’s State Department as Jordan’s State Department, for all intents and purposes, is the political faction of Hamas with the Muslim Brotherhood/Iran being their Palestinian chapter.

And while Abdullah has on surface appearances cemented his ties with the regional campaign against ISIS, isn’t it interesting that ISIS attacks all the non-Muslim Brotherhood aligned countries yet does not attack Jordan and Qatar…Qatar which by the way is playing both sides of the coin as it hosts both the Muslim Brotherhood and one of America’s largest military bases, and acts as what some call an ‘ATM for terrorists.’ And isn’t it interesting that Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which are not Muslim Brotherhood aligned countries, and who contributed hundreds of jets to the coalition fight against ISIS when Jordan sent only six jets into the fight…six as cover as Abdullah did so with a wink and a nod to the Brotherhood just to hide from the West where his true allegiances lie.



Now let’s go into this a little deeper…remember the burning alive of the Jordanian pilot…our ‘sources’ in the Middle East tell us that the pilot’s fate was NOT to send a message to Jordan but was directed at Saudi Arabia and the UAE to let them know that their actions in joining the coalition would not be tolerated by the Brotherhood. In a no longer on the internet video released solely in the Middle East by Al Jazeera…a Doha-based state-funded broadcaster partially funded by the ruling family of Qatar…a Muslim Brotherhood supporting country…the Jordanian pilot puts blame on Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Morocco (where many jets were launched from and who also do not support the Brotherhood) for his capture never once mentioning Jordan’s king when asked who wanted this coalition. And isn’t it more than a bit odd that the UAE pulled out of coalition air strikes almost immediately after the capture of Lt. Moaz al-Kasasbeh and after the video was released, saying they feared for the fate of its own pilots should they be captured. In other words they ran scared from ISIS’ warning sent…allowing ISIS to win yet another PR round.

Now add in that the pilot’s father met with Abdullah two weeks before his son was put to death and who was assured that his son would be home within two weeks, but Abdullah never said if his homecoming would be in death, which (we believe) he knew would soon be coming. And isn’t it even more interesting that after his death, the pilot’s cousin went to fight, but went to fight with ISIS not with the coalition, leaving one to wonder why fight and die with those who murdered your cousin if not for the fact that the cousin.



And here are some other little tid-bits about Jordan few know…remember seeing all those pictures of ISIS with Toyota vehicles…well it turns out that those vehicles are from a block of 4000 Toyotas sold to Jordan’s government and who Jordan’s king in turn gave to ISIS as Jordan is a trading partner with ISIS…especially buying their oil…and who Jordan’s royal family trades weapons on commission with. Those vehicles were part of a trade deal along with the king supplying them with manpower as 4000 Jordanians have joined ISIS.

And the circle is now complete as Jordan trades with the enemy ISIS who is in cahoots with the Muslim Brotherhood and whom Obama remains a stalwart believer in, so much so that he still believes the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates should be treated as legitimate political entities.



Guess that means ISIS too, as Obama has done little to nothing to stop them from their caliphate building besides his bombing empty warehouses and long-deserted training camps. In fact, he’s actually helping ISIS reach their goal by his siding with and arming the anything-but moderate rebels in Syria. And now Obama can add to his ‘Do-Nothing’ list his calling for denying guns to those on the ‘No-Fly-List’…as if this will stop any terrorist who wants a gun from obtaining a gun. Remember, no such a law would have prevented the San Bernardino terrorists nor those who came before them from obtaining guns. And that list is itself quite a joke as 72 members of DHS are on the ‘No-Fly-List’ as are some of those in the Muslim Brotherhood who are now infiltrating our halls of government.

And while both Egypt and Saudi Arabia have declared the Muslim Brotherhood a ‘terrorist organization’, and while the UAE designated the Muslim Brotherhood front groups operating in the U.S. as ‘terrorist entities’, Obama instead chooses to remove them from our list of state sponsors of terrorism…removes from our list the very source that funds almost all terrorist activity worldwide, including funding Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram, Hamas, ISIS, and the Taliban, amongst others…with these being the very groups that have tried to eradicate Christianity from the entirety of the Middle East.



And now even with reports coming in that Obama will not listen to nor act upon intelligence reports on certain islamic terrorist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama’s fall from islamic grace still stands NO matter his giving Iran what they wanted…nuclear arms…for far more important than who he arms is his promise about land for the caliphate and in that he did not come through…and his fall is courtesy of Egypt’s President el-Sisi and Vladimir Putin’s standing strong against those Obama aligned our America with.

Obama’s Deal With the Devil…Part 3 of 3

Posted on December 17, 2015 by Craig Andresen

By Craig Andresen and Diane Sori

In Part 1of our Investigative Report: ‘Obama’s Deal With the Devil’, we presented why we believe Obama gave the speech he did and why the San Bernardino police are acting after the fact in a way they should have acted before the fact. In Part 2 of ‘Obama’s Deal With the Devil’, we disclosed who Obama really is and why things are unfolding as they are including outing those who are not what they seem to be. And now Part 3…

On Monday, Barack HUSSEIN Obama spoke at the Pentagon to tout what he wants us to believe are successes in the fight against ISIS in Syria. “As we squeeze its heart, we’ll make it harder for ISIL to pump out its terror and propaganda”…and note his once again shout-out to the Levant.

And while Obama tried to sound reassuring, it was more apparent that he is desperate. He is desperate to regain that which he has lost…his hold over the forces of islam…a hold which existed only in his arrogance as he was never the one calling the shots, but was the one who all along has been bowing to the demands of 7th century barbarians.



Obama bragged about a“record number”of bombs being dropped over Syria in November, but absent from his empty rhetoric were any ‘kill statistics’…verifiable or otherwise…because obviously there have been scarcely any ‘kills’ to speak of. What Obama is attempting to do, in our opinion, is placate the islamist dogs with his own brand of propaganda.

We also believe that what happened just two weeks ago in San Bernardino was more than just a shot over Obama’s bow by ISIS, and more than likely a precursor to what comes next now that any perceived deal with that particular devil has ended.



Syria, we believe, was the last straw as far as ISIS and the devils of islam are concerned. The promise we now believe Obama made to his “religion of peace” was that they would have their own nation-state…a base of operations with an islamist government replete with sharia law, and it was to have been Egypt. That promise collapsed as the Egyptian people threw Muslim Brotherhood puppet President Mohamed Morsi from power and replaced him with a secular government under the control of Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.

From that point on, Obama has tried to reconnect with the forces of islam by supplying them with arms, intel, our military strategy…as in when exactly we would be leaving the theaters of war…and with promises to take their so-called ‘refugees’ into our country to walk our streets without our ever being able to properly vet them.

As Obama felt his deal…a deal that he would support islam’s barbarians every and any way he possibly could (including trying to place blame for such attacks elsewhere) and in return islam would keep their barbarism over there, somewhere else, but not let their pre-planned attacks occur here on American soil, Obama tried to hedge his bet with another deal…one that has paved the way for a nuclear armed Iran. Why else would he, against any sense of logic, endeavor to give the world’s most feared weapon to a rogue, terrorist-sponsoring state like Iran if not to attempt to send a message to ISIS and its ilk that if they weren’t grateful for all he, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, had done for them…perhaps someone else would be more grateful.



No doubt, playing both ends of islam against the middle was not to the liking of ISIS, and we believe that the attempt to oust Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad was to have been Obama’s ‘make good’ for having not propped up Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. But with Obama’s failure to prevent Putin from engaging Russia’s military from interfering with the grand islamic plan, including endangering a new islamic base of operations with Damascus as it’s capitol, has, we believe, signaled the end of Obama’s perceived deal with the islamist devil.

Remember, Obama had told us that al-Qaeda was on the run, which turned out to be mere propaganda to secure the vote in 2012, and then al-Qaeda overran Benghazi. He also told us that ISIS was contained, yet more propaganda aimed at soothing the barbarians of islam, and then Paris happened. And in the wake of the Paris islamic terrorist attack that left 132 dead, Obama told us that we have nothing to fear from ISIS in America, as he tried to make it palatable to import islamic so-called ‘refugees’ leaving out that embedded within them would be ISIS operatives. And what transpired just two days later…San Bernardino.



Obviously, any deal Obama had with islam had been scrapped by islam, and the question he has been left to ask himself is, what more could he have done to curry their favor? After all, he supplied them, armed them, trained them, provided them with weapons, and he even went so far as to release their ilk from GITMO so that they could return to the battlefields and continue their barbaric rampage. Obama even traded five members of the Taliban war council for one American traitor, and now he’s been cut loose by the very people he did so much to help in their building of a new and prophesied Sunni caliphate.

It…Obama’s deal with the devil…was never about providing some obtuse protection of Americans on American soil…it was about securing his islamic legacy, a legacy now left to rot in the cesspools of the islamic world.

And with his fall from islamic grace Obama must now face not only the islamic hierarchy to whom he not so silently pledged his allegiance, but he also has to answer to and for his ‘middlemen’ so to speak, for with his fall they fall too. And by middlemen we mean his ‘puppet master’ Valerie Jarrett and Hillary’s crony Huma Abedin.



Valerie Jarrett, influence peddler loyal to both the Muslim Brotherhood and to Iran’s mullahs, will now see her place in the islamic pecking order knocked down quite a few pegs as she was counting on moving with Obama to a U.N. position in the government of the hoped for New World Order. But with Obama’s dismissal as a player in any future islamic game she is dismissed as well for her job was to keep him in line and make sure her string pulling complied with her own strings being pulled….and in that she failed miserably.

As for Huma Abedin, she was the Obama regime’s direct conduit to the Muslim Brotherhood. And by direct we mean bloodline direct as her mother, Dr. Saleha Abedin, is in the hierarchy of the Muslin Sisterhood, and her father has close ties with the Saudi government’s Muslim World League. Also, it was while Abedin was advising Hillary that the State Department abandoned its long-standing policy of having no dealings with the Muslim Brotherhood…and even in their outwardly supporting the Brotherhood, Obama still could not deliver the goods for it all goes back to his Arab Spring turned Arab Winter and his failed promise to secure land…to secure Egypt…for the caliphate.



Throughout his years in office, Barack Hussein Obama has done a great deal of damage to our national security on behalf of islam, including bringing into his inner circle of advisers more than half a dozen members of the Muslim Brotherhood as well as employing more than 72 DHS personnel who are on the terrorist watch list. Obama’s open border strategy…copied from the now-proven failure of Europe…has allowed any number of islamists to simply walk into our country, and his plan to bring in 10,000 Syrian so-called ‘refugees’…who are for the most part anything but true refugees…is nothing short of a desperate attempt to bring himself back into the islamic fold.

And on the world stage, Obama has turned his back on Israel, created one vacuum of power after another to be filled by islamists, and secured a path to a nuclear arsenal for Iran. And he did all this while he has rested…if not comfortably…arrogantly…in the false belief that islam would not visit upon American soil the same sort of barbarism they have exhibited elsewhere.

That has now come to an end, a very demonstrative end as shown in San Bernardino, California. And what we can expect from this point on is more of the same. More attacks. More deaths. More terror, and more well-planned visitations of violence against ‘We the People’ whose freedoms and liberties are an anathema to islam.



Islam now sees no future in having a ‘puppet’ in office as any Republican elected president in 2016, would take a much harder stance against our enemies and those of our allies, and would work hard to strengthen ties with our allies in an effort to rebuild lost trust. And islam could never trust a woman like Hillary Clinton to do their bidding, in the way they trusted Valerie Jarrett to do so throughout the Obama years. Jarrett, as mentioned above, was a behind-the-scenes conduit islam used to pull Obama’s strings but in the end she failed when Obama lost Egypt. And any female who might assume the presidency, no matter that she would hold the most powerful office in the world, would be seen by islam as mere chattel and nothing more.

And if that president was Hillary Clinton…a non-muslim who is on shaky grounds with our allies…she would most assuredly not fit islam’s bill because she needs Huma Abedin or someone like her to direct her every action in ways pleasing to islam. And with Abedin not being strong and domineering like Jarrett, and with Hillary being the loose cannon she is known to be, the islamist hierarchy could never fully trust Hillary to do right by them.



The final piece of the puzzle, the last dot to be connected in Obama’s deal with the islamists, is the fact that for no other reason than to placate islam and to bring as many jihadis here as possible, the Obama regime has had in place a ‘secret’ policy that barred federal agencies from examining the social media posts of those whom, we believe, various islamic factions and Obama wanted placed here on American soil. Had that very policy not been in place, the San Bernardino islamic terrorist attack would not have happened as Tashfeen Malik, the female terrorist, had as far back as 2012, posted to Facebook her jihadi agenda and the fact that she wanted to become a martyr to the islamic cause.

According to John Cohen, former acting under-secretary of DHS, the federal agency that has 73 employees on the terrorist watch list, “The primary concern was that it would be viewed negatively if it was disclosed publicly and there were concerns that it would be embarrassing.”

Common sense tells us two vital things here. First, there is no embarrassment in providing the sort of security measures that would prevent Americans from being murdered in an islamist terrorist attack, and that the only person who would be embarrassed by such preventative measures would be the person who had made a deal with islam to look the other way while islam would hold off on such attacks for the duration of that person’s term as the president of the United States.



This explains Obama’s last two appearances before the cameras, first from the Oval Office and then from the Pentagon. Both times he was addressing islam not the American people. He was desperately trying to salvage his deal with islam. Think about it…not since 2010 had Obama spoken from the Oval Office, and only after his failed attempts to blame San Bernardino on guns and workplace violence did he stand (a sign of respect for islam as he turned his back on the Resolute Desk thus symbolically turning his back on America ) to send them the message, ‘Look at me…I am one of you, we had a deal…I held up my end of it as best I could…why have you gone back on your word…why have you turned your back on me after all I have done for you?’

Obama repeated the word ‘ISIL’ time and time again to show the factions of islam that he was with them and against our ally Israel. He was glassy-eyed, he looked shocked. Not shocked that the sort of attack that had taken place in Paris took place here, but shocked that it took place while he still thought he had a deal in place with the islamic hierarchy.

Obviously, no message was coming from the islamic leaders to reassure Obama so he took to the podium at the Pentagon to once again address islam, to once again try to salvage the deal by attempting to spread the same ‘dog and pony’ show cover story that he was stepping up the bombings of ISIS in Syria, and that great progress was being made despite any evidence to back up the claims.

Two speeches from the two most powerful rooms in the world…both to beg islam for another chance and neither of them to deliver any message other than propaganda to the American people.

San Bernardino was the islamic world’s signal to Obama that the deal was off and we believe it was only the tip of the iceberg. There will be more San Bernardinos to come and Obama’s legacy here at home will be measured, for years to come, in the number of graves containing the bodies of innocent victims of his treason while his legacy beyond the gates of hell, in the islamic world, will be little more than that he was a useful idiot while he lasted…a martyr to his own arrogance.

[American Patriot]

One day soon it will be legal to hunt goat fuckers.

[vector7]

A ten part study on the Muslim Brotherhood destroying America from within by Frank Gaffney.

Obama Administration's involvement is highlighted in parts 8 and 9 of the series.

[Ryan Ruck]

Thanks for the vids vector! Will make this weekend viewing...

[vector7]

Huma may be one of the most important reasons we should fear Hillary Presidency

That would be Hillary’s longtime aide Huma (Weiner) Abedin who would be in a critical position in the White House if Hillary wins the Presidency despite her longtime connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.
This is what Lee Stranahan writing at Breitbart told us earlier in the week (I’ve been awol this week).
Keep these women out of the White House!
Stranahan also gives us a bit of history about Republican Washington insider Grover Norquist, so I’m suggesting we should also keep an eye on whoever Muslim apologist and Open borders agitator Norquist endorses for the Presidency. We told you about him here (with Marco Rubio), here with Gov. Sam Brownback, and here with former Homeland Security chief, Tom Ridge.
Breitbart:
In Part One of this series, we looked at the people and events behind the history-making first White House Ramadan dinner, held in 1996 and hosted by Hillary Clinton — an event that revealed the shocking ignorance both Bill and Hillary Clinton had about Islam, especially in the light of events such as 1993’s attack on the World Trade Center.
As we detailed in Part One, that “Eid Dinner” event was put together by an organization called the American Muslim Council that was founded and headed by a man named Abdurahman Alamoudi.
Alamoudi, who is now serving a federal prison term for funding terrorism, was a political mover and shaker with ties to not just the Clinton White House, but later to the George W. Bush White House via Republican lobbyist Grover Norquist.
In 1996, Alamoudi was a key Muslim influencer with the Clinton administration. Aside from the Eid dinner, an organization Alamoudi ran was vetting Islamic Army chaplains for the U.S. military.

Another historically significant thing happened in 1996: A 20-year-old George Washington University student named Huma Abedin landed an almost impossible-to-get White House internship.
Continue reading to learn about Abedin’s rise to power at Hillary’s side.
Rep. Michele Bachmann was right! Shame on John McCain!



Vindicated! Bachmann was right about infiltration of federal government by Muslim Brotherhood operatives.Some of you may not know that in 2012 former Presidential candidate and Representative Michele Bachmann warned America about Abedin’s connections that Stranahan reveals again, and that creep (yes, creep!) Senator John McCain went to the Senate floor (on behalf of Hillary!) to attack his fellow Republican Bachmann (here is one of many accounts).


Run like hell from any Presidential candidate McCain is endorsing.

Better still, Arizona voters should send McCain to retirement!

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, if Donald Trump had not come on the scene this election year, we would still be in the dark about who the real enemies of America are!

[American Patriot]

McCain is an asshole.

[vector7]

Muslim Brotherhood Day on Capitol Hill

ttp://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...n-capitol-hill

April 18, 2016, 07:45 am
Muslim Brotherhood Day on Capitol Hill

By Frank J. Gaffney Jr., contributor



On Monday, April 18, legislators' offices will be visited by individuals associated with a group unknown to most lawmakers: The United States Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO). In the interest of helping members of the U.S. Congress understand precisely who their interlocutors are, permit a brief introduction: The USCMO is the latest in a long series of front organizations associated with, and working to advance, the agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.

Members of Congress should be clear about the true nature of that agenda. It is laid out most authoritatively in a document introduced into evidence by federal prosecutors in the course of the largest terrorism financing trial in the nation's history, U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation et al. Written in 1991 by a top Muslim Brotherhood operative, Mohamed Akram, and entitled "The Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal of the Group in North America," this internal correspondence was meant for the eyes only of the organization's leadership in Egypt. So, the document is direct and to the point: It explicitly states that the mission of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America is "destroying Western civilization from within ... by [the infidels'] hands and the hands of the believers so that Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

There are two other important facts legislators should know about Akram's memo.

First, the document helpfully attaches a list of 29 groups under the heading "Our organizations and organizations of our friends: Imagine if they all march according to one plan!" A number of the identified Muslim Brotherhood fronts — and many others that have come into being since 1991 — are members of the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations. Representatives and associates of such fronts will be among the Islamists in congressional offices on Monday.

Second, the memo describes in detail the Muslim Brotherhood's favored technique for accomplishing its stated goal of "destroying Western civilization" — at least until such time as they are strong enough to use violence decisively: "civilization jihad." This sort of jihad involves employing stealthy, subversive means like influence operations to penetrate and subvert our government and civil society institutions. (The successful application of these means have been chronicled extensively in the Center for Security Policy's "Civilization Jihad Reader Series.")

With the launch of the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations in March 2014, the Muslim Brotherhood has secured a new instrument for its subversion: a self-described U.S. "political party" meant to dominate and mobilize Muslim voters across the country and get them marching according to one plan. The object is to elicit support for the Muslim Brotherhood's demands from candidates and to help achieve what the Islamic supremacists would regard as favorable outcomes in the 2016 elections. (For more on the USCMO, its purpose and activities to date, see "Star Spangled Sharia: The Rise of America’s First Muslim Brotherhood Party.")

Unfortunately, some members of Congress have already embraced the Council of Muslim Organizations. For example, two with longstanding ties to assorted Muslim Brotherhood fronts, Reps. André Carson (D-Ind.) and Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), spoke at the USCMO's inaugural banquet in June 2014. Neither has disavowed the USCMO's subsequent participation in anti-Semitic, pro-Hamas and pro-Muslim Brotherhood demonstrations and its fundraising on behalf of Islamic Relief USA, a large, U.S.-based Islamic supremacist charity.

Another reason lawmakers and their staffs should be leery of this new Muslim Brotherhood front group is its avowed intention to make common cause with radical non-Muslim entities like the Black Lives Matter movement. At a conference in December 2015 convened by two of the Muslim Brotherhood's most virulent fronts, the Muslim American Society and Islamic Circle of North America, leading USCMO figures publicly discussed how they could impart lessons to African-Americans by holding up the Brotherhood as the community that staged revolutions across the world.

Congress is on notice: As long as organizations associated with Islamic supremacism like the USCMO and its member organizations dominate "Muslim Advocacy Day" on Capitol Hill, it will actually be Muslim Brotherhood Advocacy Day. And legislators should have nothing to do with either its participants or its programs.

Gaffney acted as an assistant secretary of Defense under President Reagan. He is the president of the Center for Security Policy in Washington. He serves as a foreign policy adviser to presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

[vector7]

Companion Thread:Attempts to Push Sharia Law on America

Clinton’s Muslim Prop Wrote Paper on Sharia Law, Runs Immigration Law Firm in NY

Posted on August 1, 2016 by creeping

Source: What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States | Walid Shoebat
…
Khizr Muazzam Khan graduated in Punjab University Law College, as the New York Times confirms. and he specialized in International Trade Law in Saudi Arabia. An interest lawyer for Islamic oil companies Khan wrote a paper, called In Defense of OPEC to defend the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries. Kahn is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law. Khan is also co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia).



Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties Kahn wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah [the works of Muhammad] — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).” A snapshot of his essay can be seen here:



At the bottom of the page, Kahn shows his appreciation for an icon of the Muslim Brotherhood: “The contribution to this article of S. Ramadan’s writing is greatly acknowledged.” S. Ramadan is Said Ramadan, head of the Islamic Center in Geneva and a major icon of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Ramadan was a writer who wrote material for the Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, an organization that has been promoting Islamic revivalism and indoctrination to recruit young people in Malaysia to jihadism. It is actually a Malaysian branch of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Ramadan wrote a book called, Islamic Law: Its Scope and Equity, and a version of it was published for the Malaysian Muslim Youth Movement (a branch of WAMY):



World Association of Muslim Youth (WAMY) was created through the collaboration of the Wahhabist and Muslim Brotherhood led by Said Ramadan who was the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood including Ahmad Bahefzallah, the boss of Huma Abedin (Hillary Clinton’s aid) and her parents Mahmoud and Saleha Abedin. It was also financed by the wealthy Abdullah Omar Naseef, another boss of the Abedin family.

Said Ramadan, Kahn’s source for his writing, was major leader of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, according to the Islamic scholar, Kemal A. Faruki. We took a snapshot of Faruki’s statement on Ramadan:



Kahn wrote the paper in the eighties while he was in Saudi Arabia, the motherland of Wahhabism, which means that Kahn clearly had a Wahabist connection. We took a snapshot of the text:



According to a recent report, Khan moved from Pakistan to the United Arab Emirates, a hotbed for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Kahn currently runs a law firm in New York City called KM Kahn Law Office. According to the website, the the law firm specializes in “immigration services.” Most likely Kahn was working to bring Muslims into the country.



To understand the inception of Muslim immigration one must study the Muslim Minority Affairs, a paradigm created by Saudi jurisprudence which sparked during the times Khan lived in Saudi Arabia while collaborating with the Saudi kingdom.

It is likely that Khan is a Muslim plant working with the Hillary Clinton campaign, probably for the interest of Muslim oil companies as well as Muslim immigration into the U.S.
Intelius reveals Khizr M. Khan used to work for Hogan & Hartson and Lovells, which has ties to the Clinton Foundation:

“Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign”
“Many lawyers at Hogan Lovells remember the week in 2004 when U.S. Army Capt. Humayun Khan lost his life to a suicide bomber. Then-Hogan & Hartson attorneys mourned the death because the soldier’s father, Khizr Khan, a Muslim American immigrant, was among their beloved colleagues”

Saudi interests with using Khan to advance Muslim immigration and advance Muslim Sharia is a lengthy subject. And it has ties to Hillary Clinton’s aid Huma Abedin as well. It will take hours of reading just to cover this topic on how it was The House of Saud’s “Muslim Minority Affairs” and the Abedins (Huma Abedin and family) that played a central role in using Muslim immigration to infiltrate the west with Wahhbi agenda. The House of Saud had used Huma’s father Sayed Zaynul Abedin’s work regarding the Muslim Minority Affairs in the West, published in 1998 as part of 29 works to construct a plan to conquer the U.S. with Islam. It is obvious that Khan is upset, that a Trump victory will eliminate and destroy decades of hard work to bring in Islamic immigration into the United States which was spearheaded by agents in Saudi Arabia like Khan and Huma Abedin’a father (Sayed Z. Abedin).

---

Read it all, because the media will ignore it like they did the Missing 28 pages. But there are alternatives now, like this: Media hypocrisy about grieving parents on full display


And this: An Open Letter to Khizr Khan
And this: Hillary Called Benghazi Mom a Liar, But Media Freak Out over Trump on Muslim Parents

[vector7]

Bill Gertz: Clinton Backed Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Regime

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2012 called the election of Egypt’s Islamist
Muslim Brotherhood leader a “milestone” for Egyptian democracy and offered
covert police and security help, according to declassified State Department documents.

Talking points show Clinton called Morsi’s election ‘milestone’ for Egyptian democracy

BY: Bill Gertz
October 13, 2016 5:00 am
http://freebeacon.com/national-secur...erhood-regime/



U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2012 / AP


A nine-page document, once-labeled “Secret,” listed talking points
for Clinton’s meeting with newly-elected Egyptian President
Mohamed Morsi on July 14, 2012.

The talking points said Morsi’s election was a key step toward popular
democracy in the strategic North African state. “We stand behind Egypt’s
transition to democracy,” the heavily-redacted Clinton talking points state,
adding that the only way to maintain a strong Egypt is “through a
successful transition to democracy.”

The first key objective of the meeting was for Clinton to “offer our
congratulations to Morsi and to the Egyptian people for this milestone
in Egypt’s transition to democracy.”

Clinton then was meant to offer Morsi American technical expertise
and assistance from both the U.S. government and private sector
to support his economic and social programs.

Clinton’s talking points also included an offer of secret assistance to help
Morsi “upgrade and reorient Egypt’s police force toward serving the needs
of a democratic people.” The offer included sending a team of U.S. police
and security experts to Egypt as part of a “framework of cooperation”
that would be carried out “quite discretely.”

Also, the talking points reveal Clinton was ready to help launch
an Egyptian-American Enterprise Fund, a private sector initiative of U.S.
and Egyptian investors to help Egyptian businesses. The fund was to
be launched with $60 million and would later involve Congress adding
$300 million over five years.

The fund was created in September 2012.

Many pro-democracy Egyptians who had taken to the streets as part
of the 2011 revolution that ousted long-time U.S. ally Egyptian President
Hosni Mubarak viewed U.S. support for Morsi as a betrayal and part
of a U.S. strategy of backing the Muslim Brotherhood in the region.

The meeting between Clinton and Morsi took place two months before
terrorists in neighboring Libya attacked a U.S. diplomatic compound
and CIA facility, killing four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to
Libya Christopher Stephens.

A second State Department document revealed that Deputy Secretary
of State Thomas R. Nides wrote to Morsi on Sept. 24, 2012 seeking
collaboration with the Egyptian leader on Syria and Iran.

“It was a honor to meet with you in Cairo,” Nides wrote in the letter.
“We share the goal of growing our markets and increasing trade, as well
as a desire for a stable, secure and peaceful region. As I said when we
met, the United States also remains committed to helping Egypt address
regional issues, including Syria and Iran.”

Both documents reveal that the State Department under Clinton had
little understanding of the Islamist threat posed by the Muslim Brotherhood
and its branches.

Andrew C. McCarthy, former assistant U.S. attorney in New York who
prosecuted Islamist terrorism cases, said Clinton backed the Muslim
Brotherhood over the Egyptian military, stating it was imperative
that power be turned over to the winner of the election.

“The defining mission of the Muslim Brotherhood is
the implementation of sharia,” McCarthy said.
Sharia is Islamic law that critics say is antidemocratic
and contrary to fundamental rights and freedoms.

The documents were released under a Freedom of Information Act
request seeking information on the Obama administration’s secret 2011
Presidential Study Directive-11, or PSD-11.

The directive, according to officials familiar with its contents,
outlined how the administration would seek to support
the Muslim Brotherhood around the world despite
the Islamist supremacist organization providing the
ideological underpinning for jihadist terrorism for both
al Qaeda and its successor, the Islamic State.

U.S. backing for Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt
was derailed by the Egyptian military a year after the meeting.

Morsi, the first democratically elected head of state in Egyptian history,
was ousted in a coup after he had sought to consolidate power by granting
himself unlimited authority in what pro-democracy critics called an Islamist
coup.

Egyptian military leaders arrested Morsi on July 3, 2013, after protesters
took to the streets to oppose his rule. Abdel Fattah al-Sisi headed a military
government and was later elected president.

The Muslim Brotherhood is an international organization
founded in 1928 that adopted as its motto “Allah is our
objective; the Prophet is our Leader; the Quran is our law;
Jihad is our way; dying in the path of Allah is our highest
hope.”

The leaders of the Brotherhood in September 2010 declared jihad,
or holy war against the United States and Israel, six months before
the Arab Spring uprisings in North Africa and the Middle East.

Clinton’s backing for Arab Spring states was guided by PSD-11
and produced ongoing disasters in the region, namely in Libya and Syria.

U.S. intervention in Libya ousted dictator Moammar Gadhafi but left
the oil-rich state in turmoil. It is now viewed as a failed state and safe
haven for several Islamist terror groups.

Syria’s civil war helped spawn the emergence of the Islamic State in 2014.

In a section on Israel, Clinton’s talking points expressed appreciation
to Morsi for assertions that Egypt would continue to abide by international
treaties and obligations.

“Maintaining peace with Israel is a fundamental shared interest and critical
for Egypt’s ability to address its economic challenges and enjoy
international support as it consolidates its democracy,” the talking points
stated. “We may not have a common view, but we do have a common
interest.”

The CIA also covertly backed the Muslim Brotherhood
in Egypt, according to Egyptian news outlets.

In December 2013, the news website Al Bashayer
published audio recordings of a CIA delegation that met
with Muslim Brotherhood Deputy Khayrat al Shatir
and Brotherhood official Isam al Haddad at the U.S. Embassy
in Cairo on Jan. 8, 2013.

The CIA asked the Muslim Brotherhood leaders to open a back channel
to al Qaeda “to secure the safe exit of U.S. troops” from Afghanistan.

Additionally, another news outlet, Al-Marshad al Amni, reported that
Maj. Gen. Abd-al-Hamid Khayrat, former deputy chief for Egyptian State
Security Investigations said the CIA in January 2013 “asked for the help
of the MB in Egypt to facilitate… the withdrawal from Afghanistan.”
The Muslim Brotherhood agreed to become a “bridge” between
the U.S. government and al Qaeda, Khayrat said.

The reports triggered widespread conspiracy theories in post-Morsi
Egypt that the CIA was collaborating with Morsi and the Muslim
Brotherhood to destabilize Egypt.

The Clinton talking points about the transition to democracy were reflected
in a briefing given by a State Department official to reporters the day
before the 2012 meeting. The covert police assistance was not mentioned.

A day after the meeting, Clinton stated in remarks at the U.S. Consulate
in Alexandria, Egypt, that she told Morsi the success of his presidency
and Egypt’s success “depends upon building consensus across the Egyptian
political spectrum and speaking to the needs and concerns of all
Egyptians—all faiths, all communities, men and women alike.”

Retired Army Lt. Col. Joseph Myers, a former DIA official and specialist
on terrorism, said the documents show the endorsement and support
of the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt was “a fools errand
and shows a disastrous strategic naivety.”

“The whole policy initiative to support a Muslim Brotherhood government
anywhere is another example of a total policy failure of Secretary Clinton,”
Myers said.

“But it also raises deeper questions of who in our government is advising
and influencing such reckless and dangerous policies that show no
fundamental comprehension of the threat we face from radical Islamic
jihad,” he added. “Or worse these advisers precisely understand what
they are doing to U.S. policy and Secretary Clinton could not.”

.

[vector7]

Huma Abedin was working as EDITOR at her mother’s jihad journal when it blamed America for 9/11 terror attacks

ByPamela Geller on August 21, 2016

White House 2016
00 Comments






This is who Hillary has been sleeping with (literally) for the past 10 years. Is it any wonder she’s owned by the Saudis. The Saudis have funded 20% of Hillary’s campaign.
This is who the American people are going to install in the White House? Start packing your bags.

REVEALED: Huma Abedin was working as ASSISTANT EDITOR at her mother’s radical Muslim journal when it blamed America for 9/11 terror attacks,” Mailonline, August 22, 2016:

Human Abedin worked at Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs until 2008
She was the assistant editor under her mother Saleha Mahmood Abedin
In 2002 journal published an article blaming US for the 9/11 attacks
Author wrote America’s ‘sanctions and injustices’ imposed on Muslim countries had created a ticking ‘time bomb’
That bomb ‘had to explode and explode it did on September 11’
Earlier articles appeared to claim that women who wore revealing clothes were inviting rape
Abedin and Clinton campaign have not commented on the articles
Informal Trump adviser Roger Stone claimed Abedin is a ‘Saudi spy’
Raises family ties to Institute of Minority Muslim Affairs, a think tank
Suggests link to Muslim Brotherhood but offers no direct evidence
Abedin was born in Kalamazoo, Michigan, and worked for Hillary in the White House, the Senate, and the State Department
Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin worked at a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11, it has been revealed.
Abedin, who could become the future White House chief of staff if Hillary wins the election, was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs until as late as 2008, NY Post reports.
The aide was at the journal in 2002 when her mother Saleha Mahmood Abedin, who remains editor-in-chief to this day, published an article which appeared to blame the US for bringing the 9/11 terror attacks on itself, according to the Post.




Human Abedin (right with Hillary Clinton, left) worked at a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11 before being appointed as Clinton’s top aide





US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (2nd L) is pictured with Saleha Mahmood Abedin (3rd L) at a women’s college in Jeddah on February 16, 2010

The article stated that the United States’ ‘spiral of violence’ was creating intense ‘anger and hostility’ while the sanctions and ‘injustices’ imposed on certain Muslim countries was creating a ‘time bomb’.
‘It was a time bomb that had to explode and explode it did on September 11, changing in its wake the life and times of the very community and the people it aimed to serve,’ Saleha wrote, according to the New York Post.
Huma was listed as ‘assistant editor’ on the masthead of the 2002 controversial issue.
Abedin has never spoken directly about the articles posted in her mother’s magazine, while she served as assistant editor.
But the admiration she has for her mom is clear.
In a recent Vogue piece, she described her mother as a feminist who was unhappy when the family moved to the conservative Saudi Arabia.



Abedin (left) who could become the future White House chief of staff if Hillary wins the election, was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs – run by her mother Saleha Mahmood Abedin (right)

‘My mother was traveling around the world to these international women’s conferences talking about women’s empowerment, and it was normal,’ she said.
But that viewpoint jars with other articles written in the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.
Shortly after Clinton gave her seminal ‘women’s rights are human rights,’ speech in Beijing in 1995, the journal published a series of articles hitting back at the speech.
A 1996 piece titled ‘Women’s rights are Islamic rights’, that appeared to claim that women who wore revealing clothes were inviting rape.
The author wrote that revealing clothes ‘directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.’
It also states that single or working moms and gay couples with children should not be classed as a family.
‘A conjugal family established through a marriage contract between a man and a woman, and extended through procreation is the only definition of family a Muslim can accept,’ the author, a Saudi official with the Muslim World League – which funds the journal.

Abedin’s mother Saleha Manmood Abedin wrote an article in 1996 claiming Clinton’s women’s rights stance was advancing a ‘very aggressive and radically feminist’ agenda that was un-Islamic
‘Pushing [mothers] out into the open labor market is a clear demonstration of a lack of respect of womanhood and motherhood,’ it added.
While the journal published the articles, Abedin had just started working for then-First Lady Clinton as a 19-year-old intern in 1996.
Abedin’s mother Saleha Manmood Abedin wrote an article in 1996 claiming Clinton’s women’s rights stance was advancing a ‘very aggressive and radically feminist’ agenda.
She continued that empowerment ‘does more harm than benefit the cause of women or their relations with men’ and ‘Among all systems of belief, Islam goes the farthest in restoring equality across gender.’
Incredibly, Saleha Abedin claimed that ‘more men are victims of domestic violence than women.’
She also helped to edit a book which claims that the practice of female genital mutilation – which has been internationally denounced as barbaric and cruel – was justified under Islamic law, the Post reports.

The aide was at the journal (pictured) working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief, when it published an article in 2002 claiming that the US brought the 9/11 terror attacks on itself
The articles have only come to light in recent months.
And it may surprise many that someone who looks likely to become the next Chief-of-Staff allowed such views on the devastating 9/11 attacks to be published on her watch.
Neither Abedin nor Hillary Clinton’s campaign have responded to requests for comment.
DailyMail.com also reached out to the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.
The nature of the articles have even led some opposition members to claim Abedin is a ‘spy.’
Last month, Roger Stone, an informal adviser to Donald Trump’s campaign publicly stated his belief that Abedin could be a ‘Saudi spy’ and encouraged the candidate to raise the issue.
‘She has a very troubling past,’ Stone told Breitbart News Daily. ‘She comes out of nowhere. She seems to have an enormous amount of cash, even prior to the time that she goes to work for Hillary,’ he added.
‘So we have to ask: Do we have a Saudi spy in our midst? Do we have a terrorist agent?’ he asked.
Stone didn’t offer any evidence for Abedin’s supposed terror ties or any proof of spying. He pointed to press reports about Abedin’s family history and time living in Saudi Arabia as a child.
Abedin has never spoken directly about the articles posted in her mother’s magazine, while she served as assistant editor

Secret agent? Donald Trump advisor Roger Stone is asking whether longtime Hillary Clinton (left) aide Huma Abedin (right) is a ‘Saudi spy’ or a ‘terrorist agent’

Secret agent? Donald Trump advisor Roger Stone is asking whether longtime Hillary Clinton (left) aide Huma Abedin (right) is a ‘Saudi spy’ or a ‘terrorist agent’
‘I also think that now that Islamic terrorism is going to be front and center, there’s going to be a new focus on whether this administration, the administration of Hillary Clinton at State was permeated at the highest levels by Saudi intelligence and others who are not loyal Americans,’ Stone said.
‘I speak specifically of Huma Abedin, the right-hand woman, the now vice-chairman or co-chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.’
Stone urged Trump to start raising the issue.
‘It’s not just Huma. It’s her mother and her father who are, who are hardcore Islamic ideologues,’ he said.
There aren’t any comments in the public record of Huma Abedin making hardcore Islamic ideological statements. She has offered very few pronouncements over her career as a behind-the-scenes operative, although she did weigh in on Twitter after Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson said a Muslim shouldn’t be in charge of the country.
‘You can be a proud American, a proud Muslim, and proudly serve this great country. Pride versus prejudice,’ Abedin tweeted in response to the comment.
Advisor Roger Stone wants Donald Trump to start raising the issue of Abedin’s family ties
Stone has participated in bare-knuckled politics since Richard Nixon’s reelection
Stone has participated in bare-knuckled politics since Richard Nixon’s reelection
‘I’m not talking about her personal relationship at this point – I’m talking about her political relationship,’ Stone continued.
Abedin is married to ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner, who quit Congress after a sexting scandal.
Stone alluded to press reports including a February Vanity Fair article that examined her late father, Syed Zainul Abedin’s ties to the Institute of Minority Muslim Affairs, a think tank, and served as editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.
National review columnist Andrew McCarthy, a former assistant U.S. attorney, claims the publication is a mouthpiece for the Muslim Brotherhood.
The article claimed that the Abedin family moved to Jidda, Saudi Arabia, when Abedin was two with the backing of Abdullah Omar Nasseef, president of King Abdulaziz University.
Abedin got her start working for Clinton when the candidate was first lady. She later followed her to the Senate and the State Department
Abedin got her start working for Clinton when the candidate was first lady. She later followed her to the Senate and the State Department
Many politicians, of both parties, strongly support Abedin including Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona.
‘Put simply, Huma represents what is best about America: the daughter of immigrants, who has risen to the highest levels of our government on the basis of her substantial personal merit and her abiding commitment to the American ideals that she embodies so fully,’ McCain said then. He added: ‘I am proud to know Huma and to call her my friend.’
Abedin was born in Kalamazoo Michigan, the child of two academics. Her father was born in New Delhi, India, while her mother was from Pakistan. She attended George Washington University and was a board member of a Muslim students association.
The Clinton campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill told Vanity Fair, ‘There are few things that President Obama and John McCain agree on. One is that … [Rep. Michele] Bachmann’s lies about Huma are baseless and bigoted fear-mongering.’
The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, first published in 1979, is produced by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs and published three times a year.

- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/08/huma....Sr9TWXne.dpuf

[vector7]

See Something Say Nothing

Phillips Haney has the keys to the valves to drain the swamp. He has the evidence of blood on Obama and his Administrations hands.



Here is the most recent Phillips Haney interview, a Homeland Security officer who reveals the government's submission to Jihad:

How he started as entomologist studying ants the Lord showed him how cells operate and elevated him to Homeland Security and tracked down the most dangerous Islamic terror cells and reported on them.

Then his work was deleted and terrorist attacks happened tied to those deletions like Fort Hood, Boston, Orlando and San Bernardino.

When he wouldn't shut up the Obama Administration opened 3 investigations against him of leaking classified information.

2-6-17 Part 1
2-7-17 Part 2


Homeland Security Whistleblower Phillips Haney Devastating Testimony Before Congress On Deleted Records of Dangerous Terror Cells Operating In the US