New Black Panthers Plot With Iran to Overthrow America

[vector7]

EXCLUSIVE–New Black Panther Leader: Blacks Need to Migrate to Five Southern States, Form ‘Country Within a Country’


Kevork Djansezian/Getty

by Aaron Klein10 Jul 2016

Babu Omowale, the so-called national minister of defense for the People’s New Black Panther Party, says his group and allied organizations have their sights set on establishing “our own government in a nation within a nation.”

Omowale was speaking in an interview set to air Sunday night on this reporter’s talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” broadcast on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and News Talk 990 AM in Philadelphia.

Omowale used the interview to claim five states as belonging to the “Black Nation”: Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama, and Georgia.

The revolutionary stated: “We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country.”

Omowale is also co-founder of the Huey P. Newton Gun Club, a black militant gun group named after Black Panther Party founder Huey P. Newton. According to reports, Dallas shooter Micah X. Johnson “liked” the Huey P. Newton Gun Club and Omawale has said that he recognized Johnson from black community events in Dallas.

Asked by this reporter what his group’s endgame is, Omowale replied:

The end game is land ownership. The endgame is our own government in a nation within a nation. Okay. So we claim the states of Louisiana, we claim the states of Mississippi, we claim the states of South Carolina, we claim the states of Alabama, and we claim the states of Georgia.

We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country.

For now, however, Omowale says the goals are more short-term:

There is no way that we can totally separate ourselves in the United States of America and we are aware of that. We know that we are owed land, we are owed monies, we are owed restitutions and we are owed reparations. That’s going to be a continuing process. What we are saying right now is we want to control the economics in our community. We want to control the black dollars. The money that goes in, the money that goes out.

We want to control the politics in our community. If a politician is not bringing anything to the table for the betterment of that community, we are not going to vote for these particular people. And we most definitely want to control the education. What our people are learning in what we call the public fool system, not school system, where they are teaching and misrepresenting the true history of the black man here in the United States.

The Huey P. Newton Gun Club says on its website it is seeking to “develop over time to a regimented Black Army.”

“Our mission is to educate the masses of black people on the necessity of self,” states the website. “That includes self-preservation, self-defense, and self-sufficiency through militant culture.”

“We want freedom. We want the power to practice self-determination, and to determine the destiny of our community and THE BLACK NATION.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ountry-within/

[MinutemanCO]

If it wasn't such a divisive tactic, I'd like to see how this arrangement worked out. I'm not sure they'd prosper economically and socially as much as they would like. How long would it be until they turned to predatory methodologies to maintain existence?

[Ryan Ruck]

EXCLUSIVE–New Black Panther Leader: Blacks Need to Migrate to Five Southern States, Form ‘Country Within a Country’

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ountry-within/

See also: From The Soviet Files: An American 'Negro Republic' - The Communist Secession Plot

[vector7]

New Black Panther Party issues MAJOR threat to RNC

Written by The Analytical Economist on July 12, 2016




It’s going to be a hectic Republican National Convention, to say the least.

The DNC has budgeted $800,000 towards disrupting the convention, the Marxist super-group Prophets of Rage is going to be playing shows on spontaneous venues around the convention, and that’s hardly all that’s in store.

The New Black Panther Party has plans for the RNC – and it’s hard not to interpret them as a threat. The Telegraph reports:

The New Black Panther Party announced on Tuesday that they planned to carry guns at next week’s Republican Party convention, in a sign of the racial tension that is roiling the nation as President Barack Obama spoke in Dallas, to pay tribute to five white police killed by a black gunman.

Formed in Dallas, Texas in 1989, it is not an official successor to the Black Panther Party of the 1960s, but bears the same ideology.

“If it is an open state to carry, we will exercise our Second Amendment rights because there are other groups threatening to be there that are threatening to do harm to us,” said Hashim Nzinga, chairman of the New Black Panther Party.

“If that state allows us to bear arms, the Panthers and the others who can legally bear arms will bear arms.”

Ohio, the state which is hosting the Republican convention, permits the open carrying of weapons.

And they won’t be the only ones bearing arms.

Another group, Oath Keepers, comprised of current and former members of the military have shown up at other tense events heavily armed and also say they plan to carry weapons into Cleveland.

Cleveland officials have said there will be increased security during the Republican gathering, with resources from city, state and federal authorities. Within the convention area, the Secret Service will set up a smaller perimeter near the conference centre itself, which will have stricter security and prohibit guns.

We can only pray that things don’t escalate. After all, it might be questionable strategy to show up armed at a convention for the party with the most gun owners.

[Note: This post was authored by The Analytical Economist]