Don't worry Phil. Take some inspiration from the great Chesty Puller...
Don't worry Phil. Take some inspiration from the great Chesty Puller...
hahaha
Libertatem Prius!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Oh, I am not too concerned actually. Just saying was all.
Companion Threads:
- General David Petraeus tipped over as the head of the CIA
- Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary
- Sequestration: The Disarming of the United States of America
- The Leftist Plot to Destroy the US Military
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Obama And The Military: Their Coup, Or His ?
Sheesh...speaking of third-world status...
I'll report, you can decide...here's one version (love the asterisked ending):
It appears that General Petraeus found out, while at the C.I.A., that the 2012 election was going to be fixed. Word is Petraeus was going to put a stop to it but was checkmated by Eric Holders F.B.I. investigation on, really him, not his girlfriend. When the Administration found out about the General’s move, they pulled out their ace-in-a-hole against the General and forced him to get out-a-Dodge and resign. Obama knew that Petraeus was Presidential material and would win a Presidential election. He had to find anything he could to discredit him, and he did!!! You see Obama had to clear his way for his third term in 2016. Yes, that’s right, his third term.*
*Don’t ask me for sources. This is what I’ve pieced together from several sources that I will never name.
This piece - from foreign sources - came out pre-election:
Obama Fires Top Admiral As Coup Plot Fears Grows
A shocking new report...states that President Obama has fired one of the United States Navy’s most powerful Admirals over growing fears the US Military is planning an overthrow of his government.
According to this report, yesterday (27 October) Obama ordered the immediate removal of Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette from his command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3)currently located in the Middle East.
CSG-3 is one of five US Navy carrier strike groups currently assigned to the US Pacific Fleet. US Navy carrier strike groups are employed in a variety of roles, which involve gaining and maintaining sea control and projecting power ashore, as well as projecting naval airpower ashore.
US news reports on Obama’s unprecedented firing of a powerful US Navy Commander during wartime state that Admiral Gaouette’s removal was for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment” that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East.
This GRU report, however, states that Admiral Gaouette’s firing by President Obama was due to this strike force commander disobeying orders when he ordered his forces on 11 September to “assist and provide intelligence for” American military forces ordered into action by US Army General Carter Ham, who was then the commander of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), against terrorist forces attacking the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya who, like Admiral Gaouette, was fired by Obama....
Even MSM stalwart ABC found the axing of Gaouette a bit odd:
In an unusual move, the Navy has replaced an admiral commanding an aircraft carrier strike group while it is deployed to the Middle East. The replacement was prompted by an Inspector General’s investigation of allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.
And the Washington Times, not known as a rumor mill, reports some possible background on General Ham's abrupt dismissal:
The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.
General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.
Finished? Not even close, pal. Obama's ax continues to draw the blood of good men, as we ask..is Marine General John Allen really about to face a court-martial?
Marine Gen. John Allen’s alleged involvement in the romantic triangle that ensnared David Petraeus could lead to something seldom glimpsed in the American history of war: the court-martial of a top battlefield commander.
Defense officials say Allen insists he has done nothing wrong, though they acknowledged he exchanged “potentially inappropriate” emails with MacDill AFB socialite Jill Kelley. But if the Defense Department’s investigation finds Allen did more than write her and actually engaged in an extramarital relationship, he would be subject to prosecution under military justice.
Although adultery is rarely a criminal matter in the civilian world, it is formally barred under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, to which Allen remains subject even as the senior four-star commander of U.S. and international troops in Afghanistan
Remember how liberals howled when we held Bill Clinton, the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, to the same standard? Just saying...
Seems as if Obama has decided to clean house at the top levels of U.S. military command. And he's doing it in his typical skulduggerous fashion - with secretive personal attacks impossible to defend against. What end is served by Obama's military coup is, of course, the real question. Is he replacing hard men with soft ones, men who will think of their CIC's political needs before their warriors on the battlefield, men who will feel a certain...empathy with America's self-declared enemies?
Or is he just trying to eliminate everyone who know anything about the 9/11 attacks in Benghazi, Libya?
Or is Obama putting in place men whom he knows won't blink an eye if he does go for that third term that has eluded all but FDR, just coincidentally the one president Obama has felt the most affinity with? What better way to prove his greatness for all the ages?
I dunno...is there a better explanation for why two top commanders were unceremoniously relieved of duty, while two other high-profile military figures were simultaneously tied to a sex scandal?
If so, I wanna know...
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
"Your grandchildren will live under communism."
“You Americans are so gullible.
No, you won’t accept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
."
We’ll so weaken your
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
like overripe fruit into our hands."
November 13, 2012
Obama's Military Coup?
Read the article "Obama And The Military: Their Coup, Or His?" here at Right, Wing-Nut, for all the names and details (smile), below is a short excerpt:
... What the purpose is of Obama's military coup is, of course, the real question. Is he replacing hard men with soft ones, men who will think of their CIC's political needs before their warriors on the battlefield, men who will feel a certain...empathy with America's self-declared enemies?
Or is he just trying to eliminate everyone who know anything about the 9/11 attacks in Benghazi, Libya?
Or is Obama putting in place men whom he knows won't blink an eye if he does go for that third term that has eluded all but FDR,...
Or have expressed having issues with his 2nd phase transformational plans against the Constitution.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
"Your grandchildren will live under communism."
“You Americans are so gullible.
No, you won’t accept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
."
We’ll so weaken your
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
like overripe fruit into our hands."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
"Your grandchildren will live under communism."
“You Americans are so gullible.
No, you won’t accept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
."
We’ll so weaken your
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
like overripe fruit into our hands."
We thank you for post this stuff Vector.
/chuckles
Bracken will be the first one to "disappear" lol
I think he knows that too.
Libertatem Prius!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Judging from his background that wouldn't be an easy thing.
Libertatem Prius!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
A Military Coup Will Remove Obama
August 9, 2013 - Conspiracy, Featured, Main - Tagged: benghazi- chris stevens, carlyle group, hamm - 14 comments
President Obama’s presidency has a definitive shelf life. His backpedaling in the Middle East is of major concern to the military establishment but also to special interest groups such as the Carlyle Group. Obama is threatening to let Iraq and Afghanistan follow in the footsteps of Vietnam. Further, Obama’s refusal to attack Syria and Iran threatens the viability of the Petrodollar. This two part series will examine the forces which are lining up against this President and how five simultaneous political scandals are being held over his head to gain compliance from several powerful special interest groups.
The Aftermath of Benghazi
Obama’s presidency may not survive until 2016. He has the most dramatic set of political scandals in the history of the Oval Office. The only question remaining for this president is will he leave office as a result of the scandals or the result of a direct military coup? Obama has already survived one military coup attempt, but it is difficult to believe that there aren’t more military coups waiting in the wings for the right moment to strike.
The First Military Coup
In the fall of 2012, it is now clear that President Obama survived an attempted military coup. My sources tell me, that Obama, is fully aware of the fact that key elements of the military want him gone as the President and, in response, Obama has secretly embedded his CIA operatives in various military command structures around the world by placing these operatives into executive command positions in order to help them prevent just such a military coup and these embedded forces have indeed served him well in the aftermath of Benghazi.
Often, these embedded operatives serve as the second-in-command. The sole purpose of Obama’s operatives is to keep watch on key military leaders and to prevent them from moving against the policies of the present administration.
The murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens and his security detail at Benghazi served as a flashpoint for an attempted military coup. What is interesting about the coup attempt, is that very divergent military forces have joined together to take down Obama’s presidency. At issue was the attempted rescue of Ambassador Stevens by two senior military command officers.
Can you imagine the reaction of Stevens, his security team, and two senior command officers if Stevens had indeed been rescued? The gun-running stories of the CIA to Al-Qaeda would have turned the general populace on its ear. This would have been Obama’s Watergate moment. Of course, Stevens had to be murdered to cover up Obama’s complicity in gun-running to Al-Qaeda. Remember, it was Hillary Clinton, on behalf of Obama, who refused to beef up security for Ambassador Stevens at his request. With all that the Benghazi event represents, the sheep of America would’ve been awakened if Stevens had survived to talk. With the inability of the Obama administration to squelch the cries of conspiracy in the aftermath of Benghazi, Hillary, in an effort to preserve her 2016 election hopes, could not jump off the Obama ship fast enough. And even Napolitano has jumped ship and look for more defections in the weeks ahead. Obama is in real trouble. Spying on reporters and using the IRS to harass political enemies is damning, but Benghazi is career ending.
A Review of Benghazi
Let’s review what we have learned about what transpired at Benghazi. The Benghazi consulate, which was no more than a CIA safe house, came under attack by Al Qaeda forces and the attack lasted several hours. We now know that CIA forces were right down the street at the time of the attack that murdered Stevens Al Qaeda attackers, as they attempted to flee the murder scene, were subsequently murdered by the CIA forces, who could have been used to rescue Stevens. This was a desperate attempt to conceal Obama’s gun running operations. We also know that several key personnel at Benghazi have been forced to sign nondisclosure agreements about what they know. What did they know?
The Truth Is Hiding In Plain Sight
What is known, and what was reported in the New York Times, is that this administration ran guns to Al Qaeda in a Middle East version of fast and furious. We’ve also learned that Ambassador Stevens was the conduit between the establishment and Al Qaeda receiving weapons, which they used to overthrow the Libyan government.
The murder of Stevens and his team at Benghazi is a seminal moment in American history. We have further learned that al-Qaeda forces, fighting on the side of NATO in Libya, obtained 20,000 hand-held stinger missiles. This means that the Obama administration has allowed al-Qaeda to be armed to the teeth including the acquisition of 20,000 stinger missiles in which only one is needed to take down an American airliner. To cover their tracks, the Obama administration left Chris Stevens and his bodyguards defenseless as they were killed by the very terrorists who this administration armed. Can you imagine how the election of 2012 would’ve turned if the American public had this information. This is why Stevens had to be killed, but there’s more.
Arming Al-Qaeda In Syria
It is now common knowledge that this administration was also running guns to Al Qaeda in an attempt to overthrow Assad of Syria. However, news of their gunrunning was beginning to leak and the source of the gunrunning had to be eliminated. That source was Ambassador Chris Stevens and the sensitive information that he held, unfortunately for Stevens, came only a couple of months prior to the 2012 presidential election. It is quite apparent that this administration felt that the evidence of their gunrunning trail must be totally obliterated and the only way to accomplish that was to arm Al Qaeda forces to assassinate Ambassador Stevens. These are not shocking revelations and I believe it’s likely that Congress knew the truth is far back as December of 2012. However, the congressional investigation did not succeed in their attempts at getting to the bottom of the Stevens murder. For more than a month Hillary Clinton refused to show up and testify. Other establishment figures were less than cooperative with regard to the congressional investigation. However, there is a clear and distinctive pattern of high command military awareness of this establishment’s murderous and treacherous actions which culminated in the death, the preventable death of Stevens and his bodyguard contingency.
In the aftermath of the Benghazi massacre, two senior level command officers, General Carter Ham, the former commander of AFRICOM and Admiral Charles M. Gayouette were removed from the command positions and arrested by their executive officers. Do you remember that I previously said that Obama was embedding CIA operatives into the number two command positions in key military commands around the world? When Hamm was in the process of launching a rescue mission to save Stevens, General Rodriguez promptly arrested Hamm and assumed his position as the head of AFRICOM.The Middle East command structure of the American military was not on board with President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. Panetta is so unpopular with the troops, that when he visits Afghanistan, the troops must be disarmed prior to his landing because he has been fired upon before from American ground forces.
Before we get into why Hamm and Gayoutte were sacked on the same day, please allow me to first say that Obama’s action of sacking two high ranking officers is so unprecedented, so reckless, that it is difficult to comprehend. Please allow me to offer a sports analogy in order to explain the magnitude of this action. Imagine that your favorite football team was on the eve of playing in the Super Bowl and the owner of your team fired both the head coach and the quarterback the night before the big game. Wouldn’t this throw your team into a state of disarray? Of course it would, and subsequently your team would face annihilation. This is exactly the case with our forces in the Middle East after the firing of these two military leaders at this critical point in time. The deposing and subsequent arrest of the AFRICOM commanding officer, and the firing of a Carrier task force commander was an irresponsible move by the Obama administration and left a dangerous leadership void in the Middle East that has needlessly put the lives of our military at risk. And it is important to note that these firings took place at a time when it appeared that war with Iran, Syria, China and Russia was on the immediate horizon.
Admiral Gayouette
The positions held by Hamm and Gayouette are so powerful and so sensitive, that their replacements require approval from the Senate. Why would Obama engage in such a reckless act when the country was so close to war? Very simply, both men were jointly attempting to rescue Ambassador Stevens and his bodyguards, despite being told to stand down by Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta who was acting under Obama’s orders.
As Stevens was begging for help after the attack had begun, General Hamm had activated a special forces team within minutes of learning that the embassy, which was really a CIA safe house, was under attack. When General Ham received his “stand down” orders from Obama, he still continued with his plans to go ahead with the rescue and was arrested within minutes of contravening the order by his second in command, General Rodriquez. Admiral Gayouette, the commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, was preparing to provide intelligence and air cover for General Hamm’s rescue in violation of his standing orders and he was promptly relieved of command for allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.” What is so significant about the sacking of these two military officers is that they were from two completely different command structures in two different branches of the military. This speaks clearly to an overall military mindset with regard to how they view Obama.
It is abundantly clear that had Obama been concerned for saving the lives of the four murdered Americans, American forces could have stopped the mortar fire that eventually killed Ambassador Stevens. However, Panetta and Obama blocked any rescue attempt. In legal parlance, Obama, Panetta and Clinton are, at minimum, accomplices to murder. At maximum these three rogue government officials are co-conspirators to first degree murder and now they have sacked two senior command military leaders to cover their complicity in an act of treason. I feel like I am watching an episode of the former popular television show, 24, as we are presently engaged in a plot that scarcely anyone would have believed if it had aired on television and not occurred in real life.
Even though the corporate controlled media refuses to provide detailed coverage of the events in Benghazi, Representative Buck McKeon wrote a letter to Obama in which he boldly stated ”As we are painfully aware, despite the fact that the military had resources in the area, the military did not deploy any assets to secure U.S. personnel in Benghazi during the hours the consulate and the annex were under attack. I find it implausible that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander of U.S. Africa Command (author’s note: General Hamm) and the Commander of U.S. European Command would have ignored a direct order from the Commander in Chief.”Others Have Taken Note and Spoken Out
There is also proof that Obama was warned in advance of the coming attack in which Stevens begged for more protection and his impassioned plea was denied by Clinton.
There’s further evidence that US agents in Libya were at least aware of weapons and militants moving across the border. The ties between murdered U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and jihadist Syrian rebels are becoming more clear as it is now known that Chris Stevens was an arms dealer for the CIA and brokered arms deals with Al-Qaeda and their affiliate rebels in both Libya and Syria. Can anyone imagine the political fallout to this President if word of this had ever leaked out? Stevens was the link between the CIA and Al-Qaeda. With Stevens out of the way, the trail could grow cold and the American public would be none the wiser. This is why a rescue attempt was not permitted and this explains why two senior level officials were sacked for trying to do so. However, it is becoming increasingly clear this mutiny represents a military mindset and has the backing of the Carlyle Group. This connection will be explored in part two.
Obama’s Tumultuous Relationship with the Military
General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya. And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders. The first sign of a major rift between the American military and Obama became evident when the supreme commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, was fired by Obama for derogatory comments made by the general about the president. Interestingly, the reporter who published a story which led to McChrystal’s firing was none other than recently murdered reporter Michael Hastings.
First McChrystal, then Hamm and Gayoutte were fired by Obama. There appears to be a growing body of evidence that the military is becoming more emboldened in their rebellion against this rogue President.
CIA Director David Patraeus Is Sacked
Patraeus was the former commander in Iraq and in Afghanistan after McChrystal was fired by Obama. He was rewarded when he was appointed to be the CIA director. An extramarital affair with Paula Broadwell brought down his reign as CIA director in November of 2012, just following the election.
There is the reason given to explain an event and there is the real reason behind the event. Sixty percent of all married men cheat on their spouses. The more money they make and the more power a man possesses, the more opportunity for cheating.
I have swamp land for sale, in Florida, for anyone to purchase if they are naive enough to believe that David Petraeus, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), resigned solely based upon having an extramarital affair with the biographer-turned-mistress, Paula Broadwell. How did the affair compromise Petraeus’ position as CIA director? The FBI, who vetted Patraeus for the CIA director position, concluded that it did not.
Within two months after the Benghazi attack, four senior U.S. military officers were purged by Obama:
- Gen. Hamm, on October 18, 2012.
- Adm. Gayouette, on October 18, 2012.
- Gen. Petraeus, on November 9, 2012.
- General Allen, on November 13, 2012.
Other casualties of military leadership during this time frame includes General Keene and General Odierno. Further, the second in commander of Central Command, General Mattis, And who could forget about General Mckiernan? In total, Obama has sacked nearly 20 generals during his tenure as president.
Conclusion
Not wanting the Middle East to become America’s next Vietnam, the military wants Obama gone. And now the military has a strong partner, the Carlyle Group whose connections ripple through the American power structure. These connections and the other reasons why the Obama administration may not be standing by the end of year will be presented in part two.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
"Your grandchildren will live under communism."
“You Americans are so gullible.
No, you won’t accept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
."
We’ll so weaken your
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
like overripe fruit into our hands."
American Patriot (August 12th, 2013),Phil Fiord (August 12th, 2013)
Vector, That was a very good read.
Reality Check
American Patriot's Reality Check
Will a Military Coup fix America?
I personally just don’t see a military coup in the United States as an option. But is my view of the world the same as others’ beliefs?
Probably not. When it comes right down to it, with my vast amount of time as a military man, from my point of view, I can’t say that absolutely, definitely a coup could or would take place. The truth is, in MY time, no such thing could have or would have happened. But other factors are in play here that I would never have considered myself – but others might.
The Spanish have a long and storied history for coups – in fact, Mexicans and most Previously-ruled-by-Spain Central and South American countries follow suit. When the people get mad, they start a war. Someone winds up on top in the end, usually the existing military and a strong leader (regardless of his moral and ethically leanings). Most south and central American countries are what we consider “banana republics”.
Is America becoming a Banana Republic?
Let us look:
A Banana republic is a pejorative term for a country with a kleptocratic government, often with a primitive economy and sometimes a puppet state of a major power.
The more proper definition being: Banana republic is a political science term for a politically unstable country whose economy is largely dependent on the export of a single limited-resource product, such as bananas. It typically has stratified social classes, including a large, impoverished working class and a ruling plutocracy that comprises the elites of business, politics, and the military. This politico-economic oligarchy controls the primary-sector productions and thereby exploits the country’s economy. (Wikipedia)
kleptocracy: Kleptocracy, alternatively cleptocracy or kleptarchy, (from Greek: κλέπτης – kleptēs, “thief” and κράτος – kratos, “power, rule”, hence “rule by thieves”) is a form of political and government corruption where the government exists to increase the personal wealth and political power of its officials and the ruling class at the expense of the wider population, often without pretense of honest service. This type of government corruption is often achieved by the embezzlement of state funds.
plutocracy: Rule by the wealthy. We’re technically not being ruled by the wealthy, but then again we are. Rich lawyers are elected thus rich lawyers are in charge of most of the government’s various sectors. Companies lobby for power in the government (and I have no trouble with open markets).
So this author’s guess is that ARE a Banana Republic, or more accurately rapidly degenerating into a Banana Republic. We still have a Constitutional Republic and most of us KNOW this and MOST of us wouldn’t do anything against “the government” in the military. Whether some rogue officer would start something, I just don’t know – but I just can’t SEE it happening.
On the other hand…
1) Morals are in decline.
2) America is in decline.
3) Money is becoming worthless.
4) The economy is tanking.
5) Things are not worth what they once were.
6) People are in “gimme gimme” mode.
7) The President himself is working to divide people of this country.
8) The Left is fighting the Right on guns and every other thing you can imagine.
9) Detroit is the first major city to have fallen.
10) Other cities won’t be far behind.
11) Obamacare will destroy what’s left of the economy.
12) Oil and Coal are verboten.
13) Scandal after scandal has rocked DC and those are being called “phony”.
14) More people are on government help than are working now.
15) Political corruption
16) Government corruption
17) borders are uncontrolled, the “barbarian hordes” are coming through daily, by the thousands
18) the government coffers are being sucked dry by “entitlements” and the government keeps wanting more from the working people, the “rich” and corporations.
Rome fell for the many of the same reasons; moral decline, political corruption, “barbarian knowledge of Roman tactics” (think about that for a moment), a failing economy, unemployment of the working “class”, decline in ethics and values, natural disasters, barbarian invasion (Hmmmm…. border security?), military decay (not being trained right, and reduction in forces), and many other reasons.
So could a military coup take America back? I can not answer that question but I can certainly suggest that this country is in a condition which will facilitate such a thing happening. But will some military officer be able to gain enough power to lead enough American men, who are independent thinkers, into such a one way path? I seriously doubt it will happen. I don’t doubt the fall of America is upon us.
Related articles
- A Military Coup Will Remove Obama (sgtreport.com)
- Is America Going to Hell in a Handbasket? (lewrockwell.com)
- What I saw at the Coup (Matt Bracken)
- General David Petraeus tipped over as the head of the CIA
- Obama Considering John Kerry (Who Served In Vietnam) For Defense Secretary
- Sequestration: The Disarming of the United States of America
- The Leftist Plot to Destroy the US Military
- Transasian Axis Thread “Obama and the Military: Their Coup or his?”
- When Is A Military Coup Not A Military Coup? When The US Says So (zerohedge.com)
August 12, 2013 Posted by American Patriot | Big Government, Communism, DHS, Education, Education System, fascism, First Amendment, Government Overreach, Gun Control, Guns, IRS, Justice Department, Manchurian Candidate, Marxism, Media Lies, Medical, Muslim, NSA, Obama, Progressive, Second Amendment, Snowden, State Department, Supreme Court, Survival, The Throes of Tyranny, Trans-Asian Axis | America, America in Decline, American Civil War, American Revolution, Banana Republic, Barack Obama, Big Government, Coup d'état, detroit, Firearms, Freedom, Government Corruption, Government Overreach, Gun, Gun Control, Guns, Homeland Security, military coup, obama, Patriots, Political Corruption, Politics, Progressive Tyranny, Republic, Resistance, Terrorism, transasian axis, Unconstitutional, United States | Leave a Comment
Last edited by American Patriot; August 12th, 2013 at 14:02.
I just got alerted to this. Probably should be under "Skeptics Corner" - but what the hell, there's a thread and it's the right place. Don't believe in this illuminant shit anyway, but we could only HOPE someone is working to get this guy brought to the light.
I have no way of vetting this, my friends, and no time to do so, but it IS possible. This wild and crazy war threat is happening for a reason right now, and there’s no telling what the fallout will be, but it is serving a purpose—probably many.
Updated w/Video – Military Coup in Progress in Washington DC 9/10/13
It could explain why Obama has been “acting” out; why his behaviour has been so over-the-top and outrageous.
The light forces may have decided that this is the best way to break it to the public that the old regime has fallen. They’re not going to believe the truth, so having a military coup would enable them to dismantle the cabal in plain sight with no mention of the Illuminati until later, when they’re ready to reveal the truth gradually. Works for me!
I was unable to access the videos due to high demand, as you can imagine, but I’ll try again later.
Use your discernment, as always. Disinfo is rampant. ~ BP
MILITARY COUP IN PROGRESS IN WASHINGTON DC 9/10/13!!!
THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!
THIS IS NOT A JOKE OR PARODY!!! THIS IS REAL!!!
I have received information originating from a well-known former General at the Pentagon; everybody knows this guy’s name. This information comes to me second hand, but I consider the go-between to be very reliable.
The information that I have received so far is that five of the US Military’s highest-ranking Generals have met with Barack Obama and warned him that if he orders an attack on Syria he will be arrested and charged with Treason for attempting to provide aid and comfort to our enemies, namely the al-Qaeda affiliate al-Nusra Front in Syria.
The generals reportedly punctuated that statement with a promise that if he is convicted of Treason, Barack Obama will find himself swinging at the end of a rope at Leavenworth.
Click to watch a Special TTiVLIVE! at www.bobpowell.blogspot.com. http://bobpowell.blogspot.com/2013/0...ashington.html
It’s ON ladies and gentlemen. I KNEW the military would not put up with this Traitor forever.
If for some reason you cannot watch videos, you can listen to the audio at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/1948-kitty
MAKE SURE THAT YOU SHARE THIS POST EVERYWHERE!!! We could be on the cusp of a historical event, and The Truth Is Viral is leading the charge!
PLEASE, Lord God in Heaven, let this be true!
God bless and SEMPER FI!!!
Bob Powell
Publisher/Editor-in-Chief
The Truth Is Viral
WWW.BOBPOWELL.BLOGSPOT.COM
Retired General tells Tea Party group he can lead a military coup against Obama
By Travis Gettys
Monday, January 27, 2014 13:37 EST
Topics: Paul Vallely ♦ tea party ♦ Tea Party Patriots
Steal this story ... LEGALLY
A retired Army general and Fox News analyst told a Tea Party group that he would lead a military coup against the U.S. government, if only reluctantly.
Paul Vallely, a retired major general and senior military analyst for the conservative news channel, told the Surprise, Arizona, Tea Party Patriots during a Dec. 3 speech that other retired military personnel and veterans groups had contacted him about the possibility.
“I had a call this afternoon from Idaho, the gentleman said, ‘If I give you 250,000 Marines to go to Washington, will you lead them?’” Vallely said as the group laughed and gasped. “I said, ‘Yes, I will, I’ll surround the White House and I’ll surround the Capitol building, but it’s going to take physical presence to do things.”
Vallely, who has suggested a variety of extra-constitutional remedies to remove President Barack Obama from office, said extraordinary means were necessary to achieve the legislative results he wanted.
“Writing letters to these senators and congressmen, I am so frustrated because nothing happens,” Vallely said. “I’m not inciting a revolution, but we’ve got to get more physical and stand up and protest.
He said such a protest would be a continuation of Tea Party activism.
“The great things the Tea Party did, I mean, they were out there in the community, standing up, being seen,” Vallely said. “They did things, so we’ve got to go based on what the Tea Party has done and elevate it into something and get more younger people involved. So I don’t know how else to do it.”
The retired general has suggested that a new George Washington could be drawn from the ranks of retired military personnel to lead an insurrection because his aims could not be achieved even through this year’s congressional midterm elections.
“I don’t want to be criticized for starting a revolution, but I’d certainly head it if we had to,” Vallely said as the crowd applauded. “We all love a good fight if it’s worth it, right?”
Listen to this audio clip posted online by Right Wing Watch:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
"Your grandchildren will live under communism."
“You Americans are so gullible.
No, you won’t accept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
."
We’ll so weaken your
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
like overripe fruit into our hands."
I don't see that happening.
Libertatem Prius!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMEMBERS URGE MILITARY OFFICERS TO REBEL AGAINST OBAMA
September 25, 2014 Qronos 16 Leave a comment Go to comments
Lawmakers want officers to resign “in a blaze of glory” in opposition to White House’s middle east policy
[IMG]http://hw.********.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/250914troops.jpg[/IMG]
Source: PAUL JOSEPH WATSON |
Republican members of Congress are urging military officers to rebel against the Obama administration’s middle eastern foreign policy by resigning “in a blaze of glory,” according to U.S. Rep. Doug Lamborn of Colorado.During a liberty group forum on Wednesday night in the basement of a Colorado Springs bar, Lamborn, a member of the House Armed Services Committee, answered a question from a member of the audience who urged members of Congress to “support the troops” in the absence of leadership from the White House.According to Cory Hutchins, who attended the meeting, Lamborn responded by remarking, ““You know what, I can’t add anything to that, but do let me reassure you on this. A lot of us are talking to the generals behind the scenes, saying, ‘Hey, if you disagree with the policy that the White House has given you, let’s have a resignation.’”“‘You know, let’s have a pubic resignation, and state your protest, and go out in a blaze of glory,’” Lamborn added . “And I haven’t seen that very much, in fact I haven’t seen that at all in years.”The Pentagon failed to respond to Hutchins’ request for a comment, but Democrat Irv Halter, a retired Air Force major general who is running against Lamborn, accused Lamborn of politicizing the military.“Our elected officials should not be encouraging our military leaders to resign when they have a disagreement over policy,” Halter said in a statement. “Someone who serves on the House Armed Services Committee should know better.”The notion that Lamborn and other members of Congress are urging military leaders to resign amidst yet another bombing campaign in the middle east is extremely noteworthy given suggestions that ground troops may ultimately be deployed in Syria and Iraq to target ISIS militants.Rumors of rancor were rife amongst members of the military in opposition to Obama’s derailed plan to attack Syria last year, with many taking to Twitter to express their discontent at the White House’s policy of arming jihadist militants throughout the region.When both active duty and retired soldiers began posting images on Twitter under the #IdidntJoin hashtag to signal their opposition to fighting on the same side as Al-Qaeda terrorists in order to topple the Assad government in Syria, many quarters of the media attempted to claim that the images were fake or the work of pro-Assad hackers, despite numerous indications to suggest that the pictures were indeed genuine.View a selection of images posted by active duty soldiers and veterans in opposition to military involvement in Syria from last year below.[IMG]http://static.************.com/p/images/september2013/020913join1.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://static.************.com/p/images/september2013/020913join2.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://static.************.com/p/images/september2013/020913join3.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://static.************.com/p/images/september2013/020913join4.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://static.************.com/p/images/september2013/020913join5.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://static.************.com/p/images/september2013/020913join6.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://static.************.com/p/images/september2013/020913join7.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://static.************.com/p/images/september2013/020913join8.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://static.************.com/p/images/september2013/020913join10.jpg[/IMG]
Libertatem Prius!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Companion Thread:Impeach Obama
Military Generals Move To Arrest Obama After They Find ‘Proof’ He Armed ISIS…?
Apparently, President Obama has been accused of implementing a series of policies that has given rise to ISIS, and has also provided them with the arms they are now using in their brutal attacks against Christians and other minorities. Investigations reveal that at least some of the weapons being used by the terrorist organization are of U.S. manufacture.
According to reports, the investigation was conducted by Conflict Armament Research, a small-arms research organization in London. The study included photographs that indicate that weapons were “seized by Kurdish forces from militants in Iraq and Syria over a 10-day period in July.”
The group had reportedly confiscated “significant quantities” of M16 rifles and other weapons, that were manufactured right here in our country. The report concludes that the weapons most likely got into the hands of ISIS by Syrian fighters armed with the help of Saudi Arabia. That is in addition to the arms that were stolen upon the defeat of Iraqi army groups.
Obama’s support for Iraq, Libyan rebels, and Syrian moderates has ultimately resulted in the literal passing of the gun to our enemies.
One pundit posted the following:
” David Rustad For…violations of the War Powers Act, requiring all Americans to purchase a product from a third party, bypassing Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat, ordering a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal conviction, arbitrarily declaring an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it, firing an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of Obama’s friends in a corruption case, Benghazi, the IRS scandal, Fast and Furious, trading FIVE high level terrorists for one American deserter (at best) behind Congress’s back, arming enemies of the State, racial tensions we haven’t seen since the 1960’s because of his and his cohorts race baiting. It’s well past time for action.”
Source: http://goo.gl/lRp1TA
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
"Your grandchildren will live under communism."
“You Americans are so gullible.
No, you won’t accept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
."
We’ll so weaken your
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
like overripe fruit into our hands."
I don't see this happening.
No arrest. Military won't do it.
Won't happen.
Libertatem Prius!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Obama’s Joint Chiefs Chairman Pleads with Military Troops Not to Join Anti-Government Revolution if Hillary Steals Election
POLITICS BY TRUTHFEEDNEWS OCTOBER 27,
They know the fix is in and what will come. For a revolution in America to be successful, it needs the military to back the people over the corrupt President, as was the case in Egypt. And they know this, and the prospect terrifies them. His language isn’t overly blunt, inartful or ham-fisted, but his message is clear.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford wrote a Medium blog post Monday to remain committed to its military oath amid the 2016 election.
What we must collectively guard against is allowing our institution to become politicized, or even perceived as being politicized, by how we conduct ourselves during engagements with the media, the public, or in open or social forums,” Dunford reminded troops.
Dunford further urged service members that the military must remain committed to the chain of command structure until the next administration comes in, and that the military should not undermine its credibility in the interim with the next president. “I have a duty to protect the integrity and political neutrality of our military profession,” he continued.
H/T – PatDollard
http://truthfeed.com/obamas-joint-ch...lection/32168/
https://medium.com/@thejointstaff/up...bd4#.5hays6i6v
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Nikita Khrushchev: "We will bury you"
"Your grandchildren will live under communism."
“You Americans are so gullible.
No, you won’t accept
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll finally wake up and find you already have communism.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
."
We’ll so weaken your
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
until you’ll
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
like overripe fruit into our hands."
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks