War in the US; when will it come?

[vector7]

Flashbacks:
U.S. "Gets Its Ass Handed To It" In World War III Simulations: RAND

March 12, 2019



In simulated World War III scenarios, the U.S. continues to lose against Russia and China, two top war planners warned last week. “In our games, when we fight Russia and China, blue gets its ass handed to it" RAND analyst David Ochmanek said Thursday.

RAND's wargames show how US Armed Forces - colored blue on wargame maps - experience the most substantial losses in one scenario after another and still can't thwart Russia or China - which predictably is red - from accomplishing their objectives: annihilating Western forces.

Watch his remarks at approximately 13:07 in the video below:


"We lose a lot of people. We lose a lot of equipment. We usually fail to achieve our objective of preventing aggression by the adversary," he warned.

In the next military conflict, which some believe may come as soon as the mid-2020s, all five battlefield domains: land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace, will be heavily contested, suggesting the U.S. could have a difficult time in achieving superiority as it has in prior conflicts.

The simulated war games showed, the "red" aggressor force often destroys U.S. F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters on the runway, sends several Naval fleets to the depths, destroys US military bases, and through electronic warfare, takes control of critical military communication systems. In short, a gruesome, if simulated, annihilation of some of the most modern of US forces.

“In every case I know of,” said Robert Work, a former deputy secretary of defense with years of wargaming experience, “the F-35 rules the sky when it’s in the sky, but it gets killed on the ground in large numbers.”

So, as Russia and China develop fifth-generation fighters and hypersonic missiles, “things that rely on sophisticated base infrastructures like runways and fuel tanks are going to have a hard time,” Ochmanek said. “Things that sail on the surface of the sea are going to have a hard time.”

"That’s why the 2020 budget coming out next week retires the carrier USS Truman decades early and cuts two amphibious landing ships, as we’ve reported. It’s also why the Marine Corps is buying the jump-jet version of the F-35, which can take off and land from tiny, ad hoc airstrips, but how well they can maintain a high-tech aircraft in low-tech surroundings is an open question," said Breaking Defense.

Meanwhile, speaking purely hypothetically of course, "if we went to war in Europe, there would be one Patriot battery moving, and it would go to Ramstein. And that’s it,” Work complained. The US has 58 Brigade Combat Teams across the continent but doesn't have anti-air and missile-defense capabilities required to handle a barrage of missiles from Russia.

RAND also war-gamed cyber and electronic attacks in the simulations, Work said; Russia and China tend to cripple US communication networks.

"Whenever we have an exercise and the red force really destroys our command and control, we stop the exercise," Work said without a trace of humor. Beijing calls this “system destruction warfare,” Work said. They aim to “attack the American battle network at all levels, relentlessly, and they practice it all the time.”

The Air Force asked RAND to formulate a plan several years ago to improve the outcomes of the wargames in favor of the US, Ochmanek said. “We found it impossible to spend more than $8 billion a year" to fix the problems.

"That’s $8 billion for the Air Force. Triple that to cover for the Army and the Navy Department (which includes the US Marines)," Ochmanek said, "and you get $24 billion."

Work was less concerned about the near-term risk of war, and he said, China and Russia aren't ready to fight because their modernization efforts have not been completed. He said any major conflict is unlikely for another 10 to 20 years from now.

He said "$24 billion a year for the next five years would be a good expenditure" to prepare the military for World War III.

RAND offers a sobering assessment that America could lose a multi-front war in the future, which is quite shocking considering that the US spent nearly three times as much as the second biggest war power, China, did in 2017.

With the defense budget stuck around $700 billion per annum for the remainder of President Trump's term, America's Warhawks are inciting fear through simulated wargames with one purpose only: demand more taxpayers' money for war spending.


Vladimir Putin endorses nuclear doctrine allowing for first strike
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8381333/Putin-endorses-rule-allowing-carry-strike.html

Chinese Dr Li Yi:"We’ll soon surpass the US, they will not survive, we’ll drive the U.S to its death"
Jan 29, 2021

This reminded me of the late John Paul Jackson's interview on Trunews April 5, 2012 about future events.

Summary of the podcast:

@47:30 Rick was talking to a Panamanian college woman with dreams and visions people are having in Panama of American riots coming during elections, cities on fire and a great persecution coming to Christians in America.

@49:30 John Paul Jackson was shown things happening to America from 2010-2020. He said shortly after the next decade (2020) if America doesn't repent it will be facing a lifestyle more like the 1800's than the 2000s.

@54:17 John Paul Jackson is led with urgency to share this word to watch Russia and China to begin projecting their influence over areas they once had control and influence over before and during the cold war. Before America goes to war, China and Russia begin taking a much stronger tone against America, telling her how it is going to be with ultimatums.

Feeble Joe Biden Falls Several Times Boarding Air Force One – Ends Up on His Knees

By Cristina Laila

Published March 19, 2021 at 11:08am



78-year-old Joe Biden fell several times while boarding Air Force One on Friday.

Biden tried jogging up the stairs to board Air Force One and fell hard on his knee.


The US military has lost a second Russian submarine in the past 24 hours

By The Baltic Review

March 14, 2021



The US has started to panic after it lost two Russian submarines from its sight overnight.

A couple of hours ago, the US military launched a military special operation to search for the Russian submarine Rostov-on-Don, which unexpectedly went missing after entering the waters of the Mediterranean Sea. A few hours later, the US military was also unable to locate a second Russian submarine, which had left the port of Tartus, where the Russian naval base is located.

The US military is most concerned that the Russian Navy submarines “disappeared” at the very moment when a US carrier strike group appeared in Mediterranean waters.

China beefs up forces in Taiwan strait

China beefs up coastal forces as it prepares for possible Taiwan invasion https://t.co/4C1s3nai4d via @scmpnews

— EndGameWW3 (@EndGameWW3) October 19, 2020

Air force loses in air war

'We're going to lose fast': U.S. Air Force held a war game that started with a Chinese biological attack https://t.co/zhqtlS79gQ via @YahooNews

— EndGameWW3 (@EndGameWW3) March 11, 2021

South seas escalation

According to Taiwanese military sources, Chinese and U.S. naval vessels appeared in the water near Taiwan's Orchid Island around the same time on March 11, after USS John Finn (DDG 113) transited Taiwan Strait. pic.twitter.com/1ZobQ0qWcP

— Duan Dang (@duandang) March 12, 2021

Biden weakening the military

Tucker Carlson accuses Joe Biden of trying to feminize the military, argues China is ramping up it's military masculinity. pic.twitter.com/8lDKEPyws6

— nikki mccann ramírez (@NikkiMcR) March 10, 2021

Putin pulls ties with Washington

BREAKING: After Pres. Biden said "Putin is a killer" in ABC interview, Russia's Washington envoy has been called back home to "analyze future ties with Washington"

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) March 17, 2021

China rebukes Biden

CCP Foreign Affairs Chief Yang Jiechi to U.S. Sec. of State Antony Blinken:

"The United States does not have the qualification to say that it wants to speak to China from a position of strength" pic.twitter.com/QiQPPIXZLe

— Izzy (@The__Real__Izzy) March 19, 2021

In separate incidents, Moscow and Beijing sent a strong message to the Democrats now running America that they will no longer tolerate being told what to do.

Russia: “Whatever you accuse others of is what you are doing or acting yourself.”

China: “The US no longer has the qualification to speak to China from a position of strength.

Russia and China tell Biden: The old days are over - Asia Times

America can do nothing to stop it, our political system has become a banana republic, divided by race, gender, economic status and everything else. We had a good run.

— LT_COMMO_THICKNESS (@CommoLt) March 26, 2021

What is America going to do when China goes for Taiwan and Russia goes for Ukraine at the same time.

The US has been too weak to fight a 2-front war for at least since Obama was elected.

Trump to his credit, was trying to rebuild the US military, w/ an eye on Beijing. Even if he'd been allowed to succeed, a 2-front war would be very unwise. https://t.co/EKOndJ020J

— Discredited Social Entity GAB@chaleck (@Chaleck) March 26, 2021

[vector7]

Outline from the post above to avoid twitter editing.

U.S. "Gets Its Ass Handed To It" In World War III Simulations: RAND


“In our games, when we fight Russia and China … blue (America) gets its ass handed to it,” RAND senior researcher David Ochmanek said during a panel discussion at the Center for a New American Security think tank last week.


Watch his remarks at approximately 13:07 in the video below:

Panel Discussion: Why America gets its ass handed to it in a war against Russia and China

Outline of those comments:

America loses a lot of people
America loses a lot equipment
America fails to contain regional aggression

• All 5 domains of warfare are contested from the outset of hostilities
• We no longer have air superiority over the battle space
• We no longer have maritime superiority
• Our Space assets are under attack by kinetic and non-kinetic means from the outset of hostilities
• Our command and control are under attack by electromagnetic and cyber means from the outset of hostilities
• Our forward bases at land or at sea are all under attack from the outset of hostilities
• We no longer have traditional regional military umbrella sanctuaries to safely operate from

[vector7]

JR Nyquist believes the time for war with Russia and China is between June 15 and the end of October.

The June 15th date comes from Russia which said that all foreign workers must leave the country by June 15th

JRN video interview below:

Video: https://www.americanpartisan.org/202...ter-of-months/

JR NYQUIST INTERVIEW: CHINA PLANNING TO LAUNCH ATTACK ON AMERICA “IN A MATTER OF MONTHS”?
Posted by NC Scout | Jun 11, 2021 | AP

June 10, 2021

by Mike Adams

Today’s Situation Update podcast (see below) focuses on what I learned from JR Nyquist in a horrifying interview conducted yesterday (also posted below, separately).

JR Nyquist’s website is JRnyquist.blog and everything there is worth reading.

Nyquist is a high-IQ researcher who has interviewed dissidents and whistleblowers from Chinese and former Soviet regimes, and he studies internal documents of these regimes to understand their geopolitical strategies and goals.

Nyquist warns that the long-term plan has always been for China to invade and conquer the continental United States by launching attacks from Mexico, while Russia plans to attack and take Alaska, then proceed to conquer Canada, which won’t be difficult since Canada has disarmed all its own citizens with fascist gun control initiatives.

What has changed recently in all this, however, is that China has sharply accelerated its timetable of attacking America due to emerging revelations about the origins of the covid-19 biological weapon, which was developed under the supervision of the communist Chinese military.

China now knows it must attack and attempt to destroy America before these investigations show China deliberately built the bioweapon after infiltrating the NIH, Pentagon, Universities and scientific establishment in America to funnel taxpayer dollars into the Wuhan virology gain-of-function research projects. (Which also involved a transfer of intellectual property from U.S. universities to China.)

Accordingly, China is preparing a multi-faceted assault on America that JR Nyquist warns may be “months away,” not years. That attack, if it is not stopped in time, is likely to consist of:

*Cyber warfare attacks on the US power grid, pipelines and food production infrastructure targets.

*Nuclear weapons attacks on military installations.

*EMP attacks on the power grid to plunge America into darkness and chaos.

*Renewed bioweapons attacks using high-fatality strains of super bioweapons that China has already developed.

*Lastly, kinetic attacks with invading troops and occupying forces, with China initiating its attacks along the U.S. / Mexico border and moving northward.

The JR Nyquist interview is shown here, with my Situation Update podcast analysis below. Be sure you are sitting down before you hear this information, and it may cause sleeplessness.

[vector7]

Invasion America?

To achieve victory in a future war, it will not be sufficient to have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them very accurately on target; it will also be necessary that the ground forces be able to move rapidly into regions which have been subjected to nuclear strikes.

Only when this problem is solved will it be possible to speak of the effective exploitation of nuclear strikes by tanks and infantry in conclusively defeating the enemy, or of carrying out extensive maneuvers and decisive advances in depth.

Soviet Military Strategy, [p. 343]

The Marxist Democrats are leading with JoBama/Soros to follow their Soviet playbook plans outlined by Jan Sejna's take over of America...

From the comments:

“Portions of the Soviet plans for seizing control of the United States following a nuclear strike were described by the head of this Administration for Special Propaganda to Sejna in 1967 just prior to Sejna’s defection.

The description provides an interesting insight into the possible nature of Soviet plans and, in a certain regard, their efforts to clothe mechanisms in indigenous or nationalistic trappings.

In 1967 the Soviets believed that, in addition to strikes against nuclear and critical military targets, roughly 110 nuclear strikes would be adequate to cripple the United States.

A ‘Central Committee for Salvation and Restoration’ and counterpart Salvation and Restoration committees in newly established regions would be set up.

The first action would be to seize radio and television networks and announce changes in national and state governments, that is, to the new Salvation and Restoration committees. (take over of MSM/BT)

A third party would be created out of the CPUSA, left-wing (DNC) Senators, and prominent figures from finance, industry, and science. Recruitment here is directed toward those people who are regarded as naive and those whom the Soviets refer to as ‘chicken opportunists.’

Middle class radicals, blacks, and Hispanics would be recruited and organized into a national militia.

‘Salvation courts’ would be established and their immediate task would be to execute members of right-wing groups.

There would be heavy reliance on outside ‘advisors’ provided by Soviet surrogates and agents, and the new government would be pushed to negotiate a peace treaty. In the attack, Europe would not be destroyed. Rather, Moscow would launch a propaganda campaign to tell the Europeans that the Soviets had saved their lives. The United States would be blamed for starting the war and an international committee for the neutrality of the United States would be formed. Pressure would be produced from the left and from Europe and elsewhere for the United States to give up.”

Jeff Nyquist says:

June 20, 2021 at 4:23 am

We are stupid enough that they (China) got this far. Look at how the pandemic has worked. They have infiltrated our media, government and business. This is obvious. Who is to say how far they might go?

If I am Xi, I would still entertain high hopes. But China is shaky on stamina, on organization, on honesty in government. Too many people steal. I am not sure they can hold everything together as they advance.

I was told that the Russians gave up the idea of invading the lower 48 states in 1991.

This does not mean they won’t help China with the attack.

I think they are committed to do so (if the war is set to happen). Communism is the common cause of the Socialist Camp, though the Russian leaders cannot say so publicly.

Russia suffered attenuation of her force structure then.

The Chinese had the manpower, shipping capacity, and the desire.

Russia only wants Alaska and to dominate Europe.

I suspect the communist ideal is going to break down because of ethnic differences.

China will have its zone.

Russia will have “the one common European home.”

If one follows Moscow’s policy statements you will see that it takes account of the division of territory with China.

We shall see how things unfold during the summer.


Interview With Nevin: Red Dawn in Retrospect

We’ve got a biological war going on. The Chinese are telling their people to get ready for nuclear war. The Russians are getting ready…. These are all pre-war signs.

They [the Russians] are getting rid of [the dollars in their] sovereign funds; and then you have these mass assassinations, these drone attacks in Mexico….

This is very important for them, for pre-positioning [small units of Spetsnaz] troops.


Populist Roundtable: Episode 9 Part 4 J.R. Nyquist (2hrs)
Jun 6, 2021
In this episode, Nevin and Jeff discussed the Red Dawn Scenario, the Chinese role in Covid-19, potential collaborators with Russian/Chinese occupation forces, Russian military strategy, the writings of Soviet era commissioned officers, and more...



Joe Biden (aka JoBama) And Allies Put America On A Track To Lose Our First Nuclear War: Democrats Want To Abolish America's Biggest Impediment To A Surprise Nuclear Attack - What Could Go Wrong?

How To Start, And Lose, A Nuclear War

By Dr. Peter Vincent Pry



Losing a nuclear war is surely not intended by the Biden administration and congressional allies, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., Chairman of the powerful House Armed Services Committee. But their call for unilaterally abolishing U.S. intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) would surely lose a nuclear World War III.

The U.S. won the Cold War without the USSR launching a thermonuclear holocaust, thanks to the U.S. Triad of ICBMs, bombers, and ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs).

Each Triad leg plays a special role making a well-rounded nuclear deterrent for the broadest range of scenarios:

—Strategic bombers are the most flexible deterrent, can carry nuclear or conventional weapons, and can be recalled;

—SSBNs, when generated so all boats are at sea, are the most survivable deterrent, a secure strategic reserve to hold at risk the most valuable adversary targets, thereby deterring attack on the most valuable U.S. targets, especially cities;

—ICBMs are the most responsive deterrent, over 95% of the force always standing on alert ready to launch in a few minutes, rapidly retargetable, linked by multiple secure redundant means to the National Command Authority for near instant execution of Emergency Action Messages (EAMs).

Today, anti-nuclear radicals in the Union of Concerned Scientists, Federation of American Scientists, and Nuclear Threat Initiative are an important part of the Democrat Party’s political and intellectual base — and are calling for unilateral abolition of U.S. ICBMs.

These same groups and their pseudointellectual sophistry, masquerading as deep strategic thinking, would have lost the Cold War.

Now they are being welcomed into the Biden Administration.

Anti-ICBM politicians and activists see the greatest virtue of ICBMs — over 95% always on high-alert, every day, for years, serving as sentinels against surprise attack — as the very reason to abolish ICBMs, that they falsely allege are on a “hair trigger” for accidental nuclear war.

Elsewhere, I and others have made the case at length why ICBMs are indispensable to the U.S. nuclear deterrent, and that the alleged risks from their high-alert rates causing an accidental nuclear war are minimal.


For example, see my report "Surprise Attack: ICBMs and the Real Nuclear Threat"(Oct. 31, 2020) or Matthew Costlow’s report "Safety in Diversity: The Strategic Value of ICBMs and GBSD in the Nuclear Triad" (National Institute for Public Policy: May 2021) or, last but not least, recent testimony about the desperate need for U.S. ICBM modernization by Admiral Charles Richard, Commander of STRATCOM.

Eliminating U.S. ICBMs would make much easier adversary nuclear surprise attack, as they would no longer have to destroy 400 hardened ICBM silos, just 3 strategic bomber bases and 2 SSBN ports.

U.S. strategic bombers are no longer maintained on alert or nuclear-armed and would be completely destroyed by a surprise attack. Surprise attack would destroy most of the 14 U.S. SSBNs that are normally at port, while only 3-4 are on patrol at sea.

If the U.S. bans ICBMs, thereby reducing U.S. strategic targets from over 400 to just 5, even if there is thereby a tiny reduction in the possibility of accidental nuclear war, there would be an enormous increased temptation to Russia, China, even North Korea and Iran, to make a surprise attack.

If U.S. ICBMs are eliminated, Russia, China, North Korea and Iran do not even need nuclear weapons to destroy U.S. bombers on their bases or SSBNs in port. Cruise and anti-ship missiles with high-explosive warheads could do the job.

Iran has Russia’s Club-K missile, which has a launcher disguised as a shipping container, so any freighter can be converted into a guided missile cruiser.



If U.S. ICBMs are abolished, and so too the biggest impediment to adversary surprise attack, during a crisis or conflict it would become far more urgent to mobilize U.S. bombers and SSBNs to a more survivable posture.

Bombers would have to be put on strip-alert and nuclear weapons uploaded. Submarines would prepare to put to sea.

Mobilization of U.S. bombers and SSBNs would be highly visible to the adversary—and highly provocative.

Absent ICBMs to deter surprise attack, would the U.S. dare mobilizing bombers and SSBNs—ever? Would the adversary allow the U.S. to mobilize bombers and SSBNs, or strike first?

Banning ICBMs would:

—Greatly increase adversary incentives to strike U.S. bombers and submarines while they are sitting ducks;

—Greatly increase the range of scenarios when the U.S. must mobilize bombers and SSBNs to survivable posture, thereby also greatly increasing risk of triggering “action-reaction” escalation resulting in accidental nuclear war;

—Introduce a real “use them or lose them” dilemma with U.S. bombers and SSBNs where no such dilemma now exists because of the ICBM deterrent;

—Create a real "hair trigger" posture for U.S. SSBNs on patrol, and probably for bombers that will of necessity have to return to airborne or strip-alert, because of greatly increased vulnerability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent without ICBMs;

—Thus, banning ICBMs would undermine and destabilize the foundations of nuclear deterrence in ways more likely to realize the worst fears of anti-ICBM activists.

If you want to start, and lose, a nuclear war — abolish U.S. ICBMs.

[vector7]

This is the DNC/DS's back up plan...HOPE?!

Hope that China doesn't side with Russia.

Soros, (Godfather of the DNC/DS/Obama-Biden Admin) Worries About Putin-Xi Partnership, Hopes They Can Be Stopped "Before They Destroy Our Civilization"

Soros Worries About Putin-Xi Partnership, Hopes They Can Be Stopped "Before They Destroy Our Civilization" https://t.co/s3xhJ3Eag2

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) March 16, 2022

Obama-Biden has brought us here...

[Malsua]

Why can't a tiny little clot work it's way up into the noggin of Soros and rid us of his taint.

[vector7]

Tucker Carlson Predicts Biden Will Wage War With Russia To Get Re-Elected

TUCKER: “There will be a hot war between the United States and Russia within the next year”

My guess is that he (his handlers (ObamaAdmin) / Overlords) will suspend sElections in a “Time of Emergency”.
RT 6min

TUCKER: “There will be a hot war between the United States and Russia within the next year”

pic.twitter.com/AGv6Iifg5U

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 30, 2023